Mining Incidents

Sample compliance report

This is a full sample of our paid Operator Compliance History Report, built entirely from public MSHA data on Peabody Energy Corporation. It shows exactly what you receive for any operator you name: the line-item record, the interpretation, and the peer context that the totals on a public page do not give you.

For insurers, brokers, and safety consultants

Operator compliance reports and monitoring

A dated report covering the 26-year penalty trail, line-item violation pattern, contest and docket posture, rate-normalized peer benchmark, and full fatality history. Delivered as a PDF with the underlying data as CSV.

Mining Incidents Operator Compliance History Report
MSHA Compliance and Enforcement History
Peabody Energy Corporation / Controller C15833
Record window 2000-01-04 to 2026-06-18 Fatality record from 1996 Prepared 2 July 2026 Source MSHA via Mining Incidents
Sample · public-record data, clinically compiled
Proposed penalties, 26 yr
$66.3M
59,827 citations; $47.3M paid to date
S&S citation share
23.0%
13,746 significant & substantial
Contested by dollar value
35.8%
only 8.0% by count; fights the big ones
Peer enforcement rate
39th pctl
8.70 vs 10.70 cohort mean (below average)

Peabody carries a large absolute enforcement record ($66.3M proposed across 59,827 citations and 19 fatalities), yet on a rate-normalized basis it sits below the industry cohort mean. It contests selectively, disputing 36% of proposed dollars while accepting 92% of citations by count. The read below separates the alarming totals from the normalized picture an underwriter actually prices on.

Methodology and attribution (read first)

Enforcement and fatality records are attributed using MSHA’s current controller-lineage mapping, not point-in-time ownership. Some penalties and deaths at mines Peabody acquired later (for example Shoal Creek, and the 1996 Baker Mine fatality under Costain Coal) are folded into this trail even though Peabody did not own those mines on the date of the event. Read this as the record of mines Peabody currently controls, not a strict history of Peabody’s ownership. Dollar figures are nominal. Rate denominators (employee and inspection hours) exist only from 2000 onward; pre-2000 activity has counts but no rates.
1

Identity and structure

MetricValue
Operating subsidiaries in the violation record34
Distinct mines appearing 2000 to 202693
Mines currently mapped to Peabody75
Currently active mines14
Current reported employment (active mines)~3,414
States with Peabody-controlled minesAL AZ CO IL IN KY MT NM WV WY
Commodity (by citations)95% coal, 1 met-coal mine tagged “M”

Insight. Peabody is a coal controller: 92 of 93 mines and roughly 95% of citations are coal-designated. Only 14 of 75 currently mapped mines are active, and current employment is concentrated there; the remaining 61 are abandoned, sealed, non-producing, or idled.

Limitations  The single “M”-tagged mine (Shoal Creek, AL) is a metallurgical-coal operation, an MSHA source quirk, not metal mining. Several subsidiary IDs map to multiple name spellings; per-subsidiary breakouts need manual cleanup.

2

Penalty trail, 2000 to 2026

Proposed Assessed (after contest)
YearCitationsProposedAssessedPaidOutstanding

Insight. After contest settlements the assessed amount falls to $48.3M, a 27% reduction from proposed, of which $47.3M is paid, leaving about $1.06M outstanding and concentrated in 2022 to 2026. Special-assessment activity peaked in 2010 to 2012 and has been near zero since 2020.

Limitations  “Assessed” is the final amount owed (paid equals assessed in every fully-resolved early year); if it were a remaining-balance field the outstanding figure would differ. No violation-level penalty data exists before 2000.

3

Violation pattern

30 CFR part-sectionCitationsProposedS&S share
75.400  combustible-material accumulation8,835$15.30M19.6%
75.370(a)(1)  ventilation-plan compliance3,183$4.30M19.0%
75.202(a)  roof / rib support2,810$8.23M56.3%
75.503  permissible electric equipment2,600$1.52M13.1%
75.220(a)(1)  roof-control plan1,428$2.95M31.3%
75.403  rock dusting1,360$1.08M4.2%
75.1725(a)  machinery safe condition1,257$1.59M55.8%
77.502  surface electric equipment1,094$0.97M24.1%
75.517  power-wire insulation1,091$1.60M49.5%
77.1104  surface combustible accumulation1,080$0.39M18.1%

Insight. The dominant exposure is 75.400 combustible-material accumulation (8,835 citations, $15.3M). Roof/rib support (75.202a) and machinery safe-condition (75.1725a) carry the highest S&S shares (about 56%), meaning those citations are far likelier to be judged reasonably likely to cause serious injury. Overall 23% of citations are S&S and about 7% cite high negligence or reckless disregard.

Limitations  About 800 citations carry blank gravity/negligence/S&S fields. Gravity is shown as its two components (likelihood, expected injury) because MSHA stores no single composite score.

4

Contest posture

Docket decision (matched by mine)DecisionsOriginal $Decided $
Settlement19,051$64.5M$38.6M
Dismissal1,548$8.47M$7.71M
Withdrawal to zero582$2.07M$0
Operator prevailed484$5.90M$3.49M
Vacate126$0.76M$0
Default124$0.41M$0.41M

Insight. Peabody contests 8.0% of citations by count but 35.8% by proposed dollars: it disputes high-value citations and pays the routine ones. Settlement dominates, reducing matched original penalties from $64.5M to $38.6M (about 40%); outright vacaturs are rare. The strategy yields negotiated reductions, not dismissals.

Limitations  Docket decisions are joined by mine ID, not controller, so they can include periods a mine had a different operator. Directional only; do not sum against the Section 2 penalty totals.

5

Rate-normalized trend

QuarterEmployee hrsCitationsCit / M-hrsS&S / M-hrsFatalities

Insight. Across the most recent 12 quarters the citation rate ranges about 160 to 285 per million employee-hours with no clear directional trend; the S&S rate holds about 28 to 59. One fatality falls in the window (Q2 2023).

Limitations  Most mine-quarters carry low-hours confidence flags, so the aggregate is effectively the rate of the few high-hours active mines. Employee-hours are self-reported and can be revised. This employee-hours denominator is not comparable to the inspection-hours rate in Section 6.

6

Peer benchmark

Insight. Peabody’s enforcement rate of 8.70 citations per 100 inspection hours is below the cohort mean of 10.70 (z = −0.38), roughly the 35th to 39th percentile: about 60% of controllers are cited more often per inspection hour. Among coal majors it sits mid-pack, near CONSOL (7.74) and Robert E. Murray (8.74), above Arch, Alliance and Alpha (all under 7.0).

Limitations  Cohort is all 2,550 rated controllers, not explicitly coal-filtered (though coal majors dominate the top). A lower rate is not necessarily “safer”; it reflects fewer citations per inspection hour and is influenced by inspection intensity and mine mix.

7

Fatality history

DateMineOperator at recordClassification

Insight. Of 19 fatalities, powered haulage (7) and machinery (7) account for 14, and “caught in, under, or between” is the recurring mechanism. The most recent was April 2023 at Bear Run; North Antelope Rochelle, Kayenta, and Willow Lake Portal each recorded two.

Limitations  Attributed by the controller lineage in the fatality record, which reaches back to 1996 (before the 2000 violation record); early entries reflect operators later folded into Peabody, so attribution depends on MSHA’s mapping, not ownership on the accident date. The Aug 2022 El Segundo fatality was a contractor employee.

8

Inspection posture

MetricValue
Total citations, 2000 to 202659,827
Total inspection hours (cohort table)687,909
Enforcement rate8.70 / 100 insp-hrs
Avg prior-violation history on a citation~443

Insight. Peabody accumulated 59,827 citations over about 687,909 inspection hours. The high average inspection-history count on each citation reflects large operations that are heavily and repeatedly inspected rather than sporadically visited sites.

Limitations  The per-citation history fields come from MSHA’s penalty-point calculation; averaging them gives an indicator, not a precise inspection frequency.