While walking down an incline to clean out an obstruction in a culvert caused by beaver activity, EE took a step and felt a burning sensation in EE's left knee area. EE has worked every day since and had a procedure on 02/27/2026. EE returned to work on EE's next scheduled shift.
No. 64 Plant: 350 MSHA citations Coal
No. 64 Plant has $90K in proposed MSHA penalties and $47K outstanding across 7 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at No. 64 Plant.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 30
- Years on record
- 1989–2025
- Latest incident
- Nov 2025
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.No. 64 Plant has $90K in proposed MSHA penalties and $47K outstanding across 7 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 12 · 71%
- Stood as issued 5 · 29%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENT 2013-608 | Settlement | Miller | 2013 | $4K → $3K |
| KENT 2012-907 | Settlement | Bulluck | 2013 | $4K → $4K |
| KENT 2012-1596 | Settlement | Bulluck | 2014 | $3K → $3K |
| KENT 2011-1382 | Settlement | Bulluck | 2013 | $3K → $3K |
| KENT 2015-0099 | Settlement | McCarthy | 2015 | $2K → $2K |
| KENT 2011-566 | Default | Lesnick | 2011 | $500 → $500 |
MSHA sampling at No. 64 Plant shows 99% of 251 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2015-12-09, 10 years ago
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.ⓘ
The excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.- CLEANUP MAN74
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR63
- MECHANIC42
Silica (quartz)
Last sampled: 2015-09-10, 10 years ago- CLEANUP MAN16
- MECHANIC7
- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR6
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2015-12-09, 10 years ago
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR33
- MECHANIC19
- CLEANUP MAN17
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 100% | 27 |
| 2014 | 100% | 8 |
| 2013 | 100% | 13 |
| 2012 | 100% | 14 |
| 2011 | 100% | 19 |
| 2010 | 100% | 32 |
| 2009 | 94% | 16 |
| 2008 | 100% | 10 |
| 2007 | 100% | 17 |
| 2006 | 100% | 5 |
| 2005 | 100% | 9 |
| 2004 | 100% | 19 |
| 2003 | 100% | 17 |
| 2002 | 95% | 21 |
| 2001 | 100% | 10 |
| 2000 | 100% | 14 |
| Year | silica avg (%) | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0.7 | 4 |
| 2014 | 0.8 | 2 |
| 2013 | 0.4 | 1 |
| 2012 | 0.4 | 2 |
| 2010 | 0.5 | 7 |
| 2009 | 0.3 | 2 |
| 2008 | 0.2 | 1 |
| 2007 | 0.6 | 1 |
| 2006 | 0.7 | 1 |
| 2004 | 0.5 | 3 |
| 2003 | 0.6 | 1 |
| 2002 | 0.9 | 2 |
| 2001 | 2.3 | 1 |
| 2000 | 1.0 | 1 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0% | 15 |
| 2014 | 0% | 3 |
| 2013 | 10% | 10 |
| 2012 | 10% | 10 |
| 2011 | 10% | 10 |
| 2010 | 10% | 10 |
| 2009 | 0% | 5 |
| 2008 | 33% | 6 |
| 2007 | 0% | 10 |
| 2005 | 0% | 10 |
| 2004 | 14% | 14 |
| 2002 | 14% | 7 |
| 2001 | 0% | 1 |
| 2000 | 20% | 5 |
No. 64 Plant recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2015.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2014 * | 3.24 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2013 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2012 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2011 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2009 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2008 * | 6.56 | 3.28 | 0.000 |
- Leeco Inc 1988 to 1995
- Leeco Incorporated 1995 to 2011
- Blue Diamond Coal Co. 2011 to 2014
- Blue Diamond Coal Co. 2014 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2022 | 1 |
| 2021 | 1 |
| 2020 | 1 |
| 2019 | 1 |
| 2018 | 1 |
| 2017 | 2 |
| 2016 | 2 |
| 2015 | 26 |
| 2014 | 29 |
| 2013 | 28 |
| 2012 | 28 |
| 2011 | 26 |
| 2010 | 29 |
| 2009 | 27 |
| 2008 | 25 |
| 2007 | 28 |
| 2006 | 27 |
| 2005 | 24 |
| 2004 | 23 |
| 2003 | 22 |
| 2002 | 26 |
| 2001 | 27 |
| 2000 | 31 |
No. 64 Plant sits in Perry County, Kentucky, where the Census mining category is 3.3% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 Q4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2025 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 Q2 | 410 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 640 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 590 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 650 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 97 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 630 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 650 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 630 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 750 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 770 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 564 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 578 | 5 | 2 | 8650.5 |
| 2022 Q2 | 620 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 640 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 610 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 630 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 570 | 1 | 0 | 1754.4 |
| 2021 Q1 | 640 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 590 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 630 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 650 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 580 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 620 | 1 | 0 | 1612.9 |
| 2019 Q2 | 640 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2018 Q4 | 505 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 499 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 521 | 1 | 0 | 1919.4 |
| 2018 Q1 | 520 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 520 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 1,040 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 1,040 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 1,040 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 1,040 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 1,000 | 2 | 1 | 2000.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 1,088 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 2,176 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 9,349 | 2 | 0 | 213.9 |
| 2015 Q3 | 15,072 | 3 | 0 | 199.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 14,718 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 15,325 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 12,310 | 7 | 1 | 568.6 |
| 2014 Q3 | 16,725 | 9 | 2 | 538.1 |
| 2014 Q2 | 16,652 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 16,077 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 9,564 | 7 | 2 | 731.9 |
| 2013 Q3 | 15,073 | 7 | 0 | 464.4 |
| 2013 Q2 | 14,310 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 14,912 | 10 | 2 | 670.6 |
| 2012 Q4 | 17,383 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 17,382 | 52 | 15 | 2991.6 |
| 2012 Q2 | 15,444 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 15,810 | 2 | 0 | 126.5 |
| 2011 Q4 | 14,459 | 1 | 0 | 69.2 |
| 2011 Q3 | 16,127 | 1 | 0 | 62.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 15,043 | 13 | 6 | 864.2 |
| 2011 Q1 | 15,909 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 15,222 | 10 | 2 | 656.9 |
| 2010 Q3 | 16,043 | 4 | 2 | 249.3 |
| 2010 Q2 | 16,669 | 14 | 5 | 839.9 |
| 2010 Q1 | 17,654 | 4 | 2 | 226.6 |
| 2009 Q4 | 15,694 | 1 | 0 | 63.7 |
| 2009 Q3 | 15,842 | 6 | 2 | 378.7 |
| 2009 Q2 | 15,348 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 16,079 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 15,288 | 1 | 1 | 65.4 |
| 2008 Q3 | 15,163 | 8 | 4 | 527.6 |
| 2008 Q2 | 14,735 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 15,824 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 15,445 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 16,254 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 16,235 | 7 | 1 | 431.2 |
| 2007 Q1 | 17,661 | 7 | 1 | 396.4 |
| 2006 Q4 | 16,464 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 17,988 | 1 | 0 | 55.6 |
| 2006 Q2 | 15,800 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 15,893 | 1 | 0 | 62.9 |
| 2005 Q4 | 14,081 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 15,648 | 2 | 0 | 127.8 |
| 2005 Q2 | 13,153 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 12,392 | 5 | 0 | 403.5 |
| 2004 Q4 | 11,062 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 12,224 | 4 | 1 | 327.2 |
| 2004 Q2 | 12,294 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 13,127 | 1 | 0 | 76.2 |
| 2003 Q4 | 11,983 | 5 | 1 | 417.3 |
| 2003 Q3 | 12,024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 12,488 | 5 | 0 | 400.4 |
| 2003 Q1 | 12,608 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 13,801 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 14,935 | 3 | 0 | 200.9 |
| 2002 Q2 | 16,335 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 16,193 | 3 | 0 | 185.3 |
| 2001 Q4 | 14,830 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 15,223 | 2 | 0 | 131.4 |
| 2001 Q2 | 16,848 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 19,651 | 2 | 0 | 101.8 |
| 2000 Q4 | 12,526 | 2 | 0 | 159.7 |
| 2000 Q3 | 12,894 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 15,759 | 3 | 1 | 190.4 |
| 2000 Q1 | 15,355 | 3 | 0 | 195.4 |
Reportable incidents
30 on file2025 · 1 incident
2014 · 1 incident
Employee was holding a wrench when another employee accidentally hit his arm with a crib/wooden block and cut his arm. Sutures required.
2008 · 2 incidents
EE is having hernia surgery due to a strain to the groin. He was lifting dryer wear plates and strained himself. Started missing work 1/21/09
Prying with pry bar and hit upper lip and broke some teeth. Went to the dentist to get teeth repaired. No lost time.
2007 · 1 incident
EE was helping to load a bearing housing onto a forklift and injured left shoulder and lower back. Required surgery-started missing work 7/30/07.
2002 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE HURT RIGHT ELBOW WHEN PRY BAR SLIPPED. STRAINED ARM & ELBOW.
1999 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE TRIPPED AND HIT HIS HEAD AGAINST THE BOBCAT BUCKET. THE LACERATION REQUIRED STITCHES.
1998 · 2 incidents
EMPLOYEE CAUGHT HIS LEFT RING FINGER WHILE USING AN AIR WRENCH THE LACERATION REQUIRED SUTURES.
EMPLOYEE HAS A MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OF PNEUMOCONIOSIS AND/OR A RESPIRATORY CONDITION.
1997 · 1 incident
ALLEDGED BACK INJURY, WHILE RIDING EQUIPMENT. (NARRATIVE NOT LEGIBLE)
1996 · 4 incidents
EMP WAS PULLING ON A CABLE WHEN IT SLIPPED AND HE FELL BACKWARDS.
EMPLOYEE CUT HIS LEFT HAND USING A BELT KNIFE. THE LACERATION REQUIRED SUTURES.
EMPLOYEE WAS STRUCK BY HOSE ON WRENCH. HE WAS HIT ON THE LOWER LIP. THE LACERATION REQUIRED SUTURES.
EMPLOYEE WAS STRUCK BY A BOTTOM BELT ROLLER JUST ABOVE THE LEFT EYE.
1994 · 2 incidents
INJURED WAS WORKING ON STEERING CLUTCHES OF A DOZER. HE WAS USING A WRENCH AND STRAINING WHEN HE FELT HIS LEFT SHOULDER POP. HE THEN FELT PAIN IN HIS SHOULDER,WHICH HAS CONTINUED.
EMPLOYEE SLIPPED ON DOZER TRACK AND CUT HIS HEAD ON THE DOZER DOOR.
1993 · 6 incidents
HE CLAIMS THAT HE STRAINED HIS BACK WHEN HE PICKED UP A COME-A-LONG.
EE CLAIMS THAT HE STRAINED HIS BACK WHEN HE PULLED THE COLLECTION PAN OUT FROM THE PLANT VACUM CLEANER
HE WAS CLIMBING A PORTABLE LADDER. WHEN THE BOTTOM OF THE LADDER SLIPPED HE FELL ABOUT 10 FEET TO THE FLOOR. THIS RESULTED IN A HAIRLINE FRACTURE OF HIS RIGHT ARM AND A SPRAINED LEFT WRIST.
EE CLAIMS THAT WHEN HE PULLED ON A 2IN WATERHOSETHAT HE STRAINED A MUSCLE IN HIS BACK
EE WAS CLOSING THE BYPASS CHUTE GATE WHEN HIS FINGER GOT CAUGHT BETWEEN HANDLE & AN 1-BEAM THIS RESULTED IN A CUT THAT REQUIRED STITCHES
EE WAS STANDING ON A LADDER TO HANG CURTAIN OVER A GARAGE DOOR IN PLANT THE LADDER SLIPPED & HE FELL TO THE PLANT FLOOR THIS RESULTED IN A CUT HAND EAR & A BUMP ON THE HEAD THE CUT ON HIS HAND REQUIRED STITCHES
1992 · 2 incidents
85379NG TO MOVE SIEVE SCREEN IT SHIFTED AND PINCHED LITTLE FINGER ON R HAND
EE ALLEGES THAT HE STRAINED A MUSCLE IN HIS LOWER BACK AS HE BENT OVER TO LIFT A LENGTH OF 6 INCH PIPE. AFTER HE TRIED TO LIFT THE PIPE, HE COULD NOT STRAIGHTEN UP AND SAID HE HAD PAIN IN HIS LOWER BACK.
1991 · 1 incident
1990 · 1 incident
I NAME ALLEGES THAT THE TONE CARTLIDGE IN HIS KNEE WHEN SLIPPED ON A SLICK SPOT ON THE PLANT FLOOR
1989 · 4 incidents
EMPLOYEE WAS CLIMBING ATAIRS AT LOADOUT-FACILTUIY UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND SLIPPED ON HYDRAULIC OIL ON STAIR TREAD.FELL ON FLOOR BRUISING LEFT ELBOW.
ASSISTING WELDER EXPOSED EYES TO UV RADIATION FORM WELDING ARC RESULTING IN UV BURNS TO BOTH EYES.
EMPLOYEE WAS THREADING CONDUIT WITH HAND-HELD THREADING MACHINE A METAL FRAGMENT WAS THROWN FROM THE WORK INTO HIS RT.EYE IMBEDDING THERE
EMPLOYEE WAS ROLLING PLASTIC COVER OVER TGOP OF RECLAIM TUNNEL SLIPPED IN MUD & SPRAINED RIGHT ANKLE