Employee was using a razor knife to cut a plastic zip tie off to repair a broken guard. His left hand was in the line of fire and cut left index finger on top of knuckle. Requiring 3 stitches to close.
HUGO: 125 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
HUGO tiene $23K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $100 pendientes en 2 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en HUGO.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 17
- Años en registro
- 1983–2008
- Último incidente
- Jul 2008
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.HUGO tiene $23K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $100 pendientes en 2 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 1 · 100%
ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT20010274M | Settlement | Weisberger | 2001 | $9K → $3K |
| CENT 2011-743M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2011 | $100 → $100 |
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2026-03-25
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz19
- Respirable dust, <.1mg18
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz2
Ver los análisis individuales (39)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2026-03-25 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.13 | 10 | 0.01 | Cleanup Man |
| 2022-06-08 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2022-06-08 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2022-06-08 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2022-06-08 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2019-06-26 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2019-06-26 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2019-06-26 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Washer Operator | ||
| 2019-06-26 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2016-09-21 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.76 | 10 | 0.08 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2016-09-21 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2016-09-21 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bulldozer Operator | ||
| 2016-09-21 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Rotary Bucket Ex. Operator | ||
| 2012-12-19 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.58 | 10 | 0.06 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2012-12-19 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.35 | 10 | 0.04 | Truck Driver |
| 2012-12-19 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bulldozer Operator | ||
| 2012-12-19 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.23 | 10 | 0.02 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2012-12-19 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2011-10-26 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.32 | 10 | 0.03 | Utility Man |
| 2011-10-26 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.14 | 10 | 0.01 | Utility Man |
| 2011-10-26 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.64 | 10 | 0.06 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2009-06-24 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.18 | 1.38 | 0.13 | Utility Man |
| 2009-06-24 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.12 | 10 | 0.01 | Mechanic |
| 2007-07-24 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.2 | 10 | 0.02 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2007-07-24 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.71 | 10 | 0.07 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2004-11-17 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.24 | 10 | 0.02 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2004-11-17 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2004-11-17 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2004-11-17 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.24 | 10 | 0.02 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2004-07-15 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.16 | 10 | 0.02 | Truck Driver |
| 2004-07-15 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.52 | 10 | 0.05 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2004-07-15 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.76 | 10 | 0.08 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2004-07-15 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.18 | 1.69 | 0.11 | Mechanic |
| 2002-08-28 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2002-08-28 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.44 | 10 | 0.04 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2002-08-28 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.33 | 10 | 0.03 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2002-08-28 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.36 | 10 | 0.04 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2002-08-28 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver |
HUGO registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2023.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2016 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2015 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2014 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2013 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2012 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Idabell Stone Company 1950 a 1979
- Boorhem-Fields Inc 1979 a 1993
- Meridian Aggregates Company 1993 a 2001
- Meridian Aggregates Company, a Limited Partnership 2001 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 7 |
| 2025 | 8 |
| 2024 | 9 |
| 2023 | 9 |
| 2022 | 10 |
| 2021 | 8 |
| 2020 | 8 |
| 2019 | 8 |
| 2018 | 8 |
| 2017 | 9 |
| 2016 | 12 |
| 2015 | 11 |
| 2014 | 13 |
| 2013 | 14 |
| 2012 | 11 |
| 2011 | 11 |
| 2010 | 14 |
| 2009 | 13 |
| 2008 | 14 |
| 2007 | 14 |
| 2006 | 14 |
| 2005 | 16 |
| 2004 | 16 |
| 2003 | 16 |
| 2002 | 18 |
| 2001 | 17 |
| 2000 | 18 |
HUGO se ubica en Choctaw County, Oklahoma, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 1.5% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 3,489 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3,116 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3,279 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3,319 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3,541 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3,514 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 4,767 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 4,656 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 98 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 4,984 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 4,759 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 6,030 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 6,016 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 6,581 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 5,425 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 6,501 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 7,083 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 6,850 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 4,800 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 5,549 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 5,034 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 3,445 | 1 | 0 | 290.3 |
| 2021 Q1 | 2,462 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 2,272 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 3,425 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 4,141 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 4,115 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 5,212 | 1 | 0 | 191.9 |
| 2019 Q3 | 5,137 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 5,321 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 5,750 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 4,510 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 3,821 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 3,529 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 3,442 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 3,658 | 1 | 0 | 273.4 |
| 2017 Q3 | 4,566 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 4,747 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 6,425 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 6,750 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 7,892 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 7,976 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 7,610 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 7,734 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 7,968 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 5,087 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 5,413 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 6,579 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 7,100 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 7,527 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 8,900 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 7,910 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 7,804 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 7,190 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 7,789 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 6,415 | 2 | 0 | 311.8 |
| 2012 Q3 | 7,273 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 6,077 | 1 | 0 | 164.6 |
| 2012 Q1 | 4,866 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 5,615 | 1 | 0 | 178.1 |
| 2011 Q3 | 6,934 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 6,401 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 5,401 | 2 | 0 | 370.3 |
| 2010 Q4 | 6,323 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 7,340 | 1 | 0 | 136.2 |
| 2010 Q2 | 8,446 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 8,507 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 8,479 | 3 | 0 | 353.8 |
| 2009 Q3 | 9,357 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 8,532 | 2 | 0 | 234.4 |
| 2009 Q1 | 8,949 | 1 | 0 | 111.7 |
| 2008 Q4 | 8,973 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 9,206 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 9,151 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 8,340 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 9,585 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 9,554 | 2 | 0 | 209.3 |
| 2007 Q2 | 8,138 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 10,472 | 3 | 1 | 286.5 |
| 2006 Q4 | 10,322 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 11,040 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 9,138 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 8,826 | 2 | 1 | 226.6 |
| 2005 Q4 | 9,162 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 10,738 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 9,349 | 1 | 0 | 107.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 9,678 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 9,302 | 13 | 6 | 1397.5 |
| 2004 Q3 | 8,511 | 4 | 0 | 470.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 7,610 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 9,700 | 13 | 2 | 1340.2 |
| 2003 Q4 | 8,079 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 7,844 | 2 | 0 | 255.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 7,972 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 10,391 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 10,915 | 2 | 1 | 183.2 |
| 2002 Q3 | 11,133 | 8 | 1 | 718.6 |
| 2002 Q2 | 11,037 | 9 | 0 | 815.4 |
| 2002 Q1 | 10,354 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 9,276 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 9,643 | 6 | 4 | 622.2 |
| 2001 Q2 | 10,431 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 9,978 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 8,810 | 11 | 6 | 1248.6 |
| 2000 Q3 | 11,284 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 10,865 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 10,331 | 20 | 2 | 1935.9 |
Incidentes reportables
17 en archivo2008 · 1 incidente
2003 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS CLOSING RAILCAR DOOR WHEN HIS FOOT SLIPPED AND HIS RIGHT ANKLE TURNED OVER. HE RECEIVED A SPRAINED ANKLE
2002 · 1 incidente
EE STATES: PULLING WET BAGS OFF OF TRUCK, BAG LANDED IN THE MUD AND THE MUD SPLASHED IN MY FACE AND EYES.
1998 · 1 incidente
LONG TERM DUST EXPOSURE. EE QUITE WITHOUT NOTICE01/23/98
1993 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE HAD BUILT A GUARD FOR WATER PUMP. HE WAS FITTING GUARD TO PUMP WITHOUT STOPPING PUMP GUARD WAS THROWN BACK INTO EMPLOYEE BY PULLEY.
1991 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS CLEANING A WORK PLATFORM, ABOVE HIM A PULLEY BROKE AND DEBRIS FELL ON HIM.
1989 · 4 incidentes
EMPL PLACING CABLE AROUND BOULDER IN PRIMARY CRUSHER CABLE PULLED AGAINST HAND CUTTING LITTLE FINGER.
EMPL LOWERED PROTECTIVE PUMP COVER AMD FAILED TO REMOVE HIS HAND.
CUTTING CONVEYOR BELT WITH POCKET KNIFE-IT SLIPPED AND CUT PALM OF LEFT HAND.
EMPLOYEE WAS BACKING DOWN LADDER FROM JAW PLATFORM AND HIS FEET SLIPPED OFF A RUNG AND HE FELL ABOUT 8 FT.
1986 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE HAD CL3MBED UP THE CRUSHER TO HAND A WELDER TO ANOTHER EMPLOYEE ON H IS WAY DOWN HE FELT HIMSELF SLIP & START TO FALL LHE TRIED TO J UMP & DID LAND ON H IS FEET (DISTANCE-13FT)
EMPLOYEE SAID H9 HAD NO IDEA WHEN HE WAS HURT BUT HIS DR TOLD HIM IT WAS PROBABLY DUE TO LIFTING SOMETHING HEAVY SO HE FIGURED IT HAPPENED AT WORK.
1985 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS SITTING ON SKIRTBOARD OF CONVEYORS WHILE THEY TRYING TO THAW THEM OUT AND DID NOT HEAR YELL FOR EVERYONE TO GET CLEAR (HE HAD STOCKING CAP ON HIS HEAD) AND HE COULDN\T BE SEEN BY THE GUY WHO TURNED ON CONVEYOR. HIS FEET WERE YANKED OUT FROM UNDER HIM AND HE BANGED HIS ANKLE.
1984 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS HELPING A CUSTOMER TO TARP HIS TRUCK WHEN HE FELL OFF THE TRUCK
EMPLOYEE WAS TGAKING A WORN BIT OUT OF A DRILL WITH A WRENCH WHEN HE CAUGHT HIS FINGER BETWEEN THE WRENCH AND THE BIT
1983 · 2 incidentes
EMP WAS SHOVELING MUD AND DIRT OUT OF SURFACE TUNNEL ONTO CONVEYOR WHEN HE SLIPPED AND FELL HURING HIS BACK HE WAS PUT IN HOSPITAL AS THE DOCTOR SAID HE HAD PRESSURE ON THE SCIATIC NERVE CAU CAUSING THE PAIN IN THE BACK GOING DOWN THE LEG
EMPLOYEE SET UP BARREL AND PUMPED OIL IN LOADER-LATER THAT NIGHT HE WAS HURTING BELOW HIS RIB CAGE. THE NEXT DAY HE WENT TO THE DOCTOR WHO SAID HE HAD A STRINED MUSCLE IN RIGHT LOWER RIB CAGE. EMPLOYEE THOUGH HE MIGHT HAVE DONE IT WHILE SETTING UP BARREL.