Employee was welding cracks in a tube on a 777 Rock Truck when some grease that was in the tube got to hot and shot out of the tube burning our employee
Alum Cave #17: 160 MSHA citations Coal
Alum Cave #17 has $55K in proposed MSHA penalties and $604 outstanding across 4 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Alum Cave #17.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 14
- Years on record
- 2020–2025
- Latest incident
- Oct 2025
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Alum Cave #17 has $55K in proposed MSHA penalties and $604 outstanding across 4 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 30 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENT 2024-0073 | Settlement | Sullivan | 2024 | $9K → $8K |
| KENT 2023-0051 | Settlement | Moran | 2023 | $9K → $7K |
| KENT 2023-0086 | Settlement | Moran | 2023 | $7K → $6K |
| KENT 2021-0098 | Settlement | Sullivan | 2022 | $622 → $497 |
MSHA sampling at Alum Cave #17 shows 100% of 217 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2026-06-11
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.ⓘ
The excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR90
- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR89
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER13
Silica (quartz)
Last sampled: 2026-06-24- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR14
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR7
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2026-06-11
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR21
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR19
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE11
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 100% | 13 |
| 2025 | 100% | 33 |
| 2024 | 100% | 23 |
| 2023 | 100% | 36 |
| 2022 | 100% | 23 |
| 2021 | 100% | 37 |
| 2020 | 100% | 25 |
| 2019 | 100% | 27 |
| Year | silica avg (%) | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.8 | 2 |
| 2025 | 5.4 | 7 |
| 2024 | 28.5 | 2 |
| 2023 | 5.9 | 3 |
| 2022 | 12.5 | 2 |
| 2021 | 10.9 | 1 |
| 2020 | 16.5 | 1 |
| 2019 | 18.7 | 3 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0% | 5 |
| 2025 | 0% | 15 |
| 2024 | 0% | 6 |
| 2023 | 0% | 14 |
| 2022 | 0% | 5 |
| 2021 | 0% | 20 |
| 2020 | 0% | 2 |
| 2019 | 0% | 10 |
Alum Cave #17 recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2025.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 4.64 | 4.64 | 0.000 |
| 2023 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 4.50 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 10.37 | 8.29 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 2.11 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- B&W Resources Inc. 2014 to present
ⓘ
Coal production is reported quarterly and lags the current period; the most recent quarters may be incomplete.| Year | Employees | Coal produced (tons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 34 | 105,892 |
| 2025 | 40 | 268,380 |
| 2024 | 36 | 261,133 |
| 2023 | 44 | 300,527 |
| 2022 | 37 | 288,188 |
| 2021 | 42 | 259,956 |
| 2020 | 38 | 307,381 |
| 2019 | 20 | 164,247 |
| 2018 | 7 |
Alum Cave #17 sits in Knott County, Kentucky, where the Census mining category is 2.8% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 18,936 | 2 | 0 | 105.6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 22,224 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 25,049 | 5 | 0 | 199.6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 6,035 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 26,205 | 3 | 0 | 114.5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 23,408 | 7 | 0 | 299.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 24,735 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 17,723 | 1 | 0 | 56.4 |
Show 23 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 19,057 | 11 | 0 | 577.2 |
| 2024 Q1 | 24,734 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 27,205 | 6 | 1 | 220.5 |
| 2023 Q3 | 27,795 | 2 | 0 | 72.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 21,958 | 13 | 1 | 592.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 27,015 | 14 | 1 | 518.2 |
| 2022 Q4 | 23,938 | 13 | 4 | 543.1 |
| 2022 Q3 | 23,549 | 4 | 0 | 169.9 |
| 2022 Q2 | 21,494 | 12 | 1 | 558.3 |
| 2022 Q1 | 19,989 | 1 | 0 | 50.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 20,042 | 4 | 1 | 199.6 |
| 2021 Q3 | 25,129 | 3 | 0 | 119.4 |
| 2021 Q2 | 26,769 | 8 | 1 | 298.9 |
| 2021 Q1 | 24,525 | 3 | 1 | 122.3 |
| 2020 Q4 | 26,406 | 2 | 1 | 75.7 |
| 2020 Q3 | 28,984 | 3 | 0 | 103.5 |
| 2020 Q2 | 21,018 | 3 | 0 | 142.7 |
| 2020 Q1 | 18,507 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 20,938 | 7 | 0 | 334.3 |
| 2019 Q3 | 14,485 | 4 | 0 | 276.1 |
| 2019 Q2 | 12,381 | 1 | 1 | 80.8 |
| 2019 Q1 | 6,298 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 2,938 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
14 on file2025 · 1 incident
2024 · 2 incidents
EE was operating an Ingersoll Rand drill near the outer edge of EE's drill bench when EE attempted to dismount the drill. As EE stepped off of the drill onto the berm, EE's footing gave way and EE fell. This resulted in a fracture to EE's left arm just above EE's wrist.
The employee's left shoulder was injured when the left side of the loader bucket on the caterpillar 992G EE was operating caught a large rock. This caused the employee's upper body to twist to the left causing pain in EE's shoulder.
2023 · 2 incidents
The employee injured their back while removing a grease pump from an empty tank.
A gravel truck hauling sandstone from the mine site ran into the ditch line while attempting to pass an empty coal truck coming on to the mine site. The accident resulted in deep bruising to the Mar-kel truck driver and lost work days.
2022 · 3 incidents
The employee was climbing onto a D9T dozer when the employee slipped on the wet track. As employee fell employee stuck right hand out to catch self and cut it on the back of the blade.
It is believed that an oil inlet line ruptured or separated near the turbo causing the fire.
As the employee dismounted drill, employee slipped on the lower step and dropped to the ground. When this occurred the top step struck employee in the mouth and broke part of the left top front tooth off. The broken piece was found and reattached by employee's dentist later that day.
2021 · 5 incidents
The employee received a small laceration on the left side of EE's nose. This occurred after a small piece of metal broke loose from a pressing plate that EE was hammering on and struck EE in the nose.
The employee injured EE's back while dismounting a 992G loader. The injury appeared to be a muscle strain on EE's left side. EE refused initial medical attention but later visited EE's primary care physician when the soreness didn't subside. EE was treated and given a full release.
The employee claims that as EE was being loaded, a rock jarred EE's truck causing an injury to EE's neck.
EE experienced back pain as EE mounted a drill, stood up and turned to EE's right. This resulted in sharp pain originating in lower back and traveling down left leg.
While dumping material to reclaim a highwall, a Rock Truck driver got to close to the dozer running the dump and backed into the rear of the cab. This resulted in damage to the dozer's operated cab and caused the dozer operator to strain a muscle in EE's neck.
2020 · 1 incident
The employee injured the small finger on right hand as employee was driving post for a silk curtain near the hollow fill pond. Injury resulted in 4 stitches.