EMPLOYEE WAS WALKING FROM TRUCK TO BUS WHEN SHE TRIPPED OVER OWN FOOT AND FELL, HURTING LEFT WRIST
Miller Creek Mine-Jenlin Pit: 118 MSHA citations Coal
Miller Creek Mine-Jenlin Pit has $18K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 0 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Miller Creek Mine-Jenlin Pit.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 8
- Years on record
- 2001–2005
- Latest incident
- Oct 2005
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Miller Creek Mine-Jenlin Pit has $18K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 0 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.MSHA sampling at Miller Creek Mine-Jenlin Pit shows 100% of 20 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2006-03-29, 20 years ago
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER5
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR3
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE3
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2002-10-07, 23 years ago
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR2
- COAL TRUCK DRIVER2
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER2
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 100% | 5 |
| 2005 | 100% | 5 |
| 2002 | 100% | 5 |
| 2001 | 100% | 5 |
Miller Creek Mine-Jenlin Pit recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2006.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2005 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2004 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2003 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2002 | 7.54 | 4.53 | 0.000 |
| 2001 | 3.99 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC 2000 to present
ⓘ
Coal production is reported quarterly and lags the current period; the most recent quarters may be incomplete.| Year | Employees | Coal produced (tons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 17 | 280,278 |
| 2005 | 70 | 928,558 |
| 2004 | 65 | 866,186 |
| 2003 | 59 | 738,450 |
| 2002 | 51 | 640,467 |
| 2001 | 36 | 473,874 |
| 2000 | 10 |
Miller Creek Mine-Jenlin Pit sits in Clay County, Indiana, where the Census mining category is 0.5% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2006 Q3 | 7,216 | 11 | 2 | 1524.4 |
| 2006 Q2 | 20,193 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 24,687 | 4 | 0 | 162.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 39,142 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 60,294 | 14 | 4 | 232.2 |
| 2005 Q2 | 51,793 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 51,150 | 11 | 1 | 215.1 |
Show 17 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Q4 | 50,891 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 43,634 | 9 | 5 | 206.3 |
| 2004 Q2 | 41,742 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 41,941 | 6 | 1 | 143.1 |
| 2003 Q4 | 36,303 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 33,857 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 35,375 | 8 | 3 | 226.1 |
| 2003 Q1 | 38,826 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 35,162 | 6 | 1 | 170.6 |
| 2002 Q3 | 35,342 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 29,462 | 7 | 2 | 237.6 |
| 2002 Q1 | 32,617 | 18 | 5 | 551.9 |
| 2001 Q4 | 30,924 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 27,838 | 5 | 0 | 179.6 |
| 2001 Q2 | 21,269 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 20,252 | 4 | 0 | 197.5 |
| 2000 Q4 | 4,225 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
8 on file2005 · 1 incident
2002 · 5 incidents
EE WAS BEING LOADED BY A CAT 992D FRONT END LOADER AND CLAIMED THAT A LARGE ROCK WAS DROPPED IN THE BED OF THE END DUMP HE WAS DRIVING. THE LARGE ROCK CAUSED THE TRUCK TO SHIFT. EE CLAIMS THAT WHEN TRUCK SHIFTED HE TWISTED HIS BACK.
EE WAS DIAGNOSED WITH DEGERATIVE DISK DISEASE WITH EXACERBATION. THIS EE IS AN END DUMP DRIVER AND THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT DRIVING THE END DUMP AGGRAVATED HER LOWER BACK AND RECOMMENDED T HAT SHE NOT DRIVE THE END DUM UNTIL SHE IMPROVES
EE WAS REPAIRING A CAT 785 END DUMP FRAME WHEN AN ERRANT PIECE OF METAL FROM A CO-WORKER'S GRINDER LODGED IN HIS LEFT EYE. HE WAS STANDING WITH HIS BACK TO THE CO-WORKER'S GRINDING AND HE WAS ALSO WEARING CUTTING GLASSES. DISCOMFORT WAS MILD AT FIRST AND THEN BECAME WORSE. HE WAS SEEN AT THE E.R. WHERE PHYSICIAN REMOVED OBJECT AND PRESCRIBED EYE DROPS.
ON 6-17-02 EE NOTIFIED HER PIT SUPERVISOR THAT SHE HIT A BUMP IN THE HAUL ROAD AND STRUCK HER LEFT KNEE ON THE STEERING COLUMN OF THE CAT 785 END DRUM SHE WAS DRIVING EE WAS TRANSPORTED TO THE CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH IN THE ENGINEERING TEC PICK TRUCK SO PROF. CAR COULD BE ADMINSTERED. DR EXAMINED EE'S KNEE AND HE RELEASED HER TO RETURN TO WORK ON 6-18-02 WITH RESTRICTED DUTY
EMPLOYEE WAS RESIZING HYDRAULIC HOSE ENDS. PIN RELEASED FROM HOSE IT PINCHED LEFT THUMB BETWEEN HOSE END AND RESIZING PIN CREATING A LACERATION ON THE LEFT THUMB.
2001 · 2 incidents
INJURED WAS JUMP STARTING A LIGHT PLANT WITH JUMPER CABLES HOOKED FROM THE WELDER ON A SER- VICE TRUCK TO THE BATTERY OF A LIGHT PLANT. AS HE DISCONNECTED THE JUMPER CABLES FROM THE LIGHT PLANT BATTERY IT ARKED, CAUSING THE BATTERY TO EXPLODE. HE HAD CHEMICAL EXPOSURE TO HIS (R) EYEAND FACE. HE WAS TAKEN TO THE HOSPITAL(ER) WHEREHE WAS EXAMINED. RELEASED BACK TO WORK W/O RESTR
ON 10-01-01 SHE WAS DISMOUNTING FROM THE WATER TRUCK AND TWISTED HER RIGHT ANKLE. AT THAT TIME THE REPORTED INJURY WAS TREATED AS A FIRST AID CASE. ON 10-2-01, SHE WAS TAKEN TO THE CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND EXAMINED BY DR. HER ANKLE WAS X RAYED, THE RESULTS WERE POSITVE CHIP FRACTURE. SHE WAS REFERRED TO THE APS SPORTS CLINIC, FOR APPT SHE WAS SEEN DR AND WAS RELEASE TO RE