Employee was moving pump tank with lull. While maneuvering the tank, the tank started to topple over. The employee reached out to attempt to stop the tank from toppling. The tank tipped over pinning the employee against a nearby pipe. The employee was able to free self and co-workers helped employee come inside to report the injury. Employee was taken to ER and treated.
Wrens Plant: 120 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
Wrens Plant has $35K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 11 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Wrens Plant.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 12
- Years on record
- 2012–2021
- Latest incident
- May 2021
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.Wrens Plant has $35K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 11 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 17 · 81%
- Vacated or withdrawn 4 · 19%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE 2013-142M | Settlement | Lewis | 2013 | $11K → $7K |
| SE 2013-162M | Settlement | Lewis | 2014 | $5K → $3K |
| SE 2013-25M | Settlement | Rae | 2013 | $2K → $426 |
| SE 2013-150M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2013 | $1K → $308 |
| SE 2013-131M | Settlement | Lewis | 2013 | $998 → $618 |
| SE 2013-300M | Settlement | Gill | 2014 | $362 → $362 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2022-09-27, 3 years ago
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz4
- Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz3
- Respirable dust, <.1mg2
- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz1
Show the individual readings (10)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-27 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.31 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2022-09-27 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.24 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2022-09-27 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.59 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2018-04-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Lab Technician | ||
| 2018-04-25 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.21 | 10 | 0.02 | Mechanic |
| 2018-04-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2017-07-25 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 0.89 | 10 | 0.09 | Mechanic |
| 2017-07-25 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 0.68 | 10 | 0.07 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2017-07-25 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 0.32 | 10 | 0.03 | Mechanic |
| 2017-07-25 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 1.47 | 10 | 0.15 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
Wrens Plant recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2023.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 2.42 | 2.42 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 0.000 |
| 2018 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2017 | 1.47 | 1.47 | 0.000 |
| 2016 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- PyraMax Ceramics Southeast, LLC 2012 to 2019
- US Ceramics LLC 2019 to 2022
- US Ceramics LLC 2022 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 3 |
| 2023 | 48 |
| 2022 | 51 |
| 2021 | 46 |
| 2020 | 58 |
| 2019 | 65 |
| 2018 | 59 |
| 2017 | 62 |
| 2016 | 55 |
| 2015 | 84 |
| 2014 | 96 |
| 2013 | 66 |
| 2012 | 5 |
Wrens Plant sits in Jefferson County, Georgia, where the Census mining category is 0.2% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 1,041 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q2 | 946 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 1,939 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 3,788 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 24,638 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 9,558 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 32,085 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 29,770 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 42 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Q3 | 31,831 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 23,323 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 17,620 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 16,423 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 16,948 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 22,887 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 26,327 | 1 | 0 | 38.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 23,361 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 19,856 | 1 | 0 | 50.4 |
| 2020 Q2 | 19,619 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 27,406 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 35,872 | 1 | 0 | 27.9 |
| 2019 Q3 | 41,311 | 1 | 0 | 24.2 |
| 2019 Q2 | 28,424 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 22,990 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 23,533 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 27,491 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 29,829 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 35,954 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 32,252 | 1 | 0 | 31.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 36,423 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 33,538 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 34,248 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 27,318 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 32,816 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 31,622 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 29,714 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 25,207 | 1 | 0 | 39.7 |
| 2015 Q3 | 41,900 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 40,436 | 1 | 1 | 24.7 |
| 2015 Q1 | 49,545 | 1 | 0 | 20.2 |
| 2014 Q4 | 56,159 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 57,544 | 3 | 2 | 52.1 |
| 2014 Q2 | 54,593 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 55,182 | 3 | 1 | 54.4 |
| 2013 Q4 | 16,122 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 46,336 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 36,850 | 2 | 2 | 54.3 |
| 2013 Q1 | 8,880 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 4,560 | 3 | 2 | 657.9 |
| 2012 Q3 | 2,080 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 1,096 | 2 | 2 | 1824.8 |
Reportable incidents
12 on file2021 · 1 incident
2019 · 1 incident
A new employee was injured repairing a fluidizer lance. The employee dropped the lance and quickly grabbed it and pinched the left pinky finger between the lance and collar. Their finger was cut and also crushed. This job was being completed "manually" and there was no work procedure to follow.
2017 · 1 incident
While using a sledgehammer, employee's left middle finger was struck and end was pinched, mashed, lacerated.
2014 · 3 incidents
While operating a man lift to gain access to the rail car load out chute, the Maintenance Technician went over a cross tie and was tossed around in the basket resulting in a laceration to his right leg. Employee was wearing proper fall prevention harness and self retracting lifeline.
Diverter going to two Quality Control (QC) bins was sticking allowing leaking of product. Work order was submitted at 8:00 am to troubleshoot leakage and repair.
Employee collecting a slurry sample from fluidizer feed line felt his shoulder moved in an awkward direction.
2013 · 1 incident
While inserting a spray nozzle into the slot on Fluidizer #2, employee came in contact with a sharp edge of a guide. The employee received a laceration on his right hand between his right thumb and first finger. The employee was not wearing gloves as required.
2012 · 5 incidents
employee was unloading a bundles of t-beams from a truck bed. the bundle of t-beams was set to the ground and steel chokers were unhooked. employee pulled the last choker from the bundle and one of the t-beams rolled over on to the top of the right foot causing the employee to receive a fracture on his right foot. employee returned to work the next morning 11/21/2012.
Employee was moving a bolt bag on the steel structure from one beam to another beam and was put off balance. This made the employee fall. The employee was wearing a full body harness and tied off 100%. When man fell his left leg came into contact with another fall protection post. This caused a fracture to his lower fibula on his left leg above the ankle.
No unsafe conditions. No damaged property. Accident involved a hammer and a wedge. Employee was knocking a wedge from a gear guard. The wedge kicked out hitting EE's upper lip. Result was an upper lip laceration requiring 2 stitches.
EE's were in a trench cutting existing concrete pipe with a hand-held saw. IE was standing beside the other EE with a hand held sprayer spraying water on the blade to eliminate dust. When pipe was cut the saw kicked back and hit EE cutting the upper thigh area to both legs. Accident was not life threatening but did require medical attention.
The employee, while dismounting a lift, twisted his ankle at ground level. The employee was diagnosed with a sprained right ankle. The employee is on work restriction and has been transferred off the mine site.