THE INTERSECTIO3 IN THE #5 HEADING, LAST OPEN CROSSCUT FELL WITHOUT WARNING RESULTING IN FATAL INJURIES TO THE VICTIM. THE INTERESECTION FELL ABOVE THE BOLT ANCHORAGE.
Sewell Mine B: 1 muerte registrada Coal
Sewell Mine B tiene $1.6M en multas propuestas de MSHA y $109K pendientes en 142 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Sewell Mine B.
- Muertes
- 1
- Incidentes totales
- 49
- Años en registro
- 1983–2025
- Último incidente
- Feb 2025
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.ⓘ
Una orden bajo la Sección 107(a) retira a los mineros de un área cuando un inspector detecta un peligro inminente. Cada orden se levanta una vez corregida la condición, por lo que esto cuenta las órdenes emitidas, no las que están en vigor ahora.Sewell Mine B tiene $1.6M en multas propuestas de MSHA y $109K pendientes en 142 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 911 · 95%
- Quedaron como emitidas 22 · 2%
- Anuladas o retiradas 4 · 0%
- Aún abiertas 22 · 2%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEVA 2025-0554 | Settlement | Young | 2026 | $64K → $10K |
| WEVA 2025-0262 | Settlement | Paez | 2025 | $59K → $30K |
| WEVA 2011-2051 | Prevail | Steele | 2013 | $58K → $58K |
| WEVA 2022-0293 | Settlement | Sullivan | 2022 | $50K → $32K |
| WEVA 2014-0883 | Settlement | Barbour | 2015 | $46K → $34K |
| WEVA 2026-0059 | Settlement | Paez | 2026 | $40K → $16K |
El muestreo de MSHA en Sewell Mine B muestra que 98% de 2,472 muestras de polvo respirable de carbón cumplieron el estandar de 1.5 mg/m3.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Polvo respirable de carbón
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.
Última medición: 2026-08-19
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
El valor de concentración excesiva (ECV) es el umbral de aplicación por muestra de la propia MSHA, que incorpora la incertidumbre de medición; una muestra por encima de su ECV puede motivar una citación. El conteo cubre solo las muestras a las que MSHA asignó un ECV.- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR874
- SHUTTLE CAR OPERATOR (STANDARD SIDE)550
- ROOF BOLTER (TWIN HEAD) (RETURN SIDE)466
Sílice (cuarzo)
Última medición: 2026-06-15- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR45
- SHUTTLE CAR OPERATOR (STANDARD SIDE)32
- ROOF BOLTER (TWIN HEAD) (RETURN SIDE)26
Ruido
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.
Última medición: 2026-06-08
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.- SHUTTLE CAR OPERATOR (STANDARD SIDE)40
- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR21
- ROOF BOLTER (TWIN HEAD) (RETURN SIDE)14
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.| Año | dentro de 1.5 mg/m3 | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 100% | 24 |
| 2025 | 99% | 94 |
| 2024 | 100% | 212 |
| 2023 | 99% | 240 |
| 2022 | 95% | 66 |
| 2021 | 100% | 190 |
| 2020 | 99% | 234 |
| 2019 | 100% | 219 |
| 2018 | 100% | 223 |
| 2017 | 99% | 233 |
| 2016 | 99% | 174 |
| 2015 | 99% | 68 |
| 2014 | 97% | 65 |
| 2013 | 100% | 62 |
| 2012 | 98% | 82 |
| 2011 | 96% | 94 |
| 2010 | 88% | 117 |
| 2009 | 89% | 75 |
| Año | sílice prom. (%) | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.4 | 2 |
| 2025 | 3.1 | 13 |
| 2024 | 4.6 | 9 |
| 2023 | 5.3 | 8 |
| 2022 | 4.4 | 13 |
| 2021 | 4.5 | 11 |
| 2020 | 4.7 | 11 |
| 2019 | 3.7 | 11 |
| 2018 | 4.0 | 11 |
| 2017 | 3.2 | 10 |
| 2016 | 3.7 | 4 |
| 2015 | 3.5 | 4 |
| 2014 | 4.5 | 3 |
| 2010 | 4.9 | 2 |
| 2009 | 4.3 | 4 |
| Año | sobre el LPE | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0% | 5 |
| 2024 | 0% | 7 |
| 2023 | 8% | 12 |
| 2022 | 0% | 3 |
| 2021 | 0% | 5 |
| 2020 | 0% | 14 |
| 2019 | 0% | 2 |
| 2018 | 0% | 10 |
| 2017 | 0% | 14 |
| 2016 | 0% | 7 |
| 2015 | 0% | 12 |
| 2014 | 0% | 9 |
| 2013 | 0% | 7 |
| 2010 | 0% | 19 |
| 2009 | 11% | 9 |
Sewell Mine B registró 3.22 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2025.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 3.22 | 3.22 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 3.21 | 3.21 | 0.000 |
| 2023 * | 6.41 | 6.41 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 3.38 | 3.38 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 6.31 | 3.16 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 5.53 | 2.76 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Simron Fuel Coal Company 1980 a 2008
- Soho Coal Company Inc 1986 a 1987
- Rocky I Inc 1987 a 1988
- Emma Mining Inc 1988 a 1990
- Shane Coal Company 2008 a 2009
- Raw Coal Mining Company, Inc. 2009 al presente
ⓘ
La producción de carbón se reporta trimestralmente y va con retraso respecto al periodo actual; los trimestres más recientes pueden estar incompletos.| Año | Empleados | Carbón producido (toneladas) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 27 | 23,706 |
| 2025 | 30 | 42,253 |
| 2024 | 30 | 58,051 |
| 2023 | 29 | 57,319 |
| 2022 | 28 | 75,642 |
| 2021 | 28 | 79,001 |
| 2020 | 34 | 90,120 |
| 2019 | 34 | 111,843 |
| 2018 | 31 | 84,556 |
| 2017 | 32 | 135,879 |
| 2016 | 34 | 97,208 |
| 2015 | 35 | 90,468 |
| 2014 | 37 | 113,105 |
| 2013 | 39 | 97,234 |
| 2012 | 43 | 105,103 |
| 2011 | 51 | 90,213 |
| 2010 | 42 | 107,209 |
| 2009 | 31 | 62,947 |
| 2008 | 3 |
Sewell Mine B se ubica en McDowell County, West Virginia, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 13.0% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 19,573 | 34 | 10 | 1737.1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 12,710 | 21 | 2 | 1652.2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 15,476 | 36 | 11 | 2326.2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 15,596 | 29 | 0 | 1859.5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 14,652 | 31 | 7 | 2115.8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 16,432 | 42 | 7 | 2556.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 15,862 | 17 | 3 | 1071.7 |
| 2024 Q3 | 16,037 | 20 | 1 | 1247.1 |
Mostrar 64 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 15,404 | 12 | 1 | 779.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 14,908 | 37 | 2 | 2481.9 |
| 2023 Q4 | 15,252 | 33 | 3 | 2163.7 |
| 2023 Q3 | 15,109 | 24 | 1 | 1588.5 |
| 2023 Q2 | 14,824 | 23 | 1 | 1551.5 |
| 2023 Q1 | 17,243 | 28 | 1 | 1623.8 |
| 2022 Q4 | 14,201 | 2 | 1 | 140.8 |
| 2022 Q3 | 13,682 | 17 | 2 | 1242.5 |
| 2022 Q2 | 14,609 | 12 | 0 | 821.4 |
| 2022 Q1 | 16,501 | 32 | 5 | 1939.3 |
| 2021 Q4 | 12,622 | 38 | 5 | 3010.6 |
| 2021 Q3 | 12,768 | 50 | 7 | 3916.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 16,115 | 44 | 10 | 2730.4 |
| 2021 Q1 | 17,601 | 58 | 6 | 3295.3 |
| 2020 Q4 | 13,709 | 54 | 10 | 3939.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 13,993 | 25 | 0 | 1786.6 |
| 2020 Q2 | 16,422 | 36 | 4 | 2192.2 |
| 2020 Q1 | 19,227 | 23 | 4 | 1196.2 |
| 2019 Q4 | 15,555 | 47 | 7 | 3021.5 |
| 2019 Q3 | 18,779 | 57 | 9 | 3035.3 |
| 2019 Q2 | 18,755 | 53 | 9 | 2825.9 |
| 2019 Q1 | 19,254 | 36 | 4 | 1869.7 |
| 2018 Q4 | 17,408 | 3 | 0 | 172.3 |
| 2018 Q3 | 17,465 | 31 | 6 | 1775.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 18,512 | 30 | 4 | 1620.6 |
| 2018 Q1 | 19,692 | 39 | 5 | 1980.5 |
| 2017 Q4 | 19,757 | 53 | 5 | 2682.6 |
| 2017 Q3 | 19,241 | 41 | 9 | 2130.9 |
| 2017 Q2 | 20,761 | 42 | 7 | 2023.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 20,733 | 27 | 10 | 1302.3 |
| 2016 Q4 | 18,887 | 17 | 3 | 900.1 |
| 2016 Q3 | 19,141 | 31 | 10 | 1619.6 |
| 2016 Q2 | 19,788 | 25 | 6 | 1263.4 |
| 2016 Q1 | 16,057 | 15 | 4 | 934.2 |
| 2015 Q4 | 18,400 | 20 | 5 | 1087.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 19,220 | 18 | 4 | 936.5 |
| 2015 Q2 | 20,101 | 36 | 11 | 1791.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 18,403 | 32 | 12 | 1738.8 |
| 2014 Q4 | 20,851 | 19 | 4 | 911.2 |
| 2014 Q3 | 19,452 | 12 | 3 | 616.9 |
| 2014 Q2 | 17,363 | 23 | 7 | 1324.7 |
| 2014 Q1 | 20,547 | 21 | 7 | 1022.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 20,254 | 7 | 3 | 345.6 |
| 2013 Q3 | 12,488 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 21,403 | 11 | 2 | 513.9 |
| 2013 Q1 | 22,416 | 12 | 3 | 535.3 |
| 2012 Q4 | 22,673 | 8 | 3 | 352.8 |
| 2012 Q3 | 22,319 | 28 | 6 | 1254.5 |
| 2012 Q2 | 23,740 | 9 | 2 | 379.1 |
| 2012 Q1 | 24,566 | 13 | 3 | 529.2 |
| 2011 Q4 | 26,874 | 30 | 5 | 1116.3 |
| 2011 Q3 | 28,107 | 23 | 3 | 818.3 |
| 2011 Q2 | 29,456 | 48 | 19 | 1629.5 |
| 2011 Q1 | 23,206 | 9 | 4 | 387.8 |
| 2010 Q4 | 28,005 | 13 | 5 | 464.2 |
| 2010 Q3 | 19,373 | 22 | 9 | 1135.6 |
| 2010 Q2 | 25,852 | 19 | 5 | 735.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 17,324 | 23 | 6 | 1327.6 |
| 2009 Q4 | 20,891 | 28 | 7 | 1340.3 |
| 2009 Q3 | 15,704 | 17 | 1 | 1082.5 |
| 2009 Q2 | 10,359 | 18 | 6 | 1737.6 |
| 2009 Q1 | 2,501 | 5 | 0 | 1999.2 |
| 2008 Q4 | 1,162 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
Muertes en esta mina
1 registradasIncidentes reportables
48 en archivo (excluyendo las muertes anteriores)2025 · 1 incidente
Employee was lying on employee's side changing a torque shaft on the continuous miner when a large rock slid off the miner and pinned employee between rock and frame of the miner.
2024 · 1 incidente
Employee was on EE's knees operating the continuous miner when a piece of draw rock measuring 2'x2'x2" fell striking employee on EE's left foot
2023 · 2 incidentes
When employee released the brake on the rail mantrip, the mantrip began to roll forward. Employee panicked and jumped off. EE slipped and struck EE's left shoulder on rib/brow.
Employee was operating a shuttle car. While being loaded, a rock fowled in the discharge end of the continuous miner conveyor chain. When the rock came loose, it was thrown toward employee, striking them on head behind right ear.
2021 · 2 incidentes
Employee was operating a shuttle car when a piece of rock was thrown from the continuous miner boom and struck employee on face and forehead.
A roof fall measuring approximately 55 inches high, 20 feet wide and 40 feet long, fell in crosscut between no. 4 and no. 5 entry near spad no. 2001. (The fall has been dangered off and will not be cleaned up)
2020 · 2 incidentes
Employee was loading roof bolt supplies onto the roof bolter when a co-worker threw a bundle of roof bolt plates and caught employee's finger between the plates and the roof bolter.
Employee stated that while walking in the No. 4 entry, EE slipped and fell causing EE to strike EE's shoulder on a rock. Employee did not return to work after scheduled 2 week vacation.
2019 · 3 incidentes
A roof fall occurred while mining the No. 1 lift off the right wing of the No. 6 Pillar block on the mains section. The material caught the continuous miner on the left side and caused the continuous miner to be stuck. The continuous miner was pulled out from under the rock by using a separate machine.
Employee was shoveling coal onto the belt conveyor when EE felt a pain in EE's left shoulder.
Employee was operating a shuttle car and was being loaded by the continuous miner when a piece of rock being discharged by the miner struck the employee on EE's lip.
2017 · 2 incidentes
Employee was removing a roof bolter tire from the rim and while striking the rim with a sledge hammer, the hammer came back and struck employee on employee's left arm.
Employee was unloading timbers and one of the timbers fell on employee's foot.
2016 · 3 incidentes
Employee was using a cut off saw when the salo disk/blade broke, a piece of the fragment from the blade struck the employee on the finger.
Employee was using a hammer to remove a bearing from a shaft, when EE struck the bearing, a piece of metal flew back and struck EE on the left eye (Employee was wearing safety glasses at the time).
Employee was shoveling the belt when felt a muscle pull in upper back.
2015 · 1 incidente
Employee was tramming the roof bolter past a parked shuttle car. The bolter slid and caught employee's leg between the bolter and the shuttle car bumper.
2014 · 5 incidentes
While moving a scoop battery charger to a new location, employee was loading cable in scoop bucket, when he was moving away from the scoop, he slipped and his foot went under the scoop bucket as the scoop was moving away
Employee was operating a roof bolting machine when he got his hand caught between the drill head and the drill steel.
Employee was hanging the continuous miner cable when he felt something start burning in his lower back.
Employee was opening airlock door to allow a scoop to travel through when the supply car being pulled by the scoop struck the door causing it to strike employees leg.
A co-worker was setting a 7 foot timber, when he loss control of the timber it fell on the left foot of this employee.
2013 · 5 incidentes
EE stated that while working on conveyor belt in the track entry, he slipped in the mud and fell on the track.
While working on track, the EE dropped a rail and the rail kicked back and struck the EE on the left foot.
Employee was operating a scoop when a small piece of draw rock fell form the roof/rib and struck employee on the upper back.
Employee was shoveling under the belt conveyor when he felt something pull in his shoulder.
While unloading cinder blocks from scoop bucket, employee dropped one of the blocks on his right knee.
2012 · 1 incidente
EE was installing line curtain using a Poco Stick. The Poco Stick slid backwards and dislodged a piece of draw rock that fell and struck EE on the forehead and eye.
2011 · 1 incidente
A 10' timber fell over and struck the employee in the lower back.
2010 · 5 incidentes
EE stated that while working near the #3 belt head he slipped on a piece of belt and twisted his ankle.
Employee was driving inserts into the bit lugs on the continuous miner when a piece of the hammer he was using broke off - flew back and struck employee on the lip.
EE stated that a piece of the rib rolled off and struck him on the foot.
EE was preparing to cross over the pinner cable when the cable flew up and struck him on the right side of his neck.
Employee was operating the continuous miner when a piece of draw rock fell striking employee on head and shoulder.
1988 · 1 incidente
ROOF FALL OCCURRED IN THE #5 ENTRY APPROXIMATELY3 BREAKS OUTBY THE FACE THE FALL MEASURED 25'X20'X6'
1987 · 5 incidentes
THE INTERSECTIO3 IN THE #5 HEADING,LAST OPEN CROSSCUT,FELL WITHOUT WARNING RESULTING IN CONTUSIONS TO THE UPPER BODY.
THE INTERSECTIO3 IN THE #5 HEADING,LAST OPEN CROSSCUT FELL WITHOUT WARNING RESULTING IN CRUSHING INJURIES TO THE VICTIMS PELVIS AND LOWER BACK.
INTERSECTION IN #5 HEADING LAST OPEN BRK FELL WITHOUT WARNING RESULTING IN BROKEN LEFT LEG.INTERSECTION FELL ABOVE ANCHORAGE BOLTS.
CUTTING TIMBERS3WITH A 36IN BOW SAW
EMPLOYEE WAS RI8ING ON BUMPER OF MOTOR WHEN THE MOTOR AND CAR BEING PULLED CAME IN CONTACT IN INTERSECTION CATCHING EMPLOYEE BETWEEN THE TWO.
1984 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS REMOVING A TIRE FROM A SHUTTLE CAR. WHILE LIFTING ON THE TIRE HE FELT A SHARP PAIN IN HIS LOWER BACK
EMPLOYEE WAS RIDING THE MAN-TRIP TOWARD THE SURFACE AT THE END OF HIS REGULAR SHIFT. WHEN THE MAN-TRIP PASSED UNDER THE OVERCAST ON THE 1ST RIGHT SECTION. IT BOUNCED THE EMPLOYEE UP, CAUSIGN H IM TO STRIKE HIS HEAD ON THE OVERCAST.
1983 · 6 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS SHOVELING COAL ON THE BELT LINE HE PICKED A SHOVEL FULL OF MUD AND COAL TO PUT IT ON THE BELT EMPLOYEE FELT A PAIN IN HIS SHOULDER
EMPLOYEE WAS CARRYING TIMBERS FROM SCOOP TO THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CONTINUOUS MINER. WHILE CARRYING THE TIMBERS HE STRAINED HIS LOWER BACK.
EMPLOYEE WAS ROOF BOLTER OPERATOR. HE WAS LIFTING AND PULLING ON THE MINER CABLE AND WATER HOSE. WHILE LIFTING THE CABLE HE STRAINED HIS LOWER BACK.
EMPLOYEE WAS OPERATING A SHUTTLE CAR. WHILE TRAVELING UNDER THE MINER CABLE, ROOF BOLTER CABLE, AND WATER LINE THE SHUTTLE CAR CAUGHT THESE CABLES AND PULLED THEM DOWN. THE CABLES AROUND THE E MPLOYEES NECK AND PULLED HIM OFF THE SHUTTLE CAR.
EE WAS SHOVELING UP COAL AROUND #3 BELTHEAD. WHEN HE PICKED UP SHOVEL FULL OF WET COAL HE FELT PAIN IN HIS LOWER BACK.
EMPLOYEE WAS LOADING SUPPLIES INTO SCOOP BUCKET HE SLIPPED ON THE SCOOP BUCKET AND FELL ON HIS SHOULDER