ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS LIFTING A BAG OF ROCKDUST FROM A PELLET, HE CLAIMS TO STRAINED HIS BACK. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERTION DUE TO IMPROPER LIFTING. COMPLIAN CE WITH RULES/REG WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (BACK SUPPORT) NOT WORN, MINER ATTITUDE A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.
Buscar en el registro
Cada lesión y muerte que la MSHA tiene registrada. Filtra por estado, año, sector, clasificación, experiencia o cualquier palabra clave de la narrativa del investigador.
- Incidentes totales
- 739,207
- De los cuales mortales
- 3,111
- Años en el registro
- 1983–2026
- Clasificaciones
- 20
Notifícame sobre esta búsqueda
Envíame un correo cuando un nuevo incidente coincida con estos filtros. Un correo de confirmación; cancela la suscripción cuando quieras.
234 registros coincidentes
Mostrando 50 de 234ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS LIFTING 3" WATER LINE ON THE TROLLEY'S ON LONGWALL MONORAIL. HE CLAIMS TO HAVE HURT HIS WRIST. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERTION AND NOT GET TING HELP. MINER ATTITUDE A FACTOR, COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS NOT A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (WRIST SUPPORT) NOT WORN, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS A FACTOR.
EE WAS HANDLING YELLOW EYE ROOF BOLTS WHEN HE LOST HIS GRIP ON A BUNDLE. HE CAUGHT HIS FINGER BETWEEN THE BUNDLE OF BOLTS & SCOOP BUCKET. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS AWARENESS & HANDLING PROCEDUR E. COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS NOT A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (GLOVES) A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR.
EE WAS ATTEMPTING TO PICK UP A OXYGEN COMPRESSEDBOTTLE. HE GRABED HOLD OF THE PROTECTIVE CAP TO LIFT AND THE CAP CAME OFF STRIKING HIM ON THE MOUTH. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS AWARENESS AND CA P NOT SECURED. MINER PROFIECIENCY A FACTOR, PRO TECTIVE EQUIPMENT NOT A FACTOR, COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS NOT A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS OK
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS CARRYING 2 KENNEDY PANELS FOR A STEEL STOPPING. HE CLAIMNS TO HAVE FELT BACK PAIN WHILE CARRYING THESE ITEMS. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERT ION AND AWARENESS, COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAA FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT NOT WORN, MINER ATTITUDE A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMNENT/SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.
EE WAS TIGHTENING THE BOLTS ON A STRAINING CLAMPOF THE BACK OF A HIGH VOLTAGE CABLE PLUG. WHEN THE CABLE HUNG ABOVE FELL STRIKING HIM CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS IMPROPER HOOKS AND WEIGHT. COMPLI ANCE WITH RULES REGS WAS NOT A FACTOR. PROTECT EIVE EQUIPMENT OK, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS OK
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EMPLOYEE WAS HELPING ANOTHER CO-WORKER IN SETTING A SAMPSON POST TO ANCHOR THE TAILPIECE. HE CLAIMS TO HAVE STRAINED HIS BACK WHEN HE LOST GRIP OF IT.
EMPLOYEE WAS ATTEMPTING TO PUT RUB RAIL BACK ON THE MINER WHEN HE DROPPED IT ON HIS LEFT FOOT.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS LOADING SUPPLIES, HANDLING METAL CHANNELS. HE CLAIMS TO HAVE HURT HIS SHOULDER WHILE PUSHING A CHANNEL UP ONTO OTHER CHANNELS. CAUSE OF THIS INJ URY WAS OVEREXERTION AND NOT HAVING ENOUGH HELP.COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS NOT A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT OK, MINER PROFICIENCY, SYSTEMS A FACTOR.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS PULLING ON A ROPE WHICH HAD A SCREEN PANEL ON THE END OF THE ROPE. HE CLAIMS TO HAVE HURT HIS BACK. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERTION COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REG WAS A FACTOR PROTECT IVE EQUIPMENT WAS NOT A FACTOR. MINER PROFIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS WAS A FACTOR
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS PUSHING A BOTTOM 50FMC ROLLER OVER TO HIS COWORKER. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERTION COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIP WAS NOT WORN (BACKSUPPORT) MINER PROFIENCYA FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS WAS NOT A FACTOR.
EE SPADDED THE VENTILATION TUBE AGAINST THE RIB WITH SPAD AND CHAIN THE SPAD PULLED OUT FROM THERIB LEAVING THE TUBE SWING STRIKING HIM ON THE HEAD & NECK. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS ASSUMING SPAD IN SOLID CONTACT WITH RIB. COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS NOT A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT NOT A FACTOR,MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, SYSTEMS A FACTOR.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS SHOVELING MATERIAL ALONG THE 6 NORTH BELTLINE. SHE CLAIMS THAT SHE OVEREXERTED HERSELF WHILE MUCK STUCK TO HER SHOVEL. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS IMPROPER LIFTING. COMPLIANCE WITH RULE/REGS WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (BACK SUPPORT) NOT WORN, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIP/SYSTEMS OK.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS DRAGGING A BOTTOM ROLLER OUT OF THE WAY. HE CLAIMS TO HAVE FELT PAIN INHIS GROIN. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS IMPROPER LIFTING, OVEREXERTION. COMPL IANCE WITH RULES WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT NOT WORN, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.
ALLEDGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCURE WHILE THIS EE WAS UNLOADING 72" BOTTOM ROLLERS FROM THE SCOOP ONTO THE GROUND. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS IMPROPERLIFTING. COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS A FACTOR , PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (BACK SUPPORT) WAS NOT USED, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/ SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.
WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS HOOKING MINER CABLE TO THE MINER WHEN HE FELT BACK PAIN.
EMPLOYEE WAS REMOVING A SAFETY SUPPORT FORMT HE CORNER OF AN INTERSECTION AND A PIECE OF ROCK STRUCK HIM ON HIS THUMB. CASUSE OF THIS INJURY WASAWARENESS AND REMOVING SUPPORT. COMPLIEANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS A FACTOR PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT NOTADEQUATE, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIMENT/SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.
THIS EE WAS LIFTING 6" ALUM. PIPE OFF THE SCOOP, CAUSED OF THIS INJURY WAS WORKING CONDITIONS, NOT HAVING ENOUGHT HELP AND ACCIDENT REPEATER. PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT WAS OK.
EE WAS BREAKING THE END OFF OF A MECHANICAL SPLICE CLIPS AND THE SHARP EDGE OF THE CLIP CUT HIS PALM OF HIS HAND.
EE WAS HANGING A WIRE THRU A METAL CHANNEL AND THE END OF THE WIRE WENT UNDER HIS SAFETY GLASSES SCRATCHING HIS EYE. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS NOT HOLDING CLOSE TO THE END OF THE WIRE. COMPLIAN CE WITH RULES/REGS WAS NOT A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQIPMENT OK MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING QEQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS A FACTOR.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS UNLOADING TRASH AT THE OUTSIDE BINS. HE SAID HE STRAINED HIS BACK. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERTION. COMPLIANCE WITH RULE/REGS WAS A FACTOR , PROTECTIVE EQUIP WAS NOT WORN (BACK SUPPORT). MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS OK.
EE WAS UNLOADING TORLLIES OFF MONORAIL AND HE GOT HIS FIGNER CAUGHT WHEN ONE OF THE DOLLIES SPRUNG. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS AWARENESS AND INEXPERIENCE. COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS A FACTOR , PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT WAS NOT ADEQUATE, MINER KNOWLEDGE A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS SUPERVISOR WAS HELPING TO UNLOAD BOLTING SUPPLIES FROM THE SCOOP BUCKET. A LOOSE BOLT STRUCK HIM ON HIS RIGHT KNEE. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS AWARENESS. COMPLIANCE WITH RULES REGS WAS NOT A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (KNEE PADS) WERE NOT WORN. MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.
WHILE THIS EE WAS CARRYING 50 LB BAG OF ROCKDUST ALONG THE BELTLINE.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS LIFTING A 4' WOOD CRIB. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERTION. COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS NOT A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT OK, MINE PROFIC IENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS HELPING TO MAKE A SPLICE ON THE SOUTH MAINS BELT. EE FLIPPED OVER THE 60" BELT.
EE WAS PULLING A TORQUE ARM OFF OF SHAFT ON AXLE WHEN THE TORQUE ARM QUICKLY RELEASED. HE TWISTED AND CAUGHT HIS FINGER BETWEEN THE ARM AND THE AXLE SHAFT.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS CARRYING 50# ROCK DUST BAGS FROM THE TRACK & THEN THRU A MANDOOR. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERTION & IMPROPER LIFTING. COMPLIANCE WITH RULE S/REGS WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT NOT ADEQUATE [BACK SUPPORT], MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEM OK.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS LIFTING A FACE PLATE FOR A PUMP OFF THE DOLLY TO BE PLACE BY THE PUMP.
ALLEGED INCIDENT OCCURRED WHILE THIS EMPLOYEE WAS SLIDING BRAKE SHOES THAT HE HAD JUST PUT ON THE SHELF. COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (BACK SUPPORT) WAS NOT WO RN, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHEN THIS EE CLAIMS TO HAVE HIS BACK WHILE SLIDING A BOTTOM ROLLER UNDER THE BELT DURING A BELT MOVE. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS ENVIRONMENT CONDITIONS & IMPROPER H ANDLING PROCEDURES. COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIP [BACK BRACE] WAS NOT WORN, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIP/SYSTEMS OK.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHEN THIS EE WAS TRYING TO PLACE A CRIB BLOCK BETWEEN THE FEEDER & THE TAILPIECE. HE LOST CONTROL OF THE CRIB. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS AWARENESS, NOT WEARING GLO VES, & MUD CONDITIONS. COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT WAS NOT ADEQUATE, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS OK.
EE INFORMED MINE MANAGEMENT ON 10-15-98 THAT HE WAS OFF DUE TO HIS 1-30-98 CLAIMED INJURY. HE DID NOT MISS WORK AT TIME OF HIS INJURY, BUT NOW IS OFF FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT. HE STATED HE WAS WO RKING IN PLANT/SHOP PICKING UP PIPE, PLACED ON WORK BENCH, IT SLIPPED OFF AND AS HE TRIED TO CATCH IT HE PULLED HIS LT. WRIST.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHEN THIS EE WAS UNLOADING CEMENT BLOCK FROM END OF SHIELD CAR. HE STEPPED BACK OFF A LEDGE OF THE SUPPLY CAR STRIKING HIS RIB ON ANOTHER PELLET.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHEN THIS EE WAS REACHING FOR TROLLEY POLE. HE CLAIMS TO HAVE HAD PAIN FROM HIS FINGER TO HIS SHOULDER CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERTION IF HAPPENED. COMPLIAN CE WITH RULES LEGS WAS NOT A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT WAS NOT WORN TENNIS ELBOW PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.
EE WAS HELPING OTHER CO WORKERS IN CARRYING A SPROCKET FOR THE SHEARER ON A STRETCHER. HE GOT HIS FINGER CAUGHT BETWEEN THE STRETCHER AND THE RELAY BAR OF THE SHIELD.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHEN THIS EMPLOYEE WAS TURNING OVER A FMC 60" TOP BELT STRUCTURE. HE CLAIMS TO HAVE PAIN IN HIS SHOULDER. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS POSSIBLE OVEREXERTION. COMPLIA NCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS NOT A FACTOR, PROTECTIVEEQUIPMENT WAS OK. MINING EQUIPMENT/ SYSTEMS A FACTOR. MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHEN THIS EE ALONG WITH OTHER CO-WORKERS WAS PULLING A 72" BELT COLLER FROM ONE SIDE OF THE BELT TO THE OTHER. HE CLAIMS TO HAVE STRUCK HIS KNEE/LEFT THIGH. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS AWARENESS & COMMUNICATIONS. COMPLAINCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS NOT A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT [KNEE PADS] NOT WORN, MINER PROFICIENCY
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHEN THIS EE WAS STRAIGHTENING AND BENT TRACK RAIL. HE CLAIMS TO HAVE FELT PAIN IN HIS LOWER GROIN AREA.
SUPERVISOR WAS CHECKING ALIGHNEMNT OF HOLE WITH HIS FINGER AND THE BAR SLIPPED WHICH WAS HOLDINGUP THE STEERING ARM. THE STEERING ARM TOOK OFF THE TIP OF HIS FINGER (FLESH ONLY). CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS PERFORMING AN UNSAFE ACT. COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REG WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT WAS NOT WORN, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINGING EQUIP/SYSTEM OK.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCURR WHILE THIS EMPLOYEE WAS SHOVELING FROM UNDER THE BELT ALONG THE NORTH MAINS 51 STOPPING, #2 BELT. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS POSSIBLE OVEREXERTION.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EMPLOYEE ALONG WITH OTHER CO-WORKERS WERE SLIDING A CANOPY OFF THE TOP OF A SCOOP. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS POSSIBLE OVEREXERTION.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE LOWERING MINER CABLE DOWN FROM HOOKS AND THE CABLE DROPPED AND STRUCK EMPLOYEE ON THE HEAD.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHEN THIS EE WAS LIFTING A CEMENT BLOCK FROM THE MINE FLOOR TO SET ON A BLOCK WALL 5' HIGH. HE FELT PAIN IN HIS BACK. CAUSED OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERTION. COMP LAINCE WITH RULES REG WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT WAS NOT WORN BACK SUPPORT, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE EE WAS PULLING A DRILL STEEL OUT OF THE HOLE IN THE ROOF THAT WAS STUCK. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERTION, COMPLAINCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS NOT A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT WRIST SUPPORT NO WORN, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.
ALLEGED INCIDENT WAS TO OCCUR WHILE THIS EE WAS WORKING ON THE #1 MAINLINE BELT CLEANING MUD AND SLOP. WHILE HOSING STRUCTURE MATERIAL SPLASHED OFF AND INTO HIS FACE. A PIECE OF DIRT GOT INTO HIS EYE. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS AWARENESS AND USING PROPER EYE PROTECTION (GOGGLES). COMPLAINCE OK, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT A FACTOR.
EMPLOYEE CLAIMS WHILE PULLING THE FEEDER CABLE UP THE BELTLINE IN MUD AND WATER HE TWISTED HIS ANKLE. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS AWARENESS AND KEEPING WALKWYAS IN TRAVELABLE CONDITION. COMPLIANC E WITH RULES/REGS IS A FACTOR PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (ANKLE SUPPORT) NOT WORN, MINER PROFICIENCY WAS A FACTOR, MINING EQUIPMENT/SYSTEMS OK.
EMPLOYEE ADN OTHER CO-WORKERS WERE LIFTING A 72" TO PSTRUCTURE WITH ROLLERS IN A IMPACT BED AND THE STRUUCTRE SLIPPED OFF THE LEDGE AND CAUGHT EMPLOYEE FINGERS. CAUSE OF THIS INJURYW AS NOT H AVING ENOUGH HELP. COMPLAINCE WITH RULES/REGS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE, EQUIPMENT OK, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR, MINING EQUIP/SYSTEMS A FACTOR.
EE WAS SLIDING OUT A 60" FMC TOP STRUCTURE OFF A PALLET IN A SCOOP BUCKET. HE ATTEMPTED TO PUSH ON STRUCTURE WHILE LIFTING & THE PIECE CAUGHT ON THE WOOD PALLET CAUSING STRAIN. CAUSE OF THIS I NJURY WAS NOT HAVING ENOUGHT HELP TO SAFELY PERFORM THE JOB. COMPLAINCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT NOT WORN, MINER PROFICIENCY A FACTOR.
EE WAS MVOING AN ACETYLENE TAN OVER ONE OVERCAST TO THE NEXT AND HE SAID HE STRAINED HIS SHOULDER. CAUSE OF THIS INJURY WAS OVEREXERTION AND NOT ASKING FOR HELP. COMPLIANCE WITH RULES/REGS WAS NOT A FACTOR, MINER PROFICIENCY WAS A FACTOR, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT WAS OK, MINING EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS NOT A FACTOR.