The employee was walking around the mag bin to get a roller when EE fell through the floor which had deteriorated to the ground about 15 feet. This resulted in a broken arm and a lost time injury.
DUTCH RUN COAL PREPARATION PLANT: 210 MSHA citations Coal
DUTCH RUN COAL PREPARATION PLANT has $207K in proposed MSHA penalties and $969 outstanding across 18 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at DUTCH RUN COAL PREPARATION PLANT.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 27
- Years on record
- 1989–2024
- Latest incident
- May 2024
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.DUTCH RUN COAL PREPARATION PLANT has $207K in proposed MSHA penalties and $969 outstanding across 18 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 28 · 78%
- Stood as issued 5 · 14%
- Vacated or withdrawn 3 · 8%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENN 2008-324 | Settlement | Paez | 2010 | $84K → $21K |
| PENN 2008-339 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2009 | $45K → $2K |
| PENN 2011-283 | Prevail | Andrews | 2012 | $14K → $14K |
| PENN 2012-156 | Settlement | Steele | 2013 | $11K → $4K |
| PENN 2011-415 | Prevail | Andrews | 2012 | $8K → $500 |
| PENN 2011-284 | Settlement | Pope II | 2012 | $4K → $3K |
MSHA sampling at DUTCH RUN COAL PREPARATION PLANT shows 100% of 411 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2026-06-08
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.ⓘ
The excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR121
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER80
- MECHANIC55
Silica (quartz)
Last sampled: 2025-10-30- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR10
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR6
- MECHANIC3
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2026-06-08
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER43
- MECHANIC29
- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR28
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 100% | 7 |
| 2025 | 100% | 11 |
| 2024 | 100% | 22 |
| 2023 | 100% | 18 |
| 2022 | 100% | 24 |
| 2021 | 100% | 17 |
| 2020 | 100% | 29 |
| 2019 | 100% | 35 |
| 2018 | 95% | 20 |
| 2017 | 100% | 32 |
| 2016 | 100% | 20 |
| 2015 | 100% | 20 |
| 2014 | 100% | 17 |
| 2013 | 100% | 13 |
| 2012 | 100% | 6 |
| 2011 | 100% | 16 |
| 2010 | 100% | 7 |
| 2009 | 100% | 11 |
| 2008 | 100% | 9 |
| 2007 | 100% | 6 |
| 2006 | 100% | 6 |
| 2005 | 100% | 9 |
| 2004 | 100% | 19 |
| 2003 | 100% | 16 |
| 2002 | 100% | 8 |
| 2001 | 100% | 6 |
| 2000 | 100% | 7 |
| Year | silica avg (%) | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.2 | 3 |
| 2024 | 2.0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 1 | |
| 2022 | 1.0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 1.0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 0.3 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0.5 | 1 |
| 2017 | 0.9 | 1 |
| 2014 | 1.0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 0.9 | 1 |
| 2009 | 0.4 | 1 |
| 2004 | 0.6 | 1 |
| 2002 | 0.7 | 1 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0% | 4 |
| 2025 | 0% | 5 |
| 2024 | 0% | 13 |
| 2023 | 0% | 6 |
| 2022 | 0% | 9 |
| 2020 | 0% | 12 |
| 2019 | 0% | 16 |
| 2018 | 0% | 5 |
| 2017 | 0% | 18 |
| 2016 | 0% | 8 |
| 2015 | 0% | 8 |
| 2014 | 0% | 8 |
| 2013 | 0% | 5 |
| 2011 | 11% | 9 |
| 2009 | 0% | 7 |
| 2008 | 0% | 3 |
| 2007 | 33% | 3 |
| 2005 | 0% | 3 |
| 2004 | 0% | 12 |
| 2003 | 0% | 6 |
| 2002 | 40% | 5 |
| 2001 | 0% | 3 |
| 2000 | 25% | 4 |
DUTCH RUN COAL PREPARATION PLANT recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2025.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 4.75 | 4.75 | 0.000 |
| 2023 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 10.41 | 10.41 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 5.26 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Darmac Associates Corp 1989 to 1994
- T.J.S. Mining, Inc. 1994 to 2010
- Rosebud Mining Company 2011 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 18 |
| 2025 | 18 |
| 2024 | 18 |
| 2023 | 16 |
| 2022 | 17 |
| 2021 | 18 |
| 2020 | 11 |
| 2019 | 19 |
| 2018 | 19 |
| 2017 | 17 |
| 2016 | 11 |
| 2015 | 8 |
| 2014 | 7 |
| 2013 | 9 |
| 2012 | 8 |
| 2011 | 16 |
| 2010 | 11 |
| 2009 | 11 |
| 2008 | 10 |
| 2007 | 8 |
| 2006 | 8 |
| 2005 | 8 |
| 2004 | 9 |
| 2003 | 10 |
| 2002 | 10 |
| 2001 | 9 |
| 2000 | 9 |
DUTCH RUN COAL PREPARATION PLANT sits in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania, where the Census mining category is 2.2% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 10,596 | 3 | 1 | 283.1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 10,573 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 10,070 | 4 | 0 | 397.2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 10,036 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 10,299 | 4 | 0 | 388.4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 10,375 | 3 | 0 | 289.2 |
| 2024 Q4 | 9,883 | 1 | 0 | 101.2 |
| 2024 Q3 | 10,532 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 98 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 10,335 | 15 | 4 | 1451.4 |
| 2024 Q1 | 11,358 | 1 | 0 | 88.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 10,096 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 9,559 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 9,785 | 1 | 1 | 102.2 |
| 2023 Q1 | 9,433 | 1 | 0 | 106.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 8,913 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 9,340 | 1 | 0 | 107.1 |
| 2022 Q2 | 9,845 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 10,334 | 5 | 0 | 483.8 |
| 2021 Q4 | 9,082 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 8,594 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 9,992 | 2 | 0 | 200.2 |
| 2021 Q1 | 10,371 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 5,344 | 7 | 0 | 1309.9 |
| 2020 Q3 | 5,344 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 6,125 | 2 | 0 | 326.5 |
| 2020 Q1 | 9,754 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 10,469 | 1 | 0 | 95.5 |
| 2019 Q3 | 11,183 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 11,248 | 2 | 1 | 177.8 |
| 2019 Q1 | 11,595 | 1 | 0 | 86.2 |
| 2018 Q4 | 11,869 | 2 | 0 | 168.5 |
| 2018 Q3 | 11,927 | 2 | 0 | 167.7 |
| 2018 Q2 | 11,699 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 11,116 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 10,673 | 3 | 1 | 281.1 |
| 2017 Q3 | 10,668 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 9,501 | 2 | 0 | 210.5 |
| 2017 Q1 | 10,272 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 8,863 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 6,494 | 1 | 0 | 154.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 5,626 | 1 | 1 | 177.7 |
| 2016 Q1 | 4,962 | 1 | 0 | 201.5 |
| 2015 Q4 | 4,376 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 5,247 | 1 | 0 | 190.6 |
| 2015 Q2 | 5,218 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 4,371 | 1 | 0 | 228.8 |
| 2014 Q4 | 4,043 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 3,483 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 3,592 | 4 | 1 | 1113.6 |
| 2014 Q1 | 4,752 | 1 | 0 | 210.4 |
| 2013 Q4 | 4,508 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 4,931 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 5,488 | 3 | 2 | 546.6 |
| 2013 Q1 | 5,390 | 1 | 0 | 185.5 |
| 2012 Q4 | 3,372 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 5,460 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 6,159 | 2 | 1 | 324.7 |
| 2012 Q1 | 6,291 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 8,634 | 3 | 1 | 347.5 |
| 2011 Q3 | 12,316 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 13,119 | 12 | 5 | 914.7 |
| 2011 Q1 | 8,354 | 18 | 7 | 2154.7 |
| 2010 Q4 | 6,898 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 7,140 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 7,473 | 2 | 2 | 267.6 |
| 2010 Q1 | 7,721 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 6,920 | 2 | 2 | 289.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 8,100 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 6,954 | 3 | 2 | 431.4 |
| 2009 Q1 | 6,028 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 5,783 | 21 | 7 | 3631.3 |
| 2008 Q3 | 5,163 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 5,275 | 3 | 0 | 568.7 |
| 2008 Q1 | 5,374 | 1 | 0 | 186.1 |
| 2007 Q4 | 4,939 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 5,148 | 7 | 4 | 1359.8 |
| 2007 Q2 | 5,363 | 1 | 0 | 186.5 |
| 2007 Q1 | 5,323 | 5 | 3 | 939.3 |
| 2006 Q4 | 4,737 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 4,652 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 5,818 | 1 | 1 | 171.9 |
| 2006 Q1 | 6,030 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 5,816 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 5,936 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 6,172 | 1 | 0 | 162.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 5,991 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 6,081 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 5,755 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 5,316 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 7,890 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 5,075 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 5,373 | 2 | 0 | 372.2 |
| 2003 Q2 | 6,567 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 7,191 | 3 | 1 | 417.2 |
| 2002 Q4 | 6,326 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 7,178 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 7,677 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 7,908 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 7,357 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 7,360 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 7,591 | 1 | 0 | 131.7 |
| 2001 Q1 | 7,142 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 6,124 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 6,494 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 6,602 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 5,566 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
27 on file2024 · 1 incident
2022 · 2 incidents
Employee was attempting to locate frozen spot on 10" pipe while on a ladder. The pipe broke and struck EE off the ladder resulting in a broken foot and wrist.
The rock truck operator had just dumped a load of refuse on the boney dump. As EE descended down the hill, EE realized EE did not have brake pressure. The employee then drove the truck through a sump to bring it to a stop. EE struck EE's head in the cab which resulted in a laceration which required 12 staples. EE was wearing EE's seatbelt.
2021 · 1 incident
Installing a 2000 amp breaker. When placing the breaker into its location it fell on EE's right index finger. Causing a laceration and getting five stitches.
2017 · 3 incidents
They were removing a steel pipe at the garage. While moving the pipe it struck the employee on the top of foot causing a bruise.
Employee was trouble-shooting a pump to see if motor was bad or the bearing housing. When they shut off pump when it slowed down and stopped they grabbed the belts and it started to drain the water out of the line which started coasting in reverse and took their thumb through the sheave cutting the thumb.
Changing tire on equipment. The tire fell striking employees foot.
2013 · 1 incident
While working on casing in a well pipe, the pipe slipped on its brackets and came down on the employees' right hand.
2011 · 1 incident
Contractor was cutting I Beam to remove from plant, when spark got in between building tin and began to smoke. Plant workers and contractor began putting water between tin and extinguished smoke.
2010 · 1 incident
Employee was drilling hole on a motor base when the drill bit jammed in hole. He reversed the drill and while pulling back out on the drill the drill struck employee's mouth thus breaking his front teeth. Employee is getting necessary dental work done.
2008 · 4 incidents
Employee was in the process of putting his left foot on the first rung of the ladder to enter loader. The right foot had been on uneven bottom when his foot rooled to the side.
Employee was attempting to clean material that had built up between the head roller and the chute on the no. 11 belt with a roof bolt when the roof bolt got up against the belt thus causing an avulsion of the left index finger.
Over the road truck driver pulled in to get loaded with coal. Driver was doing his truck inspection. He bent over to check air hoses. When he stood back up he got dizzy, lost balance, fell and hurt his ankle.
Employee had just placed rub rail onto frame of continuous miner & needed to move the cover plate in order to permit the pin to pass through the rub rail to secure to the miner, when the rail fell off the frame of the miner onto the top of employee's feet.
2007 · 1 incident
Employee was checking breaker in Motor Control Center Building. As he went to step up on a bucket with screwdriver in right hand he apparently lost his balance and as he went to catch himself he accidently contacted the top side of breaker with screwdriver thus receiving flash burns.
2006 · 1 incident
Employee was descending the ladder of the Front-End Loader when he fell backwards thus striking the back of his head on the service truck that was parked adjacent to the Front-End Loader.
2004 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE WAS GRINDING A PIECE OF PIPE WITH A HAND HELD GRINDER WHEN A FOREIGN BODY WENT UP UNDER SAFETY GLASSES INTO RT. EYE. EE DID NOT MISS ANY WORK HOWEVER HE DID GET MEDICAL TREATMENT MAKING THIS A MEDICAL REPORT.
2002 · 2 incidents
EMPLOYEE GOT FINGER CAUGHT BETWEEN DOOR AND DRYER CAUSING LACERATION.
EE WAS KNEELING DOWN ON WALKWAY WHEN HE EXPERIENCED PAIN IN RT. KNEE.
2001 · 2 incidents
A COWORKER WAS DRIVING A BOLT OUT OF PIPE FLANGE WITH ANOTHER BOLT AND HAMMER. THE INJURED EE TRIED TO CATCH THE BOLT THAT WAS BEING DRIVEN OUT AND AS HE REACHED FOR THE BOLT, THE BOLT POPPED THRU, STRIKING FINGER CAUSING A LACERATION THAT REQUIRED STITCHES.
EE WAS PUTTING VESSEL BACK TOGETHER WHEN THE PADDLE SWUNG STRIKING HIS LEFT KNEE. EE DID NOT NOTIFY US UNTIL 2-9-01 AT WHICH TIME HE REQUESTED A REPORT BE COMPLETED. ON 2-12-01, EE SAW A PANEL PHYSICIAN AND COURSE OF TREATMENT MAKES THIS REPORT A MEDICAL.
1992 · 1 incident
EE CHIPPING ICE ALONG THICKENER AT PLANT AND A PIECE OF STEEL SPALLED FOM HAMMER STRUCK EE IN HAND.
1991 · 1 incident
WHILE MOVING CRANE, HE HAD TO CHANGE DIRECTION, TRUCK OPERATOR WENT TO CHANGE GEARS FROM FORWARD TO REVERSE, HE MISSED REVERSE GEAR, CRANE WAS ON AN INCLINE AND BREAKS FAILED. CRANE OPERATOR J UMPED FROM CAB LANDING ON LEFT KNEE. CRANE RAN INTO PARKED FLAT BED TRUCK CAUSING CRANE TO STOP.
1990 · 3 incidents
USING PAINT SPRAY SYSTEM ON STRUCTURAL STEEL COMPLAINED OF DIZZINESS CHEST PAINS, AND HEADACHE. NOSE BLEED ALSO EXISTED.
WORKMAN JUST FINISHED SETTING A PIECE OF STEEL WITH CRANE ASSISTANCE CRANE OPERATOR RAISED LOAD LINE ABOVE WORKMAN READY TO SWING CLEAR WHEN CRANEMAN WAS DISTRACTED BY GROUND WORKER CRANEMAN T HOUGHT LOAD LINE BRAKE WAS SECURE DIVERTED ATTENTION TO GROUND WORKER LOAD LINE BRAKE WASNT LOCKED BALL DROPPED (15FT(+-)& STRUCK WORKER
HE WAS CRAWLING IN & OUT OF VERTICAL SUMP TO RIG UP CRANE SAID HE APPARENTLY TWISTED KNEE WHILE DOING SO
1989 · 1 incident
REWORKING SUMP DESIGN CUT TOP SQUARE END OFF,CONFIGURATION OF CONICAL DESIGN.WORKER FAILED TO SUFFICIENTLY CRIB CONE END OF SUMP.WHEN LAST CUT WAS MADE THE CONE END WEIGHT OVER SHADOWED THE PA RT THAT WAS CUT LOOSE,WORKER WAS ON LADDER ALONG SIDE OF SUMP WHEN CONE END LAYED DOWN ON GROUND,LADDER SHIFTED AND FELL TO GROUND ALONG WITH WORKER,APPARENTLY INJURING LOWER BACK FROM IMPACT