An Entrapment occurred whenever an employee was shoving coal away from the #1 Midd's feeder and the dozer slid backwards/down into the underling feeder. No injuries occurred from this incident.
Leer Prep Plant: 139 MSHA citations Coal
Leer Prep Plant has $51K in proposed MSHA penalties and $954 outstanding across 0 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Leer Prep Plant.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 16
- Years on record
- 2011–2025
- Latest incident
- May 2025
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.Leer Prep Plant has $51K in proposed MSHA penalties and $954 outstanding across 0 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.MSHA sampling at Leer Prep Plant shows 100% of 166 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2026-06-23
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.ⓘ
The excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR78
- UTILITY MAN24
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE22
Silica (quartz)
Last sampled: 2025-11-19- BULLDOZER OPERATOR23
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2025-11-13
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR46
- UTILITY MAN19
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE15
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 100% | 5 |
| 2025 | 100% | 14 |
| 2024 | 100% | 11 |
| 2023 | 100% | 10 |
| 2022 | 100% | 10 |
| 2021 | 100% | 6 |
| 2020 | 100% | 14 |
| 2019 | 100% | 24 |
| 2018 | 100% | 13 |
| 2017 | 100% | 10 |
| 2016 | 100% | 11 |
| 2015 | 100% | 6 |
| 2014 | 100% | 17 |
| 2013 | 100% | 15 |
| Year | silica avg (%) | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.7 | 4 |
| 2024 | 0.5 | 1 |
| 2023 | 1.6 | 2 |
| 2022 | 3.3 | 2 |
| 2021 | 2.0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 1.7 | 6 |
| 2019 | 1.9 | 3 |
| 2018 | 2.2 | 2 |
| 2017 | 2.3 | 1 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0% | 9 |
| 2024 | 0% | 6 |
| 2022 | 0% | 10 |
| 2020 | 31% | 16 |
| 2019 | 20% | 5 |
| 2018 | 19% | 32 |
| 2016 | 17% | 12 |
| 2015 | 0% | 1 |
| 2014 | 15% | 13 |
| 2013 | 13% | 8 |
Leer Prep Plant recorded 1.82 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2025.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 0.000 |
| 2024 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2023 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 | 1.89 | 1.89 | 0.000 |
| 2019 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- ICG Tygart Valley 2007 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 42 |
| 2025 | 53 |
| 2024 | 53 |
| 2023 | 49 |
| 2022 | 50 |
| 2021 | 45 |
| 2020 | 45 |
| 2019 | 42 |
| 2018 | 42 |
| 2017 | 43 |
| 2016 | 42 |
| 2015 | 41 |
| 2014 | 38 |
| 2013 | 30 |
| 2012 | 8 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0 |
Leer Prep Plant sits in Taylor County, West Virginia, where the Census mining category is 2.2% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 24,088 | 2 | 0 | 83.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 24,669 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 26,931 | 2 | 1 | 74.3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 28,456 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 27,829 | 2 | 1 | 71.9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 26,938 | 1 | 0 | 37.1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 28,095 | 2 | 0 | 71.2 |
| 2024 Q3 | 30,105 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 70 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 28,278 | 2 | 1 | 70.7 |
| 2024 Q1 | 29,628 | 1 | 1 | 33.8 |
| 2023 Q4 | 29,700 | 2 | 0 | 67.3 |
| 2023 Q3 | 28,194 | 2 | 0 | 70.9 |
| 2023 Q2 | 28,756 | 2 | 0 | 69.6 |
| 2023 Q1 | 26,264 | 2 | 0 | 76.1 |
| 2022 Q4 | 27,454 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 28,868 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 28,947 | 1 | 0 | 34.5 |
| 2022 Q1 | 27,056 | 4 | 1 | 147.8 |
| 2021 Q4 | 28,586 | 1 | 0 | 35.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 27,382 | 3 | 0 | 109.6 |
| 2021 Q2 | 27,800 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 26,710 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 26,973 | 3 | 0 | 111.2 |
| 2020 Q3 | 26,843 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 25,724 | 2 | 0 | 77.7 |
| 2020 Q1 | 26,351 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 26,990 | 2 | 0 | 74.1 |
| 2019 Q3 | 25,475 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 26,297 | 1 | 0 | 38.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 25,386 | 1 | 0 | 39.4 |
| 2018 Q4 | 26,752 | 2 | 1 | 74.8 |
| 2018 Q3 | 25,672 | 6 | 2 | 233.7 |
| 2018 Q2 | 24,963 | 3 | 0 | 120.2 |
| 2018 Q1 | 25,283 | 2 | 0 | 79.1 |
| 2017 Q4 | 21,121 | 1 | 0 | 47.3 |
| 2017 Q3 | 23,338 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 23,535 | 2 | 0 | 85.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 24,433 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 20,570 | 7 | 1 | 340.3 |
| 2016 Q3 | 21,288 | 2 | 0 | 93.9 |
| 2016 Q2 | 21,105 | 2 | 0 | 94.8 |
| 2016 Q1 | 24,053 | 4 | 1 | 166.3 |
| 2015 Q4 | 21,838 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 28,073 | 1 | 1 | 35.6 |
| 2015 Q2 | 27,872 | 2 | 0 | 71.8 |
| 2015 Q1 | 27,451 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 25,966 | 5 | 1 | 192.6 |
| 2014 Q3 | 21,994 | 5 | 0 | 227.3 |
| 2014 Q2 | 22,487 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 24,492 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 19,451 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 17,707 | 1 | 0 | 56.5 |
| 2013 Q2 | 12,383 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 14,170 | 3 | 1 | 211.7 |
| 2012 Q4 | 7,953 | 6 | 2 | 754.4 |
| 2012 Q3 | 480 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 320 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2011 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2011 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2011 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2011 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2010 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2010 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2010 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2010 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2009 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2009 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2009 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2009 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2008 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2008 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2008 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2008 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2007 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2007 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2007 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2007 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reportable incidents
16 on file2025 · 2 incidents
After the employee completed their shift, EE went to their vehicle to start it and allow it to warm up. The employee started the vehicle without being seated inside of it. (standing outside the vehicle) The vehicle lunged forward during this process and ran over EE's left foot.
2022 · 4 incidents
The EE was operating a forklift to retrieve an I-Beam that was being lowered to the basement floor level of the prep plant processing building by a machining hoist. As the beam was lowered to the fork lift, the operator exited the equipment and attempted to guide the beam onto the forks. The load suddenly shifted, pinching right hand between the beam and fork.
Employee was falling a tree, the tree fell and contacted a limb that was on the ground. This limb then struck the employee in the left knee causing an MCL injury.
Driver started the belt on live bottom trailer forcing load against tailgate before unlatching tailgate. EE tried to free tailgate by hitting latch with a chain hook. This caused the tailgate to break free and hit the driver in the mouth.
Employee was turning motor sheave on unit 214 on the 3rd floor of the prep plant to assess the condition of the motor. When the employee rotated the belt, employee's right thumb was caught between the belt and the sheave. This resulted in a laceration to the right thumb that required five sutures.
2020 · 1 incident
On 8/20/20, employee was carrying a small sieve pulley and lost EE's footing, while descending the 4th floor stairs, falling down four steps and injuring EE's left hand. EE started missing work on 9/9/20 upon discovering that EE's small finger was fractured at the 5th metacarpal.
2019 · 1 incident
The sample crusher was plugged from the crusher to the head of the primary belt. The employee used a scraper to try to unplug crusher while it was still operating. The crusher segment hit the scraper causing it to come upward striking EE in the mouth and cutting EE's hand, resulting in laceration.
2018 · 1 incident
Employee was starting to enter the hole area for the 7' pipe, when employee stepped on ice and fell backwards onto the ground. As a result of the fall, employee broke EE's left femur at EE's hip joint, which required surgery to correct.
2017 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE WAS STRUCK BY A PIECE OF METAL WHILE REMOVING DEBRIS FROM THE MAGNET OF THE CLEAN COAL BELT LINE. BELT AND MAGNET WERE DE-ENERGIZED. EMPLOYEE COULDN'T HOLD METAL AND WANTED MAGNET BACK ON. ONCE POWER CAME ON THE METAL SMASHED EMPLOYEE'S THUMB.
2016 · 2 incidents
EE was cutting out sides of a chute from inside the chute to be replaced. They had an over head crane stabilizing the top & a chain fall stabilizing the bottom of the plate being cut out to prevent from falling/swaying. A small weld was still in-tacked & as the employee was descending the ladder the weld came loose making the plate spin hitting the ladder & making the EE fall.
Employee was using a hammer to install a screen when the hammer slipped causing a laceration to employee's hand that required 3 stitches to close.
2015 · 1 incident
A dozer operating in the raw coal stock pile ran over the feeder #4 which had a void underneath, this allowed the dozer to drop in to the void. The dozer was covered in coal from the rear up to and including the operator's cab. It took approximately 75 minutes to uncover the cab so the operator could get out.
2012 · 2 incidents
Employee was working off a ladder using 100% fall protection anchored overhead to a piece of structural steel. His foot slipped off ladder and when land yard caught him his left foot struck and adjacent motor on the side of the foot. The EE was wearing metatarsal footwear which was confirmed during investigation but hit the side of his foot.
Employee was working near someone that was welding off to his left side. Later that evening his left eye began to hurt and he thought he may have gotten something in it, but turned out to be a flash burn and was given prescription eye drops.
2011 · 1 incident
Employee was putting valves in a des lime classifier during new construction and jumped down the corrugated deck flooring, causing him to twist his knee.