A fully trained miner was fatally injured while attempting to remove a splice pin from a 72" mechanical belt splice. The splice was positioned near the outby side of the tail frame. The victim was positioned between the bottom conveyor belt and the top conveyor belt. Investigation is on-going by company, state and federal officials.
MARSHALL COUNTY MINE: 9 recorded fatalities Coal
MARSHALL COUNTY MINE has $21.0M in proposed MSHA penalties and $780K outstanding across 505 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at MARSHALL COUNTY MINE.
- Fatalities
- 9
- Total incidents
- 2,685
- Years on record
- 1983–2026
- Latest incident
- Aug 2026
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.MARSHALL COUNTY MINE has $21.0M in proposed MSHA penalties and $780K outstanding across 505 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 5,813 · 95%
- Stood as issued 112 · 2%
- Vacated or withdrawn 67 · 1%
- Still open 121 · 2%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEVA 2009-1601 | Settlement | Moran | 2013 | $426K → $175K |
| WEVA 2008-1589 | Settlement | Weisberger | 2011 | $389K → $297K |
| WEVA 2010-284 | Settlement | Andrews | 2011 | $350K → $269K |
| WEVA 2009-1855 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2011 | $315K → $199K |
| WEVA 2008-1683 | Settlement | Weisberger | 2009 | $227K → $122K |
| WEVA 2016-0234 | Settlement | Steele | 2017 | $223K → $156K |
MSHA sampling at MARSHALL COUNTY MINE shows 94% of 14,659 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2026-08-19
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.ⓘ
The excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR4,737
- LONGWALL OPERATOR (TAILGATE SIDE)2,144
- ROOF BOLTER (MOUNTED) (RETURN SIDE)1,904
Silica (quartz)
Last sampled: 2026-08-14- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR209
- LONGWALL OPERATOR (TAILGATE SIDE)188
- ROOF BOLTER (MOUNTED) (RETURN SIDE)54
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2026-08-11
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR128
- ROOF BOLTER (MOUNTED) (RETURN SIDE)100
- UTILITY MAN93
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 98% | 599 |
| 2025 | 98% | 857 |
| 2024 | 98% | 830 |
| 2023 | 95% | 607 |
| 2022 | 97% | 776 |
| 2021 | 98% | 773 |
| 2020 | 95% | 851 |
| 2019 | 96% | 847 |
| 2018 | 98% | 772 |
| 2017 | 97% | 1,029 |
| 2016 | 97% | 652 |
| 2015 | 93% | 344 |
| 2014 | 93% | 343 |
| 2013 | 95% | 403 |
| 2012 | 96% | 428 |
| 2011 | 94% | 450 |
| 2010 | 94% | 475 |
| 2009 | 91% | 391 |
| 2008 | 87% | 365 |
| 2007 | 82% | 380 |
| 2006 | 86% | 367 |
| 2005 | 81% | 375 |
| 2004 | 85% | 408 |
| 2003 | 85% | 387 |
| 2002 | 88% | 268 |
| 2001 | 82% | 302 |
| 2000 | 88% | 380 |
| Year | silica avg (%) | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.0 | 41 |
| 2025 | 2.5 | 54 |
| 2024 | 2.7 | 47 |
| 2023 | 3.1 | 37 |
| 2022 | 3.8 | 32 |
| 2021 | 4.0 | 27 |
| 2020 | 3.3 | 43 |
| 2019 | 3.1 | 28 |
| 2018 | 3.1 | 29 |
| 2017 | 2.4 | 28 |
| 2016 | 3.3 | 20 |
| 2015 | 2.9 | 17 |
| 2014 | 3.1 | 12 |
| 2013 | 2.0 | 10 |
| 2012 | 3.1 | 10 |
| 2011 | 2.4 | 10 |
| 2010 | 2.4 | 15 |
| 2009 | 2.5 | 8 |
| 2008 | 2.6 | 9 |
| 2007 | 2.0 | 13 |
| 2006 | 2.6 | 13 |
| 2005 | 3.1 | 14 |
| 2004 | 3.0 | 17 |
| 2003 | 4.9 | 21 |
| 2002 | 2.4 | 6 |
| 2001 | 4.0 | 16 |
| 2000 | 3.5 | 16 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 18% | 33 |
| 2025 | 3% | 30 |
| 2024 | 10% | 63 |
| 2023 | 11% | 35 |
| 2022 | 15% | 55 |
| 2021 | 6% | 34 |
| 2020 | 11% | 62 |
| 2019 | 18% | 57 |
| 2018 | 17% | 64 |
| 2017 | 10% | 60 |
| 2016 | 16% | 57 |
| 2015 | 8% | 98 |
| 2014 | 6% | 62 |
| 2013 | 19% | 42 |
| 2012 | 1% | 96 |
| 2011 | 18% | 66 |
| 2010 | 14% | 42 |
| 2009 | 24% | 21 |
| 2008 | 44% | 45 |
| 2007 | 31% | 29 |
| 2006 | 23% | 47 |
| 2005 | 48% | 40 |
| 2003 | 33% | 45 |
| 2002 | 100% | 4 |
| 2001 | 23% | 13 |
| 2000 | 33% | 33 |
MARSHALL COUNTY MINE reported liberating 81,341 metric tons of methane to EPA in 2023.
ⓘ
Methane figures are what the operator reported to EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (subpart FF), collected at facility level. Only EPA facilities that resolve to a single MSHA mine record are shown, and the CO2-equivalent applies the GWP-25 factor EPA's published data uses.| Year | t CH4 | t CO2e |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 81,341 | 2,033,537 |
| 2022 | 83,597 | 2,089,920 |
| 2021 | 84,075 | 2,101,885 |
| 2020 | 74,514 | 1,862,849 |
| 2019 | 81,704 | 2,042,604 |
| 2018 | 77,839 | 1,945,981 |
| 2017 | 79,863 | 1,996,571 |
| 2016 | 81,721 | 2,043,028 |
| 2015 | 89,448 | 2,236,209 |
| 2014 | 71,831 | 1,795,779 |
| 2013 | 91,294 | 2,282,355 |
MARSHALL COUNTY MINE recorded 14.48 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2025.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 14.48 | 13.22 | 0.000 |
| 2024 | 13.09 | 11.94 | 0.000 |
| 2023 | 11.50 | 10.56 | 0.000 |
| 2022 | 8.75 | 8.44 | 0.000 |
| 2021 | 9.38 | 9.27 | 0.000 |
| 2020 | 8.36 | 8.24 | 0.000 |
| 2019 | 11.57 | 10.16 | 0.101 |
| 2018 | 9.37 | 7.42 | 0.000 |
- McElroy Coal Company 1950 to 2016
- The Marshall County Coal Company 2016 to 2020
- Marshall County Coal Resources, Inc. 2020 to present
ⓘ
Coal production is reported quarterly and lags the current period; the most recent quarters may be incomplete.| Year | Employees | Coal produced (tons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 850 | 6,052,216 |
| 2025 | 827 | 10,814,208 |
| 2024 | 848 | 9,000,360 |
| 2023 | 836 | 7,412,191 |
| 2022 | 833 | 9,640,814 |
| 2021 | 791 | 11,022,355 |
| 2020 | 753 | 8,854,604 |
| 2019 | 832 | 11,718,744 |
| 2018 | 835 | 11,433,840 |
| 2017 | 780 | 11,653,535 |
| 2016 | 724 | 10,523,671 |
| 2015 | 954 | 10,294,865 |
| 2014 | 1,007 | 10,378,940 |
| 2013 | 957 | 9,403,070 |
| 2012 | 983 | 9,400,485 |
| 2011 | 969 | 9,253,481 |
| 2010 | 921 | 10,094,681 |
| 2009 | 870 | 9,863,588 |
| 2008 | 837 | 9,636,827 |
| 2007 | 803 | 9,667,258 |
| 2006 | 747 | 10,477,398 |
| 2005 | 714 | 10,419,128 |
| 2004 | 641 | 8,357,061 |
| 2003 | 567 | 6,791,716 |
| 2002 | 432 | 4,797,128 |
| 2001 | 456 | 6,599,665 |
| 2000 | 379 | 6,763,483 |
MARSHALL COUNTY MINE sits in Marshall County, West Virginia, where the Census mining category is 3.9% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 854,338 | 320 | 56 | 374.6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 513,579 | 162 | 19 | 315.4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 516,066 | 136 | 17 | 263.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 528,900 | 220 | 29 | 416.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 518,955 | 202 | 22 | 389.2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 508,495 | 168 | 26 | 330.4 |
| 2024 Q4 | 484,382 | 176 | 25 | 363.3 |
| 2024 Q3 | 597,168 | 115 | 21 | 192.6 |
Show 98 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 529,641 | 152 | 30 | 287.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 482,160 | 123 | 25 | 255.1 |
| 2023 Q4 | 467,927 | 119 | 18 | 254.3 |
| 2023 Q3 | 477,971 | 141 | 25 | 295.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 473,721 | 137 | 16 | 289.2 |
| 2023 Q1 | 493,822 | 199 | 23 | 403.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 474,076 | 177 | 32 | 373.4 |
| 2022 Q3 | 484,025 | 168 | 21 | 347.1 |
| 2022 Q2 | 495,975 | 123 | 18 | 248.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 488,432 | 182 | 28 | 372.6 |
| 2021 Q4 | 449,755 | 109 | 28 | 242.4 |
| 2021 Q3 | 444,657 | 77 | 14 | 173.2 |
| 2021 Q2 | 441,831 | 85 | 23 | 192.4 |
| 2021 Q1 | 454,762 | 118 | 28 | 259.5 |
| 2020 Q4 | 441,388 | 99 | 22 | 224.3 |
| 2020 Q3 | 446,866 | 143 | 30 | 320.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 343,821 | 126 | 29 | 366.5 |
| 2020 Q1 | 418,294 | 137 | 29 | 327.5 |
| 2019 Q4 | 477,614 | 131 | 25 | 274.3 |
| 2019 Q3 | 480,626 | 222 | 51 | 461.9 |
| 2019 Q2 | 514,283 | 177 | 27 | 344.2 |
| 2019 Q1 | 515,868 | 139 | 16 | 269.4 |
| 2018 Q4 | 482,098 | 156 | 35 | 323.6 |
| 2018 Q3 | 484,486 | 175 | 34 | 361.2 |
| 2018 Q2 | 493,133 | 118 | 10 | 239.3 |
| 2018 Q1 | 481,936 | 156 | 21 | 323.7 |
| 2017 Q4 | 456,707 | 229 | 21 | 501.4 |
| 2017 Q3 | 465,074 | 209 | 42 | 449.4 |
| 2017 Q2 | 460,588 | 214 | 38 | 464.6 |
| 2017 Q1 | 479,767 | 150 | 24 | 312.7 |
| 2016 Q4 | 428,083 | 187 | 31 | 436.8 |
| 2016 Q3 | 404,700 | 168 | 47 | 415.1 |
| 2016 Q2 | 384,488 | 130 | 18 | 338.1 |
| 2016 Q1 | 439,455 | 187 | 45 | 425.5 |
| 2015 Q4 | 498,031 | 287 | 65 | 576.3 |
| 2015 Q3 | 497,318 | 303 | 96 | 609.3 |
| 2015 Q2 | 580,846 | 219 | 45 | 377.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 632,167 | 228 | 58 | 360.7 |
| 2014 Q4 | 604,796 | 185 | 65 | 305.9 |
| 2014 Q3 | 546,710 | 260 | 71 | 475.6 |
| 2014 Q2 | 552,202 | 276 | 75 | 499.8 |
| 2014 Q1 | 540,111 | 246 | 61 | 455.5 |
| 2013 Q4 | 518,402 | 119 | 55 | 229.6 |
| 2013 Q3 | 552,307 | 239 | 66 | 432.7 |
| 2013 Q2 | 548,220 | 252 | 80 | 459.7 |
| 2013 Q1 | 575,449 | 176 | 47 | 305.8 |
| 2012 Q4 | 547,159 | 200 | 72 | 365.5 |
| 2012 Q3 | 559,259 | 150 | 52 | 268.2 |
| 2012 Q2 | 563,301 | 162 | 74 | 287.6 |
| 2012 Q1 | 601,456 | 215 | 79 | 357.5 |
| 2011 Q4 | 569,742 | 181 | 70 | 317.7 |
| 2011 Q3 | 554,813 | 193 | 79 | 347.9 |
| 2011 Q2 | 593,918 | 184 | 69 | 309.8 |
| 2011 Q1 | 598,021 | 193 | 59 | 322.7 |
| 2010 Q4 | 576,235 | 151 | 28 | 262.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 548,875 | 202 | 92 | 368.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 548,627 | 220 | 68 | 401.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 566,221 | 292 | 122 | 515.7 |
| 2009 Q4 | 553,799 | 279 | 121 | 503.8 |
| 2009 Q3 | 533,450 | 274 | 113 | 513.6 |
| 2009 Q2 | 545,865 | 200 | 64 | 366.4 |
| 2009 Q1 | 539,407 | 275 | 90 | 509.8 |
| 2008 Q4 | 500,480 | 233 | 66 | 465.6 |
| 2008 Q3 | 499,835 | 269 | 86 | 538.2 |
| 2008 Q2 | 542,850 | 209 | 79 | 385.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 539,684 | 248 | 54 | 459.5 |
| 2007 Q4 | 497,004 | 320 | 67 | 643.9 |
| 2007 Q3 | 481,835 | 305 | 57 | 633.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 486,330 | 324 | 79 | 666.2 |
| 2007 Q1 | 495,382 | 161 | 35 | 325.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 456,081 | 221 | 86 | 484.6 |
| 2006 Q3 | 436,597 | 323 | 97 | 739.8 |
| 2006 Q2 | 452,335 | 300 | 68 | 663.2 |
| 2006 Q1 | 465,050 | 198 | 50 | 425.8 |
| 2005 Q4 | 427,215 | 209 | 71 | 489.2 |
| 2005 Q3 | 427,557 | 171 | 90 | 399.9 |
| 2005 Q2 | 430,326 | 187 | 71 | 434.6 |
| 2005 Q1 | 442,981 | 245 | 73 | 553.1 |
| 2004 Q4 | 415,821 | 340 | 105 | 817.7 |
| 2004 Q3 | 335,353 | 270 | 142 | 805.1 |
| 2004 Q2 | 376,944 | 181 | 60 | 480.2 |
| 2004 Q1 | 401,864 | 150 | 60 | 373.3 |
| 2003 Q4 | 337,233 | 192 | 98 | 569.3 |
| 2003 Q3 | 311,362 | 116 | 55 | 372.6 |
| 2003 Q2 | 362,746 | 188 | 76 | 518.3 |
| 2003 Q1 | 356,628 | 225 | 82 | 630.9 |
| 2002 Q4 | 260,726 | 128 | 62 | 490.9 |
| 2002 Q3 | 199,196 | 92 | 39 | 461.9 |
| 2002 Q2 | 123,783 | 151 | 49 | 1219.9 |
| 2002 Q1 | 303,477 | 195 | 87 | 642.6 |
| 2001 Q4 | 274,263 | 262 | 103 | 955.3 |
| 2001 Q3 | 250,850 | 207 | 117 | 825.2 |
| 2001 Q2 | 276,381 | 218 | 78 | 788.8 |
| 2001 Q1 | 277,300 | 179 | 68 | 645.5 |
| 2000 Q4 | 230,210 | 113 | 72 | 490.9 |
| 2000 Q3 | 225,579 | 181 | 103 | 802.4 |
| 2000 Q2 | 246,824 | 91 | 25 | 368.7 |
| 2000 Q1 | 241,000 | 95 | 49 | 394.2 |
Fatalities at this mine
9 recordedThe 12 East longwall had mined out of seam from 3-10 shield. Shield tip to face had been roof bolted so the coal floor could be removed. The victim was standing with his back to the face. A rib struck the victim measuring 12' long by 4' wide by 1' thick. The victim was a trained and experienced longwall supervisor. The roof control and protective equipment were compliant.
While in the process of pulling top chain onto the longwall conveyor panline, the chain became fouled. While examining the area, an apparent failure of the sheave anchor point may have occurred allowing the rope and sheave to be propelled forward. An unknown portion of the assembly apparently struck the injured causing fatal injuries.
Employee was disconnecting drawbar from dolly on outby end when trail motor collided with dollies and pushed dollies and employee into outby motor fatally injuring employee.
5 North face area, right side, cross 5 to 6 at survey station 38 and 82. Coal and rock fell out on right side of miner knocking man's head and neck into side of the continuous miner.
AN APPARENT METHANE EXPLOSION OCCURRED WHILE CONSTRUCTION WORK WAS BEING CONDUCTED ON THE SHAFT BOTTOM, RESULTING IN THREE FATALITIES. THREE OTHER WORKERS WERE INJURED. THE SHAFT WAS APPROXIMA TELY 950 FEET DEEP AND WAS WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET OF INTERSECTING THE COAL SEAM.
AN APPARENT METHANE EXPLOSION OCCURRED WHILE CONSTRUCTION WORK WAS BEING CONDUCTED ON THE SHAFT BOTTOM, RESULTING IN THREE FATALITIES. THREE OTHER WORKERS WERE INJURED. THE SHAFT WAS APPROXIMA TELY 950 FEET DEEP AND WAS WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET OF INTERSECTING THE COAL SEAM.
AN APPARENT METHANE EXPLOSION OCCURRED WHILE CONSTRUCTION WORK WAS BEING CONDUCTED ON THE SHAFT BOTTOM, RESULTING IN THREE FATALITIES. THREE OTHER WORKERS WERE INJURED. THE SHAFT WAS APPROXIMA TELY 950 FEET DEEP AND WAS WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET OF INTERSECTING THE COAL SEAM.
2 RIGHT 5 SOUTH TRACK ENTRY, TWO EES WERE INSTALLING FISH PLATES IUNBY A FLAT CAR LOADED WITH RAILS AND ATTACHED TO A BATTERY LOCOMOTIVE. WHEN A THIRD EE ATTEMPTED TO NMOVE THE LOCOMOTIVE AND RAIL CAR OUTBY, IT TRAVELED INBY STRIKING THE EES INSTALLING THE FISH PLATES RESULTING IN FATAL INJURIES TO ONE EE AND MINOR CONTUSIONS TO THE OTHER EE. ACCIDENT IS STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION.
Reportable incidents
showing the 200 most recent (excluding fatalities above)2026 · 126 incidents
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 8/11/2026 at approx. 12:14pm. The fall measured 16' wide by 20' long by 10' high. The fall occurred on Mainline 2 Track at 2-28 crosscut, in the intake on Connors Run Side. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will not be cleaned up.
Employee was checking the torque on the miner bolter when the employee pushed on the torque wrench and felt pain on the left side of the abdomen. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 8/11/2026 at approx. 8:55pm. The fall measured 16' wide by 58' long by 7' high. The fall occurred on Mainline 10 Track at 10-47 crosscut, in the track entry. This fall is a continuation of the previous fall at 10-47 that occurred on 8/04/2026. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will be cleaned up and bolted.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 8/10/2026 at approx. 9:55am. The fall measured 16' wide by 50' long by 8' high. The fall occurred on Mainline 2 Track at 2-11 crosscut, track to belt. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will not be cleaned up.
Employee was in the beltline hanging belt structure chain when a piece of rock fell from between the roof screen striking the employee in the bridge of the nose. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
IE was hanging pumpable crib bags and was struck by a falling rock in the right forearm. Injury was not the result of a training or compliance issue.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 8/04/2026 at approx. 5:02am. The fall measured 16' wide by 65' long by 8' high. The fall occurred on Mainline 10 Track at 10-47 crosscut, in the track entry. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will be cleaned up.
Employee was walking back to the Miner when employee slipped and reached to stop from falling and caught small finger on rib strap. Mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. PPE was a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 8/01/2026 at approx. 2:25pm. The fall measured 16' wide by 12' long by 8' high. The fall occurred in 6 North 4 East at 10 crosscut, track entry. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will not be cleaned up.
Employee was standing on the back of the miner getting a roof strap when the operator lowered the boom of the miner down on top of the employees foot. The miner operator did not see the employee prior to lowering the boom. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was repairing airlock doors when the top beam fell, striking employee in the left wrist and hand. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was repairing airlock doors when the top beam fell, striking employee in the right forearm. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 7/27/2026 at 2:35pm. The fall measured 16' wide by 85' long by 8' high. The fall occurred in 5 North Mains #4 Entry at 69 to 70xc. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will not be cleaned up.
Employee was mounting a dust box on CM Bolter station when dust box dropped and landed on employees finger. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was standing on the back of miner getting a roof strap when the operator did not see the employee and lowered the boom of the miner down on top of the employee's foot. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee injured right biceps while moving a piece of large rock. They worked unrestricted until 8/2/26, began missing work 8/3/26. This incident did not involve any aspect of compliance with rules and regulations; mine equipment or mining system; job skills and miner proficiency, training and attitude; or protective items relating to clothing, or protective devices on equipment.
Employee was bolting off the miner when reached up to grab a roof strap and struck right elbow on the bolting station. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 7/21/2026 at 1:40am. The fall measured 16' wide by 25' long by 10' high. The fall occurred on Mainline 13 Track at 13-41 crosscut, track to belt. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will not be cleaned up.
IE was taking a break on tight side of belt to drink water. A rock fell and hit IE in the left knee. Injury was not the result of a training or compliance issue.
Employee was driving a mantrip when received a call on the radio. Employee looked down to answer radio when they struck their head on a low hanging bolt. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 7/16/2026 at 2:25pm. The fall measured 16' wide by 40' long by 8' high. The fall occurred on Mainline 3 Track at 3-11 crosscut, track to belt. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will be cleaned up.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 7/15/2026 at 4:10am. The fall measured 16' wide by 30' long by 8' high. The fall occurred on Mainline 5 Track at 5-45 crosscut, track to belt. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will be cleaned up.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 7/14/2026 at 4:50pm. the fall measured 16' wide by 25' long by 10' high. The fall occurred om Mainline 14 Track at 14-24 crosscut, track to neutral. The area was posted on all sides and dangered off.
Employee was rib pinning when a rock fell from the top, hitting the vent tubes then the rock and vent tubes knocked the employee to the ground. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was rib pinning when a rock fell from the top and struck employee in the hard hat and left arm. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 7/07/2026 at 12:48pm. The fall measured 16' wide by 40' long by 10' high. The fall occurred on Mainline 10 Track at 10-21 crosscut, track to neutral. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will be cleaned up.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 7/05/2026 at 8:51am. The fall measured 16' wide by 50' long and 8' high. The fall occurred on Mainline 3 Track at 3-06 crosscut. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will be cleaned up.
Employee was welding when the welder stopped working, employee raised hood and received flash burns when welder suddenly arc. Mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor, PPE was a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 7/02/2026 at 5:55pm. The fall measured 16' wide by 45' long and 10' high. The fall occurred on Mainline 16 Track at 16-31 crosscut. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off, and will be cleaned up.
Employee was using jack hammer when the jack hammer tip slipped off rock and landed on top of employee's right foot. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was pushing bolt into bolt hole when employee felt pinch and pain in left shoulder. Employee continued to work until 07/07/2026 then sought treatment. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 6/29/2026 at 7:15pm. The fall measured 16' wide by 40' long and 8' high. The fall occurred on Mainline 3 Belt at 3-32 crosscut. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off and will be cleaned up.
Employee was loading vent tubes and while turning to load another vent tube, employee felt pain in the middle of EE's back. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was building a wall and came into contact with J-Tech pumpable crib material. Employee continued to work until 07/10/2026 and then sought treatment. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was shoveling the 9 Belt Take-up when right hand contacted the Take-up rail resulting in a cut to EE's hand. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was rib pinning when a rock fell from the top and struck the employee in the hard hat and on both shoulders. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was placing tubes over the bologna skin when EE felt pain in lower back. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was center bolting when rock fell from the top and struck employee in top of hard hat. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was pushing roof bolt to the top when the roof bolt bent and pinched EE's finger between bolt plate and strap jack. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was installing the door back on the Scoop kitchen when the door slipped from its hinges and pinched the employee's finger. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was pulling old cable from the beltline when a rock fell from the top and struck employee on the hard hat. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was exiting a Loader and slipped and landed on the Loader injuring their groin area. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. The employee continued to work unrestricted until 7-22-26 then sought treatment.
Employee was placing a tire back onto the scoop when the come-along chain being used to assist with the installation broke, causing the tire to fall onto the employee's legs. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was placing the tire back onto the scoop when the tire slipped off the axle and landed on the employee's foot and ankle. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was stepping off the bumper of the miner when EE stepped onto a large piece of coal, causing EE's ankle to roll.
Employee was Z-Drilling when dropping steels, the steels came apart and fell on employees finger. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
IE was helping the crew supply the miner. EE slipped on a channel plate while standing on the bumper of the miner and cut EE's hand trying to catch EE's balance. Injury was not the result of a training or compliance issue.
Employee was shoveling on the beltline, when felt pain in shoulder. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was helping get an air drill unstuck off of a cable bolt, when the drill was free the handle came around and struck EE on the hip. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was changing out draw bar on motor when EE pinched EE's finger. Mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. PPE was a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 5/22/2026 at 1:58pm. The fall measured 100' long by 15' high and 16' wide. The fall occurred on Mainline 3 Belt at 34 1/2 crosscut. The area was posted on all sides, dangered off and will be cleaned up
Employee was carrying 6' bolts to supply miner when EE slipped and fell, causing EE to twist EE's back. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was removing dollies from monorail when EE's finger got caught between 2 wheels. Mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor, PPE was a factor.
Employee was changing a piece of belt structure when the frame slid, and EE's finger was caught between bed rail and frame. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was working on air lock doors when a rock fell from roof and struck EE's lip. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue.
Employee was putting supplies on miner when EE picked up a rib strap when it cut through EE's glove. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was bolting when the pusher steel slipped out of EE's hands and hit EE on the head. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was helping unload structure from scoop when EE dropped structure on EE's foot. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was pulling shuttle car slack to hang when EE felt pain on the right side of EE's chest. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was center bolting when EE was reaching for plate and EE's finger got caught in drill guide. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was lifting miner cable and water line into hanger when EE felt pain in lower back and leg. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. Body positioning was a factor.
Employee was running shearer when a rock came off the drum and struck EE's hand. Mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. PPE was a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 5/4/26 at 8:22 am. The fall measured 16'by 40'long. The fall occurred in #6 entry 83 cross cut in 5 North. The area was posted on all sides and dangered off.
Employee was carrying 20' beams through mud. The employee got EE's foot caught on a cable bolt that was sticking out of the mud, causing EE to fall with the beam in EE's hands. Employee fell to the ground, crushing EE's left hand under the beam and EE's body weight.
Employee was walking down the face when EE tripped over a rock and injured EE's knee. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was scaling rock down from top when a piece of rib started to come down. While EE was moving away from rib EE slipped and fell injuring EE's knee and ankle. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was spotting belt structure when EE twisted around and felt pop in lower back. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. Body positioning was a factor.
Employee was at the miner hanging cable and water line into hanger when EE went to pull down on cable, EE felt pain in EE's shoulder. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was cleaning slate off of the top of EE's canopy when another piece of slate came down and hit slate bar and a piece hit EE's face. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was helping pull belt off of dolly when the belt grab slipped off belt and struck EE's nose. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was walking to center bolter when EE slipped and fell, EE tried to catch self and cut the top of EE's hand on a piece of slate. Mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor, PPE was a factor.
Employee was helping work on scoop battery when battery lid came down and hit EE's elbow/bicep. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
IE was a passenger in a mantrip that was travelling into a track spur. The mantrip struck a dolly that was unseen by the driver, and IE's back struck EE's seat hard. Employee continued to work without restriction until seeking medical attention on 4/24/2026, and began missing days after that. Injury was not the result of a training or compliance issue.
Employee was drilled hole for rib pin and turned around to grab strap when piece of rib hit EE's back and shoulder. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was loading waterline onto scoop for belt move. When one of the water lines pipes slid off the scoop and struck EE's foot. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was cleaning on LW face when another employee was attempting to pass EE, that employee slipped and fell and the miner that was cleaning tried to catch EE and injured EE's back. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was working on LW face at 12 shield when rock came over handrail and struck the back of their leg. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was helping hang miner cable and water line into a roller hanger when they felt pop in their upper arm (bicep). PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was working on a cable repair when knife slipped and cut their finger, causing them to receive stitches. PPE was a factor, mining systems was a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was at the miner when a piece of rock fell from between straps and struck the top of EE's foot causing a contusion. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was working on shearer spray arm, when lifting eye that come a long was hooked to broke causing lifting eye to hit their hand. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was helping use cobra drill when drill was collapsing, they strained their shoulder. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. Employee did not start missing until April 6th.
Employee was helping switch cars in belt spur when motorman #2 pushed cars towards EE. EE was standing near motor when EE's foot was injured. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue. Body placement was an issue.
Employee was operating mantrip dragging slick line when rope that was attached to pipe broke and piece of metal from rope struck EE's elbow. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rule and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was sitting in a track spur when another mantrip came into ride and struck EE's ride. Causing contusion to EE's back and shoulder. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor.
Employee was sitting in a track spur when another mantrip came into spur and struck EE's ride. Causing injury to EE's head and chest. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor.
Employee was riding in mantrip when the mantrip went into a spur and struck another ride, injuring employee's back and neck. PPE was not a factor; mining systems was not a factor.
IE was travelling on the mainline track on a golf cart and encountered a motor trip travelling toward them. They attempted to get out of the way but was unable, and was struck by the motor.
Employee was rib pinning when vent tube fell and knocked them down, causing them to injure a hand, PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was re railing a car when car shifted and pinched finger between car and jack. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was working on taking green pump hose apart when EE's knife slipped and cut the back of EE's leg (calf). PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee stepped down off of motor when EE stepped on a piece of coal and injured EE's ankle. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was spotting rollers and shoveling belt when EE felt pain in EE's hand. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was cleaning at belt tail when EE stepped into a hole and twisted EE's ankle. EE also fell and injured EE's wrist. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
IE experienced skin irritation after exposure to water over the boots while searching for a damaged coupler. Incident was not the result of a training or compliance issue.
Employee was operating dump truck when it became stuck in mud. While attempting to get pushed out of mud by another piece of equipment, the dump truck moved or jolted causing employee to injure their neck. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee experienced skin irritation following a cumulative exposure to water over their boots while searching for a damaged coupler. This incident did not involve any aspect of compliance with rules and regulations; mine equipment or mining system; job skills and miner proficiency, training and attitude; or protective items relating to clothing, or protective devices on equipment.
IE experienced skin irritation after exposure to water over the boots while searching for a damaged coupler. Incident was not the result of a training or compliance issue.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 3/5/2026 at 11:50 am. The fall measured 16' long by 13' wide by 8' high. The fall occurred in #1 entry just in by 90 crosscut in the 6 South Mains. The area was dangered off and will be cleaned up.
IE experienced skin irritation after exposure to water over the boots while searching for a damaged coupler. Incident was not the result of a training or compliance issue.
Employee had finished bolting on EE's side and went to assist EE's bolting partner who was struggling with setting EE's drill steels out of the top. EE asked EE's bolting partner to lower the drill pod a little bit but instead EE brought it down all the way on top of the employees right foot.
Employee and coworkers were jacking up the belt to change rollers, when the chain attached from the come along to the belt structure snapped causing the structure to fall and the employee to fall to the ground with it.
Employee assisted with loading roll of belt on scoop when roll of belt shifted and came back injuring EE's foot. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was standing on side of center bolter waiting to bolt when a piece of slate fell and struck their neck and part of their leg. PPE was not factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was cutting green hose with utility knife when it slipped and cut finger. Mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor, PPE was a factor.
Employee was changing rollers during outage when they took roller out of frame, the roller dropped and struck their hand. Palm of hand was between roller and frame. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was walking and stepped in hole and twisted ankle. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was loading a roof bolter with supplies when EE felt pop in EE's knee. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 2/16/26 at 8:10 pm. The fall measured 16'wide, 60' long and 4' high. The fall happened on the belt line at 3-36 xc and was dangered off and will be cleaned up.
Employee was cutting bands on roof straps with knife when the knife slipped and cut EE's upper leg. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. Body positioning was a factor.
Employee was center bolting, while retrieving steels, a steel let loose and struck EE's wrist. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was pass through man door when they slipped on a rock and fell, landing on right knee. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was carrying a roller from track to belt when they slipped and fell injuring their thumb. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was prepping a splice cutting outer jacket, when EE cut EE's thumb. Receiving stitches. Mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor, PPE was a factor.
Employee was pulling a CBS blade with their right arm when they felt a pull
Drill steel fell out of the top striking and cutting the employee's right middle finger.
Employee was bolting off miner when steels fell out of top and struck their knee. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was walking past a trip of supply cars when their hand came into contact with a standard (metal pipe used to keep supplies on car). This caused them to cut their hand. Mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor, PPE was a factor.
IE was carrying v-deck into and down the beltline. They stepped on uneven bottom and rolled an ankle. Injury was not the result of a training or compliance issue.
Employee was moving miner cable to rib when they felt pain in their back. PPE was not a factor, mining system was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. Body positioning was a factor.
Employee was shoveling belt when shovel got caught causing them to hit hand against bed rail. PPE was not a factor, mining system was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was working on a section fan that was just unloaded at the end of the track. A Trip of cars was being moved when it struck a motor and dolly at the end of the track, causing the dolly to come off track and hit fan. The fan moved sideways, causing the fan to pinch miner between coal rib and fan.
Employee was hosing down catwalk at prep plant when EE slipped and fell injuring EE's wrist. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was walking along stage loader when a rock struck EE injuring EE's finger. Mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue, PPE was an issue.
Employee was changing skirt rubber on belt line when they slipped and fell causing them to cut their arm and receive stitches. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was loading roof straps from car to scoop when they picked up stack of straps they felt pain in lower back. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue. Body positioning was an issue.
2025 · 74 incidents
Employee and 2 fellow workers were holding onto a winch they took off of a push pole when it slipped, they lost grip of the winch, and it came down onto their right foot.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 12/26/25 at 11:59 am at 34 3/4 crosscut on 5 north #1 entry. The fall length was undetermined at the time of the fall. The fall was dangered off and will be cleaned up and bolted.
Employee was assisting with removing shuttle car tire when EE had EE's hand behind the tire, the tire shifted pinching EE's finger. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was standing near the LW headgate watching a job, when a rock fell from between straps and struck the back of their ankle. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was helping work on belt pulley when EE said EE was carrying chain fall and felt pain in EE's right chest muscle. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
While walking on the beltline, a rock fell from the top and struck the back of the employees neck and then landed on EE's hand.
Employee was working on locomotive when lid lock let off and pinched arm between motor and cover. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue.
Employee was rib pinning off miner when EE pinched EE's finger between chuck and bolt wrench. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was carrying a jack onto the belt line when EE felt pain in EE's shoulder, PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue. Employee worked 4 shifts then re-injured the shoulder (12/9) carrying belt structure and starting missing work on 12/10.
Employee was hanging slack for bolter when EE went to walk around machine, EE twisted EE's ankle. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rule and regulations was not a factor. Body positioning was a factor.
Employee was working at power center when EE stepped back and twisted EE's knee. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was removing old belt structure when left index finger was caught between the top of the new frame and an old bottom roller.
Employee was removing structure to build drive, when a piece of bed rail fell and struck EE's foot. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 11/21/25 at 3:10PM at 56-57 xc #1 entry. The fall length was undetermined at the time of the fall. The fall was dangered off and will be cleaned up and bolted.
Employee was helping unload short sticks of rail at shanty when one rail rolled and pinched finger in between another short stick. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was loading beams onto crib scoop when beam rolled off and fell on a finger. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was bolting when bolt came down out of the hole and plate struck their lip. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee picked up a bag of rock dust; while carrying it they felt pop in back. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor, body positioning was a factor.
Employee was prepping bolts at the miner when rib fell out and a piece hit them on the back causing an abrasion and bruising. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue.
At approximately 3:02 the Blake Ridge elevator went down due to governor switch had grease from the elevator ropes that set the governor switch off. One surface electrician came to clean the switch and the elevator ran as normal. The elevator was up and running at 3:34 pm.
Employee was assisting with installing rail in a spur when a piece of slate fell and struck neck and shoulder. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was at tool car getting a tool when another employee was filling degreaser sprayer. The hose on sprayer popped off and the liquid got in their eyes. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was walking down the Longwall face when piece of rock came out of the pan line and struck their leg. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue.
Employee removing belt for storage unit when they tripped and injured left ankle/foot. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue.
Employee was rib pinning when they grabbed rib strap, it cut through glove and cut finger. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was grabbing roof mesh to install, when corner of mesh hit EE in the face and scratching EE's eye. Mining system was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor, PPE was a factor.
Employee was walking to miner when piece of rib fell onto EE's foot. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was working at the tail of #14 prep plant belt and was using a come along to tighten belt clamps when a chain broke striking EE in the right knee resulting in a sprain.
Employee was z drilling on belt line when EE squeezed trigger and felt pop in wrist. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was picking up concrete block that was stuck in the mud, when EE went to pick it up, EE felt pop in EE's shoulder. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 10/10/25 at 11:25pm 35 xc on Corridor #3 entry. The fall measured 10'high by 25' long and 16'w. The fall was dangered off and will be cleaned up and bolted.
Employee was Bolting off miner when EE advanced vent tube EE pinched EE's finger between tube and rock deflector. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was handling belt structure when they felt sharp pain in shoulder. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue.
Employee was walking along trip of cars when EE sprained right ankle. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue.
Employee was throwing track switch when the handle came back and struck EE on the right shin. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue, body positioning was an issue.
Employee was walking along belt drive when EE stepped on a nail. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue.
Employee just finished hanging longwall jumper cables in the track spur. Started to step away when the hooks straightened and jumper cables fell onto left shoulder. (coupler for one the cables struck on the top of EE's left shoulder)
Employee was installing rib strap when rock hit strap causing it to slide down and cut hand through glove. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was installing rib pin when rock fell out and struck EE on the head injuring EE's neck and shoulder. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was getting roof strap off of miner when EE fell backwards and strained EE's knee. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was spotting belt structure when felt pain in EE's lower back. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. Body positioning was a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 9/29/2025 at 10:19am at 15 1/2 crosscut in 6 North 3 East #2 entry. The roof fall measured 16' wide by 8' high and approximately 14' long. The fall was dangered off and will not be cleaned up.
Employee was changing rollers when EE came into contact with a piece of roof screen on the middle of EE's back. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was center bolting when EE went to remove steels from roof, one of the steels came out of roof and hit finger. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance was not a factor, hand placement was a factor.
Employee was climbing down off of 777 dump truck, when they slipped off of bottom rung on ladder. They felt a pop in knee. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. Employee worked after the injury until March 4th 2026, when they began missing time for surgery.
Employee was operating full face miner when a piece of slate fell out and struck their hand. Mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. PPE was a factor.
Employee was changing steels in air drill when handle swung around and struck leg. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
A rock fell out of the roof on a beltline and struck employee in the ankle. Injury was not the result of a training or compliance issue.
Employee was carrying monorail on shoulder when they tripped and fell, they dropped monorail on foot. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
An unplanned roof fall occurred at 9/15/2025 at 8:19am at 12-30 wall 4-5 xc. The roof fall measured 15' long by 16'wide 10'high. The fall was dangered off and will be cleaned up.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 9/12/2025 at 2:00PM at 47xc 5 North #6 entry. The roof fall measured 8'high by 16'wide. The fall was dangered off and will be cleaned up.
Employee was helping carry a z drill when their partner sat one end down, it caused the employee to turn awkwardly and twist their knee. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue. Body positioning was an issue.
Employee was carrying a stick of water line with another miner when EE stepped on a piece of slick line and injured EE's foot. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was dragging wash down hose to clean at the plant when they struck their head on a pipe. PPE was not a factor, Compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. Body positioning was a factor.
Employee was tramming shuttle car when EE hit a hole and while holding on EE felt pop in shoulder. PPE was not an issue, mining systems was not an issue, compliance with rules and regulations was not an issue.
Employee was loading roof straps onto scoop when one of the straps rolled over out of EE's hands and cut EE's wrist. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was hauling shields with motor, when motor came off track they struck against the kitchen resulting in bruising and strained muscles. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
An unplanned roof fall on 8/27/25 at 3:25pm on Mainline 12 track 14xc. The roof fall measured 16' wide by 30' long and 10' high. The fall was dangered off and will be cleaned up.
An un-planned roof fall occurred on 8/24/2025 at 12:48am on Mainline 15 track 13xc. The roof fall measured approximately 16' wide by 50' long and 10' high. The fall was dangered off on both sides and will be cleaned up.
A 4'x4'x 1/4'' steel plate guarding fell (old piece being removed) pinching the employees finger between the plate and backhoe slope mucker handrail.
Employee was removing crib from under the pan. Pan came off of scoop and struck their left hand, crushing their fingers
An un-planned roof fall occurred on 8/20/2025 at 12:04 am. The roof fall measured approximately 16'wide by 50' long and 6' high. The fall was dangered off on all sides and will be cleaned up.
Employee was working on taking slack out of loader cats. when EE went to remove tool there was still pressure on it the tool and grease struck EE in the face and eye. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was helping with belt splices when they stepped away to clean their glasses they were struck in the eye by a piece of rivet. PPE was a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was a factor.
Employee was loading belt structure into scoop bucket. They had their hand on the bucket when it was hit by another piece of belt structure. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations not a factor.
Employee was carrying roof straps from track to belt when they slipped and fell injuring a shoulder. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was z drilling and went to bring the bolt up, when the spin got caught. The drill head and cylinder snapped off and hit their right hand.
Employee was helping load center bolter, EE pulled cable bolt from scoop and hurt EE's shoulder, PPE was not a factor, mining system was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor .
Employee was moving cables on LW when EE strained EE's shoulder. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was changing steels on pan line bolter when EE's foot slipped and was caught under the drill pod. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. body positioning was a factor.
Employee was installing a rib bolt when the rib strap swung down hitting their hand and cutting a finger through their glove. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was assisting with pulling up miner cable slack when piece of roller hanger broke off striking them in the leg. PPE was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor.
Employee was moving feeder cable when they felt pain in shoulder. PPE was not a factor, mining systems was not a factor, compliance with rules and regulations was not a factor. EMPLOYEE DID NOT START MISSING WORK UNTIL AUGUST 13th.
An unplanned roof fall occurred on 07/26/2025 at approx 11:15 am on 5 North #2 belt at 45xc. The roof fall measured approx 16'W x 121'H x 70' L. The fall was dangered off on all sides and will be cleaned up.