Employee and witnesses were changing inline mixers on slurry line feeding #1 belt press. After completing the job, employee was cleaning up old pipe. When he lifted a piece of pipe that was 6" and approximately 4' long, he felt something tear in his left bicep.
Slaughter Creek Prep Plant: 211 MSHA citations Coal
Slaughter Creek Prep Plant has $60K in proposed MSHA penalties and $462 outstanding across 2 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Slaughter Creek Prep Plant.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 12
- Years on record
- 1994–2013
- Latest incident
- Sep 2013
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.Slaughter Creek Prep Plant has $60K in proposed MSHA penalties and $462 outstanding across 2 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 4 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEVA 2012-826 | Settlement | Paez | 2013 | $10K → $7K |
| WEVA 2007-428 | Settlement | Barbour | 2007 | $10K → $6K |
MSHA sampling at Slaughter Creek Prep Plant shows 98% of 56 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2014-08-13, 12 years ago
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.ⓘ
The excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.- UTILITY MAN13
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER12
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR9
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2013-11-18, 12 years ago
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER9
- UTILITY MAN7
- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR5
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 100% | 5 |
| 2013 | 93% | 15 |
| 2012 | 100% | 5 |
| 2011 | 100% | 15 |
| 2010 | 100% | 5 |
| 2009 | 100% | 7 |
| 2008 | 100% | 4 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 0% | 14 |
| 2011 | 0% | 12 |
| 2009 | 0% | 4 |
| 2008 | 0% | 4 |
| 2003 | 20% | 5 |
Slaughter Creek Prep Plant recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2014.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2013 * | 6.10 | 6.10 | 0.000 |
| 2012 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2011 * | 13.19 | 13.19 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Cedar Coal Company 1975 to 1984
- Nu East Mining Corp 1984 to 1987
- Mountain View Coal Company 1987 to 1994
- R T C Inc 1994 to 1999
- Mountain View Coal Company 1999 to 2001
- Siata Equipment Company 2002 to 2003
- Millennium Technical Services,Inc. 2003 to 2006
- New Millennium Technical Services, LLC 2006 to 2008
- Hanover Resources LLC 2008 to 2014
- Thoroughbred Highwall Mining LLC 2014 to 2015
- Award Development, LLC 2015 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2 |
| 2014 | 12 |
| 2013 | 22 |
| 2012 | 20 |
| 2011 | 14 |
| 2010 | 9 |
| 2009 | 5 |
| 2008 | 6 |
| 2007 | 9 |
| 2003 | 0 |
| 2002 | 0 |
Slaughter Creek Prep Plant sits in Kanawha County, West Virginia, where the Census mining category is 1.9% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2016 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2016 Q3 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q4 | 520 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 520 | 3 | 0 | 5769.2 |
| 2015 Q2 | 2,404 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 1,359 | 4 | 0 | 2943.3 |
Show 33 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Q4 | 2,007 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 3,517 | 17 | 3 | 4833.7 |
| 2014 Q2 | 6,766 | 1 | 0 | 147.8 |
| 2014 Q1 | 14,310 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 15,345 | 2 | 1 | 130.3 |
| 2013 Q3 | 17,836 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 17,586 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 14,765 | 4 | 0 | 270.9 |
| 2012 Q4 | 11,516 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 13,216 | 6 | 2 | 454.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 15,284 | 1 | 0 | 65.4 |
| 2012 Q1 | 13,224 | 7 | 0 | 529.3 |
| 2011 Q4 | 3,774 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 10,376 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 8,794 | 7 | 3 | 796.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 7,378 | 8 | 0 | 1084.3 |
| 2010 Q4 | 6,281 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 6,599 | 21 | 7 | 3182.3 |
| 2010 Q2 | 4,636 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 3,321 | 1 | 0 | 301.1 |
| 2009 Q4 | 2,891 | 14 | 2 | 4842.6 |
| 2009 Q3 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 1,220 | 16 | 1 | 13114.8 |
| 2009 Q1 | 2,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 2,045 | 5 | 0 | 2445.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 943 | 1 | 0 | 1060.4 |
| 2008 Q2 | 1,129 | 8 | 1 | 7085.9 |
| 2007 Q4 | 4,680 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 0 | 6 | 5 | |
| 2003 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2003 Q2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2003 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2002 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reportable incidents
12 on file2013 · 2 incidents
Employee alleges that on 01/31/13 his right knee "exploded" while walking and carrying something for an electrician. He did not complete an accident report. He notified his supervisor on 02/01/13 that he sought medical treatment. The worker's comp paperwork employee completed on 01/31/13 reports a DOI of 12/19/12.
2011 · 2 incidents
Employee was working on a piece of equipment when his foot slipped and scraped his shin.
The employee was in a bucket Bobcat when it went over the hillside.
2008 · 1 incident
After replacing a 4" hose on a clean up pump two ee's were putting the grating over the sump. As the grating went into place the hose came off of the pump causing the water and mud to hit employee in face filling his eyes with dirt.
2006 · 2 incidents
Employee was walking by the sump area and fell in a slump hole he did not see, banging his l knee leg.
Employee was prying with a spud wrench when it slipped & struck him in the mouth.
2005 · 2 incidents
REFUSE BELT BROKE, THEY WERE USING EXCAVATOR TO PULL CABLE TO SHEAVE BELT BACK TOGETHER, BUCKET HIT HAND RAIL ON CATWALK & BROKE IT OFF. EMPLOYEE WAS AGAINST HANDRAIL WHEN IT BROKE & HE FELL ABOUT 8'TO THE GROUND.
Small rock came out of chute and struck employee on forehead, causing a cut.
2003 · 2 incidents
EE, WHILE FUELING D-9 DOZER SLIPPED FALLING, HITTING HIS HEAD ON DOZER. HE WAS TAKEN TO HOSPITAL & RECEIVED SOME STITCHES IN HIS FOREHEAD.
EE CALLED HIS SUPERVISOR ON 9/11/03 TO REPORT THAT HE HAD BEEN INJURED ON THE EVENING SHIFT OF 9/10/03 WHILE REPAIRING A DOZER, HE WENT TO DR. ON 9/11/03 & THEY TOLD HIM THAT HIS KNEE WAS CR ACKED.
1994 · 1 incident
HE WAS WALKING A GRIP STRUT WALKWAY. HE SLIPPED WHILE REACHING FOR HIS BALANCE HE GRABBED THE METAL SHEETING HE WAS INSTALLING. HE MORE LIKELY CAUGHT HIS TOES ON THE VERY ABRASIVE GRIP STRUT A S OPPOSED TO TRIPPING AS THE FOREMAN REPORTED.