Two employees were struck by the boom of the pivoting hoist. At this point in the investigation, it appears that the boom or boom hoist ropes came in contact with an adjacent structure as the boom was being lowered. The elevation of the boom changed suddenly as the boom hoist rope or boom lost contact with the structure, striking both individuals.
Upper Second Creek Portals: 1 recorded fatality Coal
Upper Second Creek Portals has $136K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 8 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Upper Second Creek Portals.
- Fatalities
- 1
- Total incidents
- 7
- Years on record
- 2009–2010
- Latest incident
- Sep 2010
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Upper Second Creek Portals has $136K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 8 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 8 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENT 2010-1357 | Settlement | Tureck | 2012 | $70K → $52K |
| KENT 2010-1353 | Settlement | Tureck | 2011 | $52K → $5K |
| KENT 2010-1129 | Settlement | Tureck | 2011 | $5K → $5K |
| KENT 2010-939 | Settlement | Paez | 2012 | $3K → $2K |
| KENT 2011-869 | Settlement | Paez | 2011 | $100 → $100 |
| KENT 2010-1018 | Settlement | Tureck | 2012 | $100 → $100 |
MSHA sampling at Upper Second Creek Portals shows 100% of 15 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2010-08-11, 16 years ago
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.- CRANE OPER/DRAGLINE OPERATOR3
- CARPENTER2
- FORKLIFT OPERATOR2
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2011-03-14, 15 years ago
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- LABORER/BLACKSMITH3
- CRANE OPER/DRAGLINE OPERATOR2
- FIRE BOSS PRE-SHIFT EXAMINER2
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 100% | 10 |
| 2009 | 100% | 5 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 11% | 9 |
| 2010 | 25% | 4 |
- Perry County Coal Corporation 2008 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 |
Upper Second Creek Portals sits in Perry County, Kentucky, where the Census mining category is 3.3% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2010 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2010 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2010 Q1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2009 Q4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2009 Q3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2009 Q2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2009 Q1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Fatalities at this mine
1 recordedReportable incidents
6 on file (excluding fatalities above)2010 · 3 incidents
EE placed his hand on a rock for support and he slipped cutting his left forearm on the rock. Laceration required stitches.
EE was installing rebar when his left hand was caught between #6 & #11 rebar causing a laceration that required stitches.
EE was cutting a piece of panning with side cutters and as he pulled the pliers to tear the panning his hand hit another piece of panning causing a laceration that required stitches on his left hand.
2009 · 3 incidents
Ground gave way. EE was caught between concrete and ring steel. EE received a fractured tibia.
Two employees were struck by the boom of the pivoting hoist. At this point in the investigation, it appears that the boom or boom hoist ropes came in contact with an adjacent structure as the boom was being lowered. The elevation of the boom changed suddenly as the boom hoist rope or boom lost contact with the structure, striking both individuals.
EE stumbled backward and fell into the hoisting hook, causing blunt force trauma to neck.