Mining Incidents

Tug Valley Coal Processing Company: 2 recorded fatalities operator

MSHA operator ID: P24183

Watch this operator

Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at any Tug Valley Coal Processing Company mine.

Fatalities
2
Total incidents
34
Mines on record
1
Years on record
1998–2004
Compliance record
MSHA citations since 2000
75
citations
24
significant & substantial
$25,213
proposed penalties
$5,025
paid to date
20% of proposed penalties paid to date, a $20,188 gap.
Source: MSHA violations data, updated weekly.
Inspection activity
MSHA inspections since 2000
63
inspections on record
1,656
inspection hours
4.5
citations per 100 inspection hours
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.
75 citations across 1,656 inspection hours.
Source: MSHA inspections data, updated weekly.
Penalty disposition
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.
$25K
proposed penalties
$25K
current assessed
$5K
paid to date
$20K
outstanding
73 assessments are final orders; 0 contested dockets.
As of the most recent assessment on 2005-04-20.
Source: MSHA assessed-violations and conference/litigation data, updated weekly.
Violation severity profile
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.
32.9%
significant & substantial
0.0%
high negligence or reckless
32.9%
reasonably likely or greater
17.8%
permanently disabling or fatal if injury occurs
Negligence coding: 0.0% none, 6.8% low, 93.2% moderate, 0.0% high, 0.0% reckless.
Source: MSHA violations gravity and negligence coding, updated weekly.
Injury rate, 2003
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.
20.31
total case rate
20.31
days-away rate
0.000
fatality rate
Above average. The US coal mining average was 5.87 and the all-US-mining average was 4.43 cases per 100 workers.
Under 100,000 employee-hours were reported that year, so a single case moves the rate by two or more. Read the figure as approximate.
Year total case rate days-away fatal
2003 * 20.31 20.31 0.000
2002 8.88 7.40 0.000
2001 7.63 6.10 0.000
2000 10.84 4.65 1.549
* Fewer than 100,000 employee-hours that year; the rate is less stable.
Source: injury cases from MSHA accident and injury records; employee-hours from MSHA quarterly employment reports. Rate is cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers, operator employees only.
Health sampling
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.

Respirable coal dust
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.

Last sampled: 2002-07-25, 24 years ago
97%
within 1.5 mg/m3
29
samples
3.08
dust max (mg/m3)
29 samples taken by MSHA inspectors, 0 by the operator.
Most-sampled occupations
  • CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR12
  • CLEANUP MAN4
  • BULLDOZER OPERATOR3

Silica (quartz)

Last sampled: 2002-05-30, 24 years ago
1.2
silica avg (%)
4
samples
1.6
silica max (%)
Most-sampled occupations
  • CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR4

Noise
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.

Last sampled: 2003-03-25, 23 years ago
28%
over PEL
25
samples
Most-sampled occupations
  • CLEANUP MAN6
  • CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR4
  • UTILITY MAN4
Source: MSHA respirable dust, quartz, and noise sampling records, updated weekly.

Top causes

Incident timeline

2004
2 (1f)
2003
7
2002
6
2001
5
2000
9 (1f)
1999
4
1998
1

Mines on record

Fatalities under this operator

2 recorded
June 10, 2004 WV · Coal bulldozer operator, universal operator, heavy equipment operator, operating engineer Fatality · POWERED HAULAGE
Tug Valley Coal Processing Company · Struck by powered moving object

WHILE HAULING DIRT DOWN THE IMPOUNDMENT HAUL ROAD, IT APPEARS EMPLOYEE LOST CONTROL OF THE 10 WHEELER TRUCK HE WAS DRIVING. HE JUMPED FROM THE TRUCK AND IT STRUCK HIM CAUSING FATAL INJURIES.

December 27, 2000 WV · Coal mine manager, mine foreman, mine owner Fatality · EXPLODING VESSELS UNDER PRESSURE
Tug Valley Coal Processing Company · Struck by... (Not Elsewhere Classified)

EE WAS STANDING BESIDE A 8" FROZEN SLURRY LINE. HE WAS CHIPPING ICE WHICH EXITED THE PIPE & LODGED AGAINST HILLSIDE. HE WOULD CHIP A PIECE OUT &ANOTHER WOULD COME OUT & GET LODGED. HE DID THIS ABOUT 3 OR 4 TIMES WHEN PRESSURE OR SOMETHING CAUSED THE PIPE TO MOVE POSSIBLY STRIKING HIM. THE PIPE RAISED UP AND LANDED ABOUT 80' UP THE HILL.

For insurers, brokers, and safety consultants

Where Tug Valley Coal Processing Company stands on silica, penalties, and injury rate

MSHA's standard limits respirable silica to 50 micrograms per cubic metre, but MSHA publishes dust and quartz as separate files and never the silica figure itself. We derive it per sample, score it against the limit, and set the operator's injury rate against a benchmark built from the full MSHA operator record. With the 26-year penalty trail, contest posture, and fatality history. Delivered as a PDF with the underlying data as CSV.

The federal record itself stays free on this site. What costs money, and why.

See a sample report
Need a different cut of the data? Ask us