Injury was not reported at the time of the incident or while on SWN property. Injured employee reported to his dispatcher after leaving the sand mine that he was getting down from his trailer after opening his lids and slipped on the trailer ladder causing him to fall to the ground. Driver was hooked to SRL at time of incident.
SWN SAND COMPANY: 38 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
SWN SAND COMPANY tiene $6K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 2 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en SWN SAND COMPANY.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 19
- Años en registro
- 2009–2013
- Último incidente
- Oct 2013
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.SWN SAND COMPANY tiene $6K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 2 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 2 · 50%
- Anuladas o retiradas 2 · 50%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT 2011-1156M | Settlement | Gill | 2013 | $2K → $207 |
| CENT 2010-816M | Withdrawal | McCarthy | 2013 | $300 → $100 |
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2012-12-18, hace 13 años
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Respirable dust, <.1mg10
- Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz1
Ver los análisis individuales (11)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-12-18 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Supervisor, Co. Official | ||
| 2012-12-18 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2012-12-18 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Washer Operator | ||
| 2012-12-18 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Dredge/Barge Operator | ||
| 2012-12-18 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Cleanup Man | ||
| 2012-12-18 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Dry Screen Plant Operator | ||
| 2010-03-30 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Cleanup Man | ||
| 2010-03-30 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.14 | Dredge/Barge Operator | ||
| 2010-03-30 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Mechanic | ||
| 2010-03-30 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Mechanic | ||
| 2010-03-30 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator |
SWN SAND COMPANY registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2016.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2015 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2014 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2013 | 5.39 | 1.80 | 0.000 |
| 2012 | 5.16 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2011 | 4.40 | 1.47 | 0.000 |
| 2010 | 11.16 | 3.19 | 0.000 |
| 2009 * | 7.49 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Southwestern Energy Production Company 2008 a 2014
- SWN PRODUCTION (ARKANSAS), LLC 2014 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 4 |
| 2017 | 7 |
| 2016 | 10 |
| 2015 | 41 |
| 2014 | 50 |
| 2013 | 48 |
| 2012 | 49 |
| 2011 | 53 |
| 2010 | 47 |
| 2009 | 23 |
| 2008 | 15 |
SWN SAND COMPANY se ubica en Pulaski County, Arkansas, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 0.2% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Q2 | 2,028 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 2,607 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 1,192 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 2,857 | 4 | 0 | 1400.1 |
| 2017 Q2 | 3,550 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 8,081 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 9,386 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 6,755 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 31 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Q2 | 2,713 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 7,486 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 17,288 | 1 | 0 | 57.8 |
| 2015 Q3 | 19,390 | 3 | 0 | 154.7 |
| 2015 Q2 | 23,799 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 27,272 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 28,785 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 29,475 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 29,523 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 29,061 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 29,048 | 4 | 0 | 137.7 |
| 2013 Q3 | 28,102 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 26,556 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 27,675 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 27,070 | 1 | 0 | 36.9 |
| 2012 Q3 | 28,192 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 28,678 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 32,335 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 30,849 | 5 | 0 | 162.1 |
| 2011 Q3 | 34,208 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 35,416 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 35,811 | 1 | 1 | 27.9 |
| 2010 Q4 | 35,310 | 4 | 0 | 113.3 |
| 2010 Q3 | 32,883 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 28,283 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 28,999 | 10 | 0 | 344.8 |
| 2009 Q4 | 30,483 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 12,274 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 5,373 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 5,260 | 2 | 0 | 380.2 |
| 2008 Q4 | 4,489 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
19 en archivo2013 · 3 incidentes
Employee was using cutting torch to remove a damaged piece of 1/8" angle from the roof support on generator containment. Employee began removing by cutting the right side where it was connected to the structure. when the cut was complete, stored energy caused the angle to move hitting the employee in the lip causing a cut.
Employee was tightening bolt on dredge and felt pain in back. Employee had previous back condition, prior to employment.
2012 · 4 incidentes
Employee was stepping over a raised 10" pipe on the dredge. The employee did not see that there was a small (3") pipe laying on the ground on the other side of the 10" pipe. When he moved his left leg over the 10" pipe his foot came down on the smaller pipe causing him to roll his ankle.
Employee was sweeping the control room at the end of his shift using a broom when metal handle broke approximately 2' from the end of the handle cutting his middle finger.
Employee got foreign material in his left eye
Employee was on top of trac trailer opening hatches and checking for debris. Truck began move forward, when this happened employee's retractable lanyard (which was attached to life line system) locked into place causing employee to be jerked backwards landing on top of trailer.
2011 · 3 incidentes
Injured was performing maintenance on a 14' screw conveyor and when employee turned the shaft manually his (R) pinky finger became pinched between the belt and the shive pulley. His fingernail became detached. Injured was taken to the Emergency Room and treated. The fingernail was reattached with two stitches to keep the nail in place while healing.
Employee was removing a pump from a 500 gallon above ground storage tank. As he was removing the pump diesel drained from the suction tube and splashed on the employees face which ran into his eyes.
Employee reported to his supervisor approximately 1 1/2 hours after his shift ended that his back was hurting and wasn't sure what he did to hurt it. He went to the doctor and reported that he was having back spasms.
2010 · 7 incidentes
Employee strained his left knee while attempting to get a piece of equipment unstuck and stepped down into a shallow rut.
Employee was shoveling sand and reported that he hurt his back while twisting to load the sand into a wheel burrow.
Employee was shoveling spilled material from overhead conveyor systems into a wheel barrow and he claimed to have strained his lower back while dumping the wheel barrow.
Employee reported to have severe pain in his lower back and was taken to the doctor and later diagnosed with kidney stones. He was off for several weeks before we learned that he was referred to a specialist for a work related injury with having a compressed disc/nerve.
Employee was helping another employee to exit a surge hopper that was taken out of service for maintenance. During the process, the employee that was doing the lifting strained his lower back.
Injured stated incident happened on 2/1/2010 but did not report the incident until 2/2/2010. At first it was believed to be a spider bite but now the medical doctor is stating it is a staff infection and is treating employee for a staff infection.
Injured was assisting in lifting a portable stair with a total of five people. The lift was eight inches. When the group made the lift, injured felt pain in his lower back. He was taken to Baptist Medical Clinic in Little Rock, AR.
2009 · 2 incidentes
INJURED WAS MOVING A POWERED STACKER CONVEYOR HOLDING THE START BUTTON IN THE ON POSTION AS THE CONVEYOR MOVED WHEN HIS RIGHT THUMB SLIPPED OFF AND HE APPLIED ALL HIS FORCE RESULTING IN A SPRAIN/STRAIN TO HIS RIGHT THUMB.
INJURED WAS WALKING ACROSS A FIELD OF MUD WHEN HE STEPPED INTO SOME SOFT MUD APPROXIMATELY 8" DEEP, TURNED TO LOOK BEHIND HIMSELF, TWISTED HIS RIGHT KNEE.