At around 8PM on January 22nd, the Jet Mill Bagger was attempting to cut open a pallet of new bags and slipped causing a finger laceration that required stiches to repair. The bagger was using a box cutter to cut off the plastic banding used to secure the pallet loads.
Huber Specialty Hydrates, LLC: 164 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
Huber Specialty Hydrates, LLC tiene $56K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $242 pendientes en 10 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Huber Specialty Hydrates, LLC.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 28
- Años en registro
- 2012–2025
- Último incidente
- Jan 2025
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Huber Specialty Hydrates, LLC tiene $56K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $242 pendientes en 10 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 15 · 38%
- Anuladas o retiradas 24 · 62%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT 2022-0170 | Settlement | Miller | 2022 | $10K → $2K |
| CENT 2021-0010 | Settlement | Miller | 2021 | $8K → $152 |
| CENT 2025-0230 | Withdrawal | Simonton | 2025 | $5K → $0 |
| CENT 2025-0358 | Withdrawal | Simonton | 2025 | $4K → $0 |
| CENT 2024-0004 | Settlement | Simonton | 2024 | $3K → $167 |
| CENT 2024-0140 | Settlement | Bulluck | 2024 | $1K → $147 |
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2023-12-21
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Arsenic dust6
- Beryllium dust6
- Cadmium dust & salts6
- Chromium, soluble6
Ver los análisis individuales (100)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-21 | Molybdenum fumes | 0 | 20 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Manganese fumes | 0.08 | 5 | 0.02 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Magnesium oxide fumes | 0 | 20 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Lead fumes | 0 | 450 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Iron oxide fumes | 0.78 | 20 | 0.04 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Copper fumes | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Cobalt fumes | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Zinc oxide fumes | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Vanadium fumes | 0 | 50 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Nickel fumes | 0 | 3 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Arsenic fumes | 0 | 1500 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Beryllium fumes | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Cadmium oxide fumes | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Chromium, insoluble | 0 | 3 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Cobalt fumes | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Copper fumes | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Iron oxide fumes | 0.04 | 20 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Lead fumes | 0 | 450 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Magnesium oxide fumes | 0 | 20 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Manganese fumes | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Molybdenum fumes | 0 | 20 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Nickel fumes | 0 | 3 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Vanadium fumes | 0 | 50 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Zinc oxide fumes | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Arsenic fumes | 0 | 1500 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Beryllium fumes | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Cadmium oxide fumes | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Chromium, insoluble | 0 | 3 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Cobalt fumes | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Copper fumes | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Iron oxide fumes | 0.01 | 20 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Lead fumes | 0 | 450 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Magnesium oxide fumes | 0 | 20 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Manganese fumes | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Molybdenum fumes | 0 | 20 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Nickel fumes | 0 | 3 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Vanadium fumes | 0 | 50 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Zinc oxide fumes | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Arsenic fumes | 0 | 1500 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Beryllium fumes | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Cadmium oxide fumes | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2023-12-21 | Chromium, insoluble | 0 | 3 | 0.00 | Welder, etc. |
| 2019-05-07 | Manganese dust | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Molybdenum dust | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Nickel dust & salts | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Vanadium dust | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Arsenic dust | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Beryllium dust | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Cadmium dust & salts | 0 | 200 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Chromium, soluble | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Cobalt dust | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Copper dust and mist | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Lead, inorganic dust | 0 | 150 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Manganese dust | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Molybdenum dust | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Nickel dust & salts | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Vanadium dust | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Mechanic |
| 2019-05-07 | Arsenic dust | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Electrician |
| 2019-05-07 | Beryllium dust | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | Electrician |
| 2019-05-07 | Cadmium dust & salts | 0 | 200 | 0.00 | Electrician |
| 2019-05-07 | Chromium, soluble | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Electrician |
| 2019-05-07 | Cobalt dust | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Electrician |
| 2019-05-07 | Copper dust and mist | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Electrician |
| 2019-05-07 | Lead, inorganic dust | 0 | 150 | 0.00 | Electrician |
| 2019-05-07 | Molybdenum dust | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Electrician |
| 2019-05-07 | Nickel dust & salts | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Electrician |
| 2019-05-07 | Vanadium dust | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Electrician |
| 2019-05-07 | Manganese dust | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Electrician |
| 2019-05-07 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.14 | 10 | 0.01 | Forklift Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Arsenic dust | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Beryllium dust | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Cadmium dust & salts | 0 | 200 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Chromium, soluble | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Cobalt dust | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Copper dust and mist | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Lead, inorganic dust | 0 | 150 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Manganese dust | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Molybdenum dust | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Nickel dust & salts | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Vanadium dust | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Arsenic dust | 3.28 | 500 | 0.01 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Beryllium dust | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Cadmium dust & salts | 0 | 200 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Chromium, soluble | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Cobalt dust | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Copper dust and mist | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Lead, inorganic dust | 0 | 150 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Manganese dust | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Molybdenum dust | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Nickel dust & salts | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Vanadium dust | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Bagging Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Arsenic dust | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Forklift Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Beryllium dust | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | Forklift Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Cadmium dust & salts | 0 | 200 | 0.00 | Forklift Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Chromium, soluble | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | Forklift Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Cobalt dust | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Forklift Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Copper dust and mist | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Forklift Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Lead, inorganic dust | 0 | 150 | 0.00 | Forklift Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Manganese dust | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Forklift Operator |
| 2019-05-07 | Molybdenum dust | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Forklift Operator |
Huber Specialty Hydrates, LLC registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2024.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2023 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 | 3.63 | 2.72 | 0.000 |
| 2021 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 | 2.40 | 2.40 | 0.000 |
| 2019 | 3.44 | 3.44 | 0.000 |
| 2018 | 3.88 | 2.58 | 0.000 |
| 2017 | 5.37 | 2.69 | 0.000 |
- Huber Specialty Hydrates, LLC 2011 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 78 |
| 2024 | 76 |
| 2023 | 78 |
| 2022 | 81 |
| 2021 | 74 |
| 2020 | 76 |
| 2019 | 75 |
| 2018 | 74 |
| 2017 | 71 |
| 2016 | 64 |
| 2015 | 63 |
| 2014 | 62 |
| 2013 | 57 |
| 2012 | 54 |
Huber Specialty Hydrates, LLC se ubica en Saline County, Arkansas, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 0.1% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 39,085 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 48,329 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 42,755 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 48,017 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 43,104 | 4 | 0 | 92.8 |
| 2024 Q2 | 47,485 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 37,834 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 47,092 | 2 | 0 | 42.5 |
Mostrar 46 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Q3 | 37,881 | 8 | 0 | 211.2 |
| 2023 Q2 | 45,621 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 41,808 | 5 | 0 | 119.6 |
| 2022 Q4 | 49,449 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 47,959 | 3 | 0 | 62.6 |
| 2022 Q2 | 82,428 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 40,534 | 7 | 4 | 172.7 |
| 2021 Q4 | 46,688 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 43,929 | 5 | 1 | 113.8 |
| 2021 Q2 | 16,500 | 4 | 0 | 242.4 |
| 2021 Q1 | 35,647 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 39,334 | 7 | 1 | 178.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 36,423 | 4 | 0 | 109.8 |
| 2020 Q2 | 48,210 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 42,886 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 47,229 | 11 | 1 | 232.9 |
| 2019 Q3 | 44,774 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 38,575 | 12 | 2 | 311.1 |
| 2019 Q1 | 44,020 | 8 | 1 | 181.7 |
| 2018 Q4 | 40,823 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 39,388 | 6 | 1 | 152.3 |
| 2018 Q2 | 37,519 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 37,029 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 37,937 | 10 | 0 | 263.6 |
| 2017 Q3 | 38,410 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 37,375 | 3 | 0 | 80.3 |
| 2017 Q1 | 35,196 | 4 | 0 | 113.6 |
| 2016 Q4 | 38,400 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 12,891 | 11 | 2 | 853.3 |
| 2016 Q2 | 32,927 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 35,854 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 36,409 | 5 | 1 | 137.3 |
| 2015 Q3 | 32,949 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 33,438 | 4 | 1 | 119.6 |
| 2015 Q1 | 30,337 | 4 | 0 | 131.9 |
| 2014 Q4 | 28,578 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 32,060 | 3 | 0 | 93.6 |
| 2014 Q2 | 31,624 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 30,620 | 6 | 0 | 196.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 33,848 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 29,079 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 30,307 | 2 | 0 | 66.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 26,656 | 3 | 1 | 112.5 |
| 2012 Q4 | 28,863 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 27,056 | 5 | 2 | 184.8 |
| 2012 Q2 | 22,360 | 1 | 0 | 44.7 |
Incidentes reportables
28 en archivo2025 · 2 incidentes
Operator was stepping down off of a ladder after closing a valve when EE rolled their right ankle.
2022 · 4 incidentes
Employee was removing a bearing from a pump shaft. The employee cut the bearing in two places then used a hammer and chisel to separate the races of the bearing. When hammering on the bearing race, a small sliver from the bearing housing broke off and struck the employee on the left wrist.
Operator was walking down a flight of stairs and sprained right knee. EE was not carrying anything, rushing and was using the handrail. EE was treated with prescription medication and physical therapy and given work restrictions.
The operator was hammering the locking ring handle on the discharge valve of the south EW pump. When the operator struck the locking ring and it broke free, the turning handle spun striking the operators right index finger holding the hammer. This impact caused a "crush injury" right above the nail bed.
Operator was shoveling material off of the mezzanine at the bulk loading area into a drop chute when they sprained their back. Reported incident to the supervisor Thursday 3/10/22 but didn't request medical attention until Friday 3/11/22. Diagnosed with back sprain and given medication and restrictions.
2020 · 2 incidentes
Employee didn't follow procedure and attempted to clean the bulk loading belt while in operation. Employee's hand was pulled through the pinch point between the troughing idler and the conveyor. Right hand bone broke.
Employee was shoveling dry material from the ground. About 10 mins into the process, complained about shoulder hurting. Medical evaluation resulted in restricted duty for 3 days. Huber does not have a light duty system, results in LTI until 100% released.
2019 · 3 incidentes
Facility had rain after several days and floors were wet causing the employee to slip and bend knee backwards.
A B45 Operator was dumping the presses into the dump truck. The Operator backed the truck under the second press, turned off the truck and in the process of stepping out of the truck twisted an ankle. The truck was parked rather close to the containment curb and the Operator stepped on the curb while exiting.
Employee reported that EE has been experiencing pain in the groin area for about a week. Nothing was reported to management until 3-26-2019. EE was sent to the company doctor for evaluation. The treatment: no lifting more than 20lb, and a Rx for pain. Our site can not accommodate the restrictions, Thus the injury will result in an LTI until a full release from doctor.
2018 · 3 incidentes
Operator was unhooking a 1" hose when operator felt a pain in arm. ER visit determined a strained shoulder and issued Rx and a follow up visit.
Employee reported that they had slipped on flat, dry concrete causing an ankle to turn. The employee was treated at a local clinic for a pulled muscle and returned to work with restrictions. Company policy prevents employees working with restrictions, so employee was sent home until they receive a full release from the doctor.
Construction co. employee cut arm on a metal building section while erecting a new building on site.
2017 · 4 incidentes
Operator was placing an empty super sack on a forklift. During the act of pulling the loops in place employee felt a sharp pain in the right shoulder. Dr. determined the injury to be rotator cuff strain.
Employee was cleaning a filter and got caustic slurry on pants leg. The employee decided to put on rubber boots and tucked the wet pants leg into the rubber boots. The caustic caused the employee to receive 2nd degree burns.
Associate was breaking in 50 lb bags at a rework station when the left hand cramped such that the associate was not able to open employee's hand.
Employee was thawing out frozen pipe lines with a torch. Employee immediately grabbed a valve handle to open it after applying heat from the torch. The employee burned the pinky and ring fingers on right hand.
2016 · 7 incidentes
Manual handling of 50 lb bags of finished goods in preparation for shipping.
employee stated EE felt a pop in EE's back when using a sledge hammer to clear product from a blocked feeder.
Employee was getting out of bobcat and foot slipped, causing employee to fall to the side of the unit. Right arm fell between two spare buckets next to the unit and was twisted, dislocating elbow.
Employee got dehydrated and went to the hospital for some IV fluids.
Employee went to the Dr. on their own. Employee said hand had been bothering them so they wanted to get it checked. The Dr. stated it was a repetitive motion injury and put the employee on restrictions for 2 weeks.
Employee was working 435 packaging line on 4/11/16. Employee states that left shoulder started hurting because of work at the rework station or getting on and off of the forklift.
The employee was working on tank 69/70 conveyor head pulley. To get the motor and gear assembly out from under the platform they had to use a pry bar so they could chain hoist it out. While moving the assembly EE felt a pop in right forearm. The pop was instantaneous and EE did not stop working. Employee did not want to see Dr until 3/22 they referred to specialist on 4/7.
2013 · 2 incidentes
Employee was removing the east end of slurry heater. Employee dropped a nut and when the nut hit the floor it landed in some product and it splashed into the employees right eye. Employee was wearing safety glasses, but he had removed his goggles after the first break had occurred. Employee used eyewash and saw Dr who prescribed antibiotic eye drops as a precaution.
Employee operating forklift on access road and was stung by a bee.
2012 · 1 incidente
On June 9, 2012 at approximately 6:40am an employee stepped in a puddle of caustic slurry. The employee did not notify supervision of the incident until Tues June 12th. The employee received burns to both of her feet. Any notification of supervision within approximately one hour of contact with this weak caustic would have prevented a recordable and lost work day.