EE was using a 3 lbs. hammer to insert a chain link pin into the conveyor chain of a buggy. Struck left hand ring finger on chain sprocket breaking finger near top knuckle.
Bismarck Mine: 243 MSHA citations Coal
Bismarck Mine has $130K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 6 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Bismarck Mine.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 10
- Years on record
- 2010–2015
- Latest incident
- Jun 2015
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.Bismarck Mine has $130K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 6 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 6 · 86%
- Vacated or withdrawn 1 · 14%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEVA 2012-741 | Settlement | Feldman | 2015 | $70K → $50K |
| WEVA 2011-2022 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2012 | $11K → $5K |
| WEVA 2011-2006 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2012 | $6K → $4K |
| WEVA 2012-608 | Settlement | Feldman | 2015 | $5K → $4K |
| WEVA 2012-981 | Withdrawal | Feldman | 2013 | $4K → $0 |
| WEVA 2012-557 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2014 | $1K → $100 |
MSHA sampling at Bismarck Mine shows 93% of 332 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2016-11-07, 9 years ago
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.ⓘ
The excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR155
- SHUTTLE CAR OPERATOR (STANDARD SIDE)25
- ROOF BOLTER (TWIN HEAD) (RETURN SIDE)23
Silica (quartz)
Last sampled: 2015-07-07, 11 years ago- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR11
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2016-11-07, 9 years ago
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- ROOF BOLTER (TWIN HEAD) (RETURN SIDE)7
- SHUTTLE CAR OPERATOR (STANDARD SIDE)7
- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR6
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 100% | 3 |
| 2015 | 100% | 41 |
| 2012 | 97% | 132 |
| 2011 | 90% | 134 |
| 2010 | 77% | 22 |
| Year | silica avg (%) | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3.4 | 6 |
| 2012 | 4.7 | 5 |
| 2011 | 5.1 | 4 |
| 2010 | 5.6 | 5 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0% | 2 |
| 2015 | 0% | 9 |
| 2012 | 8% | 24 |
| 2011 | 0% | 6 |
| 2010 | 25% | 4 |
Bismarck Mine recorded 3.45 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2012.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 3.45 | 3.45 | 0.000 |
| 2011 | 4.71 | 1.57 | 0.000 |
- Vindex Energy Corp, 2010 to 2014
- Taylor Minerals, Inc. 2014 to 2015
- Vindex Energy LLC 2015 to present
ⓘ
Coal production is reported quarterly and lags the current period; the most recent quarters may be incomplete.| Year | Employees | Coal produced (tons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 3 | |
| 2016 | 2 | |
| 2015 | 19 | 51,431 |
| 2014 | 3 | |
| 2013 | 3 | 304 |
| 2012 | 47 | 132,974 |
| 2011 | 50 | 119,574 |
| 2010 | 12 | 5,017 |
Bismarck Mine sits in Grant County, West Virginia, where the Census mining category is 1.9% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Q1 | 1,201 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 967 | 1 | 0 | 1034.1 |
| 2016 Q2 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 340 | 1 | 0 | 2941.2 |
| 2015 Q4 | 240 | 4 | 0 | 16666.7 |
| 2015 Q2 | 16,977 | 21 | 1 | 1237.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 1,449 | 1 | 0 | 690.1 |
| 2014 Q2 | 1,556 | 2 | 0 | 1285.3 |
Show 16 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Q1 | 1,580 | 1 | 0 | 632.9 |
| 2013 Q4 | 1,550 | 1 | 0 | 645.2 |
| 2013 Q3 | 1,667 | 1 | 0 | 599.9 |
| 2013 Q2 | 2,044 | 3 | 0 | 1467.7 |
| 2013 Q1 | 1,513 | 1 | 0 | 660.9 |
| 2012 Q4 | 10,526 | 13 | 4 | 1235.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 28,445 | 15 | 5 | 527.3 |
| 2012 Q2 | 41,065 | 10 | 1 | 243.5 |
| 2012 Q1 | 35,982 | 29 | 9 | 806.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 33,585 | 17 | 6 | 506.2 |
| 2011 Q3 | 35,961 | 19 | 7 | 528.4 |
| 2011 Q2 | 37,249 | 14 | 2 | 375.8 |
| 2011 Q1 | 20,712 | 18 | 1 | 869.1 |
| 2010 Q4 | 14,003 | 19 | 13 | 1356.9 |
| 2010 Q3 | 4,975 | 6 | 3 | 1206.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reportable incidents
10 on file2015 · 1 incident
2012 · 2 incidents
Due to horseplay, injured EE was pushed, lost his balance & twisted his shoulder as he caught himself. Dr. determined EE had strained shoulder muscle which resulted in 1st aid incident. He was revaluated by an orthopedic surgeon & determined to have a torn rotator cuff. Surgery conducted on 1/17/13. At a follow up on 1/21/13 the dr wouldn't release back to modified work.
While scaling loose material from the corner of the #4 Entry at the #21 Block, employee was struck by loose material in the right lower leg. Resulted in a fracture to the second metatarsal on the right foot. X-Ray could not be confirmed until 4/30/2012 due to inflammation. Employee worked on modified job duty until 5/7/2012 then went out as LTA due to Corporate policy.
2011 · 5 incidents
EE felt sick at work and wanted to go home. His daughter came and picked him up and took him to the doctor. Drs at hospital thought he had a mild heart attack. At that time company reported to MSHA. The following day it was determined that it was not a heart attack but his gallbladder.
The bolter blower had been repaired and the lids were ready to be replaced. EE injured was assisting another EE to lift the lids back into place. He bent down to lift up the lids and while lifting turned slightly. Upon turning he felt a pull in the lower left side of his back and dropped down to one knee in pain. The EE was transported to area hospital for medical evaluation.
Upon further investigation it was noted that the principal injured fell, striking his head on the batteries as a result of horseplay. The injured employee jumped on the back of another employee & he fell to the ground when the uninvolved employee leaned forward. When the principal injured fell forward this resulted in a small laceration above his left eye which required 2 sutures.
The employee was seriously injured when he was caught between the rib in the #9 heading and the #2 roof bolter machine being operated in the No. 1 North East Main Section. The bolter was hung up and was being pulled by a scoop. The roof bolter slid to the left pinning the employee. The employee sustained a fractured pelvis and required hospitalization as a result.
Principal injured was removing the service jack off the side of the #2 Shuttle Car. He took bolts out of the jack and was removing for maintenance. The jack fell pinching his hand against shuttle car and lacerating middle finger. Employee cleaned and bandaged the wound and completed his shift. He later visited a physician and received thirteen stitches to his middle finger.
2010 · 2 incidents
The miner was assisting in the installation of a Heintzmann beam when it fell from the king rail and struck in on the left hand breaking one of his fingers.
The miner was assisting in the installation of a Heintzmann beam when it fell from the king rail and struck him on the left hand breaking one of his fingers.