EE was putting a piece of steel inside wash plant to be bolted with two people. EE was on outside putting bolt through steel. Steel slipped from the inside and smashed EE's finger against chute. Resulted in hairline fracture of middle knuckle on right index finger.
C A Langford Co Inc: 206 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
C A Langford Co Inc has $115K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 4 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at C A Langford Co Inc.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 25
- Years on record
- 1984–2026
- Latest incident
- May 2026
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.C A Langford Co Inc has $115K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 4 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 9 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE 2010-335M | Settlement | Gill | 2013 | $47K → $24K |
| SE 2008-769M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2009 | $16K → $11K |
| SE 2009-121M | Settlement | Barbour | 2010 | $10K → $4K |
| SE 2009-519M | Settlement | Miller | 2011 | $920 → $690 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2025-03-25
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz131 over
- Respirable dust, <.1mg12
- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz11
- Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz1
Show the individual readings (37)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-07-17 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 17.49 | 1.93 | 9.06 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2025-03-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2025-03-25 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.23 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2025-03-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2023-08-29 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2023-08-29 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.15 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2023-08-29 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2022-09-07 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2022-09-07 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.12 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2022-09-07 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2017-09-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2017-09-20 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.44 | 10 | 0.04 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2017-09-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Dry Screen Plant Operator | ||
| 2017-09-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2016-08-03 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.15 | 10 | 0.02 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2016-08-03 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.16 | 10 | 0.02 | Screen/Scalper Operator |
| 2013-11-05 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.3 | 2.09 | 0.14 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2013-11-05 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.16 | 10 | 0.02 | Mechanic |
| 2012-04-25 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.13 | 10 | 0.01 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2012-04-25 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.17 | 1.62 | 0.10 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2012-04-25 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.55 | 1.35 | 0.41 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2006-12-20 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.26 | 10 | 0.03 | Backhoe Operator |
| 2006-12-20 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.15 | 10 | 0.02 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2005-02-08 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.3 | 2.05 | 0.15 | Jackhammer Operator |
| 2005-02-08 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2005-02-08 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.68 | 2.92 | 0.23 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2005-02-08 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.37 | 2.74 | 0.14 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2005-02-08 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.19 | 1.71 | 0.11 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2003-01-28 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 3.08 | 3.21 | 0.96 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2003-01-28 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.7 | 2.17 | 0.32 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2003-01-28 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.8 | 2.97 | 0.27 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2003-01-28 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 1.3 | 10 | 0.13 | Truck Driver |
| 2003-01-28 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.22 | 10 | 0.02 | Truck Driver |
| 2002-07-17 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2002-07-17 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.25 | 10 | 0.03 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2002-07-17 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.18 | 10 | 0.02 | Truck Driver |
| 2002-07-17 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator |
C A Langford Co Inc recorded 6.41 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2025.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 6.41 | 3.20 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 3.42 | 3.42 | 0.000 |
| 2023 * | 3.43 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 4.43 | 4.43 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 5.04 | 5.04 | 0.000 |
- C A Langford Company Inc 1950 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 26 |
| 2025 | 26 |
| 2024 | 23 |
| 2023 | 24 |
| 2022 | 22 |
| 2021 | 22 |
| 2020 | 20 |
| 2019 | 17 |
| 2018 | 16 |
| 2017 | 16 |
| 2016 | 18 |
| 2015 | 17 |
| 2014 | 14 |
| 2013 | 14 |
| 2012 | 15 |
| 2011 | 17 |
| 2010 | 17 |
| 2009 | 17 |
| 2008 | 17 |
| 2007 | 19 |
| 2006 | 18 |
| 2005 | 18 |
| 2004 | 18 |
| 2003 | 18 |
| 2002 | 16 |
| 2001 | 16 |
| 2000 | 16 |
C A Langford Co Inc sits in Marshall County, Alabama, where the Census mining category is 0.1% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 15,874 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 14,727 | 2 | 1 | 135.8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 15,209 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 16,705 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 15,890 | 1 | 1 | 62.9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 14,600 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 14,957 | 3 | 0 | 200.6 |
| 2024 Q3 | 15,048 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 98 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 14,982 | 3 | 0 | 200.2 |
| 2024 Q1 | 13,567 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 13,731 | 3 | 2 | 218.5 |
| 2023 Q3 | 14,731 | 5 | 1 | 339.4 |
| 2023 Q2 | 14,728 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 15,163 | 5 | 2 | 329.8 |
| 2022 Q4 | 13,705 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 13,097 | 2 | 0 | 152.7 |
| 2022 Q2 | 12,130 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 13,773 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 13,424 | 1 | 0 | 74.5 |
| 2021 Q3 | 13,304 | 2 | 0 | 150.3 |
| 2021 Q2 | 13,662 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 12,704 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 12,466 | 3 | 1 | 240.7 |
| 2020 Q3 | 12,928 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 12,242 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 11,934 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 12,043 | 1 | 0 | 83.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 12,269 | 1 | 0 | 81.5 |
| 2019 Q2 | 11,102 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 9,683 | 1 | 0 | 103.3 |
| 2018 Q4 | 9,566 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 9,548 | 3 | 1 | 314.2 |
| 2018 Q2 | 10,383 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 10,223 | 1 | 0 | 97.8 |
| 2017 Q4 | 10,525 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 9,680 | 1 | 0 | 103.3 |
| 2017 Q2 | 10,095 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 9,473 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 9,223 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 9,906 | 1 | 0 | 100.9 |
| 2016 Q2 | 9,822 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 9,074 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 8,863 | 2 | 0 | 225.7 |
| 2015 Q3 | 9,015 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 9,591 | 2 | 1 | 208.5 |
| 2015 Q1 | 6,800 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 6,500 | 3 | 1 | 461.5 |
| 2014 Q3 | 7,150 | 4 | 1 | 559.4 |
| 2014 Q2 | 7,431 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 6,045 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 6,405 | 3 | 0 | 468.4 |
| 2013 Q3 | 6,984 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 7,088 | 3 | 0 | 423.3 |
| 2013 Q1 | 6,458 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 6,955 | 3 | 2 | 431.3 |
| 2012 Q3 | 7,328 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 7,591 | 2 | 1 | 263.5 |
| 2012 Q1 | 7,955 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 8,100 | 3 | 0 | 370.4 |
| 2011 Q3 | 8,125 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 8,506 | 5 | 1 | 587.8 |
| 2011 Q1 | 7,562 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 10,455 | 2 | 0 | 191.3 |
| 2010 Q3 | 9,953 | 3 | 2 | 301.4 |
| 2010 Q2 | 8,440 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 7,361 | 3 | 1 | 407.6 |
| 2009 Q4 | 8,549 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 8,825 | 4 | 1 | 453.3 |
| 2009 Q2 | 9,243 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 7,405 | 7 | 0 | 945.3 |
| 2008 Q4 | 9,262 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 2,950 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 10,261 | 9 | 3 | 877.1 |
| 2008 Q1 | 9,652 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 10,282 | 8 | 0 | 778.1 |
| 2007 Q3 | 8,603 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 9,600 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 9,925 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 9,362 | 6 | 3 | 640.9 |
| 2006 Q3 | 10,002 | 10 | 5 | 999.8 |
| 2006 Q2 | 9,832 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 9,238 | 1 | 0 | 108.2 |
| 2005 Q4 | 10,292 | 8 | 3 | 777.3 |
| 2005 Q3 | 10,799 | 2 | 1 | 185.2 |
| 2005 Q2 | 10,290 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 8,993 | 4 | 2 | 444.8 |
| 2004 Q4 | 9,470 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 9,613 | 13 | 7 | 1352.3 |
| 2004 Q2 | 10,033 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 9,044 | 5 | 2 | 552.9 |
| 2003 Q4 | 10,213 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 10,250 | 7 | 3 | 682.9 |
| 2003 Q2 | 9,270 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 9,039 | 6 | 3 | 663.8 |
| 2002 Q4 | 8,594 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 8,887 | 17 | 8 | 1912.9 |
| 2002 Q2 | 8,776 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 8,721 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 8,892 | 7 | 1 | 787.2 |
| 2001 Q3 | 8,801 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 8,772 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 7,569 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 7,480 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 9,103 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 7,925 | 2 | 0 | 252.4 |
| 2000 Q1 | 7,659 | 2 | 1 | 261.1 |
Reportable incidents
25 on file2026 · 1 incident
2025 · 2 incidents
EE(1) and EE(2) were drilling holes in rubber to attach to the scalping screen. EE(2) was drilling while injured EE(1) was holding the rubber. Another EE(3) was just outside of scalping screen. EE(3) could have been used by EE(2) and EE(1) to communicate before drilling. This resulted in EE(1) getting their right palm injured by the drill. EE(1) got three heavy duty stitches.
Lifting a 4d battery out of a komatsu 480 loader. EE hurt EE's lower back during this. Drove self to the dr. @ 11 am that morning and got x-ray. Had an MRI scheduled that friday. x -ray showed herniated L5 disk.
2024 · 1 incident
Operator was in a 490 Komatsu excavator loading a 405 Komatsu haul truck for production. As operator was loading the bucket slipped off of a rock. When the bucket slipped, the machine jarred, resulting in a muscle pull. Operator was able to drive self to the doctor. X-Ray's were performed to verify only a muscle strain. Operator was off for 2 days and returned to work.
2023 · 1 incident
Rock Fell from overhead screen deck and struck miner. EE did not lose consciousness. Had a laceration to EE's head. Was taken to Hospital to be safe. EE did not need stitches and was checked to make sure EE did not have a concussion.
2022 · 1 incident
felt a sharp pain when exiting the truck, strain to low back
2019 · 1 incident
Back Injury, Not sure of exact time/date of injury. Seems to be cumulative from clean-ups while shoveling.
2018 · 2 incidents
The delivery driver was exiting truck when ee slipped and fell to the ground, fracturing left hip
Setting caterpillar water pump, the fill pipe swung and struck employee in the shoulder/neck area.
2017 · 2 incidents
Was changing hammers on Stedman impact crusher. Ratchet slipped and finger was caught between 3/4" drive ratchet and outside edge of crusher. Resulting in a loss of distal phalange index finger.
Slipped while climbing up to operate a piece of mobile equipment. Initially thought just sprained ankle but it ended up being a broken ankle.
2015 · 1 incident
Strain of the calf muscle. We were setting a pump due to the extreme rain. He pulled his calf muscle while placing pipe. The slope (which was not extreme) may have helped cause the muscle strain.
2014 · 1 incident
Slipped coming down ladder on his front end loader.
2013 · 1 incident
Employee lifted a tank and strained his back.
2006 · 2 incidents
Employee was operating the Track hoe in the pit. He backed the machine over a 2' to 3' diameter rock. The resulting jar caused him to tear abdominal muscles. Unsure of the tear's severity until MRI is performed.
Massive Heart Attack of Primary Crusher operator
2005 · 1 incident
EE STARTED HAVING CHEST PAINS. HE NOTIFIED HIS FOREMAN HE DID NOT FEEL WELL & DROVE HIMSELF TO HOSPITAL. THEY CHECKED HIS HEART & SAID IT WAS UNDER STRESS, BUT HE HAD NOT HAD HEART ATTACK. THEY PERFORMED ANOTHER EKG LATER & EE STARTED TO HAVE A HEART ATTACK. FLOWN TO 2ND HOSPITAL. 7 BLOCKAGES FOUND. BYPASS SURGERY ON 6/29/05 (DELAYED DUE TO PNEUMONIA). DOING OK AS OF 7/1.
2002 · 1 incident
REACHED ACROSS CONVEYER TO REMOVE ROCK. HURT BACK DUE TO STRETCH. ALREADY HAD A PREVIOUS BACK PROBLEM FROM NON-WORK RELATED INJURY. REMOVING THE ROCK REAGGRAVATED THE INJURY.
2000 · 1 incident
EYES WERE IRRITATED FROM WATCHING WELDER.
1998 · 1 incident
CLOSED STEEL CHUTE ON FINGER, RESULTED IN STITCHES AND FRACTURED FINGER. SHOULD HAVE USED LEVER WHEN CLOSING CHUTE.
1992 · 1 incident
ONE LOADER WAS CHARGING THE DENSE GRADE PLANT AND THE SECOND WAS LOADING THE FINISHED PRODUCT ON TRUCKS. THESE TWO LOADERS REAR-ENDED.
1990 · 3 incidents
REPLACING TIN ROOF CUT RIGHT WRIST ON TIN.
EMPLOYEE A TTACHED CABLE TO PORTABLE WATER TANK WHICH WAS TO BE PICKED UP BY LOADER & SET ON DUMP TRUCK EMPLOYEE MISJUDGED 15FT JUMP & FOOT LANDED ON SIDE OF TIRE & FRACTURED LEFT ANKLE
METAL IN EYE, CONDITIONS UNKNOWN.
1984 · 1 incident
MASHED FINGER REPLACING WEAR PLATE ON PRIMARY CRUSHER.