EE was operating a dozer and was attempting to move a large rock when the blade slipped which resulted in a sudden jar.
Middle Fork Surface: 189 MSHA citations Coal
Middle Fork Surface has $52K in proposed MSHA penalties and $2K outstanding across 2 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Middle Fork Surface.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 14
- Years on record
- 1993–2009
- Latest incident
- Apr 2009
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Middle Fork Surface has $52K in proposed MSHA penalties and $2K outstanding across 2 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 2 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENT 2010-537 | Settlement | 2010 | $8K → $6K | |
| KENT 2004-259 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2004 | $500 → $400 |
MSHA sampling at Middle Fork Surface shows 99% of 113 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2010-04-13, 16 years ago
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR43
- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR26
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER24
Silica (quartz)
Last sampled: 2009-11-13, 16 years ago- BULLDOZER OPERATOR6
- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR3
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER1
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2010-04-13, 16 years ago
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR11
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER11
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE10
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 100% | 3 |
| 2009 | 100% | 17 |
| 2008 | 100% | 11 |
| 2007 | 100% | 4 |
| 2004 | 100% | 14 |
| 2002 | 100% | 8 |
| 2001 | 100% | 7 |
| 2000 | 98% | 49 |
| Year | silica avg (%) | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 41.6 | 1 |
| 2002 | 52.0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 15.9 | 8 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 0% | 3 |
| 2009 | 0% | 10 |
| 2008 | 0% | 10 |
| 2004 | 0% | 8 |
| 2000 | 38% | 13 |
Middle Fork Surface recorded 3.97 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2009.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 3.97 | 3.97 | 0.000 |
| 2008 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2007 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2004 * | 2.42 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Leslie Resources Inc 1986 to 1998
- Leslie Resources Inc 1998 to 2004
- LCC Kentucky LLC 2004 to 2007
- ICG Hazard, LLC 2007 to present
ⓘ
Coal production is reported quarterly and lags the current period; the most recent quarters may be incomplete.| Year | Employees | Coal produced (tons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1 | |
| 2010 | 9 | |
| 2009 | 38 | 312,200 |
| 2008 | 55 | 577,786 |
| 2007 | 18 | 174,658 |
| 2006 | 0 | |
| 2005 | 0 | |
| 2004 | 36 | 324,418 |
| 2003 | 36 | 30,197 |
| 2002 | 8 | |
| 2001 | 6 | 30,716 |
| 2000 | 44 | 850,972 |
Middle Fork Surface sits in Perry County, Kentucky, where the Census mining category is 3.3% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2011 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2011 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2011 Q1 | 667 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 2,991 | 5 | 2 | 1671.7 |
| 2010 Q3 | 2,547 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 4,433 | 3 | 0 | 676.7 |
| 2010 Q1 | 6,818 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 36 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Q4 | 4,780 | 5 | 4 | 1046.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 26,429 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 30,086 | 10 | 5 | 332.4 |
| 2009 Q1 | 39,468 | 23 | 11 | 582.8 |
| 2008 Q4 | 36,453 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 38,553 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 38,529 | 13 | 3 | 337.4 |
| 2008 Q1 | 41,738 | 7 | 2 | 167.7 |
| 2007 Q4 | 33,369 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 13,147 | 5 | 0 | 380.3 |
| 2007 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2007 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2006 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2006 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2006 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2006 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2005 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2005 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2005 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2005 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2004 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2004 Q3 | 20,106 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 30,793 | 6 | 0 | 194.8 |
| 2004 Q1 | 31,762 | 18 | 9 | 566.7 |
| 2003 Q4 | 9,921 | 7 | 0 | 705.6 |
| 2002 Q3 | 3,160 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 9,318 | 2 | 1 | 214.6 |
| 2002 Q1 | 3,157 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 2,054 | 3 | 0 | 1460.6 |
| 2001 Q3 | 2,738 | 2 | 0 | 730.5 |
| 2001 Q2 | 899 | 8 | 1 | 8898.8 |
| 2001 Q1 | 878 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 14,063 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 14,560 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 50,949 | 7 | 1 | 137.4 |
| 2000 Q1 | 46,285 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
14 on file2009 · 2 incidents
Employee stated that he was grading the haul road, when the blade of the Grader struck a tree that was imbeded in the berm of the road way. This caused the grader to stall, resulting in a sudden stop, which caused pain to his lower back. EE refused medical treatment, but went to his family doctor after work and was placed off work.
2004 · 1 incident
WHILE RIDING AS A PASSENGER IN A ROCK TRUCK EE CLAIMED HE WAS HURT WHEN TRUCK OVERTURNED. HE REFUSED ANY MEDICAL ATTENTION AT THE TIME. WENT TO DR. ON 1-23-04 ON HIS OWN. HE WAS PLACED ON LIGH T DUTY WORK. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE ROCK TRUCK.
1999 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE WAS IN THE PROCESS OF CHANGING STEEL ONA DRILL. THIS REQUIRED HIM TO PICK UP THE "BREAKOUT" WRENCH WEIGHING 32 POUNDS. IT WAS AT THIS POINT HE FELT PAIN IN HIS BACK, BUT HE COMPLETED HIS SHIFT. THE EXTENT OF THE INJURY AT THIS TIMEIS BSED ON A PENDING MRI EXAMINATION.
1998 · 1 incident
HE WAS IN THE PROCESS OF MOUNTING HIS ROCKTRUCK TO BEGIN HIS SHIFT. HE LOST HIS FOOTING AND FELL TO THE GROUND, A DISTANCE OF APPROX. 6 FT- HE WAS TAKEN TO THE HAZARD ARH WHERE HE WAS X-RAYED AND RELEASED.
1997 · 3 incidents
EE WAS WORKING ON A HYD. LINE ON THE FRONT OF A DOZER. WHEN HE STEPPED DOWN FROM THE PUSH-ARM A DISTANCE OF APPROX. 24", EE STATED THAT HE FELT SOMETHING "POP" IN THE RIGHT SIDE OF HIS NECK. H E DROVE HIMSELF TO ER WHERE HE WAS EXAMINED AND RELEASED. THE DIAGNOSIS AT THAT TIME WAS THAT HE HAD A STRAINED MUSCLE.
EE IS COMPLAINING ABOUT PAIN TO HIS LOWER BACK ADN DOWN HIS RIGHT LEG WHICH HE FEELS WAS A RESULT OF HIS JUMPING FROM A ROCKTRUCK ON 6-16-97. DURING QUESTIONING, EE STATED THAT HE HAD SUFFERED BACK PAIN PRIOR TO THIS INCIDENT. EE IS EXPECGTED TO BE OFF WORK FOR APPROX. 30 DAYS.
EMP STATED HE WAS LOADING THE LAST 2' OF SOLID ROCK WHICH WAS LEFT ON TOP OF THE COAL SEAM. HAD LOADER BUCKET HOOKED UNDER A SLAB OF ROCK, CAUSING REAR TIRES OF LOADER TO RAISE APPROX 18" OFF GROUND. WHEN ROCK BROKE IT ALLOWED LAODER TO FALL. EMP FINISHED THE SHIFT AND WORKED UNTIL 8:00PM ON 1-22-97. DIAGNOSIS WILL BE MADE ON 1-27-97.
1996 · 1 incident
HE WAS GOING ABOUT HIS NORMAL DUTIES AS AN OILER. AS HE WAS WALKING AROUND THE SIDE OF HIS GREASE TRUCK, HE STEPPED INTO A SMALL HOLE.
1995 · 1 incident
EE WAS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING LOADED BY EE WHEN A TREE LIMB PUSHED THE WINDOW FROM THECAB OF THE TRUCK LEFT SIDE CAB WINDOW BEHIND DRIVERS DOOR EE STATED THAT HE HAD TURNED TOWARD THE PASSENG ER DOOR & DID NOT SEE THE LIMB IN THE LOADER BUCK DUE TO EE BEING HALF-TURNED IN HIS SEAT THE LIMB STRUCK HIM IN THE RT SHOULDER EE ALSO STATED THAT HE HAD PAIN IN HIS LEFT KNEE
1994 · 2 incidents
EE WAS CLIMBING UP THE LADDER OF THE TRUCK.HE WAS STANDING ON THE BUMPER WHEN HE BENT TO PICK UP HIS LUNCH JUG. AS HE LET GO OF THE LADDER WITH ONE HAND, HE LOST HIS BALANCE, CAUSING HIM TO SW ING AROUND. HE DID NOT FALL TO THE GROUND. HOWEVER THE SUDDEN JERK RESULTED IN A BACK SPRAIN, HE REPORTED THE ACCIDENT TO FOREMAN HE WAS TAKEN TO HAZARD ARH.
ON 3-8-94 INJURED REPORTED TO THE MAIN OFFICE THAT HE HAD BEEN INJURED ON 3-3-94. THERE HAD BEEN NO REPORT OF AN INJURY TO THE NIGHT FOREMAN.
1993 · 2 incidents
AT 2030 EMPL & OTHER EMPL STOPPED THEIR DOZERS FOR THEIR BREAK.THEY PULLED THEIR DOZERS SIDE BY SIDE, WITH APPROX 5' SEPARATING THEM.EMPL LOST HIS FOOTING & FELL FROM THE CAT-WALK OF HIS DO ZER, STRIKING OTHER EMPLS DOZER W/HIS HEAD & & LEFT SIDE.EMPL WAS TAKEN TO HAZARD ARH BY EMT OTHER EMPL & FOREMAN. AT THIS TIME 6/12/93,EMPL IS IN STABLE CONDITION.
HE WAS IN THE PROCESS OF LOADING A ROCKTRUCK. AS HE WAS LOADING HIS BUCKET, A LOOSE ROCK CAME FROM THE SIDE OF THE SHOT AND HIT THE SIDE OF THE BUCKET, JARRING THE OPERATOR.