Personnel were attempting to determine why elevator would not run continuously. Belt was being tightened and tracked. Maintenance, arrived to assist. They reached to belt to feel belt tension. Belt started as they reached in, bucket grabbed their sleeve and pulled their arm in. Damaged shoulder bones. Still getting surgery to correct.
Pontotoc Sands: 98 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
Pontotoc Sands has $30K in proposed MSHA penalties and $147 outstanding across 2 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Pontotoc Sands.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 12
- Years on record
- 2018–2026
- Latest incident
- Feb 2026
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.Pontotoc Sands has $30K in proposed MSHA penalties and $147 outstanding across 2 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 2 · 50%
- Stood as issued 2 · 50%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT 2019-0022 | Settlement | Miller | 2019 | $2K → $1K |
| CENT 2024-0034 | Default | 2024 | $396 → $396 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2026-06-30
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Respirable dust, <.1mg10
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz6
- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz2
- Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz2
Show the individual readings (20)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.3 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2026-06-30 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Rotary Bucket Ex. Operator | ||
| 2026-06-30 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 1.77 | Utility Man | ||
| 2026-06-30 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.45 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2023-04-11 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2023-04-11 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2023-04-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.3 | 0.76 | 0.39 | Utility Man |
| 2023-04-11 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2021-01-13 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2021-01-13 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Rotary Bucket Ex. Operator | ||
| 2021-01-13 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.16 | 10 | 0.02 | Rotary Bucket Ex. Operator |
| 2021-01-13 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.94 | 10 | 0.09 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2018-08-22 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2018-08-22 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2018-08-22 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.17 | 0.42 | 0.40 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2018-08-22 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.38 | 0.6 | 0.63 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2017-05-31 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.22 | 0.6 | 0.37 | Utility Man |
| 2017-05-31 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.50 | Bobcat Operator |
| 2017-05-31 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2017-05-31 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bulldozer Operator |
Pontotoc Sands recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2025.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2023 | 5.44 | 1.09 | 0.000 |
| 2022 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.000 |
| 2021 | 4.79 | 3.19 | 0.000 |
| 2020 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Pontotoc Sands Company LLC 2017 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 72 |
| 2025 | 82 |
| 2024 | 97 |
| 2023 | 87 |
| 2022 | 88 |
| 2021 | 68 |
| 2020 | 57 |
| 2019 | 67 |
| 2018 | 77 |
| 2017 | 31 |
Pontotoc Sands sits in Pontotoc County, Oklahoma, where the Census mining category is 2.0% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 40,372 | 3 | 1 | 74.3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 36,065 | 2 | 2 | 55.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 35,539 | 3 | 0 | 84.4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 43,706 | 3 | 0 | 68.6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 45,845 | 1 | 1 | 21.8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 41,202 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 45,836 | 3 | 1 | 65.5 |
| 2024 Q3 | 44,995 | 7 | 6 | 155.6 |
Show 30 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 35,882 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 40,090 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 36,519 | 6 | 0 | 164.3 |
| 2023 Q3 | 46,428 | 10 | 2 | 215.4 |
| 2023 Q2 | 48,050 | 4 | 0 | 83.2 |
| 2023 Q1 | 52,908 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 51,237 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 56,266 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 50,142 | 2 | 0 | 39.9 |
| 2022 Q1 | 47,225 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 32,954 | 2 | 0 | 60.7 |
| 2021 Q3 | 26,898 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 35,323 | 7 | 0 | 198.2 |
| 2021 Q1 | 30,131 | 6 | 1 | 199.1 |
| 2020 Q4 | 23,976 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 21,263 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 23,740 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 36,624 | 1 | 0 | 27.3 |
| 2019 Q4 | 28,729 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 42,210 | 4 | 0 | 94.8 |
| 2019 Q2 | 41,895 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 39,110 | 2 | 0 | 51.1 |
| 2018 Q4 | 50,840 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 52,900 | 2 | 0 | 37.8 |
| 2018 Q2 | 52,064 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 51,730 | 3 | 1 | 58.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 39,808 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 23,857 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 8,300 | 5 | 3 | 602.4 |
| 2017 Q1 | 2,671 | 4 | 3 | 1497.6 |
Reportable incidents
12 on file2026 · 1 incident
2023 · 5 incidents
Three employees were in the process of removing a u-joint. Two of the three employees were using a punch and a hammer to remove the u-joint and a small metal fragment went through the third employees shirt and lodged into EE's upper, right arm causing a half inch puncture wound. The employee was seen in the ER and was referred to a surgeon to have the small metal fragment removed.
Dry plant crew was in the process of reassembling the exhaust fan on bag house 3. After performing lockout, tagout, tryout; the belt was manually turned to diagnose an issue. When the belt was moving, the employee grabbed the moving belt by hand causing employee's fingers to be pulled in between the belt and sheave.
Employee was filling an 8' water tank and was standing on the 3rd rung of the ladder to pull the hose from the top of the tank. Weight shifted and while trying to catch themselves, they fell backwards on their back. Contributing factors are, the employee placed the ladder on uneven ground and the ladder was also not tied off.
Employee was checking the compressor oil on a pump. EE stepped onto a fender to check the top compartment and EE's foot slipped causing EE to fall into the pump. EE started experiencing pain to right upper rib area. After confirmation from the doctor, EE fractured two ribs.
Employee was tightening down bolts to 600FB and the wrench slipped, smashing employee's finger in between the guard rail and wrench. The employee was wearing all appropriate PPE, including gloves. The emergency room treated employee for a closed fracture on the tuft of the finger and superglued the laceration.
2022 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE WAS BACKING UP ARTICULATING TRUCK TO DUMP A LOAD OF ROCK. AS EE WAS IN POSITION TO UNLOAD THE ROCK, EE PUSHED THE LEVER TO LIFT THE BED UP AND AS IT WAS GOING UP, EE FELT THE BACK TIRE SLIPPING SO EE TRIED TO PULL THE TRUCK FORWARD, CAUSING THE CAB TO LIFT AND FALL OVER. EMPLOYEE WAS WEARING SEATBELT. EMPLOYEE WAS SEEN BY MEDICAL DUE TO ARM REST CAUSING BRUISING.
2021 · 3 incidents
Employee was moving sheet metal from one conex to another. As they placed a piece of metal on the stack and pushed for it to be in place, hand slipped. The sheet metal caught the corner of cut resistant glove, tore it, and also made contact with left pinky causing a cut.
Employee was using the grinder to cut a piece of metal off of a shaft. While using the grinder, a foreign object went through the employees jeans and into EE's leg.
Dozer operator was cleaning area off by pushing material to the berm and drove off of the highwall.
2019 · 1 incident
Employee was shoveling sand from beneath the grizzly hopper, when the miner passed out. Temperature outside was 78 degrees with 85% humidity.
2018 · 1 incident
After receiving 20 3/4 inches of rain, employee stepped into a small hole that had been covered with silt with right leg. Employee left work that day without any pain. The next day employee woke with pain and swelling of the right knee. Employee was taken to Urgent Care. Employee was examined and released on crutches. Employee has to schedule an MRI as soon as possible.