The employee was moving and picking up debris on the site and felt a pop in his arm. He was then greasing the following week and felt a pain shooting down his arm.
Portable Plant #1: 21 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
Portable Plant #1 has $6K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 2 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Portable Plant #1.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 10
- Years on record
- 1996–2007
- Latest incident
- Jun 2007
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Portable Plant #1 has $6K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 2 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 3 · 75%
- Stood as issued 1 · 25%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEST 2008-35M | Settlement | Manning | 2009 | $5K → $4K |
| WEST 2005-80M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2005 | $300 → $240 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2004-03-23, 22 years ago
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz4
Show the individual readings (4)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-03-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.16 | 0.68 | 0.24 | Surveyor |
| 2004-03-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.19 | 0.61 | 0.31 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2004-03-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.19 | 0.62 | 0.31 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2004-03-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.9 | 2.56 | 0.35 | Bulldozer Operator |
Portable Plant #1 recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2005.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2004 * | 7.05 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Material Processing Inc 1993 to 1996
- Hall-Irwin Construction Company 1996 to 2006
- Hall-Irwin Corporation 2006 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2007 | 9 |
| 2006 | 13 |
| 2005 | 16 |
| 2004 | 14 |
| 2003 | 10 |
| 2002 | 9 |
| 2001 | 11 |
| 2000 | 0 |
Portable Plant #1 sits in Weld County, Colorado, where the Census mining category is 2.4% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2007 Q3 | 3,838 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 4,354 | 7 | 3 | 1607.7 |
| 2007 Q1 | 2,648 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 4,363 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 5,553 | 2 | 0 | 360.2 |
| 2006 Q2 | 5,750 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 3,612 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 19 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Q4 | 5,702 | 1 | 0 | 175.4 |
| 2005 Q3 | 6,375 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 6,072 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 5,445 | 1 | 0 | 183.7 |
| 2004 Q4 | 8,799 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 7,699 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 6,666 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 5,190 | 6 | 1 | 1156.1 |
| 2003 Q4 | 4,755 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 4,032 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 5,154 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 5,123 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 2,722 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 4,062 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 5,838 | 4 | 0 | 685.2 |
| 2002 Q1 | 4,765 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 6,360 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 2,771 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reportable incidents
10 on file2007 · 1 incident
2004 · 1 incident
The ee cut his right index finger on a screen while changing it.
2003 · 1 incident
EE WAS CHANGING THE SCREENS TO A SCREEN DECK WITH AN IMPACT WRENCH. HE WAS SWEATING & HE WIPED HIS BROW. HE FELT SOMETHING ON HIS EYELASH, AND WHEN HE WIPED HIS LASHES, HE FELT SOMETHING IN HIS EYE.
2002 · 2 incidents
EE WAS WORKING AT THE WELDING TODDLE AT THE SITE AND A BEE STUNG HIM ON THE HAND HIS HAND SWELLED TO DOUBLE THE SIZE AND WAS TAKEN TO THE DR THE NEXT DAY.
THE MINER WAS USING A HAMMER TO KNOCK OFF A LOADER TOOTH & THE HAMMER FLEW UP & HIT THE WORKER ON THE UPPER CHEEK.
2001 · 1 incident
THE EE WAS TRYING TO DISLODGE OVERSIZED ROCK IN A CHUTE. HE USED A SHOVEL AND WHEN THE ROCKS DISLODGED ONE CAME DOWN AND HIT HIS FINGER.
1998 · 1 incident
THE EMPLOYEE WAS HELPING TO SET UP A NEW WASH PLANT. ON THURSDAY AFTERNOON THE EMPLOYEE FELT DISCOMFORT IN HIS ARM WHICH PERSISTED THROUGH THE WEEKEND.
1997 · 2 incidents
AN EMPLOYEE DROVE HIS PERSONAL VEHICLE BEHIND THE EMPLOYEE GREASING HIS LOADER. THE DRIVER GOT TOO CLOSE AND BUMPED THE LOADER OPERATOR'S KNEE.
EMP WAS RUNNING TO SHUT OFF CONVEYOR SYSTEM AND TRIPPED OVER SUPPORT BEAM HITTING THE TOP OF HISFOOT.
1996 · 1 incident
THE EMPLOYEE WAS REMOVING SUPPLIES FROM A GANG BOX WHEN THE WIND BLEW THE LID SHUT, CUTTING HIS RIGHT HAND.