WORKER DROPPED A CHOPPED PIECE OF ROCK ON RIGHT FOOT. THE ROCK MADE CONTACT WITH THE FOOT JUST ABOVE THE STEEL TOE PROTECTED AREA RESULTING IN A CLOSED FRACTURE OF MEDIAL PHALANX OF THE RIGHT LESSER TOE.
WARD #1, BIG HILL #1, & #2: 176 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
WARD #1, BIG HILL #1, & #2 tiene $98K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $789 pendientes en 4 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en WARD #1, BIG HILL #1, & #2.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 26
- Años en registro
- 2012–2017
- Último incidente
- Oct 2017
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.ⓘ
Una orden bajo la Sección 107(a) retira a los mineros de un área cuando un inspector detecta un peligro inminente. Cada orden se levanta una vez corregida la condición, por lo que esto cuenta las órdenes emitidas, no las que están en vigor ahora.WARD #1, BIG HILL #1, & #2 tiene $98K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $789 pendientes en 4 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 5 · 100%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT 2015-0134 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2015 | $34K → $19K |
| CENT 2012-765M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2013 | $7K → $7K |
| CENT20020147M | Default | Barbour | 2002 | $315 → $315 |
| CENT20020072M | Default | Barbour | 2002 | $184 → $184 |
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2025-08-20
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz209 en exceso
- Respirable dust, <.1mg9
Ver los análisis individuales (29)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-09-04 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.51 | 0.39 | 1.31 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2014-07-01 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.51 | 0.31 | 1.65 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2014-06-18 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.49 | 0.43 | 1.14 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2014-04-16 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 1.5 | 0.69 | 2.17 | Bobcat Operator |
| 2014-04-16 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 2.27 | 0.36 | 6.31 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2014-04-16 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 1.09 | 0.54 | 2.02 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2008-02-06 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.81 | 0.53 | 1.53 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2007-10-25 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 2.96 | 0.51 | 5.80 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2007-10-25 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 1.31 | 0.49 | 2.67 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2025-08-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2025-08-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bobcat Operator | ||
| 2022-06-01 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2022-06-01 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bobcat Operator | ||
| 2018-12-18 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Pelletizer Operator | ||
| 2018-12-18 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bobcat Operator | ||
| 2015-08-25 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.36 | 0.4 | 0.90 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2015-08-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Stone Polisher/Cutter | ||
| 2015-08-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Stone Polisher/Cutter | ||
| 2015-08-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Stone Polisher/Cutter | ||
| 2014-10-15 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.97 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2014-06-18 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.39 | 0.53 | 0.74 | Bobcat Operator |
| 2012-05-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.16 | 0.53 | 0.30 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2012-05-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.80 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2012-05-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.16 | 0.49 | 0.33 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2012-05-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.84 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2012-05-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.18 | 0.52 | 0.35 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2008-03-12 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.85 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2008-02-06 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.19 | 0.72 | 0.26 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2007-10-25 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.70 | Bobcat Operator |
WARD #1, BIG HILL #1, & #2 registró 32.49 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2015.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 * | 32.49 | 32.49 | 0.000 |
| 2014 * | 14.38 | 14.38 | 0.000 |
| 2013 * | 8.21 | 5.47 | 0.000 |
| 2012 * | 2.39 | 2.39 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2007 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2006 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2005 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Rock-It Natural Stone 2001 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 3 |
| 2025 | 2 |
| 2024 | 3 |
| 2023 | 3 |
| 2022 | 4 |
| 2021 | 5 |
| 2020 | 6 |
| 2019 | 6 |
| 2018 | 6 |
| 2017 | 7 |
| 2016 | 6 |
| 2015 | 13 |
| 2014 | 31 |
| 2013 | 40 |
| 2012 | 33 |
| 2011 | 18 |
| 2010 | 14 |
| 2009 | 12 |
| 2008 | 4 |
| 2007 | 20 |
| 2006 | 11 |
| 2005 | 15 |
| 2004 | 19 |
| 2003 | 16 |
| 2002 | 10 |
| 2001 | 10 |
WARD #1, BIG HILL #1, & #2 se ubica en Le Flore County, Oklahoma, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 3.0% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 1,800 | 3 | 0 | 1666.7 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1,200 | 2 | 0 | 1666.7 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1,200 | 1 | 0 | 833.3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1,600 | 1 | 0 | 625.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 1,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 1,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 94 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 1,920 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 1,920 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 1,200 | 1 | 0 | 833.3 |
| 2023 Q2 | 1,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 2,720 | 1 | 0 | 367.6 |
| 2022 Q3 | 1,020 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 960 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 3,540 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 2,220 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 2,520 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 2,160 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 907 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 720 | 1 | 0 | 1388.9 |
| 2020 Q2 | 1,002 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 1,677 | 1 | 0 | 596.3 |
| 2019 Q1 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 1,881 | 2 | 1 | 1063.3 |
| 2018 Q2 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 1,692 | 3 | 0 | 1773.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 2,663 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 2,106 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 1,903 | 2 | 0 | 1051.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 2,248 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 1,483 | 6 | 1 | 4045.9 |
| 2016 Q3 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 2,166 | 2 | 0 | 923.4 |
| 2016 Q1 | 2,219 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 2,261 | 3 | 0 | 1326.8 |
| 2015 Q3 | 5,634 | 4 | 0 | 710.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 7,022 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 9,709 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 7,805 | 6 | 2 | 768.7 |
| 2014 Q3 | 10,645 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 19,765 | 12 | 2 | 607.1 |
| 2014 Q1 | 17,400 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 18,340 | 6 | 3 | 327.2 |
| 2013 Q3 | 17,760 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 18,155 | 25 | 12 | 1377.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 18,855 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 20,175 | 4 | 1 | 198.3 |
| 2012 Q3 | 21,215 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 21,055 | 3 | 1 | 142.5 |
| 2012 Q1 | 21,210 | 4 | 1 | 188.6 |
| 2011 Q4 | 4,307 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 4,352 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 4,460 | 4 | 2 | 896.9 |
| 2011 Q1 | 4,483 | 5 | 3 | 1115.3 |
| 2010 Q4 | 6,150 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 7,853 | 5 | 1 | 636.7 |
| 2010 Q2 | 3,163 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 4,003 | 2 | 0 | 499.6 |
| 2009 Q4 | 4,570 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 5,060 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 5,960 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 4,110 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 360 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 3,750 | 2 | 1 | 533.3 |
| 2008 Q1 | 3,210 | 2 | 2 | 623.1 |
| 2007 Q4 | 8,900 | 2 | 2 | 224.7 |
| 2007 Q3 | 7,710 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 16,540 | 7 | 0 | 423.2 |
| 2007 Q1 | 17,490 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 10,790 | 6 | 1 | 556.1 |
| 2006 Q3 | 3,840 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 7,260 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 3,920 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 2,150 | 2 | 2 | 930.2 |
| 2005 Q3 | 13,480 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 9,310 | 4 | 1 | 429.6 |
| 2005 Q1 | 15,358 | 3 | 1 | 195.3 |
| 2004 Q4 | 9,530 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 9,230 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 7,620 | 5 | 1 | 656.2 |
| 2004 Q1 | 15,358 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 11,172 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 2,200 | 4 | 2 | 1818.2 |
| 2003 Q2 | 11,020 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 14,587 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 8,545 | 2 | 0 | 234.1 |
| 2002 Q3 | 4,470 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 4,760 | 1 | 0 | 210.1 |
| 2002 Q1 | 5,440 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 3,736 | 11 | 4 | 2944.3 |
| 2001 Q3 | 6,287 | 1 | 0 | 159.1 |
| 2001 Q2 | 6,000 | 15 | 10 | 2500.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
26 en archivo2017 · 3 incidentes
WORKER WAS STEPPING BACKWARDS WHEN EE CAUGHT THE EDGE OF A SKID WITH SHOE. EE LOST BALANCE AND FELL BACKWARDS ONTO THE CONCRETE FLOOR. EE STRUCK THE BACK OF HEAD ON THE FLOOR RESULTING IN A MILD CONCUSSION.
Worker was moving a rock on chopper table into chopping position. But the operator did not make sure it was clear before engaging the chopper action. This resulted in the loss of a finger tip on the right hand.
2016 · 10 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS MOVING A PALLET AND TWISTED LEFT KNEE.
A rock was accidentally dropped on subjects' pinky finger by another worker. A smashed finger resulted.
WORKER WAS CLEANING UP CHOPPER TABLE WHEN THUMB WAS CAUGHT BETWEEN THE DUMPSTER AND CHOPPER TABLE RESULTING IN LACERATION ON THUMB.
WORKER WAS CHANGING OUT A DRIVE BELT ON A VENEER SAW WHEN EE STRAINED BACK.
EMPLOYEE WAS DRIVING A NAIL INTO A PALLET WHEN EE ACCIDENTALLY STRUCK LEFT THUMB WITH THE HAMMER.
Worker was cleaning the waste material out of the chopper. When ee accidentally stepped on the operating lever. The workers hand and wrist was caught between the chopper teeth.
STEPPED ON A ROCK AND TWISTED EE'S RIGHT KNEE.
EMPLOYEE WAS WORKING AND BECAME OVERHEATED AND BEGAN VOMITING. EE TOLD SUPERVISOR AT HAND AND WAS TOLD TO GO TO VEHICLE AND COOL OFF. EE SAID THE SEVERE VOMITING CAUSED INJURY TO RIGHT EYE AND SOUGHT MEDICAL CARE. HOWEVER, THE EMPLOYER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THIS POSSIBLE INJURY UNTIL 6/23/2016.
Veneer saw blade cover was being reinstalled after routine blade change. When the cover snapped into place the worker was caught off guard by the sound. EE fell back onto the non-operational conveyor system of said machine and suffered back strain and contusions as a result.
Load of excess metal was being moved by a fork truck. As the load began to rise, it shifted and came into contact with employee's lower back. This caused EE to fall forward into the shop wall where EE cut two of EE's fingers on a piece of metal as EE tried to regain EE's balance.
2015 · 4 incidentes
Worker was stacking a piece of chopped rock onto a pallet when his finger was caught between another piece of rock as he was setting the rock down. This resulted in a smashed and broken pinky finger on the left hand.
Worker was chopping rock at the chopper when the rock being chopped broke at a seam and fell off the chopper table. It struck the floor and then came to rest up against the workers right ankle resulting in a sprained ankle.
A rock was being moved by another worker on the chopper table when the subject's middle finger of his left hand was caught between two rocks and his finger was broken as a result. His ring finger suffered only a minor contusion.
Worker was removing rock from the chopper and stacking it on a pallet when the pinkie finger on his right hand got caught between two rocks. This resulted in a mashed finger tip on his right hand pinkie finger.
2014 · 4 incidentes
Worker was removing chopped rock from conveyor when the middle finger of his right hand got jammed between two rocks he was removing from the conveyor in order to stack on pallet. Injury resulted in a broken finger just below the first joint.
Worker was chopping a rock on the chopper when the rock shattered into several pieces failing to make a clean cut. One of the pieces fell from the chopper table striking the worker on the right leg as it fell. He was checked over by the ER doctor in Poteau and told to put no weight on the bruised and swollen leg for seven (7) days.
CHOPPED ROCK FELL ON THE MIDDLE FINGER OF THE RIGHT HAND. THIS RESULTED IN A CRACKED BONE ON THE TIP AND LOSS OF THE FINGERNAIL.
Worker was stacking rock onto a pallet at the chopper shop. When he started to place another rock onto the pallet the load of rock shifted. This caused the middle finger of his left hand to be caught in between two moving rocks and this resulted in a fractured finger.
2013 · 3 incidentes
Worker was removing stacked rock from a pallet when the load shifted and a sharp rock fell on the index finger of his left hand. It resulted in a broken and cut finger at the knuckle.
HE WAS IN OUR SALVAGE AREA LOOKING FOR A PIECE OF SCRAP METAL TO DO A REPAIR WITH. HE TRIPPED AND FELL OVER A PIECE OF ROCK AND LANDED ON A SHARP PIECE OF METAL WITH HIS LEFT HAND. THE FALL RESULTED IN A CUT ON HIS LEFT HAND REQUIRING NINETEEN (19) STITCHES.
Employee was removing rock from behind the conveyor belt when power was turned on. His right arm was caught by the belt and broken.
2012 · 2 incidentes
Replacing starting motor on D6T Bulldozer and removing the failed component. He placed the starter on the equalizer frame of the tractor to better position himself to take the starter off of the machine. The starter fell and struck his left hand ringer finger causing a fracture.
The vehicle was left in gear and the clutch was not fully depressed when the ignition was applied and the truck jerked forward pinning employee between the rear wheel and the creeper he was on. The rear wheel did not pass over him. He was pinched in between the wheel and the creeper resulting in a broken pelvis.