EE was on a 6' berm discussing reclamation project with contractor. When they turned to dismount berm they slipped and fell approximately 4' onto rocks and hard road surface resulting in a laceration to left knee that required 7 stitches to close wound.
Toney Fork Surface Mine: 852 citaciones de la MSHA Coal
Toney Fork Surface Mine tiene $924K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $16K pendientes en 54 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Toney Fork Surface Mine.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 42
- Años en registro
- 2006–2019
- Último incidente
- Jul 2019
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.ⓘ
Una orden bajo la Sección 107(a) retira a los mineros de un área cuando un inspector detecta un peligro inminente. Cada orden se levanta una vez corregida la condición, por lo que esto cuenta las órdenes emitidas, no las que están en vigor ahora.Toney Fork Surface Mine tiene $924K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $16K pendientes en 54 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 204 · 90%
- Quedaron como emitidas 15 · 7%
- Anuladas o retiradas 4 · 2%
- Aún abiertas 3 · 1%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEVA 2008-1799 | Dismissal | Weisberger | 2010 | $102K → $102K |
| WEVA 2011-1702 | Settlement | Andrews | 2012 | $62K → $32K |
| WEVA 2009-1150 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2010 | $34K → $21K |
| WEVA 2019-0046 | Settlement | Bulluck | 2019 | $32K → $21K |
| WEVA 2014-486 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2015 | $28K → $20K |
| WEVA 2019-0259 | Settlement | Rae | 2019 | $27K → $16K |
El muestreo de MSHA en Toney Fork Surface Mine muestra que 100% de 461 muestras de polvo respirable de carbón cumplieron el estandar de 1.5 mg/m3.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Polvo respirable de carbón
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.
Última medición: 2026-05-28
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
El valor de concentración excesiva (ECV) es el umbral de aplicación por muestra de la propia MSHA, que incorpora la incertidumbre de medición; una muestra por encima de su ECV puede motivar una citación. El conteo cubre solo las muestras a las que MSHA asignó un ECV.- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR257
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR117
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER38
Sílice (cuarzo)
Última medición: 2025-07-01- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR27
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR9
Ruido
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.
Última medición: 2026-03-10
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR33
- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR30
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER24
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.| Año | dentro de 1.5 mg/m3 | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 100% | 11 |
| 2025 | 100% | 7 |
| 2024 | 100% | 7 |
| 2023 | 100% | 20 |
| 2022 | 100% | 13 |
| 2021 | 100% | 1 |
| 2020 | 100% | 11 |
| 2019 | 100% | 51 |
| 2018 | 100% | 45 |
| 2017 | 100% | 80 |
| 2016 | 100% | 66 |
| 2015 | 100% | 54 |
| 2014 | 100% | 11 |
| 2013 | 100% | 16 |
| 2012 | 100% | 10 |
| 2011 | 100% | 10 |
| 2010 | 100% | 16 |
| 2009 | 100% | 15 |
| 2008 | 100% | 12 |
| 2005 | 100% | 5 |
| Año | sílice prom. (%) | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.8 | 1 |
| 2023 | 32.9 | 3 |
| 2022 | 39.5 | 2 |
| 2019 | 33.8 | 3 |
| 2018 | 34.7 | 1 |
| 2017 | 12.2 | 5 |
| 2016 | 24.5 | 10 |
| 2015 | 27.6 | 6 |
| 2012 | 35.9 | 2 |
| 2009 | 21.1 | 2 |
| 2008 | 41.5 | 1 |
| Año | sobre el LPE | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0% | 5 |
| 2025 | 0% | 5 |
| 2024 | 0% | 4 |
| 2023 | 0% | 8 |
| 2022 | 0% | 3 |
| 2019 | 0% | 6 |
| 2017 | 0% | 27 |
| 2016 | 0% | 12 |
| 2015 | 0% | 7 |
| 2014 | 0% | 5 |
| 2013 | 0% | 12 |
| 2012 | 0% | 5 |
| 2011 | 17% | 6 |
| 2010 | 0% | 5 |
| 2009 | 0% | 5 |
| 2008 | 0% | 5 |
Toney Fork Surface Mine registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2024.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2023 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 | 3.33 | 1.11 | 0.000 |
| 2018 | 3.32 | 0.83 | 0.000 |
| 2017 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2016 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2015 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Appalachian Fuels LLC 2005 a 2007
- Cliffs Logan County Coal, LLC 2007 a 2014
- Greenbrier Minerals, LLC 2014 a 2026
- Coal Mac East 2026 al presente
ⓘ
La producción de carbón se reporta trimestralmente y va con retraso respecto al periodo actual; los trimestres más recientes pueden estar incompletos.| Año | Empleados | Carbón producido (toneladas) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2 | 6,808 |
| 2025 | 3 | 11,648 |
| 2024 | 8 | 12,895 |
| 2023 | 10 | 34,668 |
| 2022 | 4 | 12,218 |
| 2021 | 5 | 11,635 |
| 2020 | 8 | 27,701 |
| 2019 | 69 | 617,756 |
| 2018 | 87 | 832,621 |
| 2017 | 76 | 1,025,582 |
| 2016 | 57 | 633,884 |
| 2015 | 47 | 569,642 |
| 2014 | 69 | 927,042 |
| 2013 | 46 | 616,718 |
| 2012 | 75 | 820,223 |
| 2011 | 107 | 1,219,753 |
| 2010 | 103 | 1,125,887 |
| 2009 | 120 | 942,999 |
| 2008 | 104 | 1,454,589 |
| 2007 | 96 | 1,187,846 |
| 2006 | 205 | 1,810,640 |
| 2005 | 63 | 326,482 |
Toney Fork Surface Mine se ubica en Logan County, West Virginia, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 6.6% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 508 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1,307 | 3 | 2 | 2295.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1,177 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1,954 | 9 | 1 | 4605.9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3,238 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 4,489 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 6,467 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 77 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 5,848 | 2 | 0 | 342.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 5,154 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 5,401 | 3 | 1 | 555.5 |
| 2023 Q3 | 7,795 | 2 | 1 | 256.6 |
| 2023 Q2 | 5,619 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 6,388 | 1 | 0 | 156.5 |
| 2022 Q4 | 4,757 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 2,273 | 1 | 0 | 439.9 |
| 2022 Q2 | 1,691 | 3 | 2 | 1774.1 |
| 2022 Q1 | 1,013 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 732 | 3 | 0 | 4098.4 |
| 2021 Q3 | 708 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 1,455 | 1 | 0 | 687.3 |
| 2021 Q1 | 2,121 | 8 | 2 | 3771.8 |
| 2020 Q4 | 2,976 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 3,701 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 4,344 | 2 | 0 | 460.4 |
| 2020 Q1 | 10,201 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 17,388 | 7 | 0 | 402.6 |
| 2019 Q3 | 33,485 | 4 | 2 | 119.5 |
| 2019 Q2 | 63,206 | 6 | 2 | 94.9 |
| 2019 Q1 | 65,844 | 61 | 19 | 926.4 |
| 2018 Q4 | 56,310 | 4 | 2 | 71.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 59,757 | 25 | 9 | 418.4 |
| 2018 Q2 | 62,718 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 62,412 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 49,360 | 15 | 8 | 303.9 |
| 2017 Q3 | 51,448 | 17 | 4 | 330.4 |
| 2017 Q2 | 53,919 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 53,850 | 29 | 8 | 538.5 |
| 2016 Q4 | 46,531 | 2 | 0 | 43.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 35,854 | 13 | 3 | 362.6 |
| 2016 Q2 | 29,002 | 1 | 0 | 34.5 |
| 2016 Q1 | 31,121 | 17 | 9 | 546.3 |
| 2015 Q4 | 27,989 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 30,696 | 9 | 3 | 293.2 |
| 2015 Q2 | 31,059 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 30,783 | 7 | 3 | 227.4 |
| 2014 Q4 | 44,092 | 1 | 1 | 22.7 |
| 2014 Q3 | 48,027 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 47,304 | 11 | 7 | 232.5 |
| 2014 Q1 | 43,298 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 26,846 | 9 | 4 | 335.2 |
| 2013 Q3 | 29,036 | 16 | 2 | 551.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 29,610 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 29,296 | 8 | 2 | 273.1 |
| 2012 Q4 | 27,871 | 2 | 0 | 71.8 |
| 2012 Q3 | 27,858 | 36 | 9 | 1292.3 |
| 2012 Q2 | 61,376 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 71,550 | 26 | 8 | 363.4 |
| 2011 Q4 | 70,968 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 67,753 | 22 | 8 | 324.7 |
| 2011 Q2 | 67,776 | 13 | 4 | 191.8 |
| 2011 Q1 | 71,042 | 30 | 7 | 422.3 |
| 2010 Q4 | 68,966 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 69,266 | 23 | 15 | 332.1 |
| 2010 Q2 | 63,121 | 1 | 1 | 15.8 |
| 2010 Q1 | 59,854 | 16 | 4 | 267.3 |
| 2009 Q4 | 68,078 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 58,827 | 26 | 11 | 442.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 78,953 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 100,679 | 40 | 16 | 397.3 |
| 2008 Q4 | 61,031 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 22,842 | 40 | 40 | 1751.2 |
| 2008 Q2 | 72,731 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 26,159 | 13 | 3 | 497.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 53,114 | 2 | 2 | 37.7 |
| 2007 Q3 | 56,592 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 69,841 | 17 | 17 | 243.4 |
| 2007 Q1 | 59,168 | 8 | 8 | 135.2 |
| 2006 Q4 | 117,373 | 14 | 12 | 119.3 |
| 2006 Q3 | 111,964 | 1 | 1 | 8.9 |
| 2006 Q2 | 112,124 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 77,097 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 54,132 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 32,492 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 2,416 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
42 en archivo2019 · 5 incidentes
opened a box of boosters, lifted out the boosters, felt something pop in EE's back
EE was watering haul roads and claimed they felt pain in their back and leg. The EE was given 3 days off work which happened to be the same time of a paid holiday weekend with no work scheduled. An MSHA E03 inspection was conducted on 9/20/2022. A citation was issued. This 7000-1 is being submitted in order to abate the citation. The company intends to contest.
EE was traveling up to pit. During this process the shifter in the truck that the EE was operating broke and the truck came out of gear. The truck rolled into a dozer in close proximity.
Piece of metal in eye while putting lug nuts on tire.
2018 · 5 incidentes
EE was pushing shot rock. EE observed rock in mirror roll down behind dozer. EE turned to look and see where the rock went as EE was turning the dozer. The dozer trammed over the rock. At this point the EE felt a bump and also felt a pain in EE's lower back.
EE was cleaning out cab of the drill. EE cut EE's hand resulting in a laceration between the left index and middle finger that required 2 sutures.
Employee was working on a 988 wheel loader and while removing the sheet metal, the access door over the pump area fell striking and lacerating left hand.
EE was mounting a Triple Seven rock truck at the beginning of the shift. The ladder was not all the way in the down position. When EE put weight on it the ladder gave down, the EE tried to catch self and twisted back.
EE was knocking pin out of shovel bucket for new tips and adapters when a piece of metal flew off and hit EE in the right side of torso.
2017 · 3 incidentes
EE was on deck of dozer, EE lost footing and started to fall, EE turned and jumped from dozer. This occurred on September 27th but was not reported by the EE until 1:45pm on September 28th.
EE was standing on bucket when it collapsed. EE fell to the ground twisting left knee. NOTE: Ladders are provided. EE chose not to use proper tools for task.
Employee was changing tires on a 993K Loader. While installing lock ring on the wheel it slipped striking employee in the head.
2016 · 1 incidente
Employee was evaluated by a physician and given a diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome with surgical repair being performed. It was made known that work activities were a contributing factor on 4-02-2016. EE's last work shift before surgery was 02/24/2016.
2015 · 2 incidentes
Employee underwent a comprehensive audiological evaluation after an abnormal hearing test. Operator was notified on November 03, 2015that the employee's work history and test results are consistent with noise-induced hearing loss, with the workplace being a significant contributing factor.
Using a track press the ram kicked sideways and the pusher pin came around hitting employee in left thigh causing abrasions and contusions.
2012 · 1 incidente
Employee was standing on the bumper of pickup he was stepping off when he missed judged the height and fell on his back/right elbow.
2011 · 3 incidentes
Driver lost control while shifting to a lower gear on main haul road. Driver should have come to a complete stop before shifting to a lower gear.
Employee was lifting a cylinder into truck with a hoist chain when the chain slipped & cut employees left (#5) pinky finger.
Tailgate on truck would not open. The driver of the truck asked grader operator to push against the tailgate with the front part of the grader. When this happened the EE was holding a rock between the grader and the tailgate his left fingers got trapped between the grader and the rock. E.R. was visted by the EE.
2010 · 3 incidentes
While taking back tire off of grease truck the tire was about to fall and the tire smashed the EE's hand.
The employee was standing on a dozer. He was reaching for a grab handle as he slipped and fell against the tilt jack. The employee then fell to the ground.
While slowly driving a powder truck down a ramp, the engine died as the truck slid sideways on snow and ice. While sliding, the truck slid into an unfrozen area, caught traction and turned onto its side.
2009 · 7 incidentes
Employee was working on a 345 Excavator installing a hose when he felt a pain in his back.
Back wheels hit a hole in road (sink hole) and truck laid over on its side.
EE tried to shift to a different gear, couldn't get it back in gear. Then couldn't stop the truck.
EE was going down hill. Went out of gear and could not recover.
While trying to knock a pin out of the push arm on a dozer, a piece of the hammer broke off and embedded in the employee's leg.
Employee was working on drill when he lost his footing causing him to fall off the steps at the operators cab.
coming out of the office at INR, slipped on the ice on the steps, fell hitting head, lower back & right shoulder.
2007 · 3 incidentes
Employee was striking a wrench with a hammer when the wrench slipped hitting him in the face.
Employee was helping to lift a pipe in valley fill, causing muscles in his back to be pulled and strained.
Bent over picking up crib block & injured lower back. Did not go to Dr. until 5/3/07. Then he was off work from 5/3/07 to 5/14/07.
2006 · 9 incidentes
Employee was repairing a drill, picked up a solenoid resulting in pulling his back.
Employee is alleging incident occured on 10/28/2006 involving strain on his back. Employee worked 10/29/2006 and left early on 10/30/2006 due to illness. Employee reported to a foreman, other than his own on 11/06/2006, that he had been injured on 10/28/2006. Witnesses claim they did not see anything occur.
Employee was exiting a dozer on the left side, as he stepped onto the step on the push arm (right foot was to the side of the step) he put weight onto his right foot and heard a pop along with feeling a sharp pain. He could not put his weight onto his right foot.
Employee was exiting the right side of a dozer when he lost his balance and fell backwards onto the ground. The employee stated he hit on his left buttocks and right shoulder. He got up off the ground under his own power.
Employee was removing plow bolt with 1" impact wrench, bolt fell down while spinning causing a laceration on his left middle finger.
The employee was driving a 473 Truck when he was overcome by the heat. When he got out of the truck he became lightheaded and needed assistance. An ambulance was called to transport him to the hospital.
Cut his right leg with a knife blade that was being used to cut plastic.
Employee was operating 830 Rock Truck, the truck was being filled with overburden when a rock dropped in the bed and jarred the employee resulting back pain.
Employee was bolting an electrical box on an 830 Rock Truck, when a grid box fell from the electrical box, hitting the employee in the forehead and across the nose. Resulting in stitches.....23 to the nose.....14 to the forehead.