Employee was walking across the stockpile area when the wind blew dust into EE's eye. Employee went to optic facility who told EE it looked like EE had removed the object from EE's eye prior to visit. They examined EE and gave EE some drops for the eye and said EE would be fine. The drops were prescription thus the reason for this report as the incident was minor.
Lincoln Park Stone Stinesville Quarry: 138 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
Lincoln Park Stone Stinesville Quarry tiene $24K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 7 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Lincoln Park Stone Stinesville Quarry.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 20
- Años en registro
- 2005–2022
- Último incidente
- May 2022
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Lincoln Park Stone Stinesville Quarry tiene $24K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 7 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 11 · 92%
- Anuladas o retiradas 1 · 8%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAKE 2009-94M | Withdrawal | Lesnick | 2010 | $3K → $0 |
| LAKE 2014-0672 | Settlement | Rae | 2014 | $873 → $392 |
| LAKE 2025-0122 | Settlement | Lewis | 2026 | $735 → $648 |
| LAKE 2011-385M | Settlement | Harner | 2011 | $334 → $100 |
| LAKE 2011-761M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2011 | $324 → $262 |
| LAKE 2013-580M | Settlement | Lewis | 2013 | $243 → $100 |
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2025-03-04
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz6
- Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz6
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz6
- Respirable dust, <.1mg3
Ver los análisis individuales (21)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-04 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.17 | Belt Crew | ||
| 2017-09-26 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.24 | 0.99 | 0.24 | Backhoe Operator |
| 2017-09-26 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.25 | 10 | 0.03 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2014-11-06 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2014-11-06 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 1.27 | 10 | 0.13 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2010-03-31 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 4.52 | 10 | 0.45 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2009-04-15 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.3 | 10 | 0.03 | Backhoe Operator |
| 2009-04-15 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2007-05-30 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 1.28 | 10 | 0.13 | Truck Driver |
| 2007-05-30 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 4.33 | 10 | 0.43 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2007-05-30 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 0.72 | 10 | 0.07 | Rotary Bucket Ex. Operator |
| 2007-05-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.4 | 2.63 | 0.15 | Backhoe Operator |
| 2007-05-23 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.22 | 10 | 0.02 | Backhoe Operator |
| 2007-05-23 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 1.84 | 10 | 0.18 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2006-06-22 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.26 | 10 | 0.03 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2005-11-22 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 2.2 | 10 | 0.22 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2004-09-08 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.5 | 3.1 | 0.16 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2004-09-08 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.42 | 2.68 | 0.16 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2004-09-08 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bulldozer Operator | ||
| 2004-09-08 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.21 | 1.82 | 0.12 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2004-09-08 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.17 | 10 | 0.02 | Washer Operator |
Lincoln Park Stone Stinesville Quarry registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2015.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2014 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2013 * | 35.45 | 17.73 | 0.000 |
| 2012 * | 9.30 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2011 * | 7.78 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 7.78 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2009 * | 18.01 | 9.01 | 0.000 |
| 2008 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- S & G Excavating, Inc. 2004 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 8 |
| 2025 | 8 |
| 2024 | 7 |
| 2023 | 8 |
| 2022 | 8 |
| 2021 | 7 |
| 2020 | 8 |
| 2019 | 6 |
| 2018 | 5 |
| 2017 | 5 |
| 2016 | 8 |
| 2015 | 9 |
| 2014 | 10 |
| 2013 | 9 |
| 2012 | 9 |
| 2011 | 10 |
| 2010 | 11 |
| 2009 | 10 |
| 2008 | 9 |
| 2007 | 8 |
| 2006 | 8 |
| 2005 | 6 |
| 2004 | 7 |
Lincoln Park Stone Stinesville Quarry se ubica en Monroe County, Indiana, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 0.1% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 4,185 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4,147 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4,109 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4,815 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4,413 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3,570 | 2 | 2 | 560.2 |
| 2024 Q4 | 4,488 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 4,334 | 8 | 2 | 1845.9 |
Mostrar 80 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 4,443 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 3,660 | 4 | 0 | 1092.9 |
| 2023 Q4 | 3,838 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 4,402 | 1 | 0 | 227.2 |
| 2023 Q2 | 4,547 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 3,497 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 4,376 | 2 | 0 | 457.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 4,478 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 4,547 | 1 | 0 | 219.9 |
| 2022 Q1 | 4,686 | 2 | 0 | 426.8 |
| 2021 Q4 | 4,237 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 4,470 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 4,581 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 4,423 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 4,544 | 1 | 0 | 220.1 |
| 2020 Q3 | 4,607 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 5,212 | 2 | 1 | 383.7 |
| 2020 Q1 | 5,381 | 1 | 0 | 185.8 |
| 2019 Q4 | 4,853 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 3,442 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 2,627 | 2 | 0 | 761.3 |
| 2019 Q1 | 2,334 | 3 | 1 | 1285.3 |
| 2018 Q4 | 2,685 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 2,523 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 2,557 | 2 | 0 | 782.2 |
| 2018 Q1 | 1,999 | 2 | 0 | 1000.5 |
| 2017 Q4 | 2,434 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 2,845 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 3,269 | 5 | 1 | 1529.5 |
| 2017 Q1 | 3,001 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 4,448 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 4,732 | 1 | 0 | 211.3 |
| 2016 Q2 | 5,300 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 5,012 | 3 | 0 | 598.6 |
| 2015 Q4 | 5,589 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 5,587 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 5,880 | 3 | 0 | 510.2 |
| 2015 Q1 | 4,997 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 6,581 | 5 | 1 | 759.8 |
| 2014 Q3 | 6,063 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 5,868 | 2 | 1 | 340.8 |
| 2014 Q1 | 4,574 | 3 | 1 | 655.9 |
| 2013 Q4 | 5,913 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 5,683 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 5,518 | 3 | 0 | 543.7 |
| 2013 Q1 | 5,450 | 6 | 0 | 1100.9 |
| 2012 Q4 | 5,499 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 5,056 | 3 | 1 | 593.4 |
| 2012 Q2 | 5,861 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 5,095 | 3 | 1 | 588.8 |
| 2011 Q4 | 6,004 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 6,463 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 7,062 | 5 | 3 | 708.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 6,169 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 5,773 | 4 | 2 | 692.9 |
| 2010 Q3 | 6,939 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 6,327 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 6,677 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 5,710 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 5,890 | 5 | 4 | 848.9 |
| 2009 Q2 | 5,840 | 1 | 0 | 171.2 |
| 2009 Q1 | 4,770 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 5,874 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 6,091 | 4 | 2 | 656.7 |
| 2008 Q2 | 6,019 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 5,998 | 6 | 1 | 1000.3 |
| 2007 Q4 | 5,556 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 4,700 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 4,135 | 3 | 1 | 725.5 |
| 2007 Q1 | 4,636 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 5,284 | 1 | 1 | 189.3 |
| 2006 Q3 | 7,430 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 4,005 | 4 | 1 | 998.8 |
| 2006 Q1 | 2,566 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 2,928 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 3,185 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 3,469 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 3,824 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 3,478 | 2 | 1 | 575.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 3,914 | 3 | 0 | 766.5 |
Incidentes reportables
20 en archivo2022 · 1 incidente
2019 · 3 incidentes
Employee was changing the skirting on the 53 x conveyor when EE's hand slipped and hit the tail pulley guard causing a 1" cut to EE's right palmar surface. Fabricated tail pulley guard.
Confirming audiogram on 8/9/19 showed a standard threshold shift.
Confirming audiogram on 8/9/19 showed a standard threshold shift.
2017 · 2 incidentes
Pulled on a hose and it cut the arm had to get 5 stitches.
Employee was ascending the catwalk to reach the #2 conveyor when their foot slipped. Employee swung their arm out to stabilize themselves and in doing so struck the 53X chute with a flat head on blow. (No cut, laceration or puncture). Employee said they thought they were fine but condition worsened.
2013 · 4 incidentes
Aggravation of injury reported on 5/1/13. Employee twisted knee while installing silt fence aggravating his knee injury. Went to Dr on 7/17/13 who told him to take 2 days off work, then report to work with no restrictions. This report is submitted to add 2 missed days to the accident.
Employee was fueling his excavator and while waiting for it to fill the wind blew dust into his right eye.
EE was stepping off of a mini excavator and twisted his knee.No real pain or discomfort at time so he didn't call the accident in. Called 2 days later to say he had pain. Sent him to clinic and the diagnosed a strain. He returned for a follow up exam and they requested a MRI. MRI revealed he had a torn meniscus so today he was scheduled for surgery on 5/9/13.
Employee was stooping over to go under the #6 conveyor (en-route to repair a flashing on the # 2 conveyor hopper) when his hard hat fell off. He picked the hard hat up then stood to replace it and struck his head on the conveyor framework.
2012 · 1 incidente
Employee was removing rocks from a plugged cone crusher when a rock became dislodged and struck his finger. Employee suffered a fractured distal phalange on his left ring finger.
2011 · 1 incidente
EE was cutting a hole in belting when the knife went through the belting while being drawn over the belting and cut the EE's right thigh.
2010 · 1 incidente
EE was walking behind his haul truck in the parking lot to retrieve a grease gun and said his knee just gave out. The surface was smooth with no obstructions.
2009 · 2 incidentes
EE was placing a roll of belting (to be used on a conveyor) onto the fork lift and when he removed his pry bar it pinched his finger. (Pry bar did the pinching). The fork lift was not in motion, cut caused by the pry bar.
Employee was using a cutting torch to cut a piece of steel(on his back beneath the work) and a piece of hot metal entered his ear canal.
2007 · 2 incidentes
Employee was cleaning rock spillage in the screen room with another employee (shoveling rocks back onto the screen surface). The other employee threw a rock toward the screen and struck the employee on top of the head. Employee states hard hat had fallen off as he was coninually reaching down.
Employee was in a jaw crushers hammering a piece of steel to flatten it out when he missed and struck the side his foot. fractured the most distal phalanpe of his r. pinky toe.
2006 · 2 incidentes
EE was digging soil from a footing he was forming. When he rotated to throw the dirt from his shovel, his foot did not pivot causing him to twist his knee. The injury did not bother him for over a week before the pain began to intensify. Became reportable today 11/2/06.
Employee was winding a garden hose up and when swinging his hand back to retreive more hose it struck the corner of an electrical box that had a bent area on it. The bent corner cut his hand.
2005 · 1 incidente
A U-belt had jumped a pulley and EE was pulling on the belt while another employee was prying the belt over to the next pulley when the shaft went over center catching EE's hand between the belt and the pulley.