Employee was walking down to turn off plant water feed pump and slipped on ice
Tamaqua Breaker: 89 citaciones de la MSHA Coal
Tamaqua Breaker tiene $10K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 3 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Tamaqua Breaker.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 55
- Años en registro
- 1983–2013
- Último incidente
- Jan 2013
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Tamaqua Breaker tiene $10K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 3 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENN 2004-53 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2004 | $192 → $95 |
| PENN20010160 | Settlement | Barbour | 2001 | $131 → $56 |
| PENN 2004-91 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2004 | $99 → $60 |
El muestreo de MSHA en Tamaqua Breaker muestra que 83% de 407 muestras de polvo respirable de carbón cumplieron el estandar de 1.5 mg/m3.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Polvo respirable de carbón
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.
Última medición: 2025-10-08
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
El valor de concentración excesiva (ECV) es el umbral de aplicación por muestra de la propia MSHA, que incorpora la incertidumbre de medición; una muestra por encima de su ECV puede motivar una citación. El conteo cubre solo las muestras a las que MSHA asignó un ECV.- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR168
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER64
- CRUSHER ATTENDANT62
Sílice (cuarzo)
Última medición: 2025-10-15- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR33
- CRUSHER ATTENDANT5
- COAL TRUCK DRIVER2
Ruido
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.
Última medición: 2025-10-15
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR37
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER35
- COAL TRUCK DRIVER32
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.| Año | dentro de 1.5 mg/m3 | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100% | 7 |
| 2024 | 100% | 11 |
| 2023 | 100% | 8 |
| 2022 | 100% | 3 |
| 2021 | 100% | 7 |
| 2020 | 100% | 7 |
| 2019 | 100% | 9 |
| 2018 | 100% | 14 |
| 2017 | 100% | 3 |
| 2015 | 100% | 1 |
| 2014 | 100% | 13 |
| 2013 | 93% | 14 |
| 2012 | 96% | 25 |
| 2011 | 95% | 21 |
| 2010 | 89% | 28 |
| 2009 | 97% | 31 |
| 2008 | 83% | 41 |
| 2007 | 85% | 26 |
| 2006 | 100% | 19 |
| 2005 | 71% | 14 |
| 2004 | 54% | 24 |
| 2003 | 45% | 20 |
| 2002 | 50% | 24 |
| 2001 | 53% | 17 |
| 2000 | 80% | 20 |
| Año | sílice prom. (%) | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.3 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1 | |
| 2023 | 0.5 | 2 |
| 2021 | 2.4 | 1 |
| 2017 | 1.4 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0.4 | 2 |
| 2010 | 0.8 | 4 |
| 2009 | 0.3 | 2 |
| 2008 | 0.9 | 5 |
| 2007 | 0.6 | 3 |
| 2006 | 0.7 | 1 |
| 2005 | 1.5 | 1 |
| 2004 | 0.4 | 3 |
| 2003 | 0.5 | 3 |
| 2002 | 0.6 | 7 |
| 2001 | 0.6 | 2 |
| 2000 | 0.7 | 2 |
| Año | sobre el LPE | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0% | 6 |
| 2024 | 0% | 11 |
| 2023 | 0% | 7 |
| 2022 | 0% | 3 |
| 2021 | 0% | 4 |
| 2020 | 0% | 2 |
| 2019 | 0% | 6 |
| 2018 | 0% | 11 |
| 2017 | 0% | 3 |
| 2015 | 0% | 4 |
| 2014 | 0% | 3 |
| 2013 | 0% | 7 |
| 2012 | 17% | 6 |
| 2011 | 0% | 6 |
| 2010 | 0% | 5 |
| 2009 | 0% | 5 |
| 2008 | 0% | 3 |
| 2007 | 0% | 5 |
| 2006 | 0% | 5 |
| 2004 | 20% | 10 |
| 2003 | 0% | 3 |
| 2002 | 40% | 5 |
| 2001 | 50% | 8 |
| 2000 | 50% | 4 |
Tamaqua Breaker registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2014.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2013 * | 8.19 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2012 * | 17.62 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2011 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 23.01 | 23.01 | 0.000 |
| 2009 * | 11.09 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2008 * | 6.13 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2007 * | 14.30 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- South Tamaqua Coal Pockets, Inc. 1978 a 2016
- Keystone Anthracite Company Incorporated 2016 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 3 |
| 2025 | 5 |
| 2024 | 5 |
| 2023 | 6 |
| 2022 | 5 |
| 2021 | 5 |
| 2020 | 5 |
| 2019 | 5 |
| 2018 | 5 |
| 2017 | 4 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2 |
| 2014 | 8 |
| 2013 | 10 |
| 2012 | 17 |
| 2011 | 17 |
| 2010 | 16 |
| 2009 | 17 |
| 2008 | 15 |
| 2007 | 13 |
| 2006 | 11 |
| 2005 | 12 |
| 2004 | 12 |
| 2003 | 11 |
| 2002 | 10 |
| 2001 | 9 |
| 2000 | 9 |
Tamaqua Breaker se ubica en Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 1.1% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 521 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3,023 | 1 | 1 | 330.8 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2,951 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3,469 | 1 | 0 | 288.3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3,468 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 3,318 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 3,351 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 97 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 3,402 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 3,111 | 2 | 0 | 642.9 |
| 2023 Q4 | 2,642 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 3,667 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 4,077 | 1 | 0 | 245.3 |
| 2023 Q1 | 3,847 | 1 | 0 | 259.9 |
| 2022 Q4 | 3,934 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 3,233 | 1 | 1 | 309.3 |
| 2022 Q2 | 3,331 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 3,316 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 3,068 | 3 | 1 | 977.8 |
| 2021 Q3 | 3,552 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 3,566 | 3 | 1 | 841.3 |
| 2021 Q1 | 3,082 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 3,259 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 3,276 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 3,477 | 1 | 0 | 287.6 |
| 2020 Q1 | 2,846 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 2,897 | 1 | 1 | 345.2 |
| 2019 Q3 | 2,480 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 3,213 | 5 | 1 | 1556.2 |
| 2019 Q1 | 2,563 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 2,861 | 3 | 1 | 1048.6 |
| 2018 Q3 | 3,037 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 1,954 | 1 | 0 | 511.8 |
| 2018 Q1 | 2,606 | 1 | 0 | 383.7 |
| 2017 Q4 | 3,034 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 2,301 | 1 | 0 | 434.6 |
| 2017 Q2 | 2,883 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 376 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2016 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2016 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q3 | 634 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 1,012 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 5,643 | 3 | 0 | 531.6 |
| 2014 Q3 | 4,695 | 1 | 0 | 213.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 5,909 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 5,199 | 1 | 0 | 192.3 |
| 2013 Q4 | 6,551 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 6,096 | 1 | 0 | 164.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 5,575 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 6,195 | 2 | 1 | 322.8 |
| 2012 Q4 | 9,746 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 8,704 | 1 | 0 | 114.9 |
| 2012 Q2 | 8,223 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 7,376 | 1 | 0 | 135.6 |
| 2011 Q4 | 10,199 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 9,211 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 9,371 | 1 | 1 | 106.7 |
| 2011 Q1 | 9,575 | 2 | 2 | 208.9 |
| 2010 Q4 | 8,823 | 3 | 0 | 340.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 8,630 | 1 | 1 | 115.9 |
| 2010 Q2 | 9,025 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 8,296 | 3 | 1 | 361.6 |
| 2009 Q4 | 8,289 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 8,519 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 9,204 | 1 | 0 | 108.6 |
| 2009 Q1 | 10,071 | 6 | 3 | 595.8 |
| 2008 Q4 | 9,811 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 3,539 | 4 | 1 | 1130.3 |
| 2008 Q2 | 9,684 | 1 | 0 | 103.3 |
| 2008 Q1 | 9,581 | 8 | 1 | 835.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 8,797 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 6,646 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 6,306 | 2 | 0 | 317.2 |
| 2007 Q1 | 6,221 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 5,793 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 5,394 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 5,685 | 1 | 0 | 175.9 |
| 2006 Q1 | 6,665 | 1 | 0 | 150.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 7,527 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 7,180 | 1 | 0 | 139.3 |
| 2005 Q2 | 7,162 | 2 | 1 | 279.3 |
| 2005 Q1 | 7,894 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 7,652 | 2 | 0 | 261.4 |
| 2004 Q3 | 7,181 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 6,199 | 3 | 2 | 483.9 |
| 2004 Q1 | 7,354 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 7,922 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 6,331 | 1 | 1 | 158.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 6,093 | 3 | 1 | 492.4 |
| 2003 Q1 | 7,118 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 6,269 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 5,460 | 1 | 1 | 183.2 |
| 2002 Q2 | 5,409 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 6,152 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 5,658 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 4,904 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 5,490 | 2 | 1 | 364.3 |
| 2001 Q1 | 5,622 | 1 | 0 | 177.9 |
| 2000 Q4 | 5,036 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 4,807 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 5,190 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 5,145 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
55 en archivo2013 · 1 incidente
2012 · 3 incidentes
grinding steel and debris got in employees eye
While working in crushing plant, employee's finger was crushed between a rock and a railing
Employee slipped on ice and fell on right knee
2010 · 4 incidentes
While dismounting a ford utility truck he slipped off the step bumper and fell to the ground.
Employee was grinding steel when a piece of metal lodged in his left eye. Employee was wearing a face shield.
Employee was lifting a piece of I-Beam with right arm to put a block of wood under it.
Employee was holding angle iron between two piece of channel for x bracing while another employee welded. He was looking away from the welder but the arc was too close and caused welders flash.
2009 · 2 incidentes
He proceeded to grab the drag line trip cable, as he pulled a sharp frayed piece of cable pierced his glove and hand.
EE was grinding metal, when debris was blown into his face. He was wearing a face shield.
2008 · 1 incidente
Shoveling coal
2007 · 2 incidentes
Employee was shoveling mud from under a conveyor belt. He twisted and popped a disc in his back.
Employee was inside a railroad car cleaning the car for loading and he slipped on ice and fell.
2006 · 2 incidentes
EE was grinding a piece of stainless steel. A piece flew into his eye from the grinding wheel.
Employee was emptying barrel used for burning trash. a piece of rust flew into his right eye. He didn't relaize it lodged there until his eye became uncomfortable, at which time he reported it to the employer.
2005 · 2 incidentes
Employees were removing drum separator from preparation plant. EE was on a ladder to reset come-a-long. The separator shifted and pinned him against a piece of steel.
Employee was grinding a plate for the vibrator in the preparation plant, something flew into his eye. It hurt a little at the time, but the pain went away, so he didn't report an injury. The pain returned a week later, he then reported the injury and went to the doctor. The doctor removed a particle from his right eye.
2004 · 3 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS CHANGING TEETH ON DRIVE SPROCKET OF CHAIN CONVEYOR AND PINCHED HIS THUMB.
EMPLOYEE WAS OPERATING TRUCK MOUNTED EXCAVATOR IN THE AREA OF THE CRUSHING PLANT. IT IS SUSPECTED THAT AN AIR OVER HYDRAULIC CONTROL DEVICE FAILED ON TRANSMISSION CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO GO OUT OF CONTROL AND CRASH INTO CRUSHER.
EE WAS DOING MAINTENANCE IN FINES PLANT. HE SLIPPED AND TWISTED HIS RIGHT FOOT. HE PULLED A LIGAMENT ON THE TOP OF HIS FOOT.
2003 · 1 incidente
EE WAS GRINDING A POINT ON A CHISEL. A PIECE OF THE CHISEL GOT IN HIS EYE.
2002 · 1 incidente
EE BENT OVER TO PICK UP TWO 55 GALLON EMPTY DRUMS, HE FELT A BURNING PAIN IN HIS LOWER BACK WHEN HE PICKED UP THE SECOND DRUM.
2000 · 4 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS LOOSENING STUCK CRUSHER IN PREPARATION PLANT WITH A PRY BAR. THE PRYBAR SLIPPED OUT OF THE CRUSHER GEAR AN DHIT HI IN THE FOREHEAD.
EE WAS REMOVING OIL FILTER BRACKET FROM LOADER IN AWKWARD POSITION FOR SEVERAL HOURS & AGGRAVATED PREVIOUS DISC INJURY.
EMPLOYEE WAS OPENING A GATE IN THE MORNING. HE DROPPED THE KEY,LEANED TO PICK IT UP.
EE WAS USING A SHOVEL AND POKING BAR IN BREAKER TO BREAK UP FROZEN LUMPS OF COAL.
1999 · 1 incidente
EE WAS CHOPPING ICE. THE CHOPPER HIT A PIECE OF COAL. A SHARD OF THE COAL FLEW IN EE'S RIGHT EYE.
1997 · 2 incidentes
EE WAS ATTACHING A GIRT TO HOLD METAL SIDING. CLAMP SLIPPED AND METAL CUT EE S SCALP.
EMP WAS WORKING AT CRUSHING PLANT, PICKING ROCK.AS HE WAS ROLLING A ROCK OFF OF PICKING BELT, ROCK WENT WRONG WAY AND PINCHED HAND.
1996 · 1 incidente
EE WAS WELDING COAL CHUTES. THAT NIGHT, HE FELT DISCOMFORT AND REALIZED HE HAD RECEIVED A FLASH BURN AND PARTICLE IN HIS EYE WHILE WELDING THAT DAY.,
1995 · 2 incidentes
EE WAS LIFTING A FIVE-GALLON DRUM OF ANTI-FREEZEONTO A LOADER. HE PULLED A MUSCLE IN HIS LOWER BACK. [REINJURY]
EMPLOYEE WAS PREPARING TO CHANGE OIL IN LOADER. HE BENT OVER TO PICK UP A 5 GAL OIL CHG BUCKET. THE BUCKET WAS FROZEN TO THE GROUND. EMPLOYEE PULLED A MUSCLE IN HIS BACK ATTEMPTING TO PICK UP THE BUCKET.
1994 · 1 incidente
EE WAS WORKING ON FINES PLANT WATER PUMP. AS HE WAS LIFTING DRIVE BELT GUARD OFF, EE FELT HIS BACK SNAP OUT. HE REINJURED PINCHED DISKS IN HIS LOWER BACK.
1993 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS DRILLING HOLES IN SHAKER PUSH-ARM HE FELT PAIN IN HIS BACK WHEN HE MOVED
1992 · 2 incidentes
AS EMPLOYEE WAS PREPARING TO FUEL A SPACE HEATER, HE PICKED UP A FIVE-GALLON CONTAINER OF KEROSENE. WHEN HE PICKED UP THE KEROSENE, EMPLOYEE FELT A MUSCLE PULL IN HIS BACK.
AS EMPLOYEE AS PULLING ROCK OFF OF PICKING TABKE, ROCK CAME OUT OF FEEDER AND HIS LITTLE FINGER OF LEFT HAND WAS PINCHED BETWEEN ROCKS AND BROKEN.
1991 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS CLEANING UP UNDER CONVEYOR WITH SHOVEL. HE PICKED UP A FROZEN LUMP AT COAL WITH SHOVEL AND HURT HIS BACK.
EMPLOYEE WAS CLEANING UP WORK AREA FLOOR WITH SHOVEL & FELT BACK GO OUT
1990 · 3 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS GRINDING WHILE WORKING HIS REGULAR SHIFT 7:00TO 3:30 HE HAD PAIN IN HIS LEFT EYE AT 8:00PM EMPLOYEE WENT TO GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL WHERE THEY SURGICALLY REMOVED PARTICLE FROM EYE
EMPLOYEE WAS PUTTING HAMMER AWAY AND GOT FINGER PINCHED BETWEEN HAMMER AND TABLE. HE RECEIVED LACERATION ON MIDDLE FINGER ON RIGHT HAND, REQUIRING STITCHES.
EMPLOYEE WAS REMOVING ROCK FROM SHAKER PULLED BACK MUSCLE
1989 · 5 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS USING A RAZOR KNIFE TO CUT A RUBBER BELT SCRAPER. THE RAZOR KNIFE SLIPPED AND CUT EMPLOYEE'S RIGHT THIGH.
EMPLS WERE DISASSEMBLING CRUSHER FOR REPAIR EMPL VICTIM LIFTED BEARING OUT OF PLACE & STRAINED LOWER BACK.
THIS EMPLOYEE INJURED HIS BACK WHILE REMOVING OVERSIZE ROCK FROM PICKING TABLE WITH OTHER MEN ON 2-7-89. THE INJURY WAS REPORTED TO MSHA AT THAT TIME. THE EMPLOYEE REPORTED BACK TO WORK ON 2-1 5-89. ON 3-21-89, WHILE CLEANING BOLTS, EMPLOYEE REPORTED BACK PAIN. DUE TO PAIN AND ADVICE OF PHYSICIAN, EMPLOYEE IS NOT WORKING AT THIS TIME.
AS EMPL WAS PUTTING AIR CYLINDE RON BACK OF PICKUP TRUCK HE SLIPPED & FELL. EMPLLS RIGHT HAND WAS CAUGHT BETWEEN CYLINDER & SIDE OF TRUCK CAUSING SIMPLE FRACTURE OF RIGHT MIDDLE FINGER.
EMPLOYEE WAS REMOVING OVERSIZE ROCK FRAOM PICKING TABLE WITH OTHERMEN AND FELT SOMETHING PULL IN LOWER BACK.
1988 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEES WERE CONSTRUCTING A TIMBER WALL AND WERE SLIDING TIMBER ALONG A LEDGE INTO POSITION,WHEN IT SLIPPED OFF AND LANDED END FIRST ON EMPLOYEEE'S TOE.
EMPLOYEE WAS WORKING AT RAILROAD SIDING MOVING EMPTY AND LOADED CARS INTO AND OUT OF LOADING AREA. HE WAS MOVING LOADED CAR OUT OF LOADING AREA WHEN IT BECAME STUCK ON ICY RAILS. EMPLOYEE CAME DOWN FROM BRAKEMAN POSITION TO REMOVE BLOCKAGE ANDMOVE CAR WITH MECHANICAL MOVER. EMPLOYEE STATED THAT SOMETIME DURING CLIMBING UP AND DOWN CAR OR MOVING CAR WITH MECHANICAL MOVER, HE STRAINE
1987 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS WO9KING ON SHAKER HE SET DOWN A SLEDGE HAMMER & A PIECE OF ANGLE IRON FELL & BRUISED HIS LEFT FOOT
EMPLOYEE WAS UN5OADING FORMS FROM LOADER BUCKET.WHILE CLIMBING DOWN OFF OF CONCRETE WALL,HE SLIPPED AND FELL,CAUSING BRUISES AND LACERATIONS TO HIS BACK.
1986 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS WA8HING LOADER HE SLIPPED AND CUT HIS RT ARM ON A PIECE OF METAL ON THE LOADER
EMP WAS FINISHE8 WORKING AND WAS PUTTING AWAY WELDING EQUIPMENT. AFTER HE FINISHED WRAPPING HOSE, HE TURNED AROUND AND WALKED INTO CONVEYOR. HE RECEIVED CUT TO RIGHT FOREHEAD
1985 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS UNLOADING COAL FROM DELIERY TRUCK WHEN TWO SMALL PIECES OF WIRE BECAME LODGED IN HIS RIGHT EYE
1983 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS PICKING ROCK ON BULL SHAKER, ROCK BOUNCED AND FLEW UP AND HIT HANT. EMPLOYEE\S WRIST WAS BROKEN.
EMPLOYEE WAS PRYING ROCK FROM COAL HOPPER WITH BAR ROCK LEFT LOOSE BAR WEDGED LEFT HAND AGAINST HOPPER IRON ON HOPPER CUT HAND CUT REQUIRED STITCHES