YAVAPAI PLANT 22 tiene $33K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 7 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en YAVAPAI PLANT 22.
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 | 4,909 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 5,279 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6,328 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 5,508 | 1 | 0 | 181.6 |
| 2024 Q4 | 6,626 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 7,121 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q2 | 6,769 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 6,222 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Q4 | 7,600 | 2 | 0 | 263.2 |
| 2023 Q3 | 6,541 | 1 | 1 | 152.9 |
| 2023 Q2 | 5,215 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 4,837 | 1 | 0 | 206.7 |
| 2022 Q4 | 5,271 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 5,697 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 7,906 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 4,787 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 4,394 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 4,833 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 4,914 | 1 | 0 | 203.5 |
| 2021 Q1 | 4,480 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 4,409 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 4,729 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 4,641 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 4,816 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 4,583 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 4,305 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 4,558 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 3,984 | 12 | 2 | 3012.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 4,043 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 4,171 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 3,897 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 3,869 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 3,935 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 4,232 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 4,373 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 4,213 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 4,047 | 1 | 0 | 247.1 |
| 2016 Q3 | 4,821 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 4,739 | 2 | 0 | 422.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 4,692 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 4,336 | 3 | 0 | 691.9 |
| 2015 Q3 | 4,579 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 5,111 | 3 | 1 | 587.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 4,506 | 7 | 0 | 1553.5 |
| 2014 Q4 | 5,204 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 5,176 | 1 | 0 | 193.2 |
| 2014 Q2 | 5,516 | 2 | 0 | 362.6 |
| 2014 Q1 | 5,549 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 5,155 | 2 | 1 | 388.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 5,482 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 6,173 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 4,637 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 4,674 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 5,097 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 5,182 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 4,857 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 4,344 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 5,026 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 4,918 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 4,681 | 1 | 0 | 213.6 |
| 2010 Q4 | 4,466 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 5,357 | 1 | 0 | 186.7 |
| 2010 Q2 | 4,357 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 4,953 | 2 | 0 | 403.8 |
| 2009 Q4 | 4,999 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 6,168 | 15 | 3 | 2431.9 |
| 2009 Q2 | 5,819 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 5,603 | 9 | 1 | 1606.3 |
| 2008 Q4 | 7,247 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 10,588 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 12,235 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 10,689 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 12,360 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 17,296 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 21,905 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 18,356 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 21,859 | 3 | 0 | 137.2 |
| 2006 Q3 | 15,709 | 4 | 3 | 254.6 |
| 2006 Q2 | 20,755 | 4 | 0 | 192.7 |
| 2006 Q1 | 18,642 | 3 | 0 | 160.9 |
| 2005 Q4 | 22,638 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 24,139 | 1 | 0 | 41.4 |
| 2005 Q2 | 23,267 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 21,234 | 1 | 0 | 47.1 |
| 2004 Q4 | 24,228 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 24,769 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 21,956 | 1 | 1 | 45.5 |
| 2004 Q1 | 22,417 | 1 | 0 | 44.6 |
| 2003 Q4 | 21,733 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 21,496 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 21,397 | 5 | 2 | 233.7 |
| 2003 Q1 | 18,337 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 20,143 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 19,465 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 19,160 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 20,571 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 19,226 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 21,893 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 20,895 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 14,454 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 9,880 | 3 | 0 | 303.6 |
| 2000 Q3 | 14,500 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 14,508 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 12,802 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
The employee was changing the spool on a weed eater, and their left thumb made contact with the string cutter, causing a laceration.
Employee was running a loader feeding the plant when the employee radioed to a fellow employee to call 911. The employee came down from the loader to get nitro pills. The employee took the pills and was transported to the nearby hospital. The Dr. stated they had to put 2 stents in and because of the previous heart condition, deemed it non-work related.
Employee was attempting to clear a primary screen discharge box that was clogged with returned concrete. Clog material was over engaged causing the employee to slip and strike an angle iron brace with hand resulting in a closed fracture of right pinkie finger. Employee returned to work at regular position but, with restrictions on use of right hand.
Employee took a shortcut after finishing work on the ABC crusher screen and, ignoring company policy, he climbed over a handrail stepping onto a moving conveyor belt running underneath the crusher screen. The belt was not part of the crusher screen that was being worked on. First aid was administered by an off-site provider on an out-patient basis.
IE was climbing down the ladder on the jaw feeder when his foot slipped on the ladder and his leg went thru the ladder and he fell backward. The IE suffered a groin muscle pull.
EMPLOYEE GOT HIS LEFT 5TH FINGER CAUGHT BETWEEN TWO PIECES OF METAL. HE RECEIVED TWO STITCHES.
EE WAS WORKING AT A DEBRIS REMOVING STATION ON ACONVEYOR, HE BANGED HIS KNEE AGAINST THE CONVEYOR FRAME
A dated report covering the 26-year penalty trail, line-item violation pattern, contest and docket posture, rate-normalized peer benchmark, and full fatality history. Delivered as a PDF with the underlying data as CSV.