EMPLOYEE WAS REMOVING MOUNTING BOLTS ON A GOB SWITCH WHEN ELECTROCUTION OCCURRED.
Preparation Plant: 1 muerte registrada Coal
Preparation Plant tiene $134K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $9K pendientes en 6 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Preparation Plant.
- Muertes
- 1
- Incidentes totales
- 28
- Años en registro
- 1998–2024
- Último incidente
- Nov 2024
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Preparation Plant tiene $134K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $9K pendientes en 6 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 20 · 100%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENT20010215 | Settlement | Bulluck | 2003 | $140K → $70K |
| KENT 2013-665 | Settlement | McCarthy | 2013 | $4K → $3K |
| KENT 2011-204 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2011 | $4K → $3K |
| KENT 2012-8 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2013 | $828 → $621 |
| KENT 2008-775 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2009 | $789 → $463 |
| KENT 2009-198 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2010 | $668 → $434 |
El muestreo de MSHA en Preparation Plant muestra que 98% de 607 muestras de polvo respirable de carbón cumplieron el estandar de 1.5 mg/m3.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Polvo respirable de carbón
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.
Última medición: 2026-06-12
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
El valor de concentración excesiva (ECV) es el umbral de aplicación por muestra de la propia MSHA, que incorpora la incertidumbre de medición; una muestra por encima de su ECV puede motivar una citación. El conteo cubre solo las muestras a las que MSHA asignó un ECV.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR198
- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR100
- MECHANIC88
Sílice (cuarzo)
Última medición: 2026-04-14- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR26
- MECHANIC18
- ELECTRICIAN15
Ruido
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.
Última medición: 2025-11-06
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR35
- UTILITY MAN28
- ELECTRICIAN27
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.| Año | dentro de 1.5 mg/m3 | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 100% | 9 |
| 2025 | 100% | 16 |
| 2024 | 100% | 16 |
| 2023 | 100% | 15 |
| 2022 | 100% | 22 |
| 2021 | 100% | 16 |
| 2020 | 100% | 16 |
| 2019 | 100% | 11 |
| 2018 | 100% | 20 |
| 2017 | 100% | 10 |
| 2016 | 100% | 22 |
| 2015 | 100% | 17 |
| 2014 | 100% | 7 |
| 2013 | 100% | 13 |
| 2012 | 100% | 21 |
| 2011 | 100% | 12 |
| 2010 | 100% | 7 |
| 2009 | 100% | 18 |
| 2008 | 100% | 25 |
| 2007 | 100% | 26 |
| 2006 | 97% | 30 |
| 2005 | 100% | 20 |
| 2004 | 95% | 42 |
| 2003 | 96% | 49 |
| 2002 | 96% | 54 |
| 2001 | 91% | 74 |
| 2000 | 95% | 19 |
| Año | sílice prom. (%) | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.5 | 2 |
| 2025 | 1 | |
| 2024 | 1 | |
| 2023 | 3.1 | 3 |
| 2022 | 2.1 | 6 |
| 2021 | 0.5 | 1 |
| 2020 | 1.2 | 2 |
| 2018 | 2.0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 2.6 | 7 |
| 2016 | 1.6 | 8 |
| 2015 | 2.5 | 7 |
| 2013 | 0.6 | 2 |
| 2012 | 0.6 | 2 |
| 2011 | 0.8 | 2 |
| 2009 | 0.7 | 3 |
| 2008 | 1.2 | 2 |
| 2007 | 1.3 | 6 |
| 2006 | 0.7 | 3 |
| 2005 | 1.0 | 5 |
| 2004 | 1.1 | 8 |
| 2003 | 2.3 | 6 |
| 2002 | 0.9 | 5 |
| 2001 | 1.6 | 5 |
| 2000 | 1.5 | 1 |
| Año | sobre el LPE | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17% | 6 |
| 2024 | 0% | 7 |
| 2023 | 0% | 6 |
| 2022 | 0% | 12 |
| 2021 | 0% | 6 |
| 2020 | 0% | 6 |
| 2018 | 17% | 12 |
| 2016 | 0% | 13 |
| 2015 | 8% | 12 |
| 2013 | 14% | 7 |
| 2012 | 0% | 13 |
| 2011 | 14% | 7 |
| 2010 | 14% | 7 |
| 2009 | 0% | 7 |
| 2008 | 0% | 4 |
| 2007 | 0% | 13 |
| 2006 | 0% | 7 |
| 2005 | 0% | 5 |
| 2003 | 25% | 16 |
| 2002 | 0% | 4 |
| 2001 | 35% | 17 |
| 2000 | 0% | 5 |
Preparation Plant registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2025.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 2.10 | 2.10 | 0.000 |
| 2023 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 2.01 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 3.15 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 3.92 | 3.92 | 0.000 |
- Pentagram Mining Company 1995 a 1996
- Garrett Mining Inc 1996 a 1997
- D-Mac Enterprises Inc 1997 a 1999
- MC Mining LLC 1999 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 28 |
| 2025 | 27 |
| 2024 | 45 |
| 2023 | 54 |
| 2022 | 41 |
| 2021 | 29 |
| 2020 | 30 |
| 2019 | 23 |
| 2018 | 23 |
| 2017 | 23 |
| 2016 | 23 |
| 2015 | 24 |
| 2014 | 26 |
| 2013 | 23 |
| 2012 | 20 |
| 2011 | 20 |
| 2010 | 20 |
| 2009 | 21 |
| 2008 | 22 |
| 2007 | 23 |
| 2006 | 22 |
| 2005 | 19 |
| 2004 | 22 |
| 2003 | 20 |
| 2002 | 18 |
| 2001 | 18 |
| 2000 | 17 |
Preparation Plant se ubica en Pike County, Kentucky, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 5.1% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 14,113 | 6 | 0 | 425.1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 13,029 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 12,652 | 5 | 1 | 395.2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 13,239 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 12,842 | 7 | 1 | 545.1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 14,861 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 21,972 | 5 | 0 | 227.6 |
| 2024 Q3 | 23,483 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 98 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 24,314 | 10 | 1 | 411.3 |
| 2024 Q1 | 25,466 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 25,648 | 9 | 1 | 350.9 |
| 2023 Q3 | 29,275 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 30,865 | 3 | 1 | 97.2 |
| 2023 Q1 | 32,092 | 1 | 0 | 31.2 |
| 2022 Q4 | 30,984 | 2 | 1 | 64.5 |
| 2022 Q3 | 24,686 | 20 | 4 | 810.2 |
| 2022 Q2 | 22,565 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 21,036 | 10 | 0 | 475.4 |
| 2021 Q4 | 17,914 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 17,512 | 9 | 2 | 513.9 |
| 2021 Q2 | 14,018 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 14,065 | 7 | 0 | 497.7 |
| 2020 Q4 | 12,556 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 20,162 | 7 | 2 | 347.2 |
| 2020 Q2 | 14,897 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 12,214 | 1 | 0 | 81.9 |
| 2019 Q4 | 11,259 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 12,161 | 2 | 0 | 164.5 |
| 2019 Q2 | 12,679 | 1 | 0 | 78.9 |
| 2019 Q1 | 13,554 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 12,360 | 8 | 1 | 647.2 |
| 2018 Q3 | 12,349 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 12,798 | 10 | 0 | 781.4 |
| 2018 Q1 | 13,536 | 1 | 0 | 73.9 |
| 2017 Q4 | 12,084 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 12,457 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 12,397 | 4 | 0 | 322.7 |
| 2017 Q1 | 13,123 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 12,759 | 5 | 0 | 391.9 |
| 2016 Q3 | 11,724 | 1 | 0 | 85.3 |
| 2016 Q2 | 11,421 | 2 | 0 | 175.1 |
| 2016 Q1 | 11,560 | 5 | 0 | 432.5 |
| 2015 Q4 | 10,839 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 11,884 | 3 | 0 | 252.4 |
| 2015 Q2 | 11,532 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 13,594 | 6 | 0 | 441.4 |
| 2014 Q4 | 13,272 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 15,262 | 9 | 1 | 589.7 |
| 2014 Q2 | 15,077 | 9 | 2 | 596.9 |
| 2014 Q1 | 16,578 | 17 | 4 | 1025.5 |
| 2013 Q4 | 13,440 | 15 | 4 | 1116.1 |
| 2013 Q3 | 13,055 | 3 | 2 | 229.8 |
| 2013 Q2 | 13,374 | 8 | 2 | 598.2 |
| 2013 Q1 | 12,865 | 1 | 1 | 77.7 |
| 2012 Q4 | 11,931 | 15 | 5 | 1257.2 |
| 2012 Q3 | 12,183 | 20 | 7 | 1641.6 |
| 2012 Q2 | 10,136 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 11,587 | 10 | 5 | 863.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 11,087 | 3 | 1 | 270.6 |
| 2011 Q3 | 12,056 | 14 | 5 | 1161.2 |
| 2011 Q2 | 12,933 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 12,566 | 16 | 4 | 1273.3 |
| 2010 Q4 | 11,128 | 2 | 2 | 179.7 |
| 2010 Q3 | 11,168 | 1 | 0 | 89.5 |
| 2010 Q2 | 12,380 | 1 | 0 | 80.8 |
| 2010 Q1 | 12,882 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 11,402 | 6 | 1 | 526.2 |
| 2009 Q3 | 12,489 | 10 | 2 | 800.7 |
| 2009 Q2 | 12,457 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 13,373 | 8 | 1 | 598.2 |
| 2008 Q4 | 13,551 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 14,152 | 11 | 1 | 777.3 |
| 2008 Q2 | 14,633 | 1 | 0 | 68.3 |
| 2008 Q1 | 15,342 | 11 | 3 | 717.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 14,626 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 14,037 | 10 | 8 | 712.4 |
| 2007 Q2 | 14,637 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 14,893 | 9 | 2 | 604.3 |
| 2006 Q4 | 14,452 | 1 | 0 | 69.2 |
| 2006 Q3 | 15,888 | 5 | 2 | 314.7 |
| 2006 Q2 | 13,930 | 9 | 2 | 646.1 |
| 2006 Q1 | 14,182 | 1 | 0 | 70.5 |
| 2005 Q4 | 13,795 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 12,755 | 5 | 2 | 392.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 13,694 | 2 | 0 | 146.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 12,203 | 9 | 1 | 737.5 |
| 2004 Q4 | 13,670 | 6 | 4 | 438.9 |
| 2004 Q3 | 13,493 | 2 | 0 | 148.2 |
| 2004 Q2 | 13,465 | 5 | 1 | 371.3 |
| 2004 Q1 | 15,014 | 13 | 5 | 865.9 |
| 2003 Q4 | 13,430 | 2 | 1 | 148.9 |
| 2003 Q3 | 12,921 | 8 | 1 | 619.1 |
| 2003 Q2 | 11,807 | 1 | 1 | 84.7 |
| 2003 Q1 | 12,855 | 4 | 2 | 311.2 |
| 2002 Q4 | 11,003 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 9,556 | 1 | 0 | 104.6 |
| 2002 Q2 | 9,993 | 3 | 0 | 300.2 |
| 2002 Q1 | 9,956 | 7 | 5 | 703.1 |
| 2001 Q4 | 10,664 | 6 | 2 | 562.6 |
| 2001 Q3 | 10,866 | 3 | 2 | 276.1 |
| 2001 Q2 | 11,442 | 9 | 4 | 786.6 |
| 2001 Q1 | 10,700 | 18 | 5 | 1682.2 |
| 2000 Q4 | 9,034 | 4 | 4 | 442.8 |
| 2000 Q3 | 10,056 | 1 | 1 | 99.4 |
| 2000 Q2 | 10,252 | 11 | 2 | 1073.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 9,538 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Muertes en esta mina
1 registradasIncidentes reportables
27 en archivo (excluyendo las muertes anteriores)2024 · 1 incidente
Employee was changing a hose on the dozer. The fitting was tight. When EE tried to loosen the fitting, EE's hand slipped off the wrench causing EE to lose balance. EE fell and hit shoulder on the frame of the dozer, causing pain in right shoulder.
2022 · 1 incidente
Employee was using a post driver to drive a copper ground rod in the ground. The driver slipped off the ground rod on the downward motion. Employees hand hit the top of the ground rod puncturing the skin causing a laceration the required stitches.
2021 · 1 incidente
Employee was shoveling rust from the floor. EE moved a ladder to clean around it and a piece of cue decking fell causing a laceration to EE's right hand.
2018 · 1 incidente
The injured miner was assisting a co-worker in throwing the flop gate at a head drive chute when the chain ratchet that was holding the gate came loose and allowed the gate to strike EE on the right side of the head. As the gate struck the injured miner, it knocked EE into an adjacent object causing EE to strike the left side of EE's head.
2017 · 1 incidente
Employee was dismounting from compactor, stepped on a rock twisting their knee. Doctor removed employee from work pending MRI results.
2015 · 2 incidentes
Refuse haul truck driver (contractor) parked in truck parking lot at end of shift and was dismounting truck. He apparently fell from truck step, landing on left side. He was taken to ER due to pain in left leg and elevated vitals. Upon arrival at ER he was sent for an EKG and they told him he had a heart attack. Later told him his hip was fractured.
The employee was pulling on flop gate handle to close it to divert coal into screen chute. He had his hand upon the up on the side edge of chute and the gate caught and pinched his finger causing a laceration which required stitches.
2014 · 1 incidente
Employee went into pump building near preparation plant to turn on water valve to wash down tail piece pad. Employee stated that he was standing on a pipe to turn the valve on. Employee stated that his foot slipped and he fell backward striking his right side and twisting his back and neck. Employee is waiting for MRI to determine necessary treatment.
2013 · 1 incidente
Employee was cleaning a spot to weld a plate inside a chute. As he was chipping rust and rock from chute a piece of debris got in behind his safety glasses and into his eye.
2010 · 3 incidentes
EE stated he was cutting pipe out of overhead when a piece of hot slag dropped inside car.
EE was assisting in repair work on thickener. A small piece of catwalk had been removed to gain access to the work area below. EE stated that he had forgot about the hole and stepped into it striking his elbow on the grating. This resulted in a laceration to his right elbow which required stitches to close.
EE states that he was sitting on top of picnic table conducting weekly safety meeting. As he finished meeting he jumped down quickly while leaning forward and landed with most of his weight on his right leg. He states that he continued to have problems and went to doctor. Doctor has removed him from work as of 10/28/10. He was having surgery today 10/29/10
2009 · 1 incidente
EE had shoveled for a couple of days clearing up transfer building. Stated that he had some soreness and pain but never thought it was anything. He later went to the doctor, but did not say if was due to injury. 12/21/09 his doc took him off work & on 1/5/10 we received a letter stating that he had a strain to his left shoulder that was due to the work related injury.
2007 · 2 incidentes
The above date of accident reflects the employee's first day away from work. Employee has been diagnosed with uncovertebral hyperthropy, right paracentral disc protrusion with stemosis of the cervical spine. Employee has been treated for his conditions for several years.
Employee was lifting/loading 100 pound sample bags of coal into the the back of a pickup truck. As he was stepping with the bag he felt and heard a popping noise which turned out to be an injury to his right knee.
2005 · 2 incidentes
EE STATED THAT EE WAS CUTTING PLASTIC PIPE WHEN KNIFE SLIPPED CAUSING A LACERATION WHICH REQUIRED SUTURES TO CLOSE
Employee stated he was cutting holes in a piece of rubber with a utility knife. Knife slipped out of rubber and cut his hand.
2003 · 4 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS PERFORMING A PRE-OPERATIONAL CHECK PRIOR TO STARTING THE DOZER. HIS FOOT SLIPPED & HIS LEG WENT BETWEEN PUSH BAR & TRACK.
EE STATED HE WAS PULLING PIPE OUT OF PLANT & PULLED MUSCLE IN GROIN. EE DID NOT GO TO DOCTOR FOR COULE OF DAYS LATER & THEN WAS RECOMMENDED TO A SPECIALIST. WE HAVE BEEN AWAITING THE RESULTS O F TEST TO DETERMINE IF REPORTABLE. EE HAS NOT MISSED ANY WORK AS OF THIS DATE.
LOADING BUCKET ON TRUCK, WAS CHAINING AND BINDING DOWN BUCKET, STARTED TO STEP OFF BUCKET, MISSED STEP, FELL DOWN BETWEEN BUCKET AND SIDE OF TRUCK BED.
EMPLOYEE WAS BENDING AND LIFTING FLYTES IN BOTTOM OF WASHBOX WHEN HIS BACK STARTED HURTING. HE DID NOT MISS ANY WORK UNTIL 2/20/04.
2002 · 1 incidente
WHILE CUTTING A PIECE OF BELTING TO INSTALL A SKIRT ON A COAL CHUTE HIS KNIFE SLIPPED AND CUT HIS RIGHT THUMB REQUIRING SIX STITCHES TO CLOSE.
2000 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS CHANGING IMPACT ROLLER. OLD BOLTS WERE RUSTY. EMPLOYEE WAS TRYING TO KNOCK BOLTS LOOSE AND RUST FROM BOLTS WENT INTO EYES AROUND SAFETY GLASSES.
EMPLOYEE WAS HOLDING A KNOCKER WRENCH & ANOTHER EMPLOYEE WAS USING A #8 SLEDGE HAMMER TO SECURE THE HOUSING ON THE VESSEL MEDIA PUMP. INJURED THOUGHT HAMMERER WAS READY FOR WRENCH TO BE REPO SITIONED. WHEN HE MOVED HIS HAND TO THE HANDLE THE FINGER WAS CAUGHT BETWEEN THE WRENCH AND THEHAMMER.
1998 · 3 incidentes
EE WAS WASHING DUST ACCUMLATIONS IN BASEMENT OF=PREP PLANT WHERE HE SLIPPED & FELL INJURING KNEE
EE WAS CUTTING METAL WITH A TORCH WHEN PIECE OF RUST POPPED IN EYE. EE WAS WEARING SAFETY GLASSES AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT
AN UNPLANNED FIRE HAPPENED IN THE SURFACE HIGH VOLTAGE SUBSTATION