It is believed that the customer truck driver fell from EE's trailer to the ground while stepping from the trailer to the safe rack. The fall resulted in multiple injuries requiring medical attention and a loss of work days.
Lamesa Plant: 179 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
Lamesa Plant tiene $84K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $14K pendientes en 2 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Lamesa Plant.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 23
- Años en registro
- 2018–2026
- Último incidente
- Mar 2026
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Lamesa Plant tiene $84K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $14K pendientes en 2 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 8 · 89%
- Aún abiertas 1 · 11%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT 2019-0346 | Settlement | Simonton | 2019 | $5K → $2K |
| CENT 2026-0195 | Decisión pendiente |
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2023-10-19
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz174 en exceso
- Respirable dust, <.1mg9
- Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz1
Ver los análisis individuales (27)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.51 | 0.31 | 1.65 | Cleanup Man |
| 2019-06-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.53 | 0.31 | 1.71 | Cleanup Man |
| 2018-12-18 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.32 | 0.29 | 1.10 | Cleanup Man |
| 2018-12-18 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.48 | 0.39 | 1.23 | Cleanup Man |
| 2023-10-19 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.56 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2023-10-19 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.19 | 0.86 | 0.22 | Sand Filler (Dry) |
| 2023-10-19 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.18 | 0.78 | 0.23 | Sand Filler (Dry) |
| 2023-10-19 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Dry Screen Plant Operator | ||
| 2023-10-19 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2023-08-30 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.2 | 0.67 | 0.30 | Kiln/Dryer Operator |
| 2023-08-30 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.26 | 0.99 | 0.26 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2023-08-30 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.13 | Kiln/Dryer Operator | ||
| 2023-08-30 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2023-08-30 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.28 | 1.01 | 0.28 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2020-03-04 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Kiln/Dryer Operator | ||
| 2020-03-04 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.25 | Kiln/Dryer Operator | ||
| 2020-03-04 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Kiln/Dryer Operator | ||
| 2020-03-04 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Kiln/Dryer Operator | ||
| 2019-07-10 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Cleanup Man | ||
| 2019-07-10 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Cleanup Man | ||
| 2019-07-10 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.13 | Cleanup Man | ||
| 2019-06-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.21 | 0.54 | 0.39 | Truck Loader |
| 2019-06-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.14 | 0.43 | 0.33 | Cleanup Man |
| 2019-06-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.19 | 0.63 | 0.30 | Supervisor, Co. Official |
| 2018-12-18 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Electrician Helper | ||
| 2018-12-18 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.16 | 0.34 | 0.47 | Cleanup Man |
| 2018-12-18 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.17 | 0.35 | 0.49 | Oiler, Greaser |
Lamesa Plant registró 0.81 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2025.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.000 |
| 2024 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2023 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.000 |
| 2021 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 | 2.96 | 0.49 | 0.000 |
- US Silica Co 2018 a 2025
- U.S. Silica Energy Company 2025 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 111 |
| 2025 | 109 |
| 2024 | 118 |
| 2023 | 140 |
| 2022 | 148 |
| 2021 | 110 |
| 2020 | 106 |
| 2019 | 178 |
| 2018 | 103 |
Lamesa Plant se ubica en Dawson County, Texas, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 12.9% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 67,080 | 13 | 1 | 193.8 |
| 2026 Q1 | 65,533 | 5 | 1 | 76.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 61,062 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 59,412 | 4 | 0 | 67.3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 63,641 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 62,894 | 1 | 0 | 15.9 |
| 2024 Q4 | 62,909 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 64,092 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 25 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 67,184 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 70,390 | 16 | 1 | 227.3 |
| 2023 Q4 | 71,892 | 1 | 0 | 13.9 |
| 2023 Q3 | 78,614 | 7 | 0 | 89.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 87,671 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 85,564 | 5 | 0 | 58.4 |
| 2022 Q4 | 85,874 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 83,977 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 77,635 | 8 | 2 | 103.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 64,162 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 65,932 | 11 | 3 | 166.8 |
| 2021 Q3 | 55,697 | 11 | 1 | 197.5 |
| 2021 Q2 | 56,367 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 43,215 | 7 | 6 | 162.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 41,103 | 5 | 0 | 121.6 |
| 2020 Q3 | 35,968 | 9 | 1 | 250.2 |
| 2020 Q2 | 32,534 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 82,061 | 3 | 0 | 36.6 |
| 2019 Q4 | 85,109 | 9 | 1 | 105.7 |
| 2019 Q3 | 108,644 | 1 | 0 | 9.2 |
| 2019 Q2 | 112,677 | 11 | 2 | 97.6 |
| 2019 Q1 | 98,618 | 4 | 3 | 40.6 |
| 2018 Q4 | 68,888 | 9 | 1 | 130.6 |
| 2018 Q3 | 62,896 | 3 | 3 | 47.7 |
| 2018 Q2 | 14,340 | 9 | 7 | 627.6 |
Incidentes reportables
23 en archivo2026 · 1 incidente
2025 · 2 incidentes
Employee fell while preparing to fuel a D6 dozer after a ladder/stool failed, resulting in a right ankle fracture.
While descending a stairway, the EE missed a step and landed hard on the outside of right foot, resulting in a fracture to the metatarsal bone. The fracture wasn't discovered until a clinic visit on 7/14/25.
2022 · 2 incidentes
Injured had just dismounted their haul truck with both feet on the ground. When the employee turned to walk away the left knee buckled. Diagnosed with a left knee strain.
While attempting to clean the windshield of a haul truck in contradiction of company policy the employee fell to the ground. The fall resulted in a fractured rib and facial bones.
2021 · 2 incidentes
The employee was dumping a dust collector hopper. The hopper would not return to the locked position, so the employee tried locking it manually. In doing so, EE's finger was caught between forklift mast and hopper, transported to the hospital: tuft fracture and stitches to EE's thumb.
Due to employees' failure to follow company policy for fall protection, EE fell off a truck. The employee was transported to the medical facility, where they received stitches to right knee. EE also has lacerations on chin, shin, a bone chip in wrist, and a chipped tooth.
2020 · 3 incidentes
The employee was using a pipe wrench to manually lower the thickener tank rake when the mechanism broke free EE's finger was smashed between structure and wrench.
Employee working in a sand dryer repairing the refractory lining. Stepped on a sharp refractory anchor that penetrated the sole of EE's boot. Puncture wound rt. foot.
Employee stated that EE felt pain in EE's neck and back when the loader operator dropped a load of sand into EE's haul truck.
2019 · 9 incidentes
Employee was changing bucket teeth on a loader, hitting the teeth with a sledge hammer, the hammer bounced back and threw their hand into the tooth causing a laceration to their thumb
Employee stated they hurt their back when the truck shifted gears. A witness stated the employee was frustrated with having to work and slammed themselves against the back of the truck seat.
Two EEs were changing out the screens at Rotex 5186. In the process of removing a screen the injured EE received burns on forearms. 1st AID measures were taken by plant personnel, recommended by Axiom Medical Service. Subsequently, EE was seen by MD for follow up evaluation on 9/18/19. The MD would not allow the EE return to work on EE's next assigned work day of 9/19/19
EE claims injury occurred on 8/5/19. EE reported to Supervisor until 8/25/19. EE was taken for medical eval on 8/26/19, released to full duty. On 9/10/19 EE complained pain returning and was transported for second medical eval and was released to full duty. MRI was scheduled & was obtained on 10/10/19. 11/5/19 EE returned for further medical evaluation, assigned restrictions.
Employee was removing the bucket pins from excavator to place the bucket on another excavator. After the pin was driven out completely the stick moved down and struck their right hand
Miner became weak, dizzy and nauseated. Co-Worker assisted miner until local EMS was notified and responded then transported EE to local emergency room. Miner was released 1 1/2 hours after arrival with heat exhaustion as diagnosis.
EE placed right hand on lid of dust bin as forklift was setting down. EE sustained minor injury. EE was offered medical treatment and declined. On 4/27/19 EE requested medical treatment and was seen by MD. Treating MD could not see issue and released to full duty. On 5/2/19, MD determined diagnosis was incorrect and a fracture was diagnosed.
Electrician was using a utility knife to strip insulation from a wire to make a repair. Employee removed cut-resistant gloves prior to beginning the task. Employee cut right thumb with the utility knife, requiring seven sutures. No lost time and no restrictions.
Employee tripped while walking to assigned work area. EE averted falling by grabbing a steel gusset with the left hand. In doing so, EE dislocated left thumb.
2018 · 4 incidentes
Employee finished installing the last fastener during installation of a wire mesh conveyor guard. EE took off gloves to install the fastener. Employee stood up from kneeling beside the guard panel, EE's bare hand brushed across a spliced area of the expanded wire mesh on the guard panel. EE's right finger received two extensive lacerations which required stitches.
Employee was in a 126' boom lift attempting to relocate the boom lift unaware the basket was lodged on structure. When basket of boom lift broke free the basket jerked causing employee who was holding on to handrails of basket to smash right hand between basket rails and structure causing employee to smash/pinch right hand and 5th fingertip.
Employee reported employee felt something on knee 11/21. EE told co worker it might be a boil. Two days later EE sought treatment. 11/26 EE reported to work with a release and complained of worsening symptoms. EE left job site and went to the hospital where EE was admitted for cellulitis.
While attempting to connect an SRL to the harness, the employee lost balance and fell (same level) striking left knee on a toe board. The resulting injury was a laceration requiring 5 stitches.