Employee was using a pry bar when working on a bus, removing the transmission. The bar slipped and struck EE in the mouth, causing the tooth filling to fall out and broke part of the tooth.
Eckman Plant: 364 citaciones de la MSHA Coal
Eckman Plant tiene $322K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $18K pendientes en 14 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Eckman Plant.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 41
- Años en registro
- 2010–2026
- Último incidente
- Mar 2026
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Eckman Plant tiene $322K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $18K pendientes en 14 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 79 · 78%
- Quedaron como emitidas 22 · 22%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEVA 2010-520 | Settlement | Lewis | 2011 | $93K → $77K |
| WEVA 2010-639 | Settlement | Lewis | 2011 | $63K → $37K |
| WEVA 2019-0622 | Settlement | Sullivan | 2021 | $39K → $11K |
| WEVA 2010-620 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2011 | $27K → $27K |
| WEVA 2010-521 | Settlement | Lewis | 2011 | $6K → $3K |
| WEVA 2010-511 | Dismissal | Lewis | 2011 | $4K → $4K |
El muestreo de MSHA en Eckman Plant muestra que 97% de 231 muestras de polvo respirable de carbón cumplieron el estandar de 1.5 mg/m3.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Polvo respirable de carbón
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.
Última medición: 2026-06-08
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
El valor de concentración excesiva (ECV) es el umbral de aplicación por muestra de la propia MSHA, que incorpora la incertidumbre de medición; una muestra por encima de su ECV puede motivar una citación. El conteo cubre solo las muestras a las que MSHA asignó un ECV.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR115
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER40
- UTILITY MAN21
Sílice (cuarzo)
Última medición: 2025-03-06- BULLDOZER OPERATOR8
Ruido
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.
Última medición: 2026-04-07
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER22
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR21
- UTILITY MAN17
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.| Año | dentro de 1.5 mg/m3 | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 100% | 3 |
| 2025 | 100% | 14 |
| 2024 | 100% | 9 |
| 2023 | 100% | 10 |
| 2022 | 100% | 19 |
| 2021 | 92% | 13 |
| 2020 | 95% | 22 |
| 2019 | 100% | 16 |
| 2018 | 100% | 18 |
| 2017 | 100% | 13 |
| 2016 | 96% | 28 |
| 2015 | 100% | 11 |
| 2014 | 91% | 11 |
| 2013 | 87% | 15 |
| 2012 | 100% | 10 |
| 2011 | 100% | 8 |
| 2010 | 100% | 5 |
| 2009 | 100% | 6 |
| Año | sílice prom. (%) | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3.2 | 1 |
| 2022 | 10.4 | 1 |
| 2021 | 4.0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 2.6 | 1 |
| 2017 | 11.9 | 1 |
| 2016 | 7.1 | 2 |
| 2014 | 3.9 | 1 |
| Año | sobre el LPE | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0% | 3 |
| 2025 | 7% | 14 |
| 2024 | 0% | 3 |
| 2022 | 0% | 5 |
| 2021 | 0% | 5 |
| 2020 | 50% | 4 |
| 2019 | 0% | 5 |
| 2018 | 0% | 10 |
| 2017 | 0% | 5 |
| 2016 | 0% | 9 |
| 2015 | 10% | 10 |
| 2013 | 11% | 9 |
| 2012 | 0% | 5 |
| 2011 | 0% | 5 |
| 2009 | 0% | 5 |
Eckman Plant registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2025.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2023 | 2.20 | 1.10 | 0.000 |
| 2022 | 2.23 | 2.23 | 0.000 |
| 2021 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.000 |
| 2020 | 2.49 | 1.25 | 0.000 |
| 2019 | 5.73 | 1.43 | 0.000 |
| 2018 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Prime Processing, Inc. 2009 al presente
- Cougar Processing LLC 2009 a 2015
- DRA Taggart Site Services, LLC 2015 a 2015
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 62 |
| 2025 | 61 |
| 2024 | 65 |
| 2023 | 80 |
| 2022 | 79 |
| 2021 | 75 |
| 2020 | 81 |
| 2019 | 70 |
| 2018 | 60 |
| 2017 | 34 |
| 2016 | 27 |
| 2015 | 17 |
| 2014 | 19 |
| 2013 | 22 |
| 2012 | 22 |
| 2011 | 21 |
| 2010 | 16 |
Eckman Plant se ubica en McDowell County, West Virginia, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 13.0% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 41,693 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 40,455 | 3 | 0 | 74.2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 36,127 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 35,655 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 34,935 | 13 | 0 | 372.1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 36,359 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 36,242 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 35,811 | 3 | 0 | 83.8 |
Mostrar 58 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 36,962 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 45,266 | 4 | 0 | 88.4 |
| 2023 Q4 | 43,542 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 45,716 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 45,477 | 1 | 0 | 22.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 46,982 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 43,363 | 2 | 0 | 46.1 |
| 2022 Q3 | 45,955 | 1 | 1 | 21.8 |
| 2022 Q2 | 44,906 | 2 | 0 | 44.5 |
| 2022 Q1 | 45,412 | 7 | 0 | 154.1 |
| 2021 Q4 | 40,801 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 40,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 41,368 | 15 | 1 | 362.6 |
| 2021 Q1 | 43,392 | 1 | 1 | 23.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 39,412 | 2 | 0 | 50.7 |
| 2020 Q3 | 43,450 | 2 | 0 | 46.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 45,268 | 1 | 0 | 22.1 |
| 2020 Q1 | 32,337 | 10 | 2 | 309.2 |
| 2019 Q4 | 38,255 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 36,150 | 5 | 1 | 138.3 |
| 2019 Q2 | 36,677 | 1 | 0 | 27.3 |
| 2019 Q1 | 28,539 | 11 | 1 | 385.4 |
| 2018 Q4 | 27,970 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 26,802 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 27,059 | 3 | 1 | 110.9 |
| 2018 Q1 | 28,140 | 5 | 0 | 177.7 |
| 2017 Q4 | 17,077 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 18,217 | 7 | 1 | 384.3 |
| 2017 Q2 | 17,384 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 13,570 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 13,800 | 1 | 1 | 72.5 |
| 2016 Q3 | 13,046 | 3 | 1 | 230.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 14,054 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 12,878 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 7,361 | 2 | 0 | 271.7 |
| 2015 Q3 | 10,147 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 9,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 5,939 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 11,361 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 9,700 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 11,594 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 10,168 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 11,491 | 1 | 0 | 87.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 12,302 | 1 | 0 | 81.3 |
| 2013 Q2 | 12,929 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 13,279 | 2 | 1 | 150.6 |
| 2012 Q4 | 11,416 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 11,945 | 1 | 0 | 83.7 |
| 2012 Q2 | 11,845 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 12,588 | 2 | 0 | 158.9 |
| 2011 Q4 | 12,979 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 13,385 | 9 | 3 | 672.4 |
| 2011 Q2 | 13,443 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 13,035 | 2 | 2 | 153.4 |
| 2010 Q4 | 12,542 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 11,337 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 8,416 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 9,181 | 5 | 3 | 544.6 |
Incidentes reportables
41 en archivo2026 · 2 incidentes
Employee was moving a 15 Hp pump and caught EE's fingers between the wheel dolly and the pump. Employee finished EE's shift and decided to see Dr. the next shift, and returned to work EE's next shift after the Dr visit.
2024 · 2 incidentes
EE was climbing onto truck to open tank lid. EE's foot slipped & EE fell backward onto ground hurting left shoulder.
Employee's vehicle caught fire on the way home. It occurred 1.5 hours after employee's scheduled shift. Employee raised the hood of the vehicle and received burns to face.
2023 · 2 incidentes
Employee was cutting hydraulic hose to make grease hoses. The hand grinder kicked back and they cut their left thumb.
An employee was sweeping the floor in the LO1432 Loader at the end of the shift. When EE straightened their back, EE noticed pain in the lower back.
2022 · 4 incidentes
When employee stepped off of the leaf spring and drag link to the ground, the left knee popped and buckled as it began to take weight resulting in pain and swelling in the affected area. Employee works 4 on and 4 off, EE began missing on January 28th 2023.
Employee was looking backward in an end loader when the bucket fell to the ground. The jarring action of the falling bucket along with the twisting motion caused a pull muscle in EE's back. Employee began missing on 10/16/2022
Lost control of a loaded coal truck. Driver had a head contusion. Neck and back strain. Lacerations to right hand and a corneal abrasion.
Worker was removing a piece of pipe off of classifying cyclone pump in basement of Prep Plant. Pipe rotated to a greater degree than anticipated, and smashed and cut-open worker's left hand.
2021 · 2 incidentes
Trucks were using a back road to access the truck dump due to the tracks being blocked by a train at the crossing. EE operating truck 807 proceeded around a horseshoe curve hauling clean coal from Eckman Plant to Dans Branch Load-out. The driver stated EE misjudged the curve and ran up on the berm due to poor visibility causing the truck to roll over.
EE was attempting to remove a D7 undercarriage roller. EE was striking the flange of the roller with a 15lb. sledgehammer when a fragment of the roller flange broke off. The piece of metal struck EE in the left thigh resulting in a 1" laceration in the thigh.
2020 · 5 incidentes
Mechanism beam hung on motor base. Used slate bar to pry beam away from motor base. Beam came loose and caught right hand between motor base and beam, causing a laceration on the ring finger.
Employee was attempting to cut a nylon zip tie with a utility knife. Access to the zip tie was very limited, employee's hand slipped on the knife and employee cut right index finger, the wound required stitches (6) to close.
Employee was hooking a chain to a chute that was being removed. After hooking the chain, employee stepped down off the chute and a jagged piece of metal punctured left boot in the area near the arch of left foot, causing a laceration of the foot.
EE was dismounting the 777B rock truck to refuel. When EE stepped from the bottom step to the ground, (approximately 30"), left ankle rolled over when foot contacted the ground. EE began to experience pain and swelling in the ankle.
Worker was aligning two pieces of pipe on a pump in order to bolt them together. One piece of pipe fell; and as a result, smashed and cut open the pinky finger on worker's right hand. Received outpatient treatment: 13 stitches to close wound and support brace applied to finger.
2019 · 10 incidentes
Employee was descending loader ladder using three points of contact and when left foot contacted the uneven ground they sprained an ankle.
EE pressure washing coal truck on side of road as EE stepped around truck another vehicle passed and EE was hit by side mirror of passing vehicle. Vehicle did not stop. Hit right elbow and back.
The employee was hauling coal to the preparation plant on the haul road. The truck got out of gear and flipped over onto its passenger side. The employee was not wearing seatbelt.
The employee was hauling coal to the preparation plant on the haul road. The truck went up onto the berm and flipped truck over onto its passenger side. The employee was not wearing seat belt.
Employee was operating 988F loader at feeder in clean coal yard when they came in contact with a/c blower mounted on ceiling of loader. Employee was attempting to replace a/c vents while blower was operating and their middle finger and index finger on right hand came in contact with blower causing injury to both fingers.
Employee was changing a screen panel in the plant when employee slipped and twisted an ankle, causing a fracture.
EE was assigned to clean up a caustic soda spill. EE had EE's PPE on and was using a 1" water hose to wash the spill to a drain. In the process of washing the spilled materials, EE dropped the hose into the area, and EE was splashed on the arm and cheek. EE suffered a 1st degree burn to EE's cheek.
Employee was using a hand grinder to clean up bore holes for pin fitting, when a piece of debris went in behind safety glasses and entered right eye. Employee was examined and no debris was found in eye. Employee did receive prescription eye drops as treatment.
Employee was hauling coal to the preparation plant on the haul road when they drove the truck into a ditch.
Employee alleges ee was trying to turn a push beam with a slate bar and in doing so hurt back. The event was not reported until Jan 25th, 2019. On Jan 29th ee presented an excuse that covered the days missed as being under Drs care for the alleged injury.
2018 · 1 incidente
Employee was taping the clean coal chute from an elevated position when they lost their footing and fell. Employee was standing on a dryer bracket (approx. 6" wide) and slipped falling approximately 4 feet to the ground. They landed on their right shoulder and face. Employee received 5 stitches to the right eyebrow area, to close a small laceration.
2017 · 1 incidente
EE was working on a belt at the vessel ref while using a box knife, the knife slipped and contacted the EE leg (thigh).
2014 · 2 incidentes
The employee was using a slate bar to pry the clean coal crusher door closed while another employee used a crib block to hit the door. The slate bar slipped and mashed the right hand of the employee and twisted his lower back.
The employee was closing the doors on a dryer and he grabbed the latch to latch the door when his hand slipped on the latch cutting his left hand under his left index finger. The latch had a sharp edge on it.
2013 · 3 incidentes
Employee stated he became ill from possible heat exhaustion.
Employee stated while positioning a feeder motor for installation, employee felt pain in his lower back.
Employee stated that while getting on a 988-G Front-End Loader, he slipped on the first step and while trying to grasp the handrail he pulled his shoulder.
2012 · 3 incidentes
Employee stated while picking up a piece of malloy (1 inch thick plastic) weighing approx 25 to 30 lbs, employee felt pain between shoulders (this will be a lost time accident).
Employee states he was spraying tracking switches w/PB Blaster on belt press #2 and, while removing mud from switch, bumped switch which allowed air to blow PB Blaster into his left eye. Employee received medical treatment, was taken off work by eye care physician for one day & returned to work full duty on next scheduled day.
Employee was using a utility knife to open a box of welding rods when the knife came apart sending the blade flying into employee's right thigh, cutting the employee. Medical treatment was sought and the employee received 3 stitches. There is no lost time associated with this injury.
2011 · 3 incidentes
Slipped on metal stairs & fell. Landed on right elbow and jammed right shoulder also. Elbow swollen. Shoulder sore.
Employee stated while washing around caustic tank with water hose, chemical splashed on his left arm on 7/14/11. Employee did not report injury until 7/13/11 after obtaining medical treatment. Employee lost 4 days work and returned on 8/8/11.
Employee was working in unnatural position and object entered eye under safety glasses. Medical treatment was received, requiring prescription eye drops.
2010 · 1 incidente
EE states a co-worker was pulling a wheel barrow up the stairs when the wheel barrow slipped out of the co-workers hand the EE fell on his knee getting out of the way. Medical treatment was given and the EE missed one day and RTW to full duty on 5/31/10.