EE was welding on belt line skirt boards over to guarded area. Lost balance and fell to ground approximately 8 to 10 feet.
Branham & Baker Coal Terminal: 231 citaciones de la MSHA Coal
Branham & Baker Coal Terminal tiene $32K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $8K pendientes en 7 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Branham & Baker Coal Terminal.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 48
- Años en registro
- 1987–2021
- Último incidente
- Sep 2021
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Branham & Baker Coal Terminal tiene $32K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $8K pendientes en 7 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 9 · 56%
- Quedaron como emitidas 1 · 6%
- Aún abiertas 6 · 38%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENT 2023-0148 | Settlement | Lewis | 2024 | $632 → $459 |
| KENT 2023-0119 | Settlement | Lewis | 2024 | $576 → $576 |
| KENT 2017-0296 | Settlement | Simonton | 2017 | $348 → $348 |
| KENT 2025-0029 | Settlement | Lewis | 2025 | $221 → $221 |
| KENT 2025-0027 | Dismissal | Young | 2025 | $189 → $189 |
| KENT 2013-3 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2013 | $100 → $100 |
El muestreo de MSHA en Branham & Baker Coal Terminal muestra que 100% de 274 muestras de polvo respirable de carbón cumplieron el estandar de 1.5 mg/m3.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Polvo respirable de carbón
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.
Última medición: 2026-07-10
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
El valor de concentración excesiva (ECV) es el umbral de aplicación por muestra de la propia MSHA, que incorpora la incertidumbre de medición; una muestra por encima de su ECV puede motivar una citación. El conteo cubre solo las muestras a las que MSHA asignó un ECV.- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER90
- BARGE ATTENDANT61
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR28
Sílice (cuarzo)
Última medición: 2026-07-09- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER5
- BARGE ATTENDANT3
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR3
Ruido
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.
Última medición: 2026-07-10
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER51
- BARGE ATTENDANT26
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR12
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.| Año | dentro de 1.5 mg/m3 | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 100% | 6 |
| 2025 | 100% | 3 |
| 2024 | 100% | 10 |
| 2023 | 100% | 2 |
| 2022 | 100% | 4 |
| 2021 | 100% | 5 |
| 2020 | 100% | 5 |
| 2019 | 100% | 13 |
| 2018 | 100% | 4 |
| 2017 | 100% | 13 |
| 2016 | 100% | 16 |
| 2015 | 100% | 13 |
| 2014 | 100% | 6 |
| 2013 | 100% | 12 |
| 2012 | 100% | 17 |
| 2011 | 100% | 8 |
| 2010 | 100% | 22 |
| 2009 | 100% | 13 |
| 2008 | 100% | 11 |
| 2007 | 100% | 17 |
| 2006 | 100% | 21 |
| 2005 | 100% | 9 |
| 2004 | 100% | 5 |
| 2003 | 100% | 10 |
| 2002 | 100% | 6 |
| 2001 | 100% | 15 |
| 2000 | 100% | 8 |
| Año | sílice prom. (%) | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.3 | 2 |
| 2025 | 1 | |
| 2016 | 1.4 | 4 |
| 2015 | 1.0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 0.2 | 1 |
| 2008 | 16.9 | 1 |
| 2003 | 24.3 | 1 |
| Año | sobre el LPE | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0% | 6 |
| 2025 | 0% | 3 |
| 2024 | 0% | 10 |
| 2023 | 0% | 2 |
| 2021 | 0% | 8 |
| 2020 | 0% | 2 |
| 2019 | 0% | 13 |
| 2018 | 0% | 4 |
| 2017 | 0% | 7 |
| 2016 | 0% | 6 |
| 2015 | 0% | 10 |
| 2013 | 0% | 5 |
| 2012 | 0% | 10 |
| 2011 | 0% | 4 |
| 2010 | 0% | 4 |
| 2009 | 0% | 7 |
| 2007 | 0% | 7 |
| 2006 | 0% | 11 |
| 2005 | 0% | 3 |
| 2004 | 0% | 6 |
| 2003 | 0% | 6 |
| 2002 | 0% | 6 |
| 2000 | 0% | 5 |
Branham & Baker Coal Terminal registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2012.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2011 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2009 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2008 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2007 * | 4.17 | 4.17 | 0.000 |
| 2006 * | 11.46 | 3.82 | 0.000 |
| 2005 * | 3.91 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2004 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Lockwood Coal Company 1979 a 1981
- Riverway South Inc 1981 a 1983
- Riverway South Inc 1983 a 2023
- Branham & Baker Coal Company, LLC 2023 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 2 |
| 2025 | 3 |
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2023 | 2 |
| 2022 | 3 |
| 2021 | 3 |
| 2020 | 3 |
| 2019 | 7 |
| 2018 | 7 |
| 2017 | 6 |
| 2016 | 4 |
| 2015 | 9 |
| 2014 | 9 |
| 2013 | 10 |
| 2012 | 10 |
| 2011 | 9 |
| 2010 | 6 |
| 2009 | 12 |
| 2008 | 17 |
| 2007 | 18 |
| 2006 | 23 |
| 2005 | 20 |
| 2004 | 13 |
| 2003 | 11 |
| 2002 | 22 |
| 2001 | 13 |
| 2000 | 8 |
Branham & Baker Coal Terminal se ubica en Boyd County, Kentucky, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 1.3% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 1,088 | 3 | 0 | 2757.4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1,026 | 2 | 0 | 1949.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1,611 | 6 | 2 | 3724.4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1,548 | 14 | 4 | 9043.9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 1,735 | 3 | 1 | 1729.1 |
| 2024 Q3 | 1,536 | 6 | 2 | 3906.2 |
Mostrar 96 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 2,237 | 8 | 2 | 3576.2 |
| 2024 Q1 | 2,437 | 3 | 1 | 1231.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 1,951 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 1,527 | 3 | 1 | 1964.6 |
| 2023 Q2 | 808 | 2 | 1 | 2475.2 |
| 2023 Q1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2022 Q4 | 400 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 1,332 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 1,106 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 3,088 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 1,512 | 7 | 2 | 4629.6 |
| 2021 Q1 | 1,303 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 739 | 1 | 0 | 1353.2 |
| 2020 Q3 | 1,144 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 1,314 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 2,440 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 3,518 | 4 | 1 | 1137.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 3,846 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 3,918 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 4,353 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 3,286 | 4 | 2 | 1217.3 |
| 2018 Q2 | 3,154 | 1 | 0 | 317.1 |
| 2018 Q1 | 3,390 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 3,278 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 3,280 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 3,098 | 1 | 0 | 322.8 |
| 2017 Q1 | 1,914 | 21 | 7 | 10971.8 |
| 2016 Q4 | 2,028 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 2,028 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 3,138 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 4,617 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 4,268 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 4,816 | 2 | 1 | 415.3 |
| 2015 Q1 | 3,784 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 4,339 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 4,428 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 4,673 | 2 | 0 | 428.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 4,574 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 5,160 | 1 | 0 | 193.8 |
| 2013 Q3 | 4,609 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 4,993 | 2 | 0 | 400.6 |
| 2013 Q1 | 5,126 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 5,315 | 1 | 0 | 188.1 |
| 2012 Q3 | 4,354 | 8 | 2 | 1837.4 |
| 2012 Q2 | 5,833 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 5,211 | 1 | 1 | 191.9 |
| 2011 Q4 | 5,213 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 6,357 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 5,504 | 7 | 6 | 1271.8 |
| 2011 Q1 | 4,121 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 3,150 | 1 | 0 | 317.5 |
| 2010 Q3 | 2,493 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 3,188 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 2,653 | 2 | 0 | 753.9 |
| 2009 Q4 | 2,679 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 2,718 | 2 | 0 | 735.8 |
| 2009 Q2 | 6,966 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 9,333 | 8 | 0 | 857.2 |
| 2008 Q4 | 9,386 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 10,307 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 10,200 | 2 | 0 | 196.1 |
| 2008 Q1 | 11,244 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 12,619 | 10 | 2 | 792.5 |
| 2007 Q3 | 12,861 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 11,949 | 8 | 4 | 669.5 |
| 2007 Q1 | 10,489 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 9,249 | 6 | 5 | 648.7 |
| 2006 Q3 | 11,609 | 11 | 8 | 947.5 |
| 2006 Q2 | 16,786 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 14,733 | 5 | 4 | 339.4 |
| 2005 Q4 | 16,147 | 1 | 1 | 61.9 |
| 2005 Q3 | 13,907 | 1 | 1 | 71.9 |
| 2005 Q2 | 11,410 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 9,681 | 1 | 0 | 103.3 |
| 2004 Q4 | 8,799 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 7,925 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 7,955 | 6 | 4 | 754.2 |
| 2004 Q1 | 7,129 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 5,734 | 5 | 3 | 872.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 4,988 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 4,697 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 6,029 | 2 | 2 | 331.7 |
| 2002 Q4 | 10,296 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 11,131 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 12,207 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 12,454 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 13,995 | 4 | 2 | 285.8 |
| 2001 Q3 | 7,965 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 4,728 | 1 | 1 | 211.5 |
| 2001 Q1 | 4,917 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 3,848 | 8 | 7 | 2079.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 4,153 | 4 | 3 | 963.2 |
| 2000 Q2 | 3,767 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 3,969 | 5 | 0 | 1259.8 |
Incidentes reportables
48 en archivo2021 · 1 incidente
2018 · 1 incidente
Cutting brace out of structure, jacks slid out causing belt line to fall, hitting employee and pinning legs.
2007 · 1 incidente
Breaking loose fozen coal from belt structure and hopper with a pinch bar. Material suddenly dislodged, pinning left hand between bar and structure. Hematoma of the left hand.
2006 · 3 incidentes
Pulling 2 tanks oxygen/acetylene on cart when feet slipped out from underneath him, landing flat on back. Pain along lenth of spine.
Employee was breaking accumulated dirt out of rollers with a sledge hammer, when in mid-swing, his finger became caught between hammer handle and a piece of overhead structure.
Employee was assisting another with putting a leaf-spring on the water truck when a piece of debris became lodged in his cornea. His eye became very irritated. Debris had to be surgically removed by a specialist.
2005 · 1 incidente
Walking under conveyor belt. Hit head on beam support bolt. No hard hat.
2003 · 3 incidentes
EE AND 2 OTHER CO-WORKERS WERE ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE SOME LARGE ROCKS FROM THE RAW CRUSHER BELT. ALL 3 EE'S WERE WORKING TOGETHER ON 1 ROCK WHEN INJURED EE FELT HIS SHOULDER PULL. PULLED LIGAME NT/LEFT SHOULDER.
EE FUELING EQUIPMENT ON A VERY WINDY DAY. WIND BLEW DEBRIS IN EYE. A PIECE BECAME LODGED AT EDGE OF CORNEA, CREATING A MINOR CORNEAL ABRASION.
EMPLOYEE WAS WELDING IN THE RIVER TUNNEL WITH A WELDING HOOD ON AND EXPERIENCED MODERATE TO SEVERE FLASH BURNS TO BOTH EYES.
2002 · 3 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS UNHOOKING CHAIN FROM LOADER BUCKER WHEN STEPPED IN BUCKET WITH MUDDY BOOTS HE SLIPPED AND FELL ON HIS RIGHT SIDE BRUISING HIS RIBS & KIDNEY.
EE WAS USING A COMEALONG TO RAISE A WINCH CABLE WHEN IT SLID BACK & MASHED HIS LEFT HAND.
EE WAS ATTEMPTING TO CLEAN TORCH TIP & GOT OXYGEN IN GLOVE THAT IGNITED WHEN HE LIT TORCH, BURNING LEFT HAND.
2001 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS LOADING OLD TROPH ROLLERS INTO LAODER BUCKET AND DROPPED ONE ON TOP OF HIS RIGHT FOOT.
1999 · 1 incidente
EE WAS FACING UP 2 BARGES WITH A WIRE CABLE THAT SLIPPED THROUGH HIS RIGHT HAND CUTTING HIS FINGERS.
1998 · 4 incidentes
EE WAS IN SHOP WELDING ON CRUSHER ROLL WHEN HE DROPPED A HOT WELDING ROD DOWN IN HIS RIGHT BOOT BURNING HIS ANKLE.
EE WAS STEPPING OF OF BOBCAT 743B TWISTING HIS LEFT ANKLE.
EE WAS ATTEMPTING TO PULL A BARGE ROPE OUT OF THE RIVER WHEN A CABLE THAT HAD SNAGGED ON TRI-TI CAME LOOSE STRIKING ON LEFT SIDE OF LOWER JAW.
EMPLOYEE WAS WALKING DOWN STEPS CARRYING TOOLS AND SLIPPED FRACTURING LEFT ANKLE.
1997 · 4 incidentes
EE WAS CLIMBING DOWN A LADDER CARRYING A GREASE GUN THE EE JUMPED FROM THE LADDER WHEN THE HANDLE OF THE GREASE GUN GOT CAUGHT IN LADDER.
EMP WAS USING TORCH TO CUT A PIECE OF METAL FROMCRUSHER. THE METAL FELL AND STRUCK EMP ON RIGHT ANKLE.
EMPLOYEE WAS ASSISTING OTHERS TO REPAIR THE COAL CRUSHER. EMPLOYEE WAS TURNING FLYWHEEL BY PULLING ONTO MOTOR BELTS. EMPLOYEE CAUGHT HIS LITTLE FINGER BETWEEN THE BELT AND BELT PULLEY.
EE WAS ASSISTING OTHER PERSONNEL IN REPAIRING A BELT DRIVE WHEN A DUST PARTICLE MAY HAVE ENTERED HIS LEFT EYE., RESULTING IN EYE IRRITATION TWO DAYS LATER. EE WAS NOT WEARING SAFETY GLASSES.
1996 · 1 incidente
EE WAS CLEANING OFF A BENCH, WHEN HE PICKED THE TOP TRAY OUT OF A TOOL BOX AND TURNED AND SET IT DOWN. THE TRAY WEIGHTED APPROX. 7 LBS.
1995 · 2 incidentes
EE WAS WELDING ON CRUSHER ON MONDAY AND THOUGHT HE HAD GOT SOMETHING IN HIS LEFT EYE BUT WASNT SURE UNTIL THE NEXT DAY WHEN HE WENT TO EMERGENCY ROOM.
EMPLOYEE WAS SAMPLING COAL COMING OFF STACKER WHEN A SMALL PIECE WENT IN HIS RT EYE
1994 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE REACHED FOR BAR IN SCREEN AND FELT PAIN IN LOWER BACK. BAR WEIGHED APPROX. 10-15 LBS.
EMPLOYEE WAS ASSISTING ANOTHER EMPLOYEE IN REMOVING A DAMAGED GEAR FROM THE FRONT DRIVE OF FEEDER WHEN EE HIT THE GEAR WITH A HAMMER A SMALL METAL FRAGMENT HIT EE ON THE CHEEK ONE INCH BELOW HIS RT EYE
1993 · 3 incidentes
EE WAS ENGAGED IN NORMAL MAINTENACE OF CRUSHER LIFTING TUGGING BENDING ETC. HE WOKE UP THE NEXT MORNING WITH SWOLLEN TESTICLES AND COULD NOT WALK. EE ASSUMED HIS PAIN WAS JOB RELATED.
EE WAS ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE ANGLE FROM HANDRAIL AND LOST HIS BALANCE, CAUSING HIM TO FALL FORWARD--HITTING HIS CHEST ON HANDRAIL.
EMPLOYEE THANKS HE HURT HIS BACK WHILE DOING HIS NORMAL WORK DUTIES AS A BARGE LOADER. HE THOUGHT IT HAPPENED ABOUT A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, OR OCCURRED OVER TIME.
1992 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS HELPING TO REPAIR RIVER WINCH.HE BENT OVER TO PICK UP A BEARING WEIGHING 35 TO 40 LBS.HE INJURED HIS BACK IN THE PROCESS.
1991 · 8 incidentes
EMPLOYEE HAS APPLIED FOR BLACK LUNG BENEFITS.
EMPLOYEE HAS APPLIED FOR BACK LUNG BENEFITS 9-6-91.
EMPLOYEE HAS APPLIED FOR BLACK LUNG BENEFITS 9-5-91.
EMPLOYEE HAS APPLIED FOR BLACK LUNG BENEFITS 8-29-91.
EMPLOYEE HAS APPLIED FOR BLACK LUNG BENEFITS 8-27-91.
EE WAS IMPROPERLY TRYING TO PUT GREASE TUBE IN GREASE GUN WHEN GUN SLIPPED AND CAME BACK STRIKING EE ON RIGHT SIDE OF FACE THE RESULT WAS A SMALL ONE AND FOURTH INCH LACERATION ON FACE.
EMPLOYEE WAS SETTING UPA BARGE FOR LOADING. EMPLOYEE ON ANOTHER WERE ATTEMPTING TO PULL WINCH ACABLE UP. WHEN ACCIDENT OCCURRED. EMPLOYEE WAS PULLING ON CABLE WHEN HE INJURED HIS LOWER BACK . NOTE: A CHAIN HOIST WAS PROVIDED AND NOT USED.
EE WAS SHOVELING COAL MUD INTO A 5 GALL BUCKET WITHIN ON PIT EXPERINCED BACK PAIN THE FOLLOWING DAY.
1990 · 2 incidentes
EE WAS TRYING A WINCH ROPE ONTO A BARGE GAVEL IN A BENT OVER MANNER WHEN HE STOOD UPRIGHT HE INCURRED A TERRIBLE BACK PAIN.
EMPLOYEE SAYS WHILE HE WAS OPERATING A FRONT END LOADER; THE BOUNCING AROUND IN THE SEAT CAUSED HIS BACK TO HURT.
1989 · 3 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS REMOVING A 2" WATER PUMP FROM THE BACK OF A PICK-UP TRUCK WHEN HE SAID HE HAD A PAIN IN HIS LOWER LEFT BACK.
EMPL WAS REMOVING EZE OUT FROM STEAM JENNY WHEN WRENCH SLIPPED CASUING LEFT ARM TO SWING BACK PUSHING LEFT ELBOW INTO METAL GUARD ON STEAM JENNY.
CUTTING PC OF METAL WITH TORCH RAISE GLASSES TO INSPECT WHILE NOT REMOVING TORCH PC OF RUST METAL FRAGMENT POPPED UP INTO EYE.
1988 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS CROSSING A BELTLINE WHILE MAINTENANCE WAS BEING DONE CAUGHT HIS PANT LEG ALMOST FELL BUT RETAINED HIS BALANCE WHICH RESULTED HIM DOING IN AN AWKWARD POSITION WHICH TWISTED OR PUL LED OR STRAIN A MUSCLE IN HIS BACK CAUSING HIM PAIN
EMPLOYEE WAS SAND BLASTING TRUCK SCALES THE NOZXZLE AT END OF THE 110-PS2 AIR/SAND HOSE HAD CLOGGED EMPLOYEE REMOVED AIR HOSE BEFORE BLEEDING AIR FROM TANK THE HIGH PRESSURE AIR & SAND EXPEL LED INSTANTLY
1987 · 1 incidente
OOPS! DUE TO SA0ETY AUDIT IT WAS FOUND THAT THIS EMP HAD 3 SMALL STITCHES WHICH QUALIFIES THIS ACCIDENT AS A MSHA REPORTALE ACCIDENT