THE EMPLOYEE WAS PREPARING TO REPAIR HOLES IN THE WALL OF THE ROTARY BREAKER.HE ENTERED THE ROTARY BREAKER BELIEVING THE ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT TO BE DE-ENERGIZED.WHEN IT WAS STARTED BY ANOTHER EM PLOYEE WHO BELIEVED THAT HE HAD BEEN ASKED TO START IT,A FATAL INJURY RESULTED.
PIGEON CREEK Coal
PIGEON CREEK tiene $588K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $167K pendientes en 94 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en PIGEON CREEK.
- Muertes
- 1
- Incidentes totales
- 109
- Años en registro
- 1983–2023
- Último incidente
- Mar 2023
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.PIGEON CREEK tiene $588K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $167K pendientes en 94 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.El muestreo de MSHA en PIGEON CREEK muestra un polvo respirable de carbon promedio de 0.30 mg/m3 (99% en cumplimiento) en 383 muestras.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medicion de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposicion individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbon y silice corresponden a instalaciones de carbon. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 | 984 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2,072 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3,288 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2,014 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 2,989 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 4,735 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q2 | 5,323 | 2 | 0 | 375.7 |
| 2024 Q1 | 5,659 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 95 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Q4 | 5,706 | 1 | 0 | 175.3 |
| 2023 Q3 | 4,413 | 2 | 1 | 453.2 |
| 2023 Q2 | 5,256 | 3 | 0 | 570.8 |
| 2023 Q1 | 8,877 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 15,626 | 17 | 4 | 1087.9 |
| 2022 Q3 | 19,441 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 17,992 | 10 | 2 | 555.8 |
| 2022 Q1 | 12,884 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 11,734 | 9 | 3 | 767.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 9,094 | 3 | 2 | 329.9 |
| 2021 Q2 | 4,259 | 4 | 1 | 939.2 |
| 2021 Q1 | 367 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 3,012 | 2 | 0 | 664.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 3,239 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 2,646 | 1 | 0 | 377.9 |
| 2020 Q1 | 12,772 | 9 | 4 | 704.7 |
| 2019 Q4 | 9,542 | 10 | 6 | 1048.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 792 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 13,852 | 26 | 13 | 1877.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 16,839 | 60 | 27 | 3563.2 |
| 2018 Q3 | 17,496 | 1 | 0 | 57.2 |
| 2018 Q2 | 17,832 | 38 | 18 | 2131.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 13,578 | 3 | 2 | 220.9 |
| 2017 Q4 | 13,578 | 23 | 9 | 1693.9 |
| 2017 Q3 | 12,628 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 14,239 | 28 | 8 | 1966.4 |
| 2017 Q1 | 13,386 | 2 | 1 | 149.4 |
| 2016 Q4 | 12,387 | 73 | 43 | 5893.3 |
| 2016 Q3 | 13,093 | 38 | 23 | 2902.3 |
| 2016 Q2 | 15,725 | 50 | 19 | 3179.7 |
| 2016 Q1 | 15,896 | 1 | 0 | 62.9 |
| 2015 Q4 | 13,750 | 13 | 1 | 945.5 |
| 2015 Q3 | 13,838 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 15,446 | 11 | 7 | 712.2 |
| 2015 Q1 | 18,647 | 3 | 0 | 160.9 |
| 2014 Q4 | 16,364 | 14 | 2 | 855.5 |
| 2014 Q3 | 17,881 | 9 | 3 | 503.3 |
| 2014 Q2 | 17,687 | 9 | 3 | 508.8 |
| 2014 Q1 | 17,832 | 13 | 1 | 729.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 17,537 | 5 | 3 | 285.1 |
| 2013 Q3 | 19,310 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 18,748 | 25 | 11 | 1333.5 |
| 2013 Q1 | 15,246 | 2 | 2 | 131.2 |
| 2012 Q4 | 17,769 | 13 | 3 | 731.6 |
| 2012 Q3 | 28,944 | 3 | 1 | 103.6 |
| 2012 Q2 | 31,419 | 25 | 19 | 795.7 |
| 2012 Q1 | 34,067 | 8 | 3 | 234.8 |
| 2011 Q4 | 36,365 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 34,539 | 28 | 10 | 810.7 |
| 2011 Q2 | 34,416 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 35,629 | 10 | 5 | 280.7 |
| 2010 Q4 | 32,459 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 34,105 | 6 | 2 | 175.9 |
| 2010 Q2 | 33,674 | 5 | 0 | 148.5 |
| 2010 Q1 | 32,486 | 11 | 5 | 338.6 |
| 2009 Q4 | 31,530 | 12 | 2 | 380.6 |
| 2009 Q3 | 32,042 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 29,251 | 37 | 17 | 1264.9 |
| 2009 Q1 | 28,738 | 1 | 0 | 34.8 |
| 2008 Q4 | 26,040 | 22 | 7 | 844.9 |
| 2008 Q3 | 25,885 | 31 | 15 | 1197.6 |
| 2008 Q2 | 22,968 | 15 | 1 | 653.1 |
| 2008 Q1 | 24,560 | 30 | 4 | 1221.5 |
| 2007 Q4 | 23,371 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 24,489 | 65 | 26 | 2654.3 |
| 2007 Q2 | 27,374 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 29,470 | 15 | 5 | 509.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 24,446 | 6 | 5 | 245.4 |
| 2006 Q3 | 25,618 | 16 | 12 | 624.6 |
| 2006 Q2 | 24,679 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 22,976 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 23,105 | 12 | 7 | 519.4 |
| 2005 Q3 | 23,965 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 22,189 | 23 | 9 | 1036.5 |
| 2005 Q1 | 22,606 | 2 | 1 | 88.5 |
| 2004 Q4 | 20,604 | 12 | 6 | 582.4 |
| 2004 Q3 | 19,511 | 40 | 21 | 2050.1 |
| 2004 Q2 | 20,363 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 18,688 | 35 | 15 | 1872.9 |
| 2003 Q4 | 16,516 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 17,697 | 19 | 9 | 1073.6 |
| 2003 Q2 | 18,056 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 17,402 | 15 | 6 | 862.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 15,865 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 16,671 | 7 | 6 | 419.9 |
| 2002 Q2 | 18,191 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 16,923 | 5 | 4 | 295.5 |
| 2001 Q4 | 13,561 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 13,329 | 7 | 4 | 525.2 |
| 2001 Q2 | 12,186 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 12,396 | 7 | 3 | 564.7 |
| 2000 Q4 | 9,936 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 7,183 | 2 | 0 | 278.4 |
| 2000 Q2 | 6,070 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 1,448 | 4 | 2 | 2762.4 |
Muertes en esta mina
1 registradasIncidentes reportables
108 en archivo (excluyendo las muertes anteriores)2023 · 1 incidente
Employee was using a hoist to repair a bent handrail on the direct ship hopper. The rail broke loose, striking the employee in the side of the head.
2022 · 1 incidente
Employee was holding Separator Speed Reducer while C0-worker was hammering on Sprocket. A small piece of the sprocket broke off and a sliver of the metal hit the injured in the forearm and the sliver of metal was imbedded into the Rt. Forearm / wrist area.
2020 · 1 incidente
The employee had placed gravel in a pail. The employee was lifting the pail above EE's head to place on a upper level when EE's right shoulder and neck began to hurt. The employee continued to work until surgery was performed on the right shoulder on 8/06/2020. The employee is currently off work.
2018 · 1 incidente
Driver was on a slight descending grade truck was in 4th gear and as EE approached a curve EE was faster that EE should have. Driver passed a truck runaway ramp then jumped from the truck driver was taken to hospital EE had two fractured ribs.
2015 · 4 incidentes
Received a CWP diagnosis for employee. He last worked on 11/16/12 (RIF) and was termed on 1/15/13. No % disability at this time.
Received a CWP diagnosis for employee. He last worked on 7/1/2010 when he retired. No % disability at this time.
Employee was walking up steps not looking up and walked into catwalk material on landing striking his head and compressing his neck resulting in pain into his upper back and shoulder area.
Driver fell asleep drove over adequate berm on wrong side of haul road over embankment hit trees. Taken to emergency room, he was drug tested checked and released. On way back to job told owner he had sleep disorder. Not back @ work because truck frame is bent and hood busted. MSHA inspector not released truck yet and we are concerned about sleep disorder we did not know about.
2014 · 3 incidentes
Received a hearing loss diagnosis for employee. He last worked on 9/20/2012.
Received a hearing loss diagnosis for employee. He last worked on 7/1/2010.
Truck driver was leaving dump. It was raining and bad wind storm blew two trees down, one on truck one on trailer. The one on truck most of impact hit on passenger side. Driver shook up thought he hit head. At that time took driver to Lonesome Pine Emergency room. He was checked out and released - gave him one day off because of soreness.
2013 · 3 incidentes
Employee was trying to hold hose on the end of wand of steam Jenny, while another worker applied pressure the hose kicked off wand an the water steam cut his hand across top between thumb an index finger.
He put a 24" ladder next to steering tire 42" tall he was filling reservoir on radiator he asked driver if it was leaking that was standing next to truck he said yes there was. He went to get down ladder twisted side-ways he fell hitting his knee on steering lugs when I came in he showed me his injury and it was 4" red spot. I asked him to go hospital he said no.
Received a CWP diagnosis on 2/14/2014. Employee was termed on 4/21/2013 and is no longer employed with the company. Accident date of 4/21/2013 is to accommodate online reporting per MSHA (Denver) instructions.
2012 · 1 incidente
Employee was linking wash box chain together, one employee was striking chain with sledge hammer, the hammer head came off striking employee in mouth, chipping left front tooth.
2011 · 2 incidentes
Employee along with another employee was carrying a piece of angle iron across the road in front of the plant office. He stated his right knee "popped" and started hurting. He said he could not put his weight on it. Employee was carrying 72 lbs. Employee was transported to Primary Care Center in Hazard, Ky where he was seen and released to return to work.
Employee was using a hand drill to drill holes in a metal sign when the drill slipped and the bit struck his left hand puncturing his hand between thumb and first finger.
2010 · 3 incidentes
The employee was cleaning out the bed of the loadout services truck when his finger was cut while attempting to throw away a broken 25' tape measure. The tape caught on an object in the truck and cut through his glove cutting his finger. There were no lost or restricted days. This is a medical only report.
Employee was attempting to open a gate over a feeder with come-a-long when the come-a-long came unhooked under tension hitting employee in left arm resulting in lacerations. Employee received 5 stitches and returned to work on his next regularly scheduled shift. This is a medical only injury.
The individual was replacing hammers in the crusher when a hammer dropped off the shelf. The individual caught the hammer to prevent it from falling onto the belt. The individual did not go to a doctor until 03/04/10 and started missing work on that day.
2009 · 1 incidente
The employee was lifting a come-along onto the load out belt and strained his back. The injury required physical therapy.
2008 · 4 incidentes
The employee was shoveling material from the floor of the no. 2 raw coal silo and strained his lower back.
The injured employee and another person were carrying a back plate of a pump. The injured walked into a pipe striking his shoulder against the pipe resulting in a strain which required physicial therapy.
The employee was tightening the bolts on a new chemical pump. The wrench he was using slipped causing his right hand to strike a shim that was under an adjacent bolt. This resulted in a laceration to the back of his right thumb which required sutures.
The employee had been cleaning top deck. As he stepped down from the screen onto the decking, he felt a pop in his right knee. He continued to work his regular job until 3-31-08. He did not miss any work until 3-31-08.
2007 · 4 incidentes
The injured was utilizing a belt crossover to cross the no. 1 truck dump belt. He climbed to the top of the crossover and when he turned he twisted his back. He did not start misisng work until feb 8, 2008.
The employee was operating a refuse haul truck. He stated that he struck a hole in the road which caused him to bounce resulting in lower back pain.
Injured was working in area of moving conveyor belt. Injured got right arm caught between troughing idler and belt.
Hoist cable slipped with oxygen tank when raising tank off 7th floor of plant with hoist. It came back and hit employee on head.
2006 · 1 incidente
Injured alleged he was setting rock off of rock crusher and experienced pain in his left shoulder. Worked 9/13/06 & was off 9/14 & 9/15.
2005 · 3 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS STANDING ON TOP OF ROTARY BREAKER THAT WAS BEING DISMANTLED (APPROX. 11 FT. ABOVE THE GROUND). HE WAS CUTTING SCRAP METAL USING WELDING TORCH. HE STEPPED ON THE PIECE JUST CUT AND IT BROKE, CAUSING HIM TO FALL TO THE GROUND (BACK STRAIN).
INJURED STATED HE WAS WORKING ON A CONVEYOR AND WALKED AROUND HEAD END AND CAUGHT CORNER OF ANOTHER CHUTE, CUTTING HIS LEFT EYE LID.
Employee was pushing coal to raw coal feeder with a dozer when he pushed into a cavity causing coal to slide in around the dozer keeping him from backing up or open the doors until the coal was removed. Employee was not injured, equipment was not hurt.
2004 · 1 incidente
Employee was climbing up a hillside that had been grubbed. He began to slip and grabbed some loose slate rock to stop his slide. The rock cut two fingers on his right hand as he slid.
2003 · 2 incidentes
INJURED WAS PULLING WIRE THROUGH CONDUIT INTO JUNCTION BOX.
EMPLOYEE BUMPED HIS CHIN ON AN OXYGEN REGULATER GUAGE CAUSING SMALL CUT ON UNDERSIDE OF CHIN.
2002 · 2 incidentes
INJURED WAS APPLYING STONEHAND TO THE SANGAVE 08 A PAN WHEN THE WET PRODUCT SEEPAD THROUGH HIS CLOTHES AND ON TO HIS WRIST CAUSING IRRITATION.
WELDING BEAM IN TIGHT AREA OVERHEAD WHEN HOT SLAG SPARD FELT IN TO LEFT EAR.
2001 · 4 incidentes
IN PROCESS OF HOISTING SUMP ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLY BECAME LODGED OR HUNG EE PLACED HIMSELF BETWEEN HOISTED LOAD AND DOORAY LOAD SHIFTED CATCHING EE S LEFT LEG.
EE WAS HELPING TO PULL THE SWING AWAY JIB, BACK ONT HE MAIN BOOM OF A 150 TON CRANE EE WAS USING A 3/8 POLY ROPE TO PULL THE JIB IN BY HAND, THE ROPE BROKE BETWEEN EE AND OTHER THE ROPE SLIPPE D THRU EE S HAND. HE RECEIVED LACERATION TO HIS RIGHT THUMB AND FOUR FINGERS OF HIS OF HIS LEFT HANDS. HE WAS TAKEN TO THE ARH MEDICAL CENTER E.R. FOR TREATMENT.
WHILE WALKING ON DRY GROUND, EE MISSTEPPED AND SPRAINED HIS RIGHT ANKLE. EE WAS SENT TO DR. OFFICE FOR EXAM ON HIS RIGHT ANKLE.
EE UNLOADING SKIRT BOARDS FROM A FLATBED TRUCK. HE SLIPPED, FELL OFF TRUCK AND LANDED ON SKIRT BOARDS, STRIKING HIS RIGHT SHOULDER AND SIDE.
2000 · 1 incidente
INJURED SAID HE HAD WATER HOSE IN ONE HAND AND BENT OVER TO PICK UP A PIECE OF BAR GRATING WITH OTHER HAND. AS HE REMOVED GRATING HE FELT SOMETHING PULL IN STOMACH.
1999 · 2 incidentes
HE WAS COME-A-LONGING A CAT TRACK BACK TOGETHER ON DOZER AND CHAIN BROKE CAUSING INJURED TO LOSE HIS BALANCE AND FALL TO THE GROUND.
INJURED WAS UNLOADING A 15 HP MOTOR FROM A LOADER BUCKET ONTO A PICKUP TRUCK. IN HANDLING MOTOR CAUGHT RIGHT LITTLE FINGER BETWEEN MOTOR SHAFT AND OXYGEN BOTTLE THAT WAS IN PICKUP, CUTTING FIN GER.
1998 · 1 incidente
EE WAS WORKING UNDERNEATH A BELT LINE TO CLEAN AND REPAIR. HE ALLEGES THAT THE TURNING AND TWIS TING UNDER THE BELT LINE PULLED MUSCLES IN UPPER BACK. EE REPORTED THE ACCIDENT ON 10-14-98 AND WENT TO THE DR. BUT WAS RELEASED THE SAME DAY AND RETURNED TO WORK ON LIGHT DUTY. EE WORKED UNTIL 10-22-98 ON LIGHT DUTY UNTIL HE COULDN'T ANY MORE. FIRST DAY OF LOST TIME WAS 10-23-98.
1995 · 20 incidentes
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THEREFORE THE CO. CANNOT REPORT ON THE CAUSE OR NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE CO. OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOYMENT.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS CLEANING UNDER CLEANCOAL SILOS, WALKING IN LOW CLEARANCE AND HIT HIS HEAD ON A PIPE.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT ON THE CAUSE OR NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES IT'S MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD BE CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOYMENT.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPOR T THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEDGE DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES IT'S MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD BE CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOYMENT
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPOR T THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOS. THE COMPANY OPERATES IT'S MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COUL BE CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS'S EMPLOYMENT.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD BE CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOYMENT.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOESNOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THECOMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THTE CAUSE OF THE NATURE OF HTE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MIENS IN SUCH A MANNER THT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT HTE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS OULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOYEE
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOESNOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THECOMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THTE CAUSE OF THE NATURE OF HTE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MIENS IN SUCH A MANNER THT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT HTE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS OULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOYEE
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPOR5TT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSISTHE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYEME
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT T HE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCAH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THS PERSONS EMPLOYMEN
HEARING LOSS.
THE CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CA USE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINER IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMENT
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOESNOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THECOMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THTE CAUSE OF THE NATURE OF HTE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MIENS IN SUCH A MANNER THT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT HTE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS OULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOYEE
PNEUMOCONIOSIS.
PNEUMOCONIOSIS.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY TEHREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSISTHE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOYMEN
PNEUMOCONIOSIS
THE CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE CO THEREFORE CAN NOT REPORT THE CAU SE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE CO OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCK A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON EE .
THE CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE CO THEREFORE CAN NOT REPORT THE CAU SE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE CO OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCK A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON EE .
PNEUMOCONIOSIS.
1994 · 10 incidentes
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS GETTING DOWN OUT OF LOCOMOTIVE, STEPPED ON ROCK AND TWISTED HIS LEFT KNEE.
EE STATEDX THAT HE WAS TAKING BOLTS OUT OF PIPE ON VACUUM PUMP WHEN WRENCH SLIPPED AND HIT HIM UNDER RIGHT EYE.
THE CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXIST OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE ORTHE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND ODES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT NAY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPO RT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OEPRATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPL
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE THREW LINE SWITCH ON RAILROAD TRACKS AND GOT SOME METAL OUT OF RAILROAD CAR. WHEN HE STARTED TO SET THE BRAKES ON RAILROAD CAR HE EXPERIENCED PAIN IN RIGHT SHOULDER.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALELGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT NY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALELGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATION ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR HTE NATURE OF HTE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THA TIT IS DOUBLTFUL THAT THE ALELGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED B THIS PERSON'S EMPLOY
COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES OT ACKNOWLEDGE THAN ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CA USE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED ILLNESS THE COMPANY OPERA TES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMENT
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALELGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT NY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALELGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATION ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR HTE NATURE OF HTE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THA TIT IS DOUBLTFUL THAT THE ALELGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED B THIS PERSON'S EMPLOY
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS CLOSING RAILROAD CAR DOORS WHEN H E FELT SOMETHING BURNING IN HIS LOWER ABDOMEN.
1993 · 8 incidentes
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS.THE COMPMAY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOY
THE CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOLWDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATION ILLNESS THE CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE CO OPERATION ITS MINES IN SUCK A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON EE. RECEIVED IN HS FROM A
AT BEGINNING OF SHIFR RAILROAD CARS HAD ACCESS TO WORK STATION BLOCKED EMPLOYEE WAS CROSSING OVER COUPLING OF CARS WHEN HE TWISTED HIS RT KNEE & FELL TO GROUND
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS LOADING GEAR AND SHAFT INTO BUCKET OF FRONT END LOADER, THE GEAR AND SHAFT SLIPPED AND CAUGHT FINGER BETWEEN SHAFT AND BUCKET.
INJURED WAS STEPPING ACROSS THE #14 SCREE, IN DOING SO HE PLACED HIS LEFT HAND ON THE HEADMOTION SHEAVE TO HELP HIMSELF GET ACROSS THE BEAM. WHEN HE PUT HIS WEIGHT ON SHEAVE IT ROLLED FOR- WARD PINNING HIS HAND/FINGERS . SUTURES
EMPLOYEE STATED HE WAS MOVING SPROCKET SO IT COULD BE MOVED WITH FRONT END LOADER. WHEN SPROCKET SLIPPED AND CAUGHT HIS LITTLE FINGER BETWEEN SPROCKET AND GROUND.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS CHECKING A MAGNETITE LINE FOR A LEAK WHEN PUMP WAS STARTED THE LINE BLEW APART CAUSING MAGNETITE TO GO IN HIS LEFT EAR. NO LOST TIME ACCIDENT. HOWEVER ON 4-5-93, WC CO CASE MANAGEMENT RECEIVED MEDICAL REPORTS STATING THAT EMPLOYEE HAS MAGNETITE AND CERUMEN IMPACTION AGAINST THE LEFT TM. SUPERFICIAL IRRITATION OF THE LEFT CONJUNCTIVA.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGDED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEDGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPO RT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPL
1992 · 1 incidente
DIAGNOSIS: OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS-DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE.
1991 · 5 incidentes
EMPLOYEE STATED HE WAS STEPPING UPON THE PLATFORM AND HIS FOOT SLIPPED CAUSING HIM TO FALL.
EMPLOYEE EXPERIENCED STRESS INDUCED ANXIETY FROM THE OCCURRENCE OF A FATALITY.
GETTING DOWN FROM TRUCK GOT LAST STEP FOOT SLIPPED OFF HE FELL HIT L SHOULDER AND RIBS
WHILE MOVING RR CARS WITH SWITCHMASTER AND APPARENTLY BRAKES FAILED.HE JUMPED FROM SWITCHMASTER AND FELL -EXPERIENCED PAIN IN HIP.
EMPL MOVING RR CARS WITH SWITCHMASTER AND APPARRENTLY BRAKES FAILED.HE JUMPED FROM SWITCHMASTER,FELL AND BRUISED LEFT LEG AND ABRASION LEFT HAND
1990 · 3 incidentes
EXPERIENCING PAIN IN LOWER LEFT BACK. DOCTORS DIAGNOSED AS DEGENERATIVE OSTEOARTHRITIS L2-3 AND ACUTE EXCERBATION LUMBAR SPONDYLOSIS.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT AS HE WALKED THROUGH THE BASEMENT. HE NOTICED THAT THE TRASH PUMP WAS NOT PUMPING. HE PULLED THE ELECTRICAL SWITCH TO DEENERGIZED THE PUMP TO ALLOW THE PUMP TO BACK-FLUSH. SHORTHLY AFTER HE PULLED THE SWITCH, THE PUMP 'EXPLODED' AND PIECES OF METAL STRUCK HIM IN SEVERAL PLACES. LACERATION HEAD; BURNS TO FACE,BACK LEGS ARMS.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS.THE COMPANY THEREFORE CNNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSISTHE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BU THE PERSON'S EMPLOYEMEN
1989 · 4 incidentes
CHUTE FROM THERMAL DRYING CHAMBER FROZE CAUSING BUILD-UP; A FIRE AND A POSSIBLE IGNITION OCCURRED.
ALLEGED DIANGOSIS DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY ILLNESS EXISTS, CO OPER ITS MINES IN SUCH MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY EMP
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE CAUGHT HIS FINGER IN DISTRIBUTOR IN THE PREPARATION PLANT.
EMPL CHECKING AIR CONDITIONER ON TRUCK WHILE RMOVING COVER HE GOT LEFT MIDDLE FINGER IN FAN.
1988 · 6 incidentes
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS ON THE 2ND FLOOR OF THE PLANT WHEN THE CENTRIFUGE STARTED CAUSING DUST TO FLY INTO HIS EYE.
EMPLOYEE STATED HE WAS GOING DOWN A HILL BESIDE CLEAN COAL SILO TO GET SOME WELDING EQUIPMENT THAT HE HAD PUT IN THE BUCKET OF A FRONT END LOADER. WHILE HE WAS GOING DOWN THE HILL HE SLIPPED IN SOME LOOSE COAL AND FELL, STRIKING HIS BACK ON A ROCK.
EMPL HAULING SLATE IN TRUCK.HIT BUMP IN ROAD AND CAME DOWN HARD IN SEAT.EXPERIENCED PAIN IN NECK AND RIGHT SHOULDER.
REMOVING RADIATOR CAP, CAP BROKE AND SPRAYED HOT ANTI-FREEZE ON RIGHT ARM AND RIGHT SIDE OF CHEST.
(THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AN DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATION ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLO
ALLEGED PNEUMOCONIOSIS.
1987 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE ALLEGE8 SAMPLING SKYLINE STOCKPILE PICKED UP SACK OF COAL & EXPERIENCED PAIN IN LEFT MID THORATIC AREA
1985 · 2 incidentes
EMP HAD CLIMBED3UP TO UNSTOP THE FEEDER WITH A PLASTIC SCAPER/AND SOMEHOW STRAINED HIS BACK, POSSIBLY WHILE STRETCHING TO GRASP SCRAPER
EE STATED THAT HE WAS CARELESS WALKING DOWN THE STEPS FROM THE 9TH FLOOR TO THE 8TH FLOOR TAKING 2 OR 3 STEPS AT A TIME & HIS FOOT SLIPPED OFF ONE STEP CAUSING HIM TO SLIP & INJURED HIS BACK.
1984 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS CLEANING ELEVATOR OF COAL AND STEPPED DOWN OFF OF TWO STEPS AND TRIPPED ON WATER HOSE IN FLOOR.
1983 · 1 incidente
PNEUMOCONIOSIS
The full compliance file on PIGEON CREEK
A dated report covering the 26-year penalty trail, line-item violation pattern, contest and docket posture, rate-normalized peer benchmark, and full fatality history. Delivered as a PDF with the underlying data as CSV.