Was going down embankment to get a GPM water measurement of the left weir when my feet flew out from under me and I landed straight down on my tail.
Prep Plant: 744 citaciones de la MSHA Coal
Prep Plant tiene $285K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $116K pendientes en 49 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Prep Plant.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 38
- Años en registro
- 1984–2019
- Último incidente
- Mar 2019
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.ⓘ
Una orden bajo la Sección 107(a) retira a los mineros de un área cuando un inspector detecta un peligro inminente. Cada orden se levanta una vez corregida la condición, por lo que esto cuenta las órdenes emitidas, no las que están en vigor ahora.Prep Plant tiene $285K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $116K pendientes en 49 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 279 · 97%
- Quedaron como emitidas 4 · 1%
- Anuladas o retiradas 6 · 2%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENT 2011-1132 | Settlement | Barbour | 2013 | $64K → $43K |
| KENT 2008-838 | Settlement | Feldman | 2010 | $30K → $21K |
| KENT 2011-947 | Settlement | Barbour | 2013 | $24K → $16K |
| KENT 2009-240 | Prevail | Barbour | 2013 | $19K → $13K |
| KENT 2011-1236 | Settlement | Barbour | 2013 | $19K → $10K |
| KENT 2011-814 | Withdrawal | Tureck | 2011 | $15K → $0 |
El muestreo de MSHA en Prep Plant muestra que 98% de 224 muestras de polvo respirable de carbón cumplieron el estandar de 1.5 mg/m3.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Polvo respirable de carbón
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.
Última medición: 2017-03-23, hace 9 años
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
El valor de concentración excesiva (ECV) es el umbral de aplicación por muestra de la propia MSHA, que incorpora la incertidumbre de medición; una muestra por encima de su ECV puede motivar una citación. El conteo cubre solo las muestras a las que MSHA asignó un ECV.- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE54
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR39
- UTILITY MAN25
Sílice (cuarzo)
Última medición: 2011-07-05, hace 15 años- BULLDOZER OPERATOR7
- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR7
- UTILITY MAN7
Ruido
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.
Última medición: 2017-06-27, hace 9 años
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR21
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE16
- UTILITY MAN15
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.| Año | dentro de 1.5 mg/m3 | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 100% | 1 |
| 2012 | 100% | 6 |
| 2011 | 100% | 22 |
| 2010 | 95% | 19 |
| 2009 | 100% | 25 |
| 2008 | 100% | 11 |
| 2007 | 100% | 17 |
| 2006 | 95% | 22 |
| 2005 | 93% | 14 |
| 2004 | 91% | 23 |
| 2003 | 100% | 16 |
| 2002 | 100% | 19 |
| 2001 | 100% | 17 |
| 2000 | 100% | 12 |
| Año | sílice prom. (%) | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.9 | 2 |
| 2010 | 0.4 | 2 |
| 2009 | 0.6 | 3 |
| 2007 | 1.4 | 2 |
| 2006 | 3.6 | 2 |
| 2005 | 2.6 | 3 |
| 2004 | 6.0 | 7 |
| 2003 | 15.3 | 3 |
| 2002 | 5.6 | 3 |
| 2001 | 3.6 | 3 |
| 2000 | 1.1 | 2 |
| Año | sobre el LPE | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 0% | 2 |
| 2012 | 0% | 2 |
| 2011 | 11% | 9 |
| 2010 | 20% | 5 |
| 2009 | 27% | 15 |
| 2008 | 0% | 4 |
| 2007 | 33% | 9 |
| 2006 | 14% | 7 |
| 2005 | 60% | 5 |
| 2004 | 27% | 22 |
| 2003 | 0% | 5 |
| 2002 | 33% | 6 |
| 2001 | 25% | 4 |
| 2000 | 33% | 3 |
Prep Plant registró 6.47 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2012.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 * | 6.47 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2011 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 3.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2009 * | 3.05 | 3.05 | 0.000 |
| 2008 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2007 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2006 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2004 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Pathfork-Harlan Coal Company Inc 1950 a 1981
- Manalapan Mining Company Inc 1981 a 2016
- Montana Bakken, LLC 2016 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1 |
| 2018 | 2 |
| 2017 | 2 |
| 2016 | 2 |
| 2015 | 1 |
| 2014 | 1 |
| 2013 | 4 |
| 2012 | 21 |
| 2011 | 32 |
| 2010 | 41 |
| 2009 | 32 |
| 2008 | 26 |
| 2007 | 27 |
| 2006 | 25 |
| 2005 | 23 |
| 2004 | 24 |
| 2003 | 24 |
| 2002 | 27 |
| 2001 | 28 |
| 2000 | 29 |
Prep Plant se ubica en Harlan County, Kentucky, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 4.3% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 Q2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2025 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2024 Q4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
| 2024 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mostrar 91 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2024 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2023 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2023 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2023 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2023 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2022 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2022 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2022 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2022 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2021 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2021 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2021 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2021 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2020 Q4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2020 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2020 Q2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2020 Q1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2019 Q4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
| 2019 Q3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 2019 Q2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2019 Q1 | 884 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 884 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 884 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 884 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 884 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 884 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 884 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 884 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 884 | 1 | 0 | 1131.2 |
| 2016 Q4 | 269 | 2 | 0 | 7434.9 |
| 2015 Q1 | 80 | 1 | 0 | 12500.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 60 | 2 | 0 | 33333.3 |
| 2013 Q4 | 52 | 1 | 0 | 19230.8 |
| 2013 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2013 Q2 | 1,221 | 1 | 0 | 819.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 4,141 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 4,155 | 1 | 0 | 240.7 |
| 2012 Q3 | 4,644 | 1 | 0 | 215.3 |
| 2012 Q2 | 10,493 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 11,610 | 5 | 3 | 430.7 |
| 2011 Q4 | 8,370 | 1 | 0 | 119.5 |
| 2011 Q3 | 11,365 | 2 | 1 | 176.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 15,635 | 46 | 19 | 2942.1 |
| 2011 Q1 | 17,504 | 22 | 11 | 1256.9 |
| 2010 Q4 | 16,430 | 1 | 0 | 60.9 |
| 2010 Q3 | 17,164 | 19 | 13 | 1107.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 18,079 | 1 | 0 | 55.3 |
| 2010 Q1 | 14,929 | 10 | 0 | 669.8 |
| 2009 Q4 | 13,126 | 19 | 2 | 1447.5 |
| 2009 Q3 | 22,076 | 13 | 3 | 588.9 |
| 2009 Q2 | 17,853 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 12,584 | 11 | 4 | 874.1 |
| 2008 Q4 | 14,114 | 1 | 0 | 70.9 |
| 2008 Q3 | 14,559 | 13 | 4 | 892.9 |
| 2008 Q2 | 17,532 | 14 | 8 | 798.5 |
| 2008 Q1 | 16,510 | 3 | 3 | 181.7 |
| 2007 Q4 | 16,270 | 21 | 11 | 1290.7 |
| 2007 Q3 | 16,384 | 7 | 4 | 427.2 |
| 2007 Q2 | 18,234 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 15,866 | 34 | 9 | 2142.9 |
| 2006 Q4 | 16,383 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 14,912 | 54 | 18 | 3621.2 |
| 2006 Q2 | 16,059 | 4 | 2 | 249.1 |
| 2006 Q1 | 13,503 | 36 | 18 | 2666.1 |
| 2005 Q3 | 13,448 | 6 | 5 | 446.2 |
| 2005 Q2 | 17,038 | 21 | 18 | 1232.5 |
| 2005 Q1 | 17,788 | 11 | 6 | 618.4 |
| 2004 Q4 | 17,807 | 1 | 0 | 56.2 |
| 2004 Q3 | 14,552 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 16,111 | 10 | 1 | 620.7 |
| 2004 Q1 | 15,759 | 2 | 1 | 126.9 |
| 2003 Q4 | 15,809 | 13 | 5 | 822.3 |
| 2003 Q3 | 14,100 | 3 | 3 | 212.8 |
| 2003 Q2 | 16,013 | 19 | 16 | 1186.5 |
| 2003 Q1 | 13,192 | 8 | 8 | 606.4 |
| 2002 Q4 | 13,376 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 13,484 | 28 | 10 | 2076.5 |
| 2002 Q2 | 15,223 | 1 | 0 | 65.7 |
| 2002 Q1 | 16,295 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 15,479 | 8 | 3 | 516.8 |
| 2001 Q3 | 14,429 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 14,743 | 8 | 4 | 542.6 |
| 2001 Q1 | 14,601 | 3 | 1 | 205.5 |
| 2000 Q4 | 14,946 | 18 | 14 | 1204.3 |
| 2000 Q3 | 18,351 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 15,924 | 1 | 0 | 62.8 |
| 2000 Q1 | 14,919 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
38 en archivo2019 · 1 incidente
2013 · 1 incidente
Injured was building a platform when the electrical hand held grinder he was operating kicked-back striking him on the left side of the face and chipping a tooth.
2012 · 1 incidente
Injured had driven a pin out of a conveyor chain when a piece of the pin broke off striking injured in the arm. Injured had no lost time or medical treatment until 6-19-2012 at which time he went to the doctor for infection and was x-rayed.
2010 · 1 incidente
While working on a miner in the re-build shop EE was hammering on a bit when a piece of metal struck him in the left eye. He was wearing safety glasses. He went to Dr. where they removed the foreign object. No lost time.
2009 · 1 incidente
The employee was changing rollers out on a conveyor belt in the prep plant when the chain fell from the I beam letting the roller and the chain fall catching the injured persons left hand between the roller and the electrical box.
2005 · 1 incidente
Injured stated he was walking near the scalehouse and fell landing on his knee. He had no lost time until 10-5-05. He left work and never returned.
2002 · 1 incidente
INJURED WAS REMOVING THE DRIVELINE FROM A MACK TRUCK AND AS HE PULLED THE DRIVELINE LOOSE IT FELL AND STRUCK HIS FOREFINGER REQUIRING 1 SUTURE. HE HAD ONE LOST SCHEDULED WORKING DAY.
2001 · 2 incidentes
INJ WAS WALKING DOWN THE STAIRS IN THE PREP PLANT & LOST HIS FOOTING & FELL
INJURED WAS HAULING SLATE FROM THE PREP PLANT TO AN AREA TO BED DOWN A ROAD. INJURED ASSUMED IT WOULD BE EASIER TO BACK OUT THE ROAD INSTEAD OF HEADING OUT AS THE OTHERS. AS HE BEGAN TO BACK O UT OF THE ROAD, HE NOTICED HE WAS TOO CLOSE TO THE DITCH. HIS REAR TIRES SLID ABOUT 4 FT INTO THE DITCH OVERTURNING TRUCK. HE WAS EXAMINED AT THE HOSPITAL AND RELEASED.
2000 · 1 incidente
INJURED WAS WALKING FROM THE PARKING AREA IN FRONT OF THE MAIN OFFICE WHEN SHE SLIPPED AND FELL IN THE SNOW AND ICE. THE SNOW HAD ACCUMULATED TO APPROX 4" OVER A LAYER OF ICE. THE SNOW WAS STI LL FALLING. INJURED'S SHIFT WOULD HAVE BEGAN ONCE SHE HAD REACHED THE OFFICE.
1999 · 2 incidentes
INJURED WAS LIFTING AN OXYGEN TANK TO MOVE IT TO ANOTHER AREA AND STRAINED HIS BACK.
WHILE SHOVELING COAL ONTO THE CONVEYOR BLET, INJURED FELT A SHARP PAIN COME IN HIS BACK AS HE TWISTED TURNED TO THE LEFT.
1998 · 1 incidente
INJURED WAS HELPING TO REMOVE THE DRIVE MOTOR FROM A PUMP WHEN HIS FINGER BECAUSE CAUGHT BETWEEN THE MOTOR AND MOTOR BASE CUTTING HIS FINGER. THE CUT REQUIRED SUTURES.
1996 · 1 incidente
INJURED WAS LIFTING A RAILROAD TIE AND FELT A SHARP PAIN IN HIS BACK.
1995 · 5 incidentes
INJURED ALLEGED THAT HE WAS USING THE BUCKET OF THE BACKHOE TO SET THE BACKHOE OVER.AS HE WAS MOVING THE BACKHOE A SUDDEN JAR CAUSED THE OPERATOR'S SEAT TO COME OUT OF TRACK CAUSING THE OPERAT OR TO FALL TO ONE SIDE AGAINST THE FENDER.
INJURED WAS GRINDING ON A PIECE OF METAL AND PARTICLES OF RUST FLEW UNDER HIS SAFETY GLASSES INTO HIS RIGHT EYE.
INJURED ALLEGED HE WAS SHOVELING COAL FROM UNDER THE CONVEYOR BELT WHEN HE HEARD SOMETHING POP IN HIS RT ARM IT WAS LATER DISCOVERED HE HAD A STRESS FRACTURE
INJURED WAS WELDING ON A PIECE OF METAL AND AS HE RAISED UP HE STRUCK HIS HEAD ON ANOTHER PIECE OF METAL,REQUIRING 4 STITCHES TO THE SCALP.
INJURED WAS ATTEMPTING TO TURN ON THE FUEL PUMPSTO FUEL THE COAL TRUCK HE OPERATED. HE LOST HIS FOOTING [BETWEEN 1' & 2' FROM GROUND LEVEL] & FELL TO THE GROUND ON HIS BACK. INJURED WAS X-RAYE D AT THE LOCAL HOSPITAL & RELEASED THE SAME DAY WITH NO VISIBLE INJURIES OR BROKEN BONES.
1994 · 1 incidente
INJURED WAS REPAIRING THE ACID PUMP AND GOT SPRAYED ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE FACE CAUSING MINOR BURNS. INJURED HAD ASSUMED THAT NO ACID WAS LEFT IN THE PUMP BECAUSE THE OUTLET LINE WAS DISCONNE CTED.
1993 · 5 incidentes
INJURED WAS SHOVELING THE TAIL PIECE FOR THE STACKER BELT WHEN HE FELT A SHARP PAIN IN HIS BACK
INJURED ALLEGED HE WAS TRAMMING THE 550 DOZER AROUND A OLD STRIP BENCH WHEN AN OVERHANGING LIMB STRUCK HIM IN THE EYE
INJURED WAS TRYING TO PICK UP A SHAFT THAT WAS TOO HEAVY & DROPPED IT ON HIS THUMB HE WENT TO THE DOC THEN RETURNED TO WORK THE SAMD DAY
INJURED HAD BEEN WELDING AND RAISED HIS WELDING HOOD TO CHANGE WELDINGRODS WHEN THE USED ROD POPPED AND A PIECE OF HOT SLAG FLEW IN HIS RIGHT EYE.
INJURED ALLEDGED HIS LOWER BACK BEGAN HURTING AS HE WAS LOADING COAL WITH A FRONT END LOADER. AT THIS TIME HE HAS NOT RETURNED TO WORK AND IS UNDER A DOCTOR'S CARE.
1992 · 3 incidentes
REMOVING PUMP UP HILL FELT PAIN IN HIP
CLEANING OFF R R TRACKS WITH HANDLE SHOVEL EXP PAIN IN LT HAND
INJURED WAS HELPING SET A PIECE OF CHANNEL IRON IT FELL & STRUCK HIM ON THE RT ELBOW
1991 · 2 incidentes
JUMPED OFF DOZER PAIN IN R LEG
INJURED WAS SERVICING FLOAT CYCLINDER IN PREPLANT WHEN HE BENT OVER TO REMOVE CAP FROM FLOAT (1 5-20 LBS) HE FELT A PAIN IN LOWER BACK
1990 · 1 incidente
INSTALLING ELECTRICAL PANEL IN CONT MINER FELT APAIN IN LOWER BACK LIFTING PANEL
1989 · 1 incidente
INJURED WAS LIFTING AN OZ TANK WHEN HE FELT A PAIN IN HIS LOWER BACK.
1986 · 2 incidentes
INJURED WAS WOR5ING AT PLANT REMOVING TIN ROOF WHEN HE WAS ON A PIECE OF TIN AND FELL THROUGH THE ROOF APPROX 12 FT
1984 · 4 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS MOVING A 55 GALLON DRUM OF OIL TO UNLOAD OFF SUPPLY TRUCK AND LAST HIS BALANCE AND FELL ON HIS ANKLE SPRAINING IT .
EMPLOYEE WAS SHOVELING COAL OFF OF MAINLINE TRACK. HE COMPLAINED OF LOWER BACK PAIN
EMP SAID HE WAS CLIMBING DOWN A LADDER THAT WAS WELDED TO THE SIDE OF A STACKING TUBE AND WHEN HE STEPPED DOWN TO A LOWER STEP THAT HIS FOOT SLIPPED OFF OF THE STEP AND THIS JERKED HIS BACK
EMP SAID HE WAS LOOSENING CHAIN BINDER WITH A PIECE OF PIPE AND WHEN HE RELEASED THE BINDER THE PIECE OF PIPE STRUCK HIM IN THE JAW