EMP WAS WORKING ON A SCOOP WHEN HE BEGAN HAVING CHEST PAIN IN LEFT SIDE OF HIS CHEST
Buscar en el registro
Cada lesión y muerte que la MSHA tiene registrada. Filtra por estado, año, sector, clasificación, experiencia o cualquier palabra clave de la narrativa del investigador.
- Incidentes totales
- 739,207
- De los cuales mortales
- 3,111
- Años en el registro
- 1983–2026
- Clasificaciones
- 20
Notifícame sobre esta búsqueda
Envíame un correo cuando un nuevo incidente coincida con estos filtros. Un correo de confirmación; cancela la suscripción cuando quieras.
70 registros en total
Mostrando 50 de 70CHANGING A MOTOR ON A 3 IN PUMP IN CONFINED AREA. HE DOWS NOT K NOW WHEN THE INJURY OCCURRED
THIS EMPLOYEE DOES NOT KNOW OF A SPECIFIC INJURY HE HAS A TENDER SORE SPOT WITHOUT ANY SWELLING OF THE KNEE AND IT SI QUESTIONABLE WHETHER IT IS A WORK RELATED INJURY THE EMPLOYEE STOPPED WORK ON 3-17-88
MANTRIP WAS LEFT INSIDE THE M INE AT FIRST CROSS CUT. EMP WAS WALKING BACK TO GET IN MANTRIP AND SLIPPED ON ICE. THE EMP HAS A HISTORY OF PRIOR INJURY TO THIS KNEE
HAD A NO LOST TIME ACCIDENT 3-9-88 LIFTING A SPEED REDUCER AT PLANT RETURNED TO DR IN NOV 1988 FOR TREATMENT OF AGGRAVATION OF BACK PAIN AND STRAIN I WAS NOT AWARE THIS WAS BEING TURNED IN AS WORK RELATED UNTIL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED JAN 12 FOR EMERGENCY DISC REMOVAL THIS IS WHY MY REPORT TO YOU IS SO LATE
FALL OCCURRED ON FIRST LEFT OFF NORTHEAST MAINS ACROSS FROM #5 TO #7 ENTRY, IN LAST OPEN CROSSCUT. APPSOX. 4' THICK, 20' WIDE AND 60' LONG.
PRIOR TO STARTING THE SHIFT, ANOTHER EMP TOOK A PIECE OF CARDBOARD OUT OF A TAPE BOX AND FLIPPED IT BACK OVER HIS SHOULDER. THIS EMP WAS STANDING BEHIND HIM AT THE TIME AND THE CARDBBOARD HI HIM IN THE EYE
EMP WAS LIFITN BELT STRUCTURE WHILE TWISTING AND FELT PAIN INLOWER BACK
THE FRONT WHEEL OF THE PERSONNEL CARRIER DROPPED INTO A HOLE, JERKING STEERING WHEEL OUT OF EMPLOYEE'S RIGHT HAND-KNOB ON STEERING WHEEL, HIT EMPLOYEE ON FOREFINGER OF RIGHT HAND-FRACTURING FI NGER.
THIS EMPLOYEE W5S RIDING IN THE MANTRIP HE SAYS HE HURT HIS BACK WHEN THE MANTRIP HIT SOME ROUGH ROAD
EMPLOYEE WAS GR3NDING A SLOT IN A PIECE OF PIPE WHICH WAS HELD IN A VICE THE HAND GRINDER KICKED BACK HITTING HIM IN THE FACE & ON BACK OF LEFT HAND LACERATION OF FACE REQUIRED SUTURES
THIS ELECTRICIA3 WAS SPLICING CUTTER CABLE HE WAS CUT TING CABLE OPEN WITH HAWBILL KNIFE & THE KNIFE SLIPPED-CUTTING HIS RT.THUMB & FOREFINGER SIX STITCHES REQUIRED
EMP WAS GRINDIN1 WITH ANGLE GRINDER. IT SLIPPED AND THE GRINDING WHEEL TOUCHED HIS RT KNEE CUTTING IT REQUIRED 4 SUTURES
ON 10-15-87 THI8 COAL MINER FILED A CLAIM FOR HEARING LOSS, WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYED BY THIS CO HIS DR HAS STATED IN HIS PROFESSIONAL OPINION THIS MINER HAS A HEARING LOSS DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO OR PERCEPTIB5Y AGGRAVATED BY INDUSTRIAL NOISE EXPOSURE, IN THE COURSE OF AND RESULTING FROM HIS EMPLOYMENT
INJ OCCURRED OVER PERIOD OF TIME FROM CRAWLING ON KNEES.EMPL 1ST BEGAN HAVING SWELLING 9-3-87.BEGAN MISSING WORK 9-30-87.
EMPLOYEE BACKED3UP THE TRACTOR TO HOOK UP TO OIL CAR. PULL TONGUE DID NOT LINE UP, HE SET LEFT FOOT OUT OF TRACTOR TO LINE CAR UP. TRACTOR ROLLED BACK, CATCHING FOOT BETWEEN TRACTOR AND OIL CA
EMPLOYEE WAS CR5WLING ALONG RIB ON LEFT SIDE. HE GOT OVER CLOSE TO COAL RIB TO LET SCOOP BY. COAL RIB SET DOWN ON HIS LEFT SIDE, FRACTURING RIBS.
EE WAS OPERATIN1 A KERSEY WHEN HE RUN OVER A ROCK WHICH CAUSED HIM TO H IT THE RIGHT ARM AT THE ELBOW ON THE DECK OF THE KERSEY. EE DID NOT START MISSING WORK UNTIL 9-14-87.
EE CLAIMED HE G2T SHOCKED WHEN HE TURNED ON PUM. HE COMPLAINED OF HEADAHCE & BACK HURTING. AN INVESTIGATION REVEALED A PLASTIC SWITCH WHICH HE CLAIMS HE TOUCHED & WAS SHOCKEDTHROUGH. WV DEPT OF ENERGY ELEC7RICAL INSPECTOR THOROUGHLY EXAMINED THIS PUMP & DETERMINED THERE WAS NO WAY THE EE WAS SHOCKED BY IT.
MINER FILED FOR3HEARING LOSS WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYED BY THIS COMPANY.DR STATED -HEARING LOSS DIRRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO OR PERCEPTIBLY AGGRAVATED BY INDUSTRIAL NOISE EXPOSURE,IN THE COURSE OF E
THE TRAILING CA6LE ON #2 BOLTER WAS DEFECTIVE IN THAT THE GROUND WIRE WAS INTO, A SPLICE IN THE CABLE. FOR SOME UNDETERMINED REASON THE CIRCUIT BREAKER DID NOT TRIP. WHEN THE VICTIM ATTEMPTED TO START THE M5CHINE, HE WAS ELECTROCUTED. THIS OCCURRED IN #2 ENTRY, ONE CROSS CUT OUTBY THE FACE.
THE EMPLOYEE HA8 A HISTORY OF BACK PROBLEMS, INCLUDING SURGERY. DETAILS OF ACCIDENT UNKNOWN.
A FALL OCCURRED3IN THE SECOND CROSSCUT OUTBY THR FACE IN NO.4 ENTRY. IT WAS 40'L X 18'W & 4' THICK
THE EMPLOYEE HA8 A HISTORY OF KNEE PROBLEMS. HE WAS CRAWLING IN THE MINE AND BUMPED HIS KNEE ON A SMALL ROCK.
ON 001 SECTION,25FT. INBY FAN IN #2 ENTRY,THERE WAS A FALL,9 FT. HIGH AND 20FT. LONG AND 12" FEET WIDE.
THE SHOT FIREMA3 HAD CLEARED EVERYONE OUT OT SHOXXXX SHOTFIREMAN AND INTO THE ENTRY AT THE SAME TIME THE FACE WAS SHOT. A FLYING OBJECT HIT HIM IN THE LEFT LEG.
EMPLOYEE WAS PU8HING STOPPING OUT WITH SCOOP. THE TOP ROW OF BLOCKS DID NOT FALL UNTIL EMPLOYEE GOT UNDER THEM. A 4X8 CINDER BLOCK FELL ON HIS HEAD, SHOULDER AND LEFT HAND. HE HAD A MASHED FIN GER AND STIFF N9CK.
EMPLOYEE WAS MO5ING FORK ON FORK LIFT, CAUGHT INDEX FINGER OF RIGHT HAND BETWEEN FORK AND FRAME OF FORK LIFT. LACERATION REQUIRED SUTURES.
EMPLOYEE WAS CH5NGING STAB JACK ON BOLT MACHINE, WAS PRYING JACK UP TO LINE IT UP, AND BAR SLIPPED, HITTING FINGER ON OLD JACK, HE HAD JUST TOOK OFF MACHINE. LACERATION REQUIRED SUTURES.
EMPLOYEE CAUGHT3INDEX FINGER OF RIGHT HAND BETWEEN TWO 4 I NCH METAL PIPES. LACERATION REQUIRED STITCHES.
EMPLOYEE PULLED3A MUSCLE IN HIS BACK, WHILE HANGING THE CUTTER CABLE IN 30 INCH COAL.
OPERATOR CAUGHT3SHOULDER BETWEEN RIB AND SCOOP. SCOOP WAS IN GOOD OPERATING CONDITION.
EMPLOYEE WAS WA5KING AROUND THE COAL STOCK PILE AT THE LOADOUT, HE SLIPPED ON LOOSE COAL AND FELL.
FIRST LEFT MAIN8 BREAK THROUGH AT MOUTH OF #1 ROOM ON THE LEFT, FELL 20 FT WIDE, 50 FT LONG AND 4 FT THICK. TOP WAS SLATE/SHALE MIXED WITH COAL.
CLAIM FILED ON 050686 THIS COAL MINER HAS FILED A CLAIM FOR HEA RING LOSS WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYED BY THIS COMPANY HIS PHYSICIAN HAS STATED IN HIS PROFESSIONAL OPINION THIS MINER HAS A HEARING LOSS DIRECTLY A7TRIBUTABLE TO OR PERCEPTIBLY AGGRAVATED BY INDUSTRIAL NOISE EXPOSURE IN THE COURSE OF & RESULTING FROM HIS EMPLOYMENT (THIS CLAIM IS IN LITIGATION)
CLAIM FILED ON 110584 THIS COAL MINER FILED A CLAIM WITH WORKERS COMPENSATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYED WITH OUR COMPANY HIS PHYSICIAN HAS OPINED THAT HIS COAL MI NER HAS CONTRAC7ED OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS (THIS CLAIM IS IN LITIGATION)
THIS COAL MINER3FILED A CLAIM WITH WORKERS COMPENSATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS, WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYEED WITH OUR COMPANY.
THIS COAL MINER3FILED A CLAIM FOR HEARING LOSS, WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYEED BY THIS COMPANY. THE PHYSICAN HAS STATED THIS MINER HAS A HEARING LOSS DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO OUR PERCEPTIBLY AGGAVA TED NOISE EXPOS6RE, IN THE COURSE OF THE RESULTING FROM HIS EMPLOYMENT.
THIS COAL MINER3FILED A CLAIM WITH WORKERS COMPENSATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS, WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYED WITH OUR COMPANY.
THIS COAL MINER3FILED A CLAIM WITH WORKERS COMPENSATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMONIOSIOUS, WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYEED WITH OUR COMPANY.
THIS COASL MINE9 FILED A CLAIM WITH WORKERS COMPENSATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYED WITH OUR COMPANY HIS PHYSICIAN HAS OPINED THAT THIS COAL MINER HAS CONTRACTED O CCUPATIONAL PNE6MOCONIOSIS (THIS CLAIM IS IN LITIGATION) (DATE OF FILING 060884)
THIS COAL MINER3FILED A CLAIM WITH WORKERS COMPENSATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYED WITH OUR COMPANY HIS PHYSICIAN HAS OPINED THAT THIS COAL MINER HAS CONTRACTED OC CUPATIONAL PNEU4OCONIOSIS (THIS CLAIM IS IN LITIGATION)
THIS COAL MINER3FILED A CLAIM FOR HEARING LOSS, WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYEED BY THIS COMPANY. HIS PYSICIAN HAS STATED THIS MINER HAS A HEARING LOSS DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO OR PERCEPTIBLY AGGRAVA TED BY NOISE EX1OSURE, IN THE COURSE OF AND RESULTING FROM HIS EMPLOYMENT.
THIS COAL MINER3FILED A CLAIM WITH WORKERS COMPENSATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS WHILE ACTIVELY EMPLOYED WITH OUR COMPANY HIS PHYSICIAN HAS OPINED THAT THIS COAL MINER HAS CONTRACTED OU CCUPATIONAL PNE6MOCONIOSIS (THIS CLAIM IS IN LITIGATION)
OCCUPATIONAL PN9UMOCONIOSIS BOARD REVIEWED THE RECORD OF THIS COAL MINER AND FOUND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY A DIAGNOSIS OF OCCUP PNEUMOCONIOSIS WITH NO PULMONARY FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT AT TRIBUTABLE TO T2IS DISEASE HE WAS GRANTED A 5% AWARD ON 8-15-86
THE OCC PNEUMO 6OARD REVIEWED THE RECORD OF THIS MINER AND FOUND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY A DIAGNOSIS OF OCC PNEUMO WITH 25% PULMONARY FUNCTIONAL IMAPIRMENT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THIS DISEASE HE WAS GRANTED 25% AWARD ON 09 7 84 THIS CLAIM IS STILL INLITIGATION
THE OCCUPATIONA5 PNEUMOCONI/SIS BOARD REVIEWED THE RECORD OF THIS COAL MINER AND FOUND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY A DIAGNOSIS OF OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS WITH NONE PULMONARY FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT ATT9IBUTABLE TO THIS DISEASE. HE WAS GRANTED A FIVE PERCENT AWARD, ON OCT 30 1986.
PNEUMOCONIOSIS 3
THE OCCUPATIONA5 PNEUMOCONIOSIS BOARD REVIEWED THE RECORD OF THIS COAL MINER AND FOUND SUFFICENT EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY A DIAGNOSIS OF OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS WITH FIFTEEN PERCENT (15%) PULMO NARY FUCTIONAL 3MPAIRMENT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THIS DISEASE. HE WAS GRANTED A 15% AWARD ON MARCH 238 1984.
THE OCCUPATIONA5 PNEUMOCONIOSIS BOARD REVIEWED THE RECORD OF THIS COAL MINER AND FOUND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY A DIAGNOSIS OF OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS WITH NONE PULMONARY FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT ATT9IBUTABLE TO THIS DISEASE. HE WAS GRANTED A FIVE PERCENT AWARD ON OCT 30 1986.