Employee was lifting metal out of the bed of his pick - up truck, as he was shifting his weight to throw the metal from the truck he felt a sharp pain run up his left side.
Harris Branch/Tackett Creek Surface Mine: 140 MSHA citations Coal
Harris Branch/Tackett Creek Surface Mine has $104K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 9 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Harris Branch/Tackett Creek Surface Mine.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 22
- Years on record
- 2005–2009
- Latest incident
- Apr 2009
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Harris Branch/Tackett Creek Surface Mine has $104K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 9 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 34 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE 2009-90 | Settlement | Paez | 2011 | $38K → $27K |
| SE 2008-356 | Prevail | Zielinski | 2010 | $36K → $2K |
| SE 2008-973 | Settlement | Pope II | 2011 | $5K → $2K |
| SE 2008-180 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2009 | $3K → $2K |
| SE 2008-355 | Settlement | Melick | 2009 | $2K → $1K |
| SE 2007-348 | Settlement | Feldman | 2007 | $792 → $600 |
MSHA sampling at Harris Branch/Tackett Creek Surface Mine shows 99% of 137 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2009-04-27, 17 years ago
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE45
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR39
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER37
Silica (quartz)
Last sampled: 2009-03-04, 17 years ago- BULLDOZER OPERATOR3
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER2
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2009-02-25, 17 years ago
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE24
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER16
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR11
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 100% | 7 |
| 2008 | 97% | 38 |
| 2007 | 100% | 46 |
| 2006 | 100% | 31 |
| 2005 | 100% | 6 |
| 2004 | 100% | 9 |
| Year | silica avg (%) | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 0.3 | 1 |
| 2008 | 0.4 | 1 |
| 2007 | 28.2 | 3 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 0% | 5 |
| 2008 | 0% | 19 |
| 2007 | 0% | 20 |
| 2006 | 0% | 5 |
| 2004 | 0% | 10 |
Harris Branch/Tackett Creek Surface Mine recorded 14.79 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2008.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 * | 14.79 | 3.70 | 0.000 |
| 2007 | 14.16 | 8.26 | 0.000 |
| 2006 | 3.13 | 2.09 | 0.000 |
| 2005 | 3.79 | 1.89 | 0.000 |
| 2004 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Mountainside Coal Company Inc 2003 to present
ⓘ
Coal production is reported quarterly and lags the current period; the most recent quarters may be incomplete.| Year | Employees | Coal produced (tons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 6 | 20,881 |
| 2008 | 25 | 99,382 |
| 2007 | 75 | 431,988 |
| 2006 | 74 | 452,055 |
| 2005 | 34 | 249,258 |
| 2004 | 15 | 106,585 |
| 2003 | 0 |
Harris Branch/Tackett Creek Surface Mine sits in Claiborne County, Tennessee, where the Census mining category is 1.0% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2009 Q2 | 4,706 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 6,450 | 11 | 5 | 1705.4 |
| 2008 Q4 | 7,048 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 9,589 | 20 | 16 | 2085.7 |
| 2008 Q2 | 18,605 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 18,838 | 5 | 1 | 265.4 |
| 2007 Q4 | 38,256 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 16 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Q3 | 33,772 | 31 | 17 | 917.9 |
| 2007 Q2 | 43,278 | 17 | 11 | 392.8 |
| 2007 Q1 | 54,182 | 7 | 3 | 129.2 |
| 2006 Q4 | 59,938 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 46,487 | 7 | 6 | 150.6 |
| 2006 Q2 | 44,880 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 40,226 | 6 | 0 | 149.2 |
| 2005 Q4 | 34,648 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 33,583 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 27,075 | 11 | 2 | 406.3 |
| 2005 Q1 | 10,290 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 16,353 | 3 | 0 | 183.5 |
| 2004 Q3 | 7,247 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 7,037 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 3,600 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reportable incidents
22 on file2009 · 1 incident
2008 · 4 incidents
Employee was welding on a 777C Rock Truck Bed, and a piece of Slag flew up and struck the employee below the left eye, causing a mild burn below his eye.
D9R dozer operator was traveling in reverse and struck a 777C rock truck in the rear, the rock truck was also traveling in reverse. The D9R operator states he didn't see the rock truck as he began to go in reverse, the rock truck driver also states he did not see the D9R dozer through his mirrors as he was traveling in reverse.
Employee was climbing off of the bed of the hydro seeder truck; he slipped causing him to fall to the ground landing on his right elbow.
Employee was climbing down the ladder of the truck he had been driving and slipped catching his foot/ankle in the step causing him to fall to the ground.
2007 · 12 incidents
EE was stepping up on the boarding ladder. As he began climbing up on the ladder, he felt a very sharp pain shoot up his lower back. The pain progressed when he started working, causing him to leave early.
Employee was hitting the side of powered bin with a sledge hammer. The hammer came back and struck the employee in the right rib cage causing him to black out hitting his head on the beam of the powered bin.
Employee was tossing bails of multch on seeder truck and felt a sharp pain shoot up his right side neck.
EE was pushing material down to 992D loader with a D9R dozer co. # M37 & the machine's blade slipped off a rock causing a sudden jerk, which resulted in EE having sudden pain in lower abdomen.
Outburst of fuel hose, blowing fuel in his eyes.
Employee stepped on loose material at the edge of a hole. The material moved causing employee to slip into hole.
Employee was standing on stabilizer bar, slipped and fell due to it being oil-covered.
Employee stepped in loose material on drill bench twisting his ankle.
Employee was moving from one dozer to the other when he slipped due to muddy and wet conditions.
Employee was assisting in removing the 4" discharge hose which was wrapped around pump during transport. As employee pulled on hose, which had become tangled, the coupling on end of hose came loose and struck employee.
EE was climbing down ladder; highwall fell and a rock flew from highwall hitting him in the left hand.
Employee steps down on push arm on 395 Dozer on a dirt clot & dirt clot rolled causing the EE to fall from push arm to the ground.
2006 · 3 incidents
Employee was removing a hydrolic hose and the wrench slipped off the hose fitting causing the wrench to his the employee in the forehead, which caused a laceration to his forehead.
Employee was changing a tire on IT28 loader and the jack fell causing the tire to hit the employee in the left lower leg.
Fell from rear of loader.
2005 · 2 incidents
AS EE UNCOUPLED A 6" DISCHARGE HOSE FROM A PUMP, THE HOSE, BEING UNDER PRESSURE, MOVED TO THE LEFT, STRIKING THE EE ON THE LEG. THE METAL HOSE COUPLING BROKE EE'S LEG.
Equipment being used broke & came apart at the connecting joint throwing part of said equipment into hand of employee.