Employee was working at the prep plant, and was trying to remove a piece of belt skirt that had broken loose from raw coal feed belt. Employee slipped or pinched his upper right thigh against existing angle iron. The employee's upper right thigh was cut by a sharp point on angle. Belt was tagged out.
Pageton Refuse Impoundment: 150 MSHA citations Coal
Pageton Refuse Impoundment has $28K in proposed MSHA penalties and $4K outstanding across 1 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Pageton Refuse Impoundment.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 7
- Years on record
- 2001–2012
- Latest incident
- Aug 2012
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Pageton Refuse Impoundment has $28K in proposed MSHA penalties and $4K outstanding across 1 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Stood as issued 2 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEVA 2009-1087 | Default | Lesnick | 2010 | $242 → $242 |
MSHA sampling at Pageton Refuse Impoundment shows 100% of 36 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2012-09-05, 14 years ago
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.- UTILITY MAN7
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER6
- MECHANIC5
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2012-09-05, 14 years ago
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- UTILITY MAN6
- ROTARY BUCKET EXCAVATOR OPERATOR4
- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR3
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 100% | 5 |
| 2011 | 100% | 10 |
| 2006 | 100% | 3 |
| 2005 | 100% | 3 |
| 2004 | 100% | 2 |
| 2003 | 100% | 3 |
| 2002 | 100% | 5 |
| 2001 | 100% | 5 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 0% | 5 |
| 2011 | 0% | 5 |
| 2009 | 0% | 4 |
| 2006 | 33% | 3 |
| 2005 | 0% | 3 |
| 2004 | 0% | 2 |
| 2003 | 0% | 2 |
| 2001 | 0% | 5 |
Pageton Refuse Impoundment recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2006.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.- Recon Resources 1996 to 1999
- Deepgreen Wv Inc 1999 to 2000
- Miller Logging Inc 2000 to 2002
- Deepgreen West Virginia Inc 2002 to present
ⓘ
Coal production is reported quarterly and lags the current period; the most recent quarters may be incomplete.| Year | Employees | Coal produced (tons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 0 | |
| 2013 | 2 | |
| 2012 | 8 | |
| 2011 | 18 | |
| 2010 | 14 | |
| 2009 | 0 | |
| 2008 | 1 | |
| 2007 | 4 | |
| 2006 | 7 | |
| 2005 | 6 | |
| 2004 | 7 | |
| 2003 | 2 | |
| 2002 | 4 | |
| 2001 | 2 | |
| 2000 | 2 | 80,968 |
Pageton Refuse Impoundment sits in McDowell County, West Virginia, where the Census mining category is 13.0% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2014 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2013 Q4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2013 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2013 Q2 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 1,480 | 2 | 0 | 1351.4 |
| 2012 Q4 | 2,582 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 6,708 | 6 | 3 | 894.5 |
Show 37 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Q4 | 10,937 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 8,815 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 5,080 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2008 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2008 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2008 Q2 | 320 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 1,233 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 2,048 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 1,869 | 1 | 0 | 535.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 3,194 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 8,202 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 6,047 | 2 | 0 | 330.7 |
| 2006 Q1 | 3,625 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 2,480 | 4 | 4 | 1612.9 |
| 2005 Q3 | 2,842 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 3,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 2,752 | 9 | 5 | 3270.3 |
| 2004 Q4 | 3,228 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 3,325 | 10 | 6 | 3007.5 |
| 2004 Q2 | 4,800 | 9 | 8 | 1875.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 960 | 6 | 4 | 6250.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 960 | 1 | 0 | 1041.7 |
| 2002 Q4 | 960 | 2 | 1 | 2083.3 |
| 2002 Q3 | 960 | 8 | 5 | 8333.3 |
| 2002 Q2 | 1,280 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 5,532 | 6 | 4 | 1084.6 |
| 2001 Q4 | 1,138 | 2 | 2 | 1757.5 |
| 2001 Q3 | 1,046 | 5 | 2 | 4780.1 |
| 2001 Q2 | 623 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 1,500 | 6 | 4 | 4000.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 925 | 3 | 2 | 3243.2 |
| 2000 Q3 | 940 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 960 | 3 | 0 | 3125.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 160 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
7 on file2012 · 2 incidents
Was moving an existing double door to new side of plant. Door frame got hung on conduit when employee got it loose it swung and hit the employee in the chest and shoulder knocking him to the ground. Medical treatment was received employee was returned to work on 4/10/12.
2005 · 1 incident
While off the machine looking over work area, an area that extended out approximately 30' to 35' broke away and caused me to fall. The extent of injury was bruises to hands, right shoulder, left arm and back.
2002 · 2 incidents
COLD WITH SOME SNOW AND ICE IN AREA. EE WAS CARRYING FUEL CANS WHEN HE SLIPPED AND FELL HURTING HIS BACK. ONE TO TWO HOURS LATER EE WAS DISMOUNTING THE EXCAVATOR WHEN HE SLIPPED AND FELL HURTI NG HIS BACK.
EE WAS FILLING A DIESEL FUEL CAN WHEN FUEL SQUIRTED INTO THE SAFETY GLASSES SOME OF WHICH IRRITATED BOTH EYES.
2001 · 2 incidents
WORKER WAS WELDING CAUSING RIGHT EYE TO BE DAMAGED.
THE EXCAVATOR OPERATOR SLIPPED AND BUMPED HIS HEAD WHILE TRYING TO ENTER INTO THE OPERATORS CAB OF THE EXCAVATOR, INJURING HIS HEAD, NECK, AND LOWER BACK.