VICTIM WAS DRIVING A LOADED COAL TRUCK DOWN A ELEVATED ROAD WAY AND APPARENTLY TRIED TO SHIFT GEAR HE GO THE TRUCK IN NEUTRAL AND COULD NOT GET IT BACK IN GEAR WHILE GAINING EXCESSIVE SPEED.HE DROVE THE TRUCK INTO A STOCK PILE KILLING HIM INSTANTLY.
Point Lick Surface Facility: 1 recorded fatality Coal
Point Lick Surface Facility has $48K in proposed MSHA penalties and $8K outstanding across 4 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Point Lick Surface Facility.
- Fatalities
- 1
- Total incidents
- 13
- Years on record
- 1992–2009
- Latest incident
- Oct 2009
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Point Lick Surface Facility has $48K in proposed MSHA penalties and $8K outstanding across 4 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 6 · 50%
- Stood as issued 3 · 25%
- Vacated or withdrawn 3 · 25%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEVA 2010-908 | Dismissal | Harner | 2012 | $1K → $1K |
| WEVA 2010-1986 | Settlement | Harner | 2012 | $693 → $456 |
| WEVA 2009-922 | Settlement | Weisberger | 2011 | $276 → $176 |
| WEVA 2010-676 | Settlement | Harner | 2012 | $100 → $100 |
MSHA sampling at Point Lick Surface Facility shows 100% of 65 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2014-09-11, 11 years ago
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.ⓘ
The excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.- UTILITY MAN20
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER13
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE8
Silica (quartz)
Last sampled: 2013-03-14, 13 years ago- UTILITY MAN1
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2014-09-11, 11 years ago
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER10
- UTILITY MAN8
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE6
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 100% | 2 |
| 2013 | 100% | 10 |
| 2012 | 100% | 5 |
| 2011 | 100% | 10 |
| 2010 | 100% | 12 |
| 2009 | 100% | 16 |
| 2008 | 100% | 5 |
| 2007 | 100% | 5 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 0% | 2 |
| 2013 | 29% | 7 |
| 2012 | 0% | 6 |
| 2011 | 10% | 10 |
| 2010 | 0% | 3 |
| 2008 | 0% | 5 |
| 2007 | 20% | 5 |
Point Lick Surface Facility recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2013.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2011 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2009 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2008 * | 2.04 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2007 * | 2.74 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Catenary Coal Company LLC 1992 to 2008
- Midland Trail Energy LLC 2008 to 2016
- ERP Environmental Fund Inc 2016 to 2019
- Hanover Resources, LLC 2019 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 |
| 2014 | 5 |
| 2013 | 13 |
| 2012 | 7 |
| 2011 | 26 |
| 2010 | 28 |
| 2009 | 33 |
| 2008 | 29 |
| 2007 | 30 |
| 2006 | 3 |
| 2005 | 3 |
| 2004 | 3 |
| 2003 | 3 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2000 | 3 |
Point Lick Surface Facility sits in Kanawha County, West Virginia, where the Census mining category is 1.9% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2018 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2018 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2018 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2017 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2017 Q3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2017 Q2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2017 Q1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Show 68 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2016 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2016 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2016 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q2 | 514 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 635 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 3,525 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 3,402 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 2,429 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 10,910 | 7 | 0 | 641.6 |
| 2013 Q2 | 14,360 | 1 | 0 | 69.6 |
| 2013 Q1 | 9,950 | 8 | 1 | 804.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2012 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2012 Q2 | 3,561 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 15,669 | 8 | 1 | 510.6 |
| 2011 Q4 | 16,541 | 2 | 0 | 120.9 |
| 2011 Q3 | 19,394 | 2 | 0 | 103.1 |
| 2011 Q2 | 22,537 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 23,789 | 1 | 0 | 42.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 20,860 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 22,121 | 10 | 1 | 452.1 |
| 2010 Q2 | 21,555 | 2 | 0 | 92.8 |
| 2010 Q1 | 22,865 | 6 | 0 | 262.4 |
| 2009 Q4 | 23,829 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 30,454 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 30,555 | 1 | 0 | 32.7 |
| 2009 Q1 | 31,037 | 1 | 0 | 32.2 |
| 2008 Q4 | 26,156 | 11 | 0 | 420.6 |
| 2008 Q3 | 24,262 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 25,620 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 21,912 | 5 | 0 | 228.2 |
| 2007 Q4 | 21,651 | 6 | 4 | 277.1 |
| 2007 Q3 | 19,177 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 20,125 | 11 | 8 | 546.6 |
| 2007 Q1 | 11,965 | 3 | 0 | 250.7 |
| 2006 Q4 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 1,708 | 1 | 1 | 585.5 |
| 2005 Q4 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 1,582 | 1 | 0 | 632.1 |
| 2003 Q2 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Fatalities at this mine
1 recordedReportable incidents
12 on file (excluding fatalities above)2009 · 2 incidents
The injured was trying to remove a discharge line from a feed box. The line shifted as it cleared the opening in the feed box, smashing the injured's right thumb. He was diagnosed with a laceration and fracture at CAMC General, where he received approximately 15 sutures to close the wound.
Climbing up tarp rock, EE slipped and fell and stubbed his right hand.
2008 · 1 incident
Injured was in the process of changing out metal in the back of the raw coal chute, as he installed the new peices of metal his finger was pinched between the handrail that his hand was resting on and the metal he was installing.
2007 · 1 incident
Employee attempting to shift gears going up grade with truck. Got it out of gear. The truck rolled backwards into a ditch and turned on its side. Employee got out, noticed a fire starting in engine compartment. Used fire exinguisher but did not get fire undercontrol.
2006 · 1 incident
EE was driving back to pit to get another load and ran into the ditch.
2004 · 1 incident
BASED UPON THE INFORMATION RECEIVED AT THIS TIME, EE WAS PUTTING A SPRING ON EE'S TRUCK AND HE FELL OFF AND HIT HIS RIGHT ARM AND IT STARTED TO SWELL. THE DR SAID THAT HE BRUISED A MUSCLE AND WOULD BE BACK TO WORK ON THE FOLLOWING MONDAY. EE WENT BACK TO THE DR. ON MONDAY AND CALLED AND SAID THAT HE WOULD BE OFF LONGER THAN ORIGINALLY ANTICIPATED
1999 · 2 incidents
EE WAS GETTING UP IN TRUCK TO START SHIFT. HE STEPPED UP ON FIRST STEP WITH RIGHT FOOT, FOOT SLIPPED OFF, HE LANDED ON LEFT FOOT WITH ALL HIS WEIGHT. HE ALLEGED HE STRAINED HIS BACK WHEN THIS HAPPENED.
EE WAS CONSTRUCTING BATTERY HOLD DOWN FOR WATER TRUCK HE HAD A COUPLE OR MORE WELDING PASSES TO COMPLETE JOB. HE GOT A NEW WELDING ROD HE HAD PROBLEM GETTING ROD TO STRIKE. HE LIFTED OUTER LEN S OF WELDING HOOD TO SEE. THERE WAS NO INNER LENS WHEN ROD STRUCK IT POPPED & APPARENTLY BLEW A RUST PARTICLE INTO HIS EYE. PARTICLE WAS DISOVERED & REMOVED 2 DAYS LATER
1995 · 2 incidents
EE WAS PULLING 2 TEN FOOT SECTIONS OF POLE UP A GRADE WHEN THE ENGINE ON THE BACKHOE BEING USED STALLED AND THE BACKHOE ROLLED BACKWARDS WITH TEH POLES AND STRUCK A STUMP WITH THE POLES. THE R IGHT REAR TIRE ROLLED UP ON THE POLES AND FLIPPED THE TRACTOR ON ITS LEFT SIDE. THE EE WAS THROWN OUT OF THE BACKHOE.
THE SECURITY OFFICER WAS ASKED BY CLIENT PERSONNEL TO REMOVE A BARREL FROM THE CREEK. THE SECURITY OFFICER STATED THAT WHEN HE DID SO HE INJUREDHIS UPPER BACK.
1994 · 1 incident
DOOR MOULDING ON THE GUARD HOUSE DOOR WAS BROKEN AND CAUSED THE SECURITY OFFICER TO TRIP WHEN EXITING THE GUARD HOUSE. THIS SECURITY OFFICER FRACTURED HIS LEFT ANKLE WHEN HE FELL.
1992 · 1 incident
FELL FROM TRUCK.