During installation of new screens in the screening plant, one screen did not set in properly. The employee was adjusting the screen and cut EE's finger on the new screen edge causing a laceration. The laceration required 3 stitches.
Portable Plant #1: 78 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
Portable Plant #1 tiene $16K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 1 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Portable Plant #1.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 21
- Años en registro
- 1986–2020
- Último incidente
- Oct 2020
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Portable Plant #1 tiene $16K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 1 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 1 · 100%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT 2005-110M | Settlement | Bulluck | 2005 | $8K → $8K |
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2025-09-25
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Respirable dust, <.1mg4
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz3
- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz1
- Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz1
Ver los análisis individuales (9)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2025-09-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Cleanup Man | ||
| 2022-09-21 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2022-09-21 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Rotary Bucket Ex. Operator | ||
| 2013-07-23 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 2.02 | 10 | 0.20 | Utility Man |
| 2012-08-29 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.17 | 1.63 | 0.10 | Truck Driver |
| 2012-08-29 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.51 | 1.33 | 0.38 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2010-06-29 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.17 | 10 | 0.02 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2010-06-29 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.15 | 1.68 | 0.09 | Front-end Loader Operator |
Portable Plant #1 registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2025.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 9.75 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 9.50 | 9.50 | 0.000 |
| 2017 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2016 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2015 * | 7.05 | 7.05 | 0.000 |
| 2014 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Martin Marietta Aggregates 1950 a 1982
- River Products Company, Inc. 1982 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 9 |
| 2025 | 11 |
| 2024 | 11 |
| 2023 | 11 |
| 2022 | 10 |
| 2021 | 10 |
| 2020 | 11 |
| 2019 | 9 |
| 2018 | 11 |
| 2017 | 12 |
| 2016 | 11 |
| 2015 | 14 |
| 2014 | 11 |
| 2013 | 7 |
| 2012 | 7 |
| 2011 | 12 |
| 2010 | 8 |
| 2009 | 7 |
| 2008 | 8 |
| 2007 | 7 |
| 2006 | 8 |
| 2005 | 8 |
| 2004 | 9 |
| 2003 | 6 |
| 2002 | 5 |
| 2001 | 5 |
| 2000 | 19 |
Portable Plant #1 se ubica en Washington County, Iowa, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 0.1% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 7,635 | 1 | 0 | 131.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5,265 | 1 | 0 | 189.9 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6,835 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 6,440 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6,578 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4,327 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 5,452 | 2 | 0 | 366.8 |
| 2024 Q3 | 5,831 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 98 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 6,434 | 2 | 1 | 310.8 |
| 2024 Q1 | 4,752 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 3,866 | 1 | 0 | 258.7 |
| 2023 Q3 | 5,729 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 5,259 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 3,108 | 1 | 0 | 321.8 |
| 2022 Q4 | 5,519 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 4,382 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 5,888 | 1 | 0 | 169.8 |
| 2022 Q1 | 2,957 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 5,931 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 6,058 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 5,846 | 2 | 0 | 342.1 |
| 2021 Q1 | 2,105 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 5,867 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 5,901 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 5,957 | 1 | 0 | 167.9 |
| 2020 Q1 | 2,790 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 5,745 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 5,781 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 6,106 | 6 | 0 | 982.6 |
| 2019 Q1 | 2,306 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 5,223 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 5,989 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 6,240 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 3,603 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 6,654 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 6,735 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 5,878 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 3,036 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 5,448 | 2 | 0 | 367.1 |
| 2016 Q3 | 6,024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 6,020 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 4,213 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 5,798 | 6 | 2 | 1034.8 |
| 2015 Q3 | 10,650 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 8,952 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 2,978 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 7,668 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 4,831 | 3 | 1 | 621.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 6,015 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 3,405 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 4,412 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 5,084 | 7 | 4 | 1376.9 |
| 2013 Q2 | 3,813 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 4,868 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 4,383 | 1 | 0 | 228.2 |
| 2012 Q2 | 3,404 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 3,147 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 10,405 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 7,780 | 3 | 2 | 385.6 |
| 2011 Q1 | 2,814 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 5,431 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 6,264 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 5,646 | 4 | 1 | 708.5 |
| 2010 Q1 | 2,310 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 4,274 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 4,534 | 2 | 0 | 441.1 |
| 2009 Q2 | 4,496 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 2,766 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 4,968 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 4,677 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 4,742 | 3 | 0 | 632.6 |
| 2008 Q1 | 2,691 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 4,378 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 4,940 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 4,552 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 3,046 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 4,631 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 4,455 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 5,679 | 4 | 1 | 704.3 |
| 2006 Q1 | 2,606 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 5,305 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 5,301 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 4,697 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 3,273 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 4,835 | 1 | 1 | 206.8 |
| 2004 Q3 | 4,054 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 3,348 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 4,356 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 4,179 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 4,458 | 4 | 0 | 897.3 |
| 2003 Q2 | 4,065 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 1,101 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 2,848 | 1 | 0 | 351.1 |
| 2002 Q2 | 2,898 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 1,210 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2001 Q2 | 7,445 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 2,956 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 13,129 | 4 | 0 | 304.7 |
| 2000 Q3 | 18,469 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 11,752 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 5,926 | 11 | 2 | 1856.2 |
Incidentes reportables
21 en archivo2020 · 1 incidente
2018 · 1 incidente
While connecting discharge water pipeline together employee pulled the collar from the bottom of the pipe around to secure the lock straining shoulder.
2015 · 1 incidente
With supt removing flywheel off crusher, spacer pins buckled pinching employee's hand. Employee refused treatment; had full mobility of finger & hand. 6-2-15 Employee reported everything was fine just sore & bruising. 6-9-15 employee complained of lack of full extension of pinky finger went to dr for eval & sent to specialist 6-10-15 specialist determined fracture & put in cast
2006 · 1 incidente
While lifting the tongue on a dolly so it could be chained up, the tongue was let down and the employees 3rd and 4th fingers on his left hand were smashed. The 4th finger required stitches.
2004 · 1 incidente
While attempting to isolate an electrical problem, the supervisor of the Portable Plant opened portable switch box and put his right hand down in the area of the electrical breakers (without de-energizing the circuits) resulting in an electrical shock and burns. 2nd & 3rd degree burns to the right hand just below the thumb joint.
2000 · 1 incidente
WHILE USING A GRINDING AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OF OUR NEW CRUSHER PLANT. A METAL FLAKE ENTERED HIS LEFT EYE.
1999 · 3 incidentes
WAS GETTING READY TO DRILL. A LEVER BROKE (BOLT CAME OUT OF BACK) THE PISTON PULLED OUT OF THE VALVE, THE PISTON HIT EE ON THE HAND. THIS CAUSED THE SKIN TO BREAK ABOVE THE KNUCKLE RESULTING I N A LACERATION APPROX. 3/4 INCH WIDE AND DEEP. HE HAS 5-7 STITCHES AND IS TO RETURN TO DR. NEXT FRIDAY, OCT. 15TH. HE RETURNED TO WORK THE SAME DAY.
EE FAILING TO USE PROPER METHOD WHILE DISMOUNTING EQUIPMENT. NOT TAKING HIS TIME. EE FELL STRIKING THE GROUND THIS RESULTED IN INJURY TO HIS LOWER BACK AND MILD CASE OF SCIATICA.
WET/MUDDY GROUND. EE WAS DISMOUNTING THE ENDLOADER WHEN HE SLIPPED IN THE MUD AND LANDED WRONG ON HIS ANKLE. THIS CAUSED THE EE TO STRAIN ANKLE.
1998 · 1 incidente
WIND AND SLIPPERY EQUIPMENT. EE WAS CLEANING THE WINDOWS ON THE ENDLOADER FOR BETTER VISABILITY WHILE CLEANING RAMP TO PRIMARY CRUSHER. EITHER WIND OR SLIPPERY CONDITIONS CAUSED EE TO LOSE FOO TING. FALL LANDING ON BACK. WEATHER CONDITIONS ON 11-10-98: CLOUDY,W/RAIN. WINDS 25-40 MPH, GUSTS TO 60 MPH. TEMP. 50-52.
1997 · 1 incidente
WHILE USING METAL PRY BAR TO DISLODGE A ROCK, THE BAR SLIPPED AND CAUSED EMPS LEFT FOREARM TO CONTACT A METAL BRACE.
1995 · 2 incidentes
EE WAS STANDING ON AN ELEVATED PLATFORM 3 FT OFF THE GROUND DUMPING DRAINED OIL INTO A BULK WASTE OIL CONTAINER AFTER EMPTYING THE DRAIN PAN EE JUMPED OFF THE PLATFORM INJURING HIS LEFT KEN E THE INJURY IS DUE TO THE JUMP & COMPRESSION ONTHE KNEE & NOT CONTACTING OTHER MATERIAL
WHILE EMPLOYEE WAS CLEANING OUT THE TAIL PULLEY OF P-17, THE CONVEYOR SYSTEM WAS ACCIDENTLY ENERGIZED.
1993 · 4 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS HAULING CRUSHED LIMESTONE FROM THE CRUSHER TO THE STOCKPILE. HE BACKED UP THE STOCKPILE RAMP. SUNLIGHT & DUST BLINDED HIS VISION IN HIS RIGHT MIRROR, WAS AT THE WRONG ANGLE-WIND C AUGHT HIM AT THE TIME-THE TRUCK ROLLED DOWN STOCKKPILE & LANDED ON IT'S SIDE.
ON THE 3RD, WHILE ASSISTING IN THE RESETTING OF THE PORTABLE PLANT, INJURED WAS MOVING 12 X 12 X & 4 X 6 WOODEN BLOCKS & PULLED HIS ABDOMINAL MUSCLES, HE DIDN'T FEEL BAD & DID NOT NOTIFY HIS S UPERVISOR UNTIL THE 7TH WHEN HE HAD TWISTED & TURNED HIS BODY WHILE HE WAS TURNING A SCREW JACK ON THE PLANT & HE POPPED IN HIS UNBILICAL AREA. HE WAS SEEN BY A DR ON THE 7TH, RESTRICTED ON W
EMPLOYEE WAS GETTING BACK INTO DRIVERS SEAT OF MACK. DID NOT SEE WASP ON SEAT WHEN HE SAT DOWN. WASP STUNG HIM ON RIGHT THIGH. EMPLOYEE IS ALLERGIC TO BEE/WASP STING & WAS TREATED WITH SHOT S @ DR. OFFICE.
WHILE CHANGING GRATES IN HAMMERMILL, A GRATE SLIPPED AND FELL ON INJURED'S HAND. HE PULLED TENDONS AND BRUISED HIS HAND.
1992 · 1 incidente
EMPL SETTING A SCREW JACK UNDER THE PLANT WHEN THE BAR SLIPPED AND EMPL STRUCK RIGHT ELBOW ON SIDE OF PLANT.
1987 · 1 incidente
RAISING THE LAN8ING GEAR ONT HE SCREENINGPLANT TO I NSTALL CRIBBING UNDER THE PLANT. WHILE TURNING THE HANDLE ON THE LANDING GEAR, I NAME SPRAINED HIS BACK
1986 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS ST5NDING ON A FLAT SURFACE. HE WAS ATTEMPTING TO STAIGHTEN OUT SOME CHAINS LAYING ON A 3-DECK SCREEN USING A PIECE OF WIRE WITH A HOOK IN THE END OF IT. THE CHAIN WAS SNAGGED AND THE EMPLOYEE PU5LED, THE CHAIN CAME LOOSE. THE EMPLOYEE OVERBALANCED AND FELL 7' TO 9'. HE LANDED ON HIS FOREHEAD, STRIKING THE GROUND.
WHILE REPLACING3THE ROLLER ON THE CONVEYOR I NAME LOST HIS FOOTING CAUSING HIM TO FALL AGAINST THE GUARD ON THE RETURN CONVEYOR. X RAYS TAKEN ON 6-18-86 TO DETERMINE EXTENT OF INJURIES.