AN INSULATOR BROKE DURING SWITCH THROW OPERATION ALLOWING THE SWITCHING ARM TO CONTACT THE SWITCH STRUCTURE AND BASE CAUSING AN ELECTRICAL FAULT IN THE 34.5 KV SYSTEM. THE INJURED, ALTHOUG H WEARING PRESCRAIBED APROTECTIVE GLOVES, APPARENTLY CONTACTED THE SWITCH THROW HANDLE DURING THE FAULT CONDITION IN THE AREA OF HIS CHEST, A FINDING INDICATED BY THE MEDICAL EXAMINERS REPORT.
Central Machine Shop Coal
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Central Machine Shop.
- Muertes
- 1
- Incidentes totales
- 63
- Años en registro
- 1983–1996
- Último incidente
- Jun 1996
Muertes en esta mina
1 registradasIncidentes reportables
62 en archivo (excluyendo las muertes anteriores)1996 · 1 incidente
EE HAD DISMOUNTED HAULER AFTER SHOWER OF RAIN, SLID IN UD AND FELL, TRYING TO BREAK FALL WITH RIGHT ARM. EE RECEIVED NO MEDICAL TREATMENT AND HE STARTED MISSING TIME FIRST DAY OFF 8-21-96.
1995 · 7 incidentes
PNEMOCONIOSIS.
CO IS REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATU RE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. CO OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMENT.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPOR T THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED ILLNESS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOY
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPOR T ON THE CAUSE OR NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES IT'S MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLO
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE CO OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCK A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THE PERSON S EE.
EMPLOYEE STTED THAT HE WAS STRIPPING A BED LINER OUT OF A FEEDER A FORK LIFT WAS BEING USED TO APPLY UP PRESSURE TO THE LINER WHILE THE WELDS WERE BEING CUT WITH A TORCH WHEN THE NEXT TO LAST WELD WAS TORCHED THE REMAINING WELD POPPED LOOSEPROPELLING THE INJURED APP 3FT INTOTHE AIR RESTRICTED DUTY BEGINNING 05-20-95
THE CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATION ILLNESS. THE CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE DR NATURAL OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE CO OPERATED ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON EE.
1994 · 5 incidentes
EMPLOYEE STATED HE PICKED UP IPE AND TURNE DAROUND NAD BUMPED MOUTH ON BEAM. DAMAGED TOOTH WHICH BORKE OUT LATER (12-25-94) WHILE EATING. NOTE: EMPLOYEE DID NTO REPORT INCIDENT UNTIL 112-27 -94 AT SEVEN A.M.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS USING POWER HANDLE AND SOCKETS TO REMOVE BOLTS AND NUTS. WRENCH SLIPPED AND HIS HAND STRUCK BROKEN BOLT RESULTING IN A CUT TO THE BACK OF HIS RIGHT HAND. SUTURES.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXIST OR THAT THE DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOY.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALELGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT NY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALELGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATION ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR HTE NATURE OF HTE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THA TIT IS DOUBLTFUL THAT THE ALELGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED B THIS PERSON'S EMPLOY
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE STEPPED DOWN FROM 820 HAULER HE WAS WORKING ON ONTO A WOODEN PALLET ON FLOOR. PALLET CREELED AND HE FELL ON RIGHT KNEE.
1993 · 5 incidentes
INJURED CALLED SUPERVISOR ON SUNDAY NIGHT 11/7/93 & STATED HE HAD INJURED HIS BACK ON SATURDAY 11/6/93. A PANEL HAD FELL OF PAN LINES HE WAS TRANSPORTING & AS HE THREW IT BACK ON TRUCK HE FELT A PAIN IN BACK.
EMPLOYEE WENT TO FETCH A PAIL OF WATER WHEN LIFTING HE FELT A TWINGE OF PAIN IN HIS BACK.
MEDICAL REPORT RECEIVED ON 4/20/93 STATED EMPLOYEE WAS ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL ON 3/26/93 & DISCHARGED ON 3/29/93. DIAGNOSIS: CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE EXACERBATION SECONDARY TO ACUT E BRONCHITIS WELDING IN ENCLOSED SPACE & CIGARETTE ADDICTION. MANAGEMENT HAS DETERMINED THIS INCIDENT BE REPORTED AS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS.
INJURED WAS PLACING HEADER BLOCKS UNDER CUTTER DRUMS AS THEY WERE BEING RAISED. ONE BLOCK HAD BEEN PLACED & IN THE PROCESS OF ADDING ANOTHER BLOCK THE DRUM SLIPPED CATCHING FINGER BETWEEN BLK S.
MEDICAL REPORT RECEIVED ON 1-4-93 INDICATES THAT MRI CONDUCTED ON HIS INDICATES THAT HE HAS PREVIOUS HISTORY OF BACK PROBLEMS (RUPTURED DISC).
1992 · 3 incidentes
LATERAL VIEW SHOWS OSTEOPHYTE FORMATION ON AMTERIOR ASPECT OF THE L5 VERTEBRA NOTE FIRST DAY OFF WORK DUE TO OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS 09-11-92 HISTORY OF BACK PROBLEMS DATES BACK TO 1985 MED REPT RECEIVED 09-19-92
79522ING BEARING OFF SHAFT. SHAFT KICKED OUT OF PRESS ONTO FLOOR AND FELL STRIKING EMPLOYEE ON RIGHT FOOT.
CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEDGE DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NA TURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS CO OPERATES IT MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMENT
1991 · 5 incidentes
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPO RT THE CAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH AMANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPL
EMPLOYEE STATED HE HOOKED SLINGS TO SHEARING MACHINE & WAS CHECKING TENSION ON EACH LEG WHEN PRESSURE WAS APPLIED THE LIFTING EYE ON ONE LEG SPREAD APART ALLOWING SLING LEG TO COME LOOSE FLY A ROUND & HIT HIM ON H IS RT ELBOW
EMPLOYEE STATED HE WAS DESLAGING METAL WHEN HAMMER HANDLE CAME OFF HAMMER GLANCED OFF A PIECE OFMETAL AND STRUCK EMPLOYEE OVER RIGHT EYE(EYEBROW).SUTURES.
EMPLOYEE STATED HE WAS DESLAGING A PIECE OF METAL AND HIT HIS LEFT INDEX FINGER WITH A SLAG HAMMER.
INJURED WAS ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE A PALLET OF RESIN OUT OF A BIN. HE BECAME PINNED BETWEEN A HORIZONTAL BEAM AND THE CONTROLLER OF THE MACHINE.
1990 · 11 incidentes
EMPL STATED THAT HE PLACED PIECE OF METAL AGAINST SHEAR MACHINE & IT FELL STRIKING EMPL ON FOOT BEHIND SAFETY TOE.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE AND MINE CLERK LOADED BY HAND A SCOOP TIRE ONTO DELIVERY TRUCK.PULLED MUSCLE IN HIS BACK.NOTE -FIRST DAY OFF JULY 19,1990.
COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT ALLEGED DIANOSIS IS OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT CASUE OR NATURE OF ALLEG ED DIAGNOSIS. CO OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULDHAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMENT.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS LIFTING OUT RIGGER PAD TO REPLACE IT ON CRANE WHEN HE EXPERIENCED PAIN IN BACK.
COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT ALLEGED DIANOSIS IS OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT CASUE OR NATURE OF ALLEG ED DIAGNOSIS. CO OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULDHAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMENT.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS.THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSISTHE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMENT
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOISIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IN AN OCCUPATION ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFOE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES IT'S MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IS IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPL
EMPL WAS REMOVING BOLTS FROM JOY SHEAR. HE WAS WORKING UNDER SHEAR REMOVING TRAPPING SHOES. USING 3/4" DRIVE RATCHE HE HAD APPLIED EXTREME PRESSURE ON RATCHET WHEN HAND SLIPPED CAUSING HANDLED TO SPRING BACK & STRIKE HIM IN LEFT EYEBROW. 1/4" TRIANGLE SHAPE SUTURE.
WHILE REARRANGING SLINGS IN OVERHEAD CRANE HOIST HOOK INJURED'S RING FINGER GOT MASHED WHEN ONE SLING SLIPPED & PINNED FINGER AGAINST HOIST HOOK.
EE WAS ALIGNING COUPLING ON PUMP AND ELECTRIC MOTOR. WHEN HE WENT TO PULL ON EYE BOLT TO ALIGN PUMP, EYE BOLT TURNED EE LOST BALANCE AND FELL ON RIGHT ELBOW WHICH IN TURNED JERKED RIGHT SHOUL DER.
EMPLOYEE WAS LIFTING COOKER TO VULCANIZE CABLE. EXPERIENCED PAIN IN LOWER BACK.
1989 · 2 incidentes
HAMMER GLANCED STRUCK EMP ON L LEG ABOVE ANKLE
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYME
1988 · 8 incidentes
EMPLOYEE STATES THAT HE WAS REMOVING BOLTS FROM PAN LINE,BOLT JAMMED AND AIR WRENCH PULLED HAND INTO PIECE OF METAL CUTTING AND FRACTURING LEFT LITTLE FINGER.FRACTURE AND HEMATOMA OF THE DITAL TUFT OF THE LEFT 5TH FINGER.
INJURIED ALONG WITH ANOTHER EMPLOYEE WAS USING A SLATE BAR TO LOAD A HYDRAULIC POWER UNIT ONTO A PICK-UP TRUCK. WHEN INJURE'S FINGER BECAME WEDGED BETWEEN THE TAILGATE OF THE TRUCK AND SLATE B AR, HE JERKED HIS HAND FREE. HE SUBSTAINED A LACERATION TO HIS MIDDLE FINGER ON HIS RIGHT HAND.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT THE LEADS FROM MOTOR WERE LAYING ACROSS FLOOR. EMPLOYEE HUNG FOOT IN LEADS AND FELL FACE DOWN, STRIKING KNEES AND ARMS.
EMPLOYEE STATED THE PIPE THREADER SLIPPED AND CAUSED HIM TO SLIP ON THE FLOOR AND HE EXPERIENCED PAIN IN BACK AND GROIN
INJURED WAS BINDING LOAD OF BELTING ON TRUCK. HE WAS PULLING BINDER LEVER WITH LEFT HAND & PUSHING WITH HIS RIGHT. BINDER FAILED TO CATCH & EMPL. FELL FORWARD & IMMEDIATELY EXPERIENCED P AIN IN BACK.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE STEPPED OFF LOW BOY TRAILER INTO A HOLE ABOUT 3 IN DEEP AND TURNED ANKLE CAUSING A SPRAIN
EMPLOYEE STATED WHILE LIFTING CABLE INTO CABLE JIG HE EXPERIENCED PAIN IN LOWER BACK
EMPLOYEE STATED3HE WAS SHOVELING SNOW IN FRONT OF SHOP AND EXPERIENCED PAIN IN LOWER BACK.
1987 · 5 incidentes
STRAINED UPPER 6ACK
EMP WAS BLOCKIN1 UP A MINER WITH CRIB BLOCKS, CUT THE BAND ON AN APPARENT LEVEL STACK OF BLOCKS WHEN THEY TOPPLED FROM APPROX 4' HIGH STRIKING LEFT FOOT.
EMPL PULLING BE5T ROLLER WITH COME-ALONE CONNECTING CHAIN BROKE AND ELBOW STRUCK BELT ROLLER.
EMP ALLEGES ARC3CUTTING AND HOT METAL ENTERED LEFT BOOT BURNING BOTOM OF FOOT.
EMP ALLEGES CUT3NG WEEDS ON SIDES OF ROAD FOR SIGHT CLEARANCE RECIEVED INJECTION (CLESTONE) FOR INJURY TO ARM
1986 · 3 incidentes
EMP WAS HELPING3LOAD AN ELECTRIC MOTOR ON TRUCK WHEN HE FELT PAIN LIKE A KNIFE IN HIS BACK
EE WAS USING A 7HAIN SAW TO CUT A RIGHT OF WAY WHEN HE SLIPPED & FELL ON THE CHAIN SAW BLADE. HE HAS A 3CM LACERATION OF THE ANTERIOR TIBIA BELOW THE LEFT KNEE.
EMPLOYEE ALLEGE8 HE WAS TIGHTENING UP A NUT WITH A WRENCH WHEN HIS HAND CAME IN CONTACT WITH A SHARP EDGE OF A THREADED ROD.EMPLOYEE SUSTAINED A 3 CM LACERATION TO HIS RIGHT RING FINGER REQUIR ING SUTURES. 3
1985 · 2 incidentes
STACKING CARDBO5RD PANELS ONTO A PILE OF 65IN HIGH WHEN HE ATTEMPTED TO HEAVE A PANEL ONTO THE PILE IT SLID OFF HIS SHOULDER AS HE KNELT TO GET A BETTER GRASP HIS KNEE STRUCK THE METAL EDGE OF A FLOURESCENT L3GHTING FIXTURE CUTTING GASH BELOW HIS RT KNEE CAP (SUTURES)
EMPLOYEE WERE ADJUSTING OR POSITIONIUNG PRESS USING OVERHEAD HOIST, WHEN PRESS BECAMME HUNG, THIS CAUSED PRESSURE ON AKJUSTING ROPE. BROKE SHEEAVE BRACKET, BROKE SHEAVE BRACKET AND BACK PRESS STRUCTURE CAUGHT EMPLOYEES RT.HAND.
1984 · 2 incidentes
INJURED WAS USING SLATE BAR TO PRY GEAR OFF HUB OF WHEEL ON PETTIBONE CRANE. BAR SLIPPED AND FINGER WAS CAUGHT BETWEEN BAR AND FRAME OF MACHINE.
HOLDING 16 IN. WHEEL WHILE ANOTHER EMPLOYEE DROVE AXLE THRU, LACERATION LEFT FINGER-SUTURED.
1983 · 3 incidentes
HEARING LOSS
THE CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT CAUSE OR N NATURE OF ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS CO OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMENT
PNEUMOCONIOSIS