Employee was removing a top roller frame from the Raw Coal Belt No. 3 when they lost grip and their fingers were caught between the structure and roller frame, resulting in a laceration.
Elk Creek Plant: 581 citaciones de la MSHA Coal
Elk Creek Plant tiene $417K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $93K pendientes en 22 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Elk Creek Plant.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 73
- Años en registro
- 1984–2026
- Último incidente
- Jul 2026
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.ⓘ
Una orden bajo la Sección 107(a) retira a los mineros de un área cuando un inspector detecta un peligro inminente. Cada orden se levanta una vez corregida la condición, por lo que esto cuenta las órdenes emitidas, no las que están en vigor ahora.Elk Creek Plant tiene $417K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $93K pendientes en 22 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 99 · 83%
- Quedaron como emitidas 1 · 1%
- Anuladas o retiradas 10 · 8%
- Aún abiertas 10 · 8%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEVA 2020-0067 | Settlement | Moran | 2020 | $72K → $32K |
| WEVA 2019-0658 | Settlement | Moran | 2020 | $65K → $22K |
| WEVA 2019-0458 | Settlement | Lewis | 2022 | $34K → $14K |
| WEVA 2025-0523 | Settlement | Paez | 2026 | $27K → $10K |
| WEVA 2018-0513 | Settlement | Lewis | 2019 | $14K → $8K |
| WEVA 2021-0078 | Settlement | Paez | 2021 | $12K → $6K |
El muestreo de MSHA en Elk Creek Plant muestra que 99% de 162 muestras de polvo respirable de carbón cumplieron el estandar de 1.5 mg/m3.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Polvo respirable de carbón
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.
Última medición: 2026-06-23
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
El valor de concentración excesiva (ECV) es el umbral de aplicación por muestra de la propia MSHA, que incorpora la incertidumbre de medición; una muestra por encima de su ECV puede motivar una citación. El conteo cubre solo las muestras a las que MSHA asignó un ECV.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR103
- UTILITY MAN15
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE10
Sílice (cuarzo)
Última medición: 2025-09-19- BULLDOZER OPERATOR13
- CAR TRIMMER/CAR LOADER1
Ruido
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.
Última medición: 2026-03-23
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR14
- UTILITY MAN6
- CLEANING PLANT OPERATOR5
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.| Año | dentro de 1.5 mg/m3 | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 100% | 8 |
| 2025 | 100% | 13 |
| 2024 | 100% | 29 |
| 2023 | 96% | 23 |
| 2022 | 100% | 18 |
| 2021 | 100% | 18 |
| 2020 | 100% | 13 |
| 2019 | 100% | 23 |
| 2018 | 100% | 17 |
| Año | sílice prom. (%) | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6.9 | 1 |
| 2024 | 4.4 | 2 |
| 2023 | 4.5 | 2 |
| 2022 | 5.0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 3.4 | 3 |
| 2020 | 8.0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 5.4 | 3 |
| 2018 | 4.7 | 1 |
| Año | sobre el LPE | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0% | 5 |
| 2024 | 0% | 10 |
| 2023 | 0% | 5 |
| 2021 | 0% | 5 |
| 2019 | 0% | 10 |
| 2018 | 0% | 5 |
Elk Creek Plant registró 0.79 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2025.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.000 |
| 2024 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2023 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.000 |
| 2022 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 | 4.26 | 2.13 | 0.000 |
| 2019 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.000 |
| 2018 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Island Creek Coal Company 1950 a 1993
- Island Creek Coal Company 1993 a 2012
- Ramaco Resources, LLC 2012 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 106 |
| 2025 | 109 |
| 2024 | 100 |
| 2023 | 107 |
| 2022 | 94 |
| 2021 | 81 |
| 2020 | 78 |
| 2019 | 70 |
| 2018 | 54 |
| 2017 | 6 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1 |
| 2007 | 1 |
| 2006 | 1 |
| 2005 | 1 |
| 2004 | 1 |
| 2003 | 1 |
| 2002 | 1 |
| 2001 | 1 |
| 2000 | 2 |
Elk Creek Plant se ubica en Logan County, West Virginia, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 6.6% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 61,588 | 14 | 2 | 227.3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 64,091 | 11 | 1 | 171.6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 61,092 | 2 | 1 | 32.7 |
| 2025 Q3 | 65,160 | 70 | 10 | 1074.3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 66,662 | 8 | 3 | 120.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 61,337 | 7 | 1 | 114.1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 56,428 | 16 | 2 | 283.5 |
| 2024 Q3 | 57,228 | 4 | 3 | 69.9 |
Mostrar 76 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 57,077 | 16 | 3 | 280.3 |
| 2024 Q1 | 60,772 | 8 | 6 | 131.6 |
| 2023 Q4 | 57,426 | 33 | 7 | 574.7 |
| 2023 Q3 | 60,651 | 6 | 1 | 98.9 |
| 2023 Q2 | 61,047 | 9 | 3 | 147.4 |
| 2023 Q1 | 59,194 | 12 | 2 | 202.7 |
| 2022 Q4 | 55,278 | 1 | 1 | 18.1 |
| 2022 Q3 | 56,804 | 7 | 1 | 123.2 |
| 2022 Q2 | 54,848 | 4 | 0 | 72.9 |
| 2022 Q1 | 54,072 | 11 | 3 | 203.4 |
| 2021 Q4 | 49,391 | 1 | 0 | 20.2 |
| 2021 Q3 | 53,072 | 4 | 0 | 75.4 |
| 2021 Q2 | 49,520 | 11 | 1 | 222.1 |
| 2021 Q1 | 49,469 | 18 | 4 | 363.9 |
| 2020 Q4 | 46,326 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 45,534 | 1 | 1 | 22.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 44,087 | 11 | 1 | 249.5 |
| 2020 Q1 | 51,675 | 2 | 0 | 38.7 |
| 2019 Q4 | 44,154 | 9 | 2 | 203.8 |
| 2019 Q3 | 45,790 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 42,572 | 27 | 11 | 634.2 |
| 2019 Q1 | 34,697 | 17 | 2 | 490.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 31,289 | 1 | 1 | 32.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 30,839 | 5 | 0 | 162.1 |
| 2018 Q2 | 26,113 | 15 | 2 | 574.4 |
| 2018 Q1 | 23,788 | 20 | 6 | 840.8 |
| 2017 Q4 | 9,888 | 1 | 0 | 101.1 |
| 2017 Q3 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 1,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 960 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 480 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2016 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2014 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2014 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2014 Q2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2014 Q1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 2013 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2013 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2013 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2013 Q1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | |
| 2012 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2012 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2008 Q4 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 720 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 131 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 187 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 141 | 1 | 1 | 7092.2 |
| 2006 Q4 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 142 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 112 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 137 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 116 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 162 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 146 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 164 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 136 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 243 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 380 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 377 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 405 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 432 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 385 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 372 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 360 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 280 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 630 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 1,022 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 1,052 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 1,038 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
73 en archivo2026 · 2 incidentes
EE was removing scrap metal from a muddy area when EE felt a pain in EE's back. EE visited the hospital on 2-24-26 and received a full release. EE worked until 2-26-26 when EE followed up with a PCP and was given another full release. EE went back to PCP on 3-5-26 when EE was taken out of full-duty work
2025 · 3 incidentes
A loaded coal truck collided with an empty coal truck while traveling in opposite directions. The operator of loaded coal truck experienced soreness and was written off work.
A loaded coal truck collided with an empty coal truck while traveling in opposite directions. This incident resulted in a broken leg for the operator in the empty coal truck.
Employee was climbing off the belt after clearing the grizzly bars and twisted EE's right ankle on 2/18/2025. The employee was later treated on 2/20/2025 and received a full release. The employee later sought treatment again on 2/26/2025 and was written off work at that time.
2024 · 1 incidente
Employee was carrying a bucket with an electric saw inside of the bucket. The saw started to fall out of the bucket and the employee went to catch the saw and contacted the bar of the saw creating an incision. The saw was not operating nor on at time of contact, the action of grabbing the bar as it was falling caused the injury.
2023 · 1 incidente
Employee was pulling on a wrench while performing maintenance and injured their left shoulder.
2022 · 1 incidente
Employee was walking on stairway. EE stumbled and caught right hand. Fractured right middle finger.
2021 · 1 incidente
Employee ran into diversion ditch while operating a coal truck and the truck turned on it's side. The employee slid from the drivers side to the passenger side of the truck.
2020 · 4 incidentes
Employee was cleaning out belly pan discharge and material fell from the chute and knocked EE down causing EE's hard hat to fall off and the employee lost EE's balance and fell. When EE fell, EE struck EE's head on a piece of metal.
Employee was backing up to dump an Artic truck and the bed rolled to the side. The employee stated that when the bed rolled to the side, the seat belt tightened up creating pressure on EE's left hip. The employee was transported to LRMC and was written off work because of a possible pinched nerve.
The Employee stated, the EE was exiting an articulation truck. While climbing down the ladder EE fell from the ladder hitting the ground, landing on right hand. Employee was released to return to work in two days, but went for second opinion, and referred for MRI at a later date.
Employee was securing an electric motor and the employees hand was caught in a pinch point pinching the left index finger.
2019 · 2 incidentes
Employee was cutting wood with an electric saw and a piece of wood went into employee's eye (left eye).
The employee stated that EE injured EE's shoulder on 10/14/19 and was taken to a medical facility and examined and it was determined EE had a sprain and considered a "first aid case". On 3/30/2020, the employee stated that EE's shoulder was aching again and EE went to a medical facility and was written off beginning on 3/31/2020.
2018 · 2 incidentes
Employee lost balance while cleaning up work area and tried to catch self with right arm. When body weight came down on arm, employee felt sharp pain in arm. EE was taken to the hospital and examined and the result was a torn muscle in bicep area.
Employee cut a tree. As the tree was falling it struck a broken tree causing it to flip back striking the employee in the leg.
2017 · 1 incidente
Truck driver says they exited truck to inspect it. Upon re-entry they slipped on the bottom step.
1997 · 1 incidente
HELPING REMOVE A PIECE OF METAL FROM A CHUTE ON A RAW COAL VIBRATOR. THE METAL AND STRUCK THE TOP OF LEFT FOOT.
1996 · 1 incidente
OFF WORK DUE TO SAME PROBLEM AS ORIGINAL 9-12-96INJURY.
1995 · 3 incidentes
EMPLOYEE PULLING A HYDROSEEDER HOSE, FELT PAIN IN LOWER BACK.
EMPLOYEE SLIPPED AND FELL OFF DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE.
EMPLOYEE SLIPPED AND FELL ON SIDEWALK.
1994 · 1 incidente
EE WAS POSITIONING HIMSELF TO HOLD A METAL PLATE ON THE SIDE OF A COAL CHUTE, WHEN A BRACE UNDER HIS LEFT FOOT GAVE WAY. EE STATED THAT HE TWISTED HIS BACK. NO FALL OCCURRED.
1993 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS BOLTING A PIECE OF WATER LINE TOGETHER WHEN HE RAISED THE PIPE UP AND FELT A PAIN IN HIS GROIN AREA. EMPLOYEE WORKED UNTIL AUGUST 6, 1993.
RIDING MANTRIP TO SECTION AT CONTRACT MINE WHEN MANTRIP HIT A BUMP IN ROADWAY CAUSING MAN TO INJURE HIS NECK.
1992 · 8 incidentes
INJ CHECKING OIL ON 240 CAT EXCAVATOR. PLATFORM WAS WET AND DAMP. EMPL HAD RUBBER BOOTS ON, SLIPPED AND FELL 7' TO GROUND. LANDED ON BACK.
INJURED WAS LIFTING A SAMPLE BAG FULL OF COAL IN THE CLEAN COAL STORAGE AREA AND AS HE WAS SETTING IT UPON THE ROAD BERM OUT OF THE ROAD HE STRAINED HIS BACK.
INJURED WAS WELDING A PIECE OF METAL ON WOOD PICKEN AND WHILE LEANING FORWARD HE TWISTED HIS TARP AND HURT HIS LOWER BACK.
61204ROPPING 2 RAILROAD CARS AND BRAKE FAILED AND HE STEPPED OFF AND FELL AND HURT HIS BACK, NECK AND RIGHT ANKLE.
PUTTING UP A SIGN POST AND BOLT WORKED OUT OF POST AND LET THE SIGN FALL AND STRIKE HIS HAND CUTTING FINGER.
LIGHTING ARRESTOR WAS BROKEN AND AS EMPL WAS LOOSENING BOLT THAT HOLD IT ON TO THE X-PIECE OF THE ARRESTOR FELL AND HIT EMPL ON TOP OF RIGHT HAND.
PICKED UP A PIECE OF WOOD FROM VIBRATOR AND AS GHE WAS BRINGING HIS HAND BACK HE HIT HIS LITTLE FINGER ON THE CHUTE.
WAS GETTING OFF DOZER AND SLIPPED AND FELL AND HURT HIS BACK AND LEG.
1991 · 8 incidentes
I.NAME GETTING SAMPLE TUB FROM UNDER SAMPLER AT LOADOUT AND CUT HIS FINGER.
I.NAME GETTING OFF DOZER HIS FOOT SLIPPED OFF THE TRACK CAUSING FALL BACKWARD TO THE GROUND.
I NAME WAS CLIMBING OFF OF THE LOADED RR CAR WHEN HE LOST HIS FOOTING/FOOT SLIPPED HE FELL TO THE GROUND HITTING THE SIDE OF THE RR CAR AS HE CAME DOWN HE SCRAPED HIS LEFT THIGH & SAID THAT HE MIGHT HAVE HURT HIS BACK
INJURED STEPPED OUT OF SIDE DOOR OF PLANT AND STEPPED ON A HALF HEADER AND SPRAINED HIS RIGHT ANKLE.
WAS LIFTING A BOX OF 7/8" BOLTS AND SAID HE HURT HIS BACK.
GETTING OFF DOZER & SLIPPED & FELL & HURT HIS BACK ARM & SHOULDER
INJURED STATED THAT HE STARTED TO STEP UPON TRUCK STEP & HIS FOOT SLIPPED & HE TWISTED HIS KNEE
WAS AWARDED A HEARING LOSS CLAIM.
1990 · 4 incidentes
INJURED SLIPPED ON SOME FLOCK ON 3RD FLOOR AND HURT HIS KNEE, ELBOW AND BACK.
WHILE LIFTING ON SLATE CHUTE INSIDE THE PREP PLANT INJURED FELT PAIN IN HIS LOWER BACK.
LIFTING CEMENT BLOCK AND HURT HIS BACK.
TIGHTENING BRAKE ON RAILROAD CAR AND HE SAID HE HURT HIS BACK.
1989 · 13 incidentes
ACETYLENE TANK CAUGHT FIRE AROUND GUAGE AND HE GRABBED THE NECK OF TANK AND TRIED TO SMOTHER FLAME OUT AND HE BURNED PALM OF LEFT HAND.
INJ PULLING WATER LINE AROUND SIDE OF HILL AND SLIPPED AND FELL OVER BANK,HURT BACK,SIDE AND RIGHT LEG & ANKLE.
HEARING LOSS
HEARING LOSS
HEARING LOSS.
HEARING LOSS
NOISE, HEARING LOSS.
NOISE HEARING LOSS
HEARING LOSS.
WORKING IN AREAS OF NOISE, DAMAGING HEARING.
WAS USING ROPE HOIST TO STRAIGHTEN OUT TAKE-UP ON BELT AND HURT RIGHT SHOULDER.
INJURED WAS PUTTING UP A CAR DOOR ON 2/23/89 AND SLIPPED AND FELL AND TWISTED HIS ANKLE. HE CAME BACK TO WORK 1 AND ON 2/27/89 HE WAS CLIMBING DOWN LADDER ON RAILROAD CAR AND TWISTED HIS ANKLE AGAIN.
INJURED WAS OPERATING PAN AND AS HE WAS COMING DOWN HILL PICKING UP SLATE HE TWISTED HIS BODY AROUND AND HIT A BUMP IN TRAEL WAY AND HURT HIS BACK.
1988 · 8 incidentes
HEARING LOSS 3.75%.
EMPL WAS STANDING ON A SILO BELT CUTTING METAL TO FIT CRNER OF CHUTE HOT METAL ROLLED DOWN CORNER OF CHUTE & WENT DOWN INSIDE OF LEFT BOOT.
INIVIDUAL WAS TRYING TO PICK UP A 10 H.P. MOTOR AND PUT IT IN THE BACK OF A PICK UP TRUCK AND STRAINED HIS BACK.
WAS WALKING TO HIS TRUCK TO GET SOME TOOLS AND STEPPED OVER A SMALL DIRT BANK AND TWISTED HIS LEFT KNEE.
UNKNOWN ALLEGED LUNG IMPAIRMENT.
HEARING LOSS 11%
WAS SHOVELING C2AL OFF TOP OF TRUCK AND TRUCK MOVED FORWARD AND SHOVEL STRUCK HIM IN SIDE.
HEARING LOSS 3.75%.
1987 · 3 incidentes
PUTTING UP DOOR3ON RR CAR AND BAR SLIPPED AND HE FELL BACKWARDS AND TWISTED HIS ANKLE
CARRYING BUCKET8 OF DIESEL FUEL UP STOP. AND TWISTED HIS BACK.
HE WAS STANDING3ON THE STEPS BETWEEN THE 3RD & 4TH FLOOR PULLING A WATER HOSE & HURT HIS KNEES.
1986 · 2 incidentes
WAS GOIND UP ST9P. TO ANSWER PHONE AND SLIPPED AND HIT HAND AGAINST RAILING.
WALKING TOWARDS3LOAD-OUT TO GO TO WORK AND HE SLIPPED ON SOME LOOSE COAL AND TWISTED HIS RIGHT KNEE.
1984 · 1 incidente
WHILE WORKING ON PLATFORM MADE OF PLYWOOD INJURED FELL APPROX 3 1/2\ TO 4\ OFF OF IR WHEN IT TURNED UP.