In repairing screener, EE released the open/close lever and in doing so did not anticipate the weight of the equipment. The equipment began to close rapidly and caught EE's finger between the screener and channel iron.
Carbon Plant (Preparation): 464 citaciones de la MSHA Coal
Carbon Plant (Preparation) tiene $173K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 40 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Carbon Plant (Preparation).
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 44
- Años en registro
- 1983–2019
- Último incidente
- May 2019
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Carbon Plant (Preparation) tiene $173K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 40 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 150 · 84%
- Quedaron como emitidas 27 · 15%
- Anuladas o retiradas 1 · 1%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENN 2010-291 | Prevail | Lewis | 2015 | $73K → $43K |
| PENN 2010-63 | Prevail | Lewis | 2015 | $13K → $10K |
| PENN 2010-191 | Prevail | Lewis | 2015 | $8K → $4K |
| PENN 2011-217 | Settlement | Lewis | 2015 | $7K → $4K |
| PENN 2017-0042 | Default | Lesnick | 2017 | $5K → $5K |
| PENN 2010-381 | Prevail | Lewis | 2015 | $4K → $4K |
El muestreo de MSHA en Carbon Plant (Preparation) muestra que 91% de 894 muestras de polvo respirable de carbón cumplieron el estandar de 1.5 mg/m3.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Polvo respirable de carbón
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.
Última medición: 2026-08-20
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
El valor de concentración excesiva (ECV) es el umbral de aplicación por muestra de la propia MSHA, que incorpora la incertidumbre de medición; una muestra por encima de su ECV puede motivar una citación. El conteo cubre solo las muestras a las que MSHA asignó un ECV.- LABORER/BLACKSMITH549
- FORKLIFT OPERATOR102
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER94
Sílice (cuarzo)
Última medición: 2026-06-05- LABORER/BLACKSMITH94
- FORKLIFT OPERATOR19
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER17
Ruido
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.
Última medición: 2026-02-11
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.- LABORER/BLACKSMITH92
- FORKLIFT OPERATOR26
- DRYER OPERATOR25
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.| Año | dentro de 1.5 mg/m3 | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 91% | 23 |
| 2025 | 100% | 27 |
| 2024 | 100% | 28 |
| 2023 | 100% | 15 |
| 2022 | 100% | 33 |
| 2021 | 100% | 32 |
| 2020 | 100% | 27 |
| 2019 | 100% | 26 |
| 2018 | 100% | 33 |
| 2017 | 90% | 52 |
| 2016 | 89% | 28 |
| 2015 | 86% | 37 |
| 2014 | 100% | 27 |
| 2013 | 100% | 30 |
| 2012 | 90% | 41 |
| 2011 | 86% | 59 |
| 2010 | 72% | 111 |
| 2009 | 96% | 71 |
| 2008 | 89% | 56 |
| 2007 | 88% | 33 |
| 2006 | 96% | 24 |
| 2005 | 82% | 17 |
| 2004 | 100% | 10 |
| 2003 | 94% | 16 |
| 2002 | 100% | 4 |
| 2001 | 100% | 17 |
| 2000 | 94% | 17 |
| Año | sílice prom. (%) | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.2 | 5 |
| 2025 | 1.1 | 5 |
| 2024 | 1.4 | 2 |
| 2022 | 1.7 | 10 |
| 2020 | 1.9 | 7 |
| 2019 | 1.3 | 6 |
| 2018 | 1.5 | 5 |
| 2017 | 1.7 | 6 |
| 2016 | 2.3 | 3 |
| 2015 | 1.3 | 10 |
| 2014 | 1.1 | 6 |
| 2013 | 1.5 | 3 |
| 2012 | 1.5 | 9 |
| 2011 | 0.8 | 2 |
| 2010 | 0.8 | 24 |
| 2009 | 1.5 | 12 |
| 2008 | 1.0 | 12 |
| 2007 | 1.2 | 3 |
| 2006 | 1.2 | 1 |
| 2005 | 1.0 | 3 |
| 2004 | 0.8 | 4 |
| 2003 | 0.8 | 3 |
| 2000 | 3.2 | 1 |
| Año | sobre el LPE | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0% | 6 |
| 2025 | 0% | 13 |
| 2024 | 0% | 7 |
| 2023 | 0% | 5 |
| 2022 | 0% | 15 |
| 2021 | 0% | 4 |
| 2020 | 0% | 8 |
| 2019 | 0% | 6 |
| 2018 | 0% | 7 |
| 2017 | 0% | 14 |
| 2015 | 0% | 11 |
| 2014 | 0% | 5 |
| 2013 | 0% | 5 |
| 2012 | 0% | 5 |
| 2011 | 0% | 7 |
| 2010 | 0% | 5 |
| 2009 | 0% | 9 |
| 2008 | 0% | 15 |
| 2007 | 0% | 5 |
| 2006 | 0% | 13 |
| 2005 | 0% | 4 |
| 2004 | 0% | 5 |
| 2003 | 0% | 5 |
| 2001 | 0% | 9 |
| 2000 | 0% | 7 |
Carbon Plant (Preparation) registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2025.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 6.98 | 6.98 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 3.06 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2017 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Shamokin Filler Company Inc. 1950 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 17 |
| 2025 | 20 |
| 2024 | 24 |
| 2023 | 29 |
| 2022 | 35 |
| 2021 | 26 |
| 2020 | 28 |
| 2019 | 30 |
| 2018 | 31 |
| 2017 | 27 |
| 2016 | 32 |
| 2015 | 48 |
| 2014 | 58 |
| 2013 | 54 |
| 2012 | 42 |
| 2011 | 45 |
| 2010 | 37 |
| 2009 | 29 |
| 2008 | 30 |
| 2007 | 29 |
| 2006 | 32 |
| 2005 | 30 |
| 2004 | 31 |
| 2003 | 32 |
| 2002 | 33 |
| 2001 | 35 |
| 2000 | 37 |
Carbon Plant (Preparation) se ubica en Northumberland County, Pennsylvania, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 0.6% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 6,919 | 2 | 2 | 289.1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 9,136 | 7 | 3 | 766.2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 8,086 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 8,725 | 4 | 0 | 458.5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 9,970 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9,636 | 2 | 0 | 207.6 |
| 2024 Q4 | 8,060 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 11,110 | 5 | 3 | 450.0 |
Mostrar 97 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 10,095 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 10,239 | 33 | 15 | 3223.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 7,658 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 9,850 | 3 | 0 | 304.6 |
| 2023 Q2 | 10,332 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 12,388 | 10 | 3 | 807.2 |
| 2022 Q3 | 9,796 | 11 | 6 | 1122.9 |
| 2022 Q2 | 12,638 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 11,262 | 2 | 1 | 177.6 |
| 2021 Q4 | 18,201 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 11,457 | 2 | 1 | 174.6 |
| 2021 Q2 | 10,033 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 11,021 | 1 | 0 | 90.7 |
| 2020 Q4 | 12,114 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 11,389 | 2 | 0 | 175.6 |
| 2020 Q2 | 12,857 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 13,746 | 3 | 0 | 218.2 |
| 2019 Q4 | 13,669 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 13,965 | 15 | 6 | 1074.1 |
| 2019 Q2 | 14,916 | 1 | 0 | 67.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 14,792 | 7 | 2 | 473.2 |
| 2018 Q4 | 15,980 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 15,528 | 7 | 2 | 450.8 |
| 2018 Q2 | 17,425 | 2 | 0 | 114.8 |
| 2018 Q1 | 16,431 | 8 | 2 | 486.9 |
| 2017 Q4 | 15,818 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 11,894 | 5 | 1 | 420.4 |
| 2017 Q2 | 13,560 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 12,678 | 3 | 1 | 236.6 |
| 2016 Q4 | 12,567 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 12,749 | 13 | 3 | 1019.7 |
| 2016 Q2 | 14,982 | 1 | 0 | 66.7 |
| 2016 Q1 | 17,206 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 19,980 | 20 | 6 | 1001.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 16,201 | 1 | 1 | 61.7 |
| 2015 Q2 | 19,708 | 9 | 5 | 456.7 |
| 2015 Q1 | 19,993 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 20,870 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 18,860 | 1 | 0 | 53.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 20,264 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 19,171 | 10 | 3 | 521.6 |
| 2013 Q4 | 18,480 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 20,426 | 9 | 3 | 440.6 |
| 2013 Q2 | 21,198 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 20,735 | 6 | 2 | 289.4 |
| 2012 Q4 | 20,079 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 20,175 | 4 | 1 | 198.3 |
| 2012 Q2 | 19,701 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 17,165 | 11 | 1 | 640.8 |
| 2011 Q4 | 18,470 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 21,199 | 4 | 0 | 188.7 |
| 2011 Q2 | 19,296 | 12 | 4 | 621.9 |
| 2011 Q1 | 20,260 | 3 | 1 | 148.1 |
| 2010 Q4 | 17,135 | 1 | 1 | 58.4 |
| 2010 Q3 | 19,143 | 13 | 4 | 679.1 |
| 2010 Q2 | 14,697 | 3 | 2 | 204.1 |
| 2010 Q1 | 14,398 | 5 | 2 | 347.3 |
| 2009 Q4 | 12,630 | 13 | 8 | 1029.3 |
| 2009 Q3 | 11,657 | 21 | 6 | 1801.5 |
| 2009 Q2 | 10,170 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 8,747 | 9 | 1 | 1028.9 |
| 2008 Q4 | 10,614 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 10,701 | 9 | 1 | 841.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 10,673 | 3 | 0 | 281.1 |
| 2008 Q1 | 10,635 | 41 | 5 | 3855.2 |
| 2007 Q4 | 826 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 10,168 | 1 | 0 | 98.3 |
| 2007 Q2 | 9,391 | 13 | 2 | 1384.3 |
| 2007 Q1 | 9,835 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 11,445 | 10 | 1 | 873.7 |
| 2006 Q3 | 11,729 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 10,994 | 21 | 7 | 1910.1 |
| 2006 Q1 | 13,539 | 1 | 0 | 73.9 |
| 2005 Q4 | 11,803 | 1 | 0 | 84.7 |
| 2005 Q3 | 10,919 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 12,060 | 4 | 4 | 331.7 |
| 2005 Q1 | 12,654 | 16 | 12 | 1264.4 |
| 2004 Q4 | 12,694 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 12,910 | 4 | 1 | 309.8 |
| 2004 Q2 | 11,228 | 3 | 0 | 267.2 |
| 2004 Q1 | 11,369 | 6 | 2 | 527.8 |
| 2003 Q4 | 12,089 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 12,381 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 12,227 | 5 | 4 | 408.9 |
| 2003 Q1 | 11,655 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 11,915 | 4 | 3 | 335.7 |
| 2002 Q3 | 11,320 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 12,116 | 2 | 1 | 165.1 |
| 2002 Q1 | 13,658 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 12,997 | 2 | 0 | 153.9 |
| 2001 Q3 | 12,260 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 12,469 | 2 | 0 | 160.4 |
| 2001 Q1 | 14,369 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 13,790 | 2 | 0 | 145.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 12,797 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 10,988 | 1 | 0 | 91.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 13,945 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
44 en archivo2019 · 2 incidentes
Frozen material jammed auger. Pellet mill operator attempted to free jam by using a metal bar. Bar slipped off of leverage point, pulley recoiled back and pulled hands into belt. Incident resulted in pellet operator losing two fingers on left hand.
2018 · 1 incidente
Another EE was driving the forklift. IE and other EE were unloading a container filled with 20 2000lb sacks with no skids under. Other EE had lifted the straps for 1 of the sacks about 1/4 of the way in the truck. IE pinched IE's finger between the sack and the tip of the fork lift. was sent to the er.
2016 · 2 incidentes
Walking down steps and caught thumb on an upright and bent EE's thumb backwards
Was filling fuel truck and was walking on a narrow walkway and slipped ee grabbed the railing and fell against fuel truck bruising ribs
2015 · 4 incidentes
while checking the dust collector operator lifted the lid up and removed the clogged dust popped lid up and slid down and cut the operators finger.
entrance gate got wedged between truck and trailer while it was stuck as the truck pulled away the gate was freed and sling shot backwards and hit the employee in the head ( was wearing a hardhat ) as he fell down he broke his right leg.
While shrink wrapping bags with heat gun bag caught on fire he attempted out of impulse to swat the small flame with left hand was wearing latex gloves instead of work gloves. (forgot them at home)
Shoveling material into pay loader bucket, while swinging the shovel over to dump it, he hit the edge on bucket slicing his finger
2014 · 7 incidentes
Working on street sweeper and slipped on oil that was on the motor
Employee was lifting and stacking 60 pound bags. Claimed he hurt shoulder/back.
Employee complained of numbness in left hand and arm while driving forklift. Employee claims this has been ongoing for two weeks. Employee was sent for treatment for left 1st extensor compartment tendonitis and placed on restricted duty.
Employee was ducking under the dryer to look at gear when a bolt sticking out of the dryer knocked off his hard hat. When he reacted to catch it, another bolt struck him on the top of his head.
Employee stepped down off of the yard lift and onto a piece of rock and rolled his right ankle.
Employee was reaching over pellet mixer and bumped bottom rib on left side.
Employee was lifting 60 pound bags of Carb-O-Cite material. He felt sharp pains in his right elbow and couldn't lift any longer.
2013 · 10 incidentes
Employee was greasing equipment when tarp line caught his boot and he fell injuring his right arm.
Employee attempted to lift latch on tanker truck. Latch was rusted and partially frozen shut. Employee felt a pull in groin and left arm near elbow joint.
While loading tanker, pulley on chute broke causing chute to fall on employee's left foot.
Stacking bagged material into a box bottom. The box bottom shifted on the pallet. He picked up the end of the box bottom to move it back on to the pallet. Did not notice any pain until he got home. Reported incident to supervisor on 07/23/13.
Employee was going through the plant doing the morning preventative maintenance checklist. He slipped and fell on the catwalk cutting his left knee and shin.
Employee was bending over and shrink wrapping a pallet of material. After he finished wrapping the pallet, his back began to tighten.
driving loader, was turned so he could see backing up
Employee was bagging material when he felt his right arm start to hurt.
Employee was opening bagged material and material got in his right eye.
Employee was dumping barrels, he bent over to pick up empty barrel and started having muscle spasms.
2012 · 6 incidentes
Outside Pellet mill, payloader was coming towards him, operator of payloader was brining the bucket downward toward level position, foot was pinched by bucket
Loading tanker truck with material. Lifted arm to reach for the load chute. Employee heard a "pop".
Working on street sweeper changing the hydraulic valve. Employee was wearing safety glasses. Debris in his left eye.
EE was on top of a railcar. Lifted the mat so they can move the car.
Step off forklift to check if sack of product was secure.
On top of railcar lifted the mat to move the car.
2011 · 1 incidente
Employee was cleaning rollers, inside the die. Glove got caught. Injured fingers on his left hand
2010 · 3 incidentes
Right hand was caught between dryer and chute. Steel ripped EE's skin.
Leaves blew under the dryer and ignited the wall. Fire damage is limited to the wall.
Holding a sack that was filling with product.
2009 · 2 incidentes
EE was cutting a tarp. Cut palm - left hand.
EE was removing a chute, slipped and fell and fractured his left foot.
2000 · 1 incidente
CAUSE UNKNOWN. EE STARTED UP THE STREET SWEEPER.APPEARED LOW ON GAS. WENT TO LOOK FOR A GAS CAN.COULD NOT FIND A CLEAN ONE. PUT KEY TO SWEEPER IN THE FOREMAN'S LOCKER. EE WENT HOME.
1997 · 1 incidente
EE APPARENTLY WANTED TO CHECK THE BELTS ON THE FAN. HE APPARENTLY REACHED IN BEHIND THE BELT GUARD WHICH WAS IN PLACE, TO FEEL IF THEY WERE LOOSE. WHILE DOING THIS HIS GLOVE GOT CAUGHT BETWEEN THE BELT AND THE SHIV.
1989 · 2 incidentes
MAKING REPAIRS INSIDE DRYER SORE BACK DEV UMP ALLEGES AS RESULT OF WORK PERFORMED.
HE WAS OPERATING FORKLIFT MOVING MATERIAL. HE PULLED BACK LEVER & GOT HAND CAUGHT ON ROLLER.
1988 · 1 incidente
HE STARTED TO ASCEND THE STAIRS WITHIN THE BUILDING HIS FOOT SLIPPED OFF THE FIRST STEP HE CAUGHT HIMSELF BY GRABBING THE RAILING BUT SOMETHING IN HIS KNEE POPPED.
1983 · 1 incidente
BANGED RIGHT HAND AGAINST MACHINERY, BROKEN BONE RIGHT HAND LEADING TO SMALL FINGER