Employee had not been feeling well. Thought they had a cold or bronchitis in April 2026. Went to a specialist in June 2026. On 6/19/26 received a diagnosis of silicosis from specialist. Still waiting for follow up information. Conditions contributing to this are unknown.
Hudson NH Plant: 52 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
Hudson NH Plant tiene $15K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $691 pendientes en 4 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Hudson NH Plant.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 30
- Años en registro
- 1989–2026
- Último incidente
- Jun 2026
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.ⓘ
Una orden bajo la Sección 107(a) retira a los mineros de un área cuando un inspector detecta un peligro inminente. Cada orden se levanta una vez corregida la condición, por lo que esto cuenta las órdenes emitidas, no las que están en vigor ahora.Hudson NH Plant tiene $15K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $691 pendientes en 4 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 2 · 67%
- Quedaron como emitidas 1 · 33%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YORK20020013M | Settlement | Bulluck | 2002 | $7K → $6K |
| YORK 2013-205M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2014 | $555 → $167 |
| YORK 2009-159M | Dismissal | Lesnick | 2010 | $392 → $0 |
| YORK 2008-15M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2008 | $100 → $0 |
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2021-06-03, hace 5 años
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Respirable dust, <.1mg8
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz7
Ver los análisis individuales (15)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-03 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.76 | 1.02 | 0.75 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2021-06-03 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2021-06-03 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2016-07-12 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2016-07-12 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.61 | 0.77 | 0.79 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2007-10-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.68 | 2.41 | 0.28 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2007-10-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.47 | 3.04 | 0.15 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2007-10-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.13 | 0.59 | 0.22 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2007-10-11 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2007-10-11 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Drill Operator, Rotary | ||
| 2004-07-01 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2004-07-01 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2004-07-01 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.14 | 0.65 | 0.22 | Washer Operator |
| 2004-07-01 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.19 | 0.4 | 0.48 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2004-07-01 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver |
Hudson NH Plant registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2025.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 7.72 | 7.72 | 0.000 |
| 2023 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 7.99 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Brox Industries Incorporated 1950 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 14 |
| 2025 | 14 |
| 2024 | 13 |
| 2023 | 14 |
| 2022 | 13 |
| 2021 | 15 |
| 2020 | 15 |
| 2019 | 13 |
| 2018 | 12 |
| 2017 | 12 |
| 2016 | 13 |
| 2015 | 11 |
| 2014 | 14 |
| 2013 | 12 |
| 2012 | 11 |
| 2011 | 12 |
| 2010 | 15 |
| 2009 | 13 |
| 2008 | 11 |
| 2007 | 12 |
| 2006 | 12 |
| 2005 | 14 |
| 2004 | 12 |
| 2003 | 11 |
| 2002 | 11 |
| 2001 | 11 |
| 2000 | 11 |
Hudson NH Plant se ubica en Hillsborough County, New Hampshire, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 0.0% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 7,228 | 1 | 0 | 138.4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6,113 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7,260 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9,349 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 8,709 | 6 | 2 | 688.9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 5,503 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 4,980 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 8,877 | 5 | 0 | 563.3 |
Mostrar 98 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 7,746 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 4,299 | 1 | 1 | 232.6 |
| 2023 Q4 | 7,940 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 8,092 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 7,575 | 1 | 0 | 132.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 4,650 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 5,762 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 6,870 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 7,253 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 3,961 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 5,587 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 7,123 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 6,977 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 4,725 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 6,318 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 8,207 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 7,373 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 4,940 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 6,712 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 7,466 | 2 | 0 | 267.9 |
| 2019 Q2 | 6,666 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 3,878 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 6,878 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 7,068 | 1 | 0 | 141.5 |
| 2018 Q2 | 7,532 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 3,547 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 6,014 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 6,951 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 6,755 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 2,566 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 5,485 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 6,284 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 7,633 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 3,311 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 4,998 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 6,648 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 7,232 | 1 | 0 | 138.3 |
| 2015 Q1 | 2,965 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 5,658 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 7,678 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 7,734 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 3,748 | 1 | 0 | 266.8 |
| 2013 Q4 | 4,483 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 6,385 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 7,896 | 3 | 1 | 379.9 |
| 2013 Q1 | 2,495 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 4,144 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 6,071 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 6,493 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 3,370 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 3,873 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 6,073 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 6,383 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 3,204 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 3,906 | 2 | 0 | 512.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 7,319 | 2 | 0 | 273.3 |
| 2010 Q2 | 8,507 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 2,816 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 3,890 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 7,340 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 7,165 | 1 | 0 | 139.6 |
| 2009 Q1 | 2,846 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 3,489 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 6,335 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 6,565 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 4,136 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 5,230 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 6,611 | 1 | 0 | 151.3 |
| 2007 Q2 | 7,417 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 3,798 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 5,327 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 7,645 | 3 | 1 | 392.4 |
| 2006 Q2 | 8,404 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 5,489 | 1 | 0 | 182.2 |
| 2005 Q4 | 7,730 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 10,465 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 10,069 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 4,946 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 8,608 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 9,084 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 8,040 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 3,423 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 6,954 | 1 | 0 | 143.8 |
| 2003 Q3 | 8,141 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 8,144 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 3,354 | 1 | 1 | 298.2 |
| 2002 Q4 | 6,978 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 8,076 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 8,137 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 3,566 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 5,383 | 4 | 1 | 743.1 |
| 2001 Q3 | 5,678 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 6,967 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 3,147 | 2 | 1 | 635.5 |
| 2000 Q4 | 5,469 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 8,458 | 1 | 1 | 118.2 |
| 2000 Q2 | 8,360 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 1,988 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
30 en archivo2026 · 2 incidentes
EE was helping a delivery driver offload material. During that process, EE lost EE's grip and a piece of steel fell onto EE's left upper thigh resulting in a contusion.
2024 · 1 incidente
A miner was checking fluids on a piece of equipment when EE lost EE's footing and ended up falling onto the ground. The fall resulted in EE fracturing EE's right wrist.
2018 · 1 incidente
While cutting rubber belting material with utility knife, employee lacerated left hand. Employee received 3 sutures and was released to RTW-no restrictions.
2014 · 1 incidente
While cutting/splicing conveyor belting, utility knife slipped causing laceration on right thigh. Employee required three sutures.
2007 · 1 incidente
While adjusting conveyor belt tracking, EE was using hammer to strike adjustable return roller bracket. EE missed hitting bracket causing his right arm to be drawn into belt & he became wedged between belt & roller.
2006 · 1 incidente
Employee was assisting in replacing a bolt on primary jaw crusher. While striking a slugging wrench with a sledge hammer, employee's hand struct ajoining metal rail causing a fracture of the tip of right thumb. Employee didn't go to clinic until two days after accident.
2005 · 2 incidentes
WHILE REPLACING A SCREEN IN A SAND SCREEN DECK, SCREEN SLIPPED AND CAUSED LACERATION OF TWO FINGERS ON RIGHT HAND (SUTURES REQUIRED).
WHILE RE-ATTACHING A GUARD THAT HAD BECOME LOOSE, EE WAS CUTTING WIRE-TIE ATTACHMENT AND UTILITY KNIFE SLIPPED AND CUT EE LEFT THUMB
2004 · 1 incidente
While cutting a conveyor belt, utility knife slipped cutting employee's right forearm.
2003 · 1 incidente
ICY GROUND SURFACE THAT WAS PLOWED AND SANDED, EE SLIPPED ON UNEVEN SURFACE, FELL ON LUNCH PAIL INJURING RIBS.
2002 · 1 incidente
LOADER SEAT ADJUSTMENT IMOPERABLE LEADING TO OPERATOR COMPLAINT OF UNSPECIFIC BACK PAIN. OPERATOR REFER TO PCP. ORDERED TO BED REST UNTIL 5-6-02. LOADER WAS REPLACED WITH LOANER UNTIL NEW SEAT ARRIVES.
2000 · 1 incidente
STANDING ON THE FEED BOX OF A CRUSHER, 15' OFF THE GROUND, EE WAS REACHING ABOVE HIS HEAD TIGHTENING 2 BOLTS WITH A WRENCH. THE WRENCH SLIPPED OFF THE BOLT CAUSING EE TO FALL BACKWARD TO THE G ROUND.
1998 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE ALLEGES THAT HE CUT HIS THUMB WHILE CUTTING A PIECE OF ELECTRICAL WIRE WITH A UTILITY KNIFE.
1996 · 2 incidentes
EMP ALLEGES THAT A PIECE OF CONVEYOR BELT HE WASLIFTING SLIPPED OUT OF HIS HANDS. WHEN IT SLIPPED, HIS RIGHT MIDDLE FINGER CAUGHT IN A HOLE IN THE BELT TWISTING IT OUT OF JOINT.
EE ALLEGES THAT HE BANGED THE KNUCKLE OF HIS "PINKIE" FINGER ON A CONVEYOR SUPPORT WHILE HE WAS WALKING THROUGH THE TUNNEL CARRYING TOOLS.
1995 · 3 incidentes
EE STATES THAT HE WAS STANDING ON THE CATWALK RAILING TO CHECK A CHUTE THAT WAS PLUGGED. WHEN HE STEPPED DOWN ONTO THE MIDRAIL HE LOST HIS BALANCE AND FELL OVER THE RAIL AND DOWN TO THE GROUND .
EE ALLAEGES THAT THE WRENCH HE WAS USING SLIPPED OFF THE NUT CAUSING HIS FINGER TO HIT ANOTHER NUT. HE JERKED HIS ARM BACK & STRUCK HIS ELBOW ON THE METAL CHUTE WHICH CUT HIS ELBOW. THIS CUT L ATER BECAME INFECTED, MAKING IT NECESSARY FOR HIM TO BE PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS.
EE ALLEGES THAT HE WAS WORKING ON THE LOWER LEVEL OF THE PRIMARY CRUSHER WHEN ROCKS FROM THE FEED HOPPER ROLLED DOWN THE EMBANKMENT & STRUCK HIM ON THE FOOT & LEGS.
1994 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE ALLEGES THAT HE WAS WALKING BY THE CRUSHER WITH HIS SAFETY GLASSES ON WHEN HE FELT A PARTICLE IN HIS EYE. HE IS UNSURE OF WHAT IT WAS OR HOW IT GOT IN THERE.
1991 · 2 incidentes
WELDING PULLEY BEHING GRABBED SHIRT TAIL PULLED DOWN BENDING L LEG BENEATH HIM
IT APPEARS THAT DUE TO A SLIGHT SLOPING OF THE GROUND THE TRUCK WAS ON WHILE DUMPING IT CAUSED THE TRAILED TO TIP OVER ON ITS SIDE THE DRIVER FELL FROM HIS SEAT INTO THE PAASSENGER SIDE APPARE NTLY CAUSING HIS INJURY.
1990 · 3 incidentes
EMPLOYEE ALLEGES THAT HE WAS CLIMBING DOWN FROM HIS TRUCK WHEN HE SLIPPED ON SOME ICE AND HIT HIS BACK ON AN I-BEAM WHEN HE TRIED TO BREAK HIS FALL.
EE SAID HE WAS MOVING PIECES OF STEEL. HE ALLEGES THAT ONE PIECE WAS STUCK, AND WHEN HE ATTEMPTED TO PULL IT OUT HE FELT A SHARP PAIN IN HIS BACK. (ACCORDING TO HIS 1990 W-4 FORM HE HAD 3 DISK S OPERATED ON IN THE PAST).
I NAME WAS WALKING THE DRILL OFF THE LOW BED TRAILER DOOR OF DRILL WAS OPEN & HIS MIDDLE FINGER OF RT HAND WAS IN THE DOOR DOOR SLAMMED SHUT & HIS FINGER WAS AMPUTATED TO THE FIRST JOINT
1989 · 5 incidentes
EMPL ALLEGES THAT HE WAS CHANING SCREENS FOR CRUSHER. WHEN HE STRUCK HIP AGAINST SCREEN SPRAY NOZZLE.
EMPLOYEE ALLEGES THAT HE WAS REMOVING A SOCKET SEALING RING BY STANDING ON THE RING AND HITTING IT WITH A HAMMER. EMPLOYEE ALLEGES THAT A CRANE WAS LIFTING THE RING ABOUT THE SAME TIME, WHEN T HE RING SUDDENLY RELEASED, THROWING HIM TO THE CATWALK BELOW WHERE HE LANDED ON HIS RIGHT HAND.
EMPLOYEE ALLEGES HE WAS WELDING DOING MAINTENCE OF THE CRUSHING PLANT, WHEN A FLASH FROM THE WELDING ARC CAME THROUGH A HAIRLINE CRACK IN THE WELDING MASL AND GOT HIM IN THE EYES.
WHILE OPERATING A HOE RAM A PIECE OF ROCK WENT FLYING INTO THE CAB HITTING THE OPERATOR IN THE R FOREARM RESULTING IN A SMALL CUT REQURING 2-3 STITCHES APPARENTLY SAFETY SHIELD WAS NOT ON AND CAB DOOR WAS OPEN PER MAINE DRILLER AND BLASTINGS SUPERVISORS INCIDENT REPORT
EMPLOYEE IS NOT SURE OF WHEN OR WHAT EXACTLY CASUSED HIS MUSCLES BACK STRAIN. HE BELIEVES THAT IT MAY HAVE BEEN DURING A ROUTINE JOB OF UNPLUGGING THE JAW OF THE CRUSHER BY BENDING OVER THE R AIL AND DROPPING A BUCKET TOOTH SUSPENDED ON A ROPE ONTO PLUGGED ROCK MATERIAL.