Employee had not been feeling well. Thought they had a cold or bronchitis in April 2026. Went to a specialist in June 2026. On 6/19/26 received a diagnosis of silicosis from specialist. Still waiting for follow up information. Conditions contributing to this are unknown.
Hudson NH Plant: 52 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
Hudson NH Plant has $15K in proposed MSHA penalties and $691 outstanding across 4 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Hudson NH Plant.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 30
- Years on record
- 1989–2026
- Latest incident
- Jun 2026
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.Hudson NH Plant has $15K in proposed MSHA penalties and $691 outstanding across 4 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 2 · 67%
- Stood as issued 1 · 33%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YORK20020013M | Settlement | Bulluck | 2002 | $7K → $6K |
| YORK 2013-205M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2014 | $555 → $167 |
| YORK 2009-159M | Dismissal | Lesnick | 2010 | $392 → $0 |
| YORK 2008-15M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2008 | $100 → $0 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2021-06-03, 5 years ago
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Respirable dust, <.1mg8
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz7
Show the individual readings (15)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-03 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.76 | 1.02 | 0.75 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2021-06-03 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2021-06-03 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2016-07-12 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2016-07-12 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.61 | 0.77 | 0.79 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2007-10-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.68 | 2.41 | 0.28 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2007-10-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.47 | 3.04 | 0.15 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2007-10-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.13 | 0.59 | 0.22 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2007-10-11 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2007-10-11 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Drill Operator, Rotary | ||
| 2004-07-01 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2004-07-01 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2004-07-01 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.14 | 0.65 | 0.22 | Washer Operator |
| 2004-07-01 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.19 | 0.4 | 0.48 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2004-07-01 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver |
Hudson NH Plant recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2025.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 7.72 | 7.72 | 0.000 |
| 2023 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 7.99 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Brox Industries Incorporated 1950 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 14 |
| 2025 | 14 |
| 2024 | 13 |
| 2023 | 14 |
| 2022 | 13 |
| 2021 | 15 |
| 2020 | 15 |
| 2019 | 13 |
| 2018 | 12 |
| 2017 | 12 |
| 2016 | 13 |
| 2015 | 11 |
| 2014 | 14 |
| 2013 | 12 |
| 2012 | 11 |
| 2011 | 12 |
| 2010 | 15 |
| 2009 | 13 |
| 2008 | 11 |
| 2007 | 12 |
| 2006 | 12 |
| 2005 | 14 |
| 2004 | 12 |
| 2003 | 11 |
| 2002 | 11 |
| 2001 | 11 |
| 2000 | 11 |
Hudson NH Plant sits in Hillsborough County, New Hampshire, where the Census mining category is 0.0% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 7,228 | 1 | 0 | 138.4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6,113 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7,260 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9,349 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 8,709 | 6 | 2 | 688.9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 5,503 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 4,980 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 8,877 | 5 | 0 | 563.3 |
Show 98 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 7,746 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 4,299 | 1 | 1 | 232.6 |
| 2023 Q4 | 7,940 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 8,092 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 7,575 | 1 | 0 | 132.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 4,650 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 5,762 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 6,870 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 7,253 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 3,961 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 5,587 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 7,123 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 6,977 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 4,725 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 6,318 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 8,207 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 7,373 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 4,940 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 6,712 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 7,466 | 2 | 0 | 267.9 |
| 2019 Q2 | 6,666 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 3,878 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 6,878 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 7,068 | 1 | 0 | 141.5 |
| 2018 Q2 | 7,532 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 3,547 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 6,014 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 6,951 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 6,755 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 2,566 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 5,485 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 6,284 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 7,633 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 3,311 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 4,998 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 6,648 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 7,232 | 1 | 0 | 138.3 |
| 2015 Q1 | 2,965 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 5,658 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 7,678 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 7,734 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 3,748 | 1 | 0 | 266.8 |
| 2013 Q4 | 4,483 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 6,385 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 7,896 | 3 | 1 | 379.9 |
| 2013 Q1 | 2,495 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 4,144 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 6,071 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 6,493 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 3,370 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 3,873 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 6,073 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 6,383 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 3,204 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 3,906 | 2 | 0 | 512.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 7,319 | 2 | 0 | 273.3 |
| 2010 Q2 | 8,507 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 2,816 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 3,890 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 7,340 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 7,165 | 1 | 0 | 139.6 |
| 2009 Q1 | 2,846 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 3,489 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 6,335 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 6,565 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 4,136 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 5,230 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 6,611 | 1 | 0 | 151.3 |
| 2007 Q2 | 7,417 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 3,798 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 5,327 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 7,645 | 3 | 1 | 392.4 |
| 2006 Q2 | 8,404 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 5,489 | 1 | 0 | 182.2 |
| 2005 Q4 | 7,730 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 10,465 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 10,069 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 4,946 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 8,608 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 9,084 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 8,040 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 3,423 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 6,954 | 1 | 0 | 143.8 |
| 2003 Q3 | 8,141 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 8,144 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 3,354 | 1 | 1 | 298.2 |
| 2002 Q4 | 6,978 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 8,076 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 8,137 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 3,566 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 5,383 | 4 | 1 | 743.1 |
| 2001 Q3 | 5,678 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 6,967 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 3,147 | 2 | 1 | 635.5 |
| 2000 Q4 | 5,469 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 8,458 | 1 | 1 | 118.2 |
| 2000 Q2 | 8,360 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 1,988 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
30 on file2026 · 2 incidents
EE was helping a delivery driver offload material. During that process, EE lost EE's grip and a piece of steel fell onto EE's left upper thigh resulting in a contusion.
2024 · 1 incident
A miner was checking fluids on a piece of equipment when EE lost EE's footing and ended up falling onto the ground. The fall resulted in EE fracturing EE's right wrist.
2018 · 1 incident
While cutting rubber belting material with utility knife, employee lacerated left hand. Employee received 3 sutures and was released to RTW-no restrictions.
2014 · 1 incident
While cutting/splicing conveyor belting, utility knife slipped causing laceration on right thigh. Employee required three sutures.
2007 · 1 incident
While adjusting conveyor belt tracking, EE was using hammer to strike adjustable return roller bracket. EE missed hitting bracket causing his right arm to be drawn into belt & he became wedged between belt & roller.
2006 · 1 incident
Employee was assisting in replacing a bolt on primary jaw crusher. While striking a slugging wrench with a sledge hammer, employee's hand struct ajoining metal rail causing a fracture of the tip of right thumb. Employee didn't go to clinic until two days after accident.
2005 · 2 incidents
WHILE REPLACING A SCREEN IN A SAND SCREEN DECK, SCREEN SLIPPED AND CAUSED LACERATION OF TWO FINGERS ON RIGHT HAND (SUTURES REQUIRED).
WHILE RE-ATTACHING A GUARD THAT HAD BECOME LOOSE, EE WAS CUTTING WIRE-TIE ATTACHMENT AND UTILITY KNIFE SLIPPED AND CUT EE LEFT THUMB
2004 · 1 incident
While cutting a conveyor belt, utility knife slipped cutting employee's right forearm.
2003 · 1 incident
ICY GROUND SURFACE THAT WAS PLOWED AND SANDED, EE SLIPPED ON UNEVEN SURFACE, FELL ON LUNCH PAIL INJURING RIBS.
2002 · 1 incident
LOADER SEAT ADJUSTMENT IMOPERABLE LEADING TO OPERATOR COMPLAINT OF UNSPECIFIC BACK PAIN. OPERATOR REFER TO PCP. ORDERED TO BED REST UNTIL 5-6-02. LOADER WAS REPLACED WITH LOANER UNTIL NEW SEAT ARRIVES.
2000 · 1 incident
STANDING ON THE FEED BOX OF A CRUSHER, 15' OFF THE GROUND, EE WAS REACHING ABOVE HIS HEAD TIGHTENING 2 BOLTS WITH A WRENCH. THE WRENCH SLIPPED OFF THE BOLT CAUSING EE TO FALL BACKWARD TO THE G ROUND.
1998 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE ALLEGES THAT HE CUT HIS THUMB WHILE CUTTING A PIECE OF ELECTRICAL WIRE WITH A UTILITY KNIFE.
1996 · 2 incidents
EMP ALLEGES THAT A PIECE OF CONVEYOR BELT HE WASLIFTING SLIPPED OUT OF HIS HANDS. WHEN IT SLIPPED, HIS RIGHT MIDDLE FINGER CAUGHT IN A HOLE IN THE BELT TWISTING IT OUT OF JOINT.
EE ALLEGES THAT HE BANGED THE KNUCKLE OF HIS "PINKIE" FINGER ON A CONVEYOR SUPPORT WHILE HE WAS WALKING THROUGH THE TUNNEL CARRYING TOOLS.
1995 · 3 incidents
EE STATES THAT HE WAS STANDING ON THE CATWALK RAILING TO CHECK A CHUTE THAT WAS PLUGGED. WHEN HE STEPPED DOWN ONTO THE MIDRAIL HE LOST HIS BALANCE AND FELL OVER THE RAIL AND DOWN TO THE GROUND .
EE ALLAEGES THAT THE WRENCH HE WAS USING SLIPPED OFF THE NUT CAUSING HIS FINGER TO HIT ANOTHER NUT. HE JERKED HIS ARM BACK & STRUCK HIS ELBOW ON THE METAL CHUTE WHICH CUT HIS ELBOW. THIS CUT L ATER BECAME INFECTED, MAKING IT NECESSARY FOR HIM TO BE PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS.
EE ALLEGES THAT HE WAS WORKING ON THE LOWER LEVEL OF THE PRIMARY CRUSHER WHEN ROCKS FROM THE FEED HOPPER ROLLED DOWN THE EMBANKMENT & STRUCK HIM ON THE FOOT & LEGS.
1994 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE ALLEGES THAT HE WAS WALKING BY THE CRUSHER WITH HIS SAFETY GLASSES ON WHEN HE FELT A PARTICLE IN HIS EYE. HE IS UNSURE OF WHAT IT WAS OR HOW IT GOT IN THERE.
1991 · 2 incidents
WELDING PULLEY BEHING GRABBED SHIRT TAIL PULLED DOWN BENDING L LEG BENEATH HIM
IT APPEARS THAT DUE TO A SLIGHT SLOPING OF THE GROUND THE TRUCK WAS ON WHILE DUMPING IT CAUSED THE TRAILED TO TIP OVER ON ITS SIDE THE DRIVER FELL FROM HIS SEAT INTO THE PAASSENGER SIDE APPARE NTLY CAUSING HIS INJURY.
1990 · 3 incidents
EMPLOYEE ALLEGES THAT HE WAS CLIMBING DOWN FROM HIS TRUCK WHEN HE SLIPPED ON SOME ICE AND HIT HIS BACK ON AN I-BEAM WHEN HE TRIED TO BREAK HIS FALL.
EE SAID HE WAS MOVING PIECES OF STEEL. HE ALLEGES THAT ONE PIECE WAS STUCK, AND WHEN HE ATTEMPTED TO PULL IT OUT HE FELT A SHARP PAIN IN HIS BACK. (ACCORDING TO HIS 1990 W-4 FORM HE HAD 3 DISK S OPERATED ON IN THE PAST).
I NAME WAS WALKING THE DRILL OFF THE LOW BED TRAILER DOOR OF DRILL WAS OPEN & HIS MIDDLE FINGER OF RT HAND WAS IN THE DOOR DOOR SLAMMED SHUT & HIS FINGER WAS AMPUTATED TO THE FIRST JOINT
1989 · 5 incidents
EMPL ALLEGES THAT HE WAS CHANING SCREENS FOR CRUSHER. WHEN HE STRUCK HIP AGAINST SCREEN SPRAY NOZZLE.
EMPLOYEE ALLEGES THAT HE WAS REMOVING A SOCKET SEALING RING BY STANDING ON THE RING AND HITTING IT WITH A HAMMER. EMPLOYEE ALLEGES THAT A CRANE WAS LIFTING THE RING ABOUT THE SAME TIME, WHEN T HE RING SUDDENLY RELEASED, THROWING HIM TO THE CATWALK BELOW WHERE HE LANDED ON HIS RIGHT HAND.
EMPLOYEE ALLEGES HE WAS WELDING DOING MAINTENCE OF THE CRUSHING PLANT, WHEN A FLASH FROM THE WELDING ARC CAME THROUGH A HAIRLINE CRACK IN THE WELDING MASL AND GOT HIM IN THE EYES.
WHILE OPERATING A HOE RAM A PIECE OF ROCK WENT FLYING INTO THE CAB HITTING THE OPERATOR IN THE R FOREARM RESULTING IN A SMALL CUT REQURING 2-3 STITCHES APPARENTLY SAFETY SHIELD WAS NOT ON AND CAB DOOR WAS OPEN PER MAINE DRILLER AND BLASTINGS SUPERVISORS INCIDENT REPORT
EMPLOYEE IS NOT SURE OF WHEN OR WHAT EXACTLY CASUSED HIS MUSCLES BACK STRAIN. HE BELIEVES THAT IT MAY HAVE BEEN DURING A ROUTINE JOB OF UNPLUGGING THE JAW OF THE CRUSHER BY BENDING OVER THE R AIL AND DROPPING A BUCKET TOOTH SUSPENDED ON A ROPE ONTO PLUGGED ROCK MATERIAL.