Employee was pulling on a pry bar to remove the V-belts for the secondary shaker when releasing the pressure on the pry bar ee felt back tighten up.
Kopperl Plant 2034: 41 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
Kopperl Plant 2034 tiene $9K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $305 pendientes en 0 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Kopperl Plant 2034.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 14
- Años en registro
- 2004–2018
- Último incidente
- Jul 2018
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Kopperl Plant 2034 tiene $9K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $305 pendientes en 0 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2011-11-02, hace 14 años
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Respirable dust, <.1mg8
- Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz5
Ver los análisis individuales (13)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-11-02 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Mechanic | ||
| 2011-11-02 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2011-11-02 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.13 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2010-09-29 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2010-09-29 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2010-09-29 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bulldozer Operator | ||
| 2010-01-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2010-01-20 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.13 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2010-01-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2009-04-22 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.12 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2009-04-22 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2009-04-22 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.16 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2008-01-17 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.14 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
Kopperl Plant 2034 registró 0.00 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2019.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 4.69 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2017 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2016 * | 3.80 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2015 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2014 * | 4.36 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2013 * | 4.85 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2012 * | 11.20 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Arcosa Aggregates,Inc. 2003 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 |
| 2019 | 18 |
| 2018 | 20 |
| 2017 | 20 |
| 2016 | 19 |
| 2015 | 22 |
| 2014 | 18 |
| 2013 | 15 |
| 2012 | 13 |
| 2011 | 13 |
| 2010 | 15 |
| 2009 | 15 |
| 2008 | 14 |
| 2007 | 15 |
| 2006 | 18 |
| 2005 | 16 |
| 2004 | 11 |
Kopperl Plant 2034 se ubica en Bosque County, Texas, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 2.4% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2020 Q2 | 652 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 2,529 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 2,600 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 11,438 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 10,812 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 8,454 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 8,751 | 2 | 1 | 228.5 |
Mostrar 59 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Q3 | 11,413 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 10,654 | 1 | 0 | 93.9 |
| 2018 Q1 | 11,783 | 2 | 0 | 169.7 |
| 2017 Q4 | 12,350 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 12,246 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 12,051 | 1 | 0 | 83.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 13,481 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 13,185 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 13,615 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 12,876 | 1 | 0 | 77.7 |
| 2016 Q1 | 13,019 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 14,152 | 2 | 2 | 141.3 |
| 2015 Q3 | 13,291 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 12,357 | 2 | 0 | 161.9 |
| 2015 Q1 | 11,724 | 1 | 0 | 85.3 |
| 2014 Q4 | 11,465 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 12,338 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 11,518 | 2 | 0 | 173.6 |
| 2014 Q1 | 10,552 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 10,070 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 10,650 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 10,401 | 1 | 1 | 96.1 |
| 2013 Q1 | 10,115 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 9,581 | 2 | 0 | 208.7 |
| 2012 Q3 | 8,716 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 8,427 | 2 | 0 | 237.3 |
| 2012 Q1 | 8,975 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 8,894 | 2 | 0 | 224.9 |
| 2011 Q3 | 8,859 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 7,464 | 2 | 1 | 268.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 7,465 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 8,298 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 8,609 | 3 | 0 | 348.5 |
| 2010 Q2 | 8,721 | 1 | 0 | 114.7 |
| 2010 Q1 | 7,986 | 3 | 0 | 375.7 |
| 2009 Q4 | 8,146 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 9,548 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 10,212 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 8,561 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 9,004 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 9,415 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 10,393 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 11,076 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 10,980 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 10,134 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 9,676 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 8,053 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 9,617 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 10,664 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 9,183 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 13,677 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 12,706 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 9,576 | 1 | 0 | 104.4 |
| 2005 Q2 | 9,680 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 8,283 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 7,992 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 8,031 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 6,927 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 3,611 | 3 | 1 | 830.8 |
Incidentes reportables
14 en archivo2018 · 1 incidente
2016 · 1 incidente
Employee was replacing the rear tire on a service truck. Employee was trying to lift the old tire into another truck when the employee felt soreness in lower back.
2014 · 1 incidente
Employee was replacing rollers on a conveyor belt. He was trying to force the roller frame between the belt, he lost his grip and smashed his left index finger between the roller frame and conveyor frame.
2013 · 1 incidente
Employee was standing under overhead hopper when a 2.5 inch rock fell and struck on left shoulder, employee was examined by physician and was release to regular duty, employee followed up with physician on 3/28/13 and was put on restricted duty due to soreness until 4/11/13 follow up visit.
2012 · 2 incidentes
Employee complained of pain in right shoulder, neck and back from driving haul truck.
Employee was conducting a workplace examination on the primary conveyor belt and knocked off some built up mud on a troughing idler with a hammer. The hammer and employees left arm was pulled between the troughing idler and conveyor belt causing pain to left wrist. Employee was examined by physician and released to restricted duty and is to follow-up with doctor on 2-8-12.
2011 · 2 incidentes
Employee was removing wiper blade on primary shaker, while loosening bolts he felt pain in his left shoulder and neck, he was examined by a physician and was released to work with restrictions and will follow up with doctor on 4-28-2011.
Employee was replacing cutting edges on a 980H Front End Loader, the employee pushed up on a bolt that slipped out of the cut out, when another employee engaged the impact wrench cutting employee's right palm, employee received six stitches and was returned to work on restricted duty, employee will follow up with doctor on 3-17-2011.
2006 · 4 incidentes
Employee was climbing on the side of a Cat 750 Excavator to remove fuel hose. His foot slipped on bottom step an he felt pain between his right elbow and shoulder The employee did not request medical care at this time. Employee requested to see a doctor on 10/17/06 and was given restricted duty and returned to work.
Employee was hooking welding trailer to pick-up and was not lined up with trailer and tried to pull trailer to align with pick-up and strained his back. He was seen by a doctor on 5/3/06 and was told he strained his back. He was returned to work with restrictions and wil follow up with doctor on 5/12/06.
On 3/25/06, EE told his supervisor that his back was aching. On 3/27/06, EE wanted to see a Dr. He stated that his back had been hurting for a couple of weeks and believed pain was caused from a previous back injury several years ago. The Dr. asked EE what he had done and EE said his normal job duties, and on Saturday he had removed a pulley from a motor shaft.
Employee hurt right shoulder while adjusting tail pulley on feeder belt. He reported injury to plant manager but did not want to see a doctor at this time. On April 4, 2006 he requested to see a doctor and later was referred to an orthopedic doctor and is waiting to be scheduled for minor corrective surgery.
2005 · 1 incidente
Got on a hopper, dumped load, slowly pulled off hopper, put on high gear. Thinking he was in low gear came off hopper too fast.
2004 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS HELPING LOAD STEPS INTO BACKHOE BUCKET. THE STEPS SLID IN THE BUCKET, SCRAPING EMPLOYEE ON THE LEFT THIGH CAUSING A BRUISE. EMPLOYEE WENT TO SEE THE DOCTOR AND WAS RETURNED TO LIGHT DUTY.