Employee claims that while dismantling a water pump in shop facilities his right hand slipped under the pump and table causing a "pinch" on his right thumb. He continued to work the rest of the day without incident until later complained about his hand.
Nidco Aggregates Corporation Metal/Non-Metal
Nidco Aggregates Corporation tiene $53K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $47K pendientes en 11 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Nidco Aggregates Corporation.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 21
- Años en registro
- 2001–2009
- Último incidente
- May 2009
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Nidco Aggregates Corporation tiene $53K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $47K pendientes en 11 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Q3 | 2,101 | 1 | 0 | 476.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 6,743 | 3 | 1 | 444.9 |
| 2013 Q1 | 8,163 | 3 | 2 | 367.5 |
| 2012 Q4 | 8,714 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 8,661 | 6 | 2 | 692.8 |
| 2012 Q2 | 8,533 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 8,326 | 2 | 1 | 240.2 |
| 2011 Q4 | 9,427 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 41 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Q3 | 9,696 | 3 | 1 | 309.4 |
| 2011 Q2 | 9,562 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 9,110 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 9,001 | 2 | 1 | 222.2 |
| 2010 Q3 | 7,280 | 3 | 1 | 412.1 |
| 2010 Q2 | 6,942 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 4,288 | 8 | 5 | 1865.7 |
| 2009 Q4 | 4,360 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 8,320 | 1 | 0 | 120.2 |
| 2009 Q2 | 4,117 | 5 | 2 | 1214.5 |
| 2009 Q1 | 3,120 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 8,840 | 2 | 2 | 226.2 |
| 2008 Q2 | 17,680 | 9 | 2 | 509.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 17,680 | 7 | 3 | 395.9 |
| 2007 Q4 | 16,656 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 18,720 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 14,960 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 18,200 | 5 | 5 | 274.7 |
| 2006 Q4 | 19,760 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 18,813 | 2 | 1 | 106.3 |
| 2006 Q2 | 18,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 19,240 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 18,200 | 4 | 4 | 219.8 |
| 2005 Q3 | 18,200 | 1 | 0 | 54.9 |
| 2005 Q2 | 18,720 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 20,280 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 20,676 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 19,680 | 1 | 0 | 50.8 |
| 2004 Q2 | 19,240 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 17,160 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 10,560 | 6 | 0 | 568.2 |
| 2003 Q3 | 13,008 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 13,104 | 7 | 2 | 534.2 |
| 2003 Q1 | 13,209 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 13,150 | 10 | 10 | 760.5 |
| 2002 Q3 | 13,216 | 5 | 5 | 378.3 |
| 2002 Q2 | 13,249 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 13,343 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 13,660 | 7 | 4 | 512.4 |
| 2001 Q3 | 16,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 14,256 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
21 en archivo2009 · 1 incidente
2008 · 1 incidente
After working for our company for only 3 months, the employee claims lower back problems from work done several weeks ago.
2007 · 5 incidentes
The employee was cleaning the primary when his right foot slipped under the main rotor.
Employee claims fell from loader steps two week ago. He claims lower back pain. He never reported his fall to any of his supervisor until now.
The EE while cleaning drum pulley with rebar while operating. The rebar was caught by the drum pulley injuring index finger.
While cleaning the muel pump area, a pare part of the mud pump was secured by a chain, the EE decided to push it aside when it dropped in his right hand.
Employee alleges he sprained ankle while descending from stairs leading to the primary area.
2006 · 1 incidente
While inspecting the skid loader after operating, the EE resulted with minor burns on hand and chest when he removed the radiator cap.
2005 · 2 incidentes
EE was cleaning between conveyor 20 and conveyor 7 area. A stone fell (from operating conveyor approx. 6" above EE's head), hitting EE on back of head, right side. EE was unconscious approx. 25 mins.; regained consciousness prior to being taken to hospital. EE was wearing hard hat at time of accident. Diagnosis: concussion.
The ee was trying to disjoint a tube in the conveyer. The tube loosened up and caught his right hand, affected his little finger.
2004 · 5 incidentes
Waiting to be loaded the ee decided to get off his truck and while walking outside and around the pit area he tripped hurting his right elbow, hand and back.
THE EE WAS CLEANING THE CONVEYOR WALKWAY AREA WHEN A STONE BOUNCED INTO HIS RIGHT HAND, CUTTING HIS RING FINGER.
THE EMPLOYEE WAS WALKING UNDER THE CONVEYOR WHEN A 3 TO 4 INCH STONE APPROX FELL ON HIS HEAD. THE EMPLOYEE HAD SECURITY HELMET BUT DIE TO THE IMPACT AND SIZE OF BOULDER EMPLOYEE SUFFERED A CUT TO HIS HEAD AND DIZZYNESS.
The ee was cleaning the primary crusher balcony area and dirt fell into his left eye. This caused irritation in the eye, but he continued working. The next day his eye was swollen, and could not work.
THE CONTROL ROOM OPERATOR CALLED EE CONCERNING A PROBLEM WITH THE TERTIARY CRUSHER MAIN BREAKER. EE STARTED THE TROUBLESHOOTING BY CHECKING VOLTAGE ON THE TERTIARY MAIN BREAKER WITH AN ANALOG VOLTMETER; AN EXPLOSIVE SHORT CIRCUIT CAUSED EEBURNS ON BOTH HANDS AND FACE. CAUSE OF ACCIDENTCOULD HAVE BEEN THE WRONG SETTING ON THE ANALOG VOLTMETER WHEN TAKING THE READING.
2003 · 2 incidentes
WHEN HE WENT TO GET HIS PAYROLL CHECK AT THE OFFICE HIS FEET SLIPPED AND GOT AN INJURY AT THE ANKLE AREA. AT THE MOMENT OF THIS ACCIDENT HE WASN'T AT WORKING HOURS.
HE WAS WORKING ON THE MAINTENANCE OF A MACHINERY CHAIN AND THE GLOVE IN THE RIGHT HAND WAS STUCK OR CAUGHT IN IT CAUSING HIM AN INJURY ON A FINGER OF THE RIGHT HAND.
2002 · 2 incidentes
THIS EMPLOYEE WAS DOING MAINTENANCE TO MACHINERY PART IN THE MAINTENANCE AREA, AND HE WASN'T USING SECURITY EYE GLASSES WHEN CLEANING THIS PART. A PIECE OF THE PART HIT HIM ON A EYE.
THE EE WAS WORKING ON THE MAINTENANCE OF A CONVEYOR BELT, HE DIDN'T STOP THE MACHINE TO CLEAN IT, THEN THE MACHINE HURT A FINGER OF THIS EE.
2001 · 2 incidentes
WHILE WORKING ON THE INSTALLATION OF THE WEIGHT BALANCE HE STUCK A NAIL UNDER HIS FOOT THAT WENTIN THROUGH HIS SHOE. HE HAS TO STAY OUT OF WORK FOR UNKNOWN DAYS.
UNCOVERING VALVE PINCHED FINGER ON RIGHT HAND.
The full compliance file on Nidco Aggregates Corporation
A dated report covering the 26-year penalty trail, line-item violation pattern, contest and docket posture, rate-normalized peer benchmark, and full fatality history. Delivered as a PDF with the underlying data as CSV.