Employee claims that while dismantling a water pump in shop facilities his right hand slipped under the pump and table causing a "pinch" on his right thumb. He continued to work the rest of the day without incident until later complained about his hand.
Nidco Aggregates Corporation: 105 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
Nidco Aggregates Corporation has $53K in proposed MSHA penalties and $47K outstanding across 11 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Nidco Aggregates Corporation.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 21
- Years on record
- 2001–2009
- Latest incident
- May 2009
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Nidco Aggregates Corporation has $53K in proposed MSHA penalties and $47K outstanding across 11 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Stood as issued 30 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE 2009-747M | Default | Lesnick | 2011 | $21K → $21K |
| SE 2013-105M | Default | Lesnick | 2013 | $5K → $5K |
| SE 2012-418M | Default | Lesnick | 2012 | $3K → $3K |
| YORK20030077M | Settlement | Barbour | 2003 | $2K → $1K |
| SE 2010-1221M | Default | Lesnick | 2011 | $1K → $1K |
| SE 2010-613M | Default | Lesnick | 2011 | $712 → $712 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2011-07-14, 15 years ago
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz6
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz2
Show the individual readings (8)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-07-14 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.23 | 10 | 0.02 | Cleanup Man |
| 2011-07-14 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.13 | 10 | 0.01 | Cleanup Man |
| 2005-11-20 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.49 | 10 | 0.05 | Cleanup Man |
| 2005-11-20 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.34 | 10 | 0.03 | Cleanup Man |
| 2003-12-01 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.77 | 10 | 0.08 | Cleanup Man |
| 2003-12-01 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.31 | 1.81 | 0.17 | Cleanup Man |
| 2001-10-18 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 1.27 | 10 | 0.13 | Cleanup Man |
| 2001-10-18 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 1.12 | 2.75 | 0.41 | Cleanup Man |
Nidco Aggregates Corporation recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2012.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2011 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2007 * | 14.59 | 14.59 | 0.000 |
| 2006 * | 2.63 | 2.63 | 0.000 |
| 2005 * | 5.30 | 5.30 | 0.000 |
| 2004 * | 10.42 | 10.42 | 0.000 |
| 2003 * | 8.02 | 8.02 | 0.000 |
- Nidco Aggregates Corporation 2001 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2013 | 12 |
| 2012 | 20 |
| 2011 | 23 |
| 2010 | 21 |
| 2009 | 12 |
| 2008 | 28 |
| 2007 | 34 |
| 2006 | 37 |
| 2005 | 37 |
| 2004 | 38 |
| 2003 | 26 |
| 2002 | 26 |
| 2001 | 24 |
Nidco Aggregates Corporation sits in Manatí Municipio, Puerto Rico, where the Census mining category is 0.0% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Q3 | 2,101 | 1 | 0 | 476.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 6,743 | 3 | 1 | 444.9 |
| 2013 Q1 | 8,163 | 3 | 2 | 367.5 |
| 2012 Q4 | 8,714 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 8,661 | 6 | 2 | 692.8 |
| 2012 Q2 | 8,533 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 8,326 | 2 | 1 | 240.2 |
| 2011 Q4 | 9,427 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 41 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Q3 | 9,696 | 3 | 1 | 309.4 |
| 2011 Q2 | 9,562 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 9,110 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 9,001 | 2 | 1 | 222.2 |
| 2010 Q3 | 7,280 | 3 | 1 | 412.1 |
| 2010 Q2 | 6,942 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 4,288 | 8 | 5 | 1865.7 |
| 2009 Q4 | 4,360 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 8,320 | 1 | 0 | 120.2 |
| 2009 Q2 | 4,117 | 5 | 2 | 1214.5 |
| 2009 Q1 | 3,120 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 8,840 | 2 | 2 | 226.2 |
| 2008 Q2 | 17,680 | 9 | 2 | 509.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 17,680 | 7 | 3 | 395.9 |
| 2007 Q4 | 16,656 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 18,720 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 14,960 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 18,200 | 5 | 5 | 274.7 |
| 2006 Q4 | 19,760 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 18,813 | 2 | 1 | 106.3 |
| 2006 Q2 | 18,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 19,240 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 18,200 | 4 | 4 | 219.8 |
| 2005 Q3 | 18,200 | 1 | 0 | 54.9 |
| 2005 Q2 | 18,720 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 20,280 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 20,676 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 19,680 | 1 | 0 | 50.8 |
| 2004 Q2 | 19,240 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 17,160 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 10,560 | 6 | 0 | 568.2 |
| 2003 Q3 | 13,008 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 13,104 | 6 | 2 | 457.9 |
| 2003 Q1 | 13,209 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 13,150 | 10 | 10 | 760.5 |
| 2002 Q3 | 13,216 | 5 | 5 | 378.3 |
| 2002 Q2 | 13,249 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 13,343 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 13,660 | 7 | 4 | 512.4 |
| 2001 Q3 | 16,200 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 14,256 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
21 on file2009 · 1 incident
2008 · 1 incident
After working for our company for only 3 months, the employee claims lower back problems from work done several weeks ago.
2007 · 5 incidents
The employee was cleaning the primary when his right foot slipped under the main rotor.
Employee claims fell from loader steps two week ago. He claims lower back pain. He never reported his fall to any of his supervisor until now.
The EE while cleaning drum pulley with rebar while operating. The rebar was caught by the drum pulley injuring index finger.
While cleaning the muel pump area, a pare part of the mud pump was secured by a chain, the EE decided to push it aside when it dropped in his right hand.
Employee alleges he sprained ankle while descending from stairs leading to the primary area.
2006 · 1 incident
While inspecting the skid loader after operating, the EE resulted with minor burns on hand and chest when he removed the radiator cap.
2005 · 2 incidents
EE was cleaning between conveyor 20 and conveyor 7 area. A stone fell (from operating conveyor approx. 6" above EE's head), hitting EE on back of head, right side. EE was unconscious approx. 25 mins.; regained consciousness prior to being taken to hospital. EE was wearing hard hat at time of accident. Diagnosis: concussion.
The ee was trying to disjoint a tube in the conveyer. The tube loosened up and caught his right hand, affected his little finger.
2004 · 5 incidents
Waiting to be loaded the ee decided to get off his truck and while walking outside and around the pit area he tripped hurting his right elbow, hand and back.
THE EE WAS CLEANING THE CONVEYOR WALKWAY AREA WHEN A STONE BOUNCED INTO HIS RIGHT HAND, CUTTING HIS RING FINGER.
THE EMPLOYEE WAS WALKING UNDER THE CONVEYOR WHEN A 3 TO 4 INCH STONE APPROX FELL ON HIS HEAD. THE EMPLOYEE HAD SECURITY HELMET BUT DIE TO THE IMPACT AND SIZE OF BOULDER EMPLOYEE SUFFERED A CUT TO HIS HEAD AND DIZZYNESS.
The ee was cleaning the primary crusher balcony area and dirt fell into his left eye. This caused irritation in the eye, but he continued working. The next day his eye was swollen, and could not work.
THE CONTROL ROOM OPERATOR CALLED EE CONCERNING A PROBLEM WITH THE TERTIARY CRUSHER MAIN BREAKER. EE STARTED THE TROUBLESHOOTING BY CHECKING VOLTAGE ON THE TERTIARY MAIN BREAKER WITH AN ANALOG VOLTMETER; AN EXPLOSIVE SHORT CIRCUIT CAUSED EEBURNS ON BOTH HANDS AND FACE. CAUSE OF ACCIDENTCOULD HAVE BEEN THE WRONG SETTING ON THE ANALOG VOLTMETER WHEN TAKING THE READING.
2003 · 2 incidents
WHEN HE WENT TO GET HIS PAYROLL CHECK AT THE OFFICE HIS FEET SLIPPED AND GOT AN INJURY AT THE ANKLE AREA. AT THE MOMENT OF THIS ACCIDENT HE WASN'T AT WORKING HOURS.
HE WAS WORKING ON THE MAINTENANCE OF A MACHINERY CHAIN AND THE GLOVE IN THE RIGHT HAND WAS STUCK OR CAUGHT IN IT CAUSING HIM AN INJURY ON A FINGER OF THE RIGHT HAND.
2002 · 2 incidents
THIS EMPLOYEE WAS DOING MAINTENANCE TO MACHINERY PART IN THE MAINTENANCE AREA, AND HE WASN'T USING SECURITY EYE GLASSES WHEN CLEANING THIS PART. A PIECE OF THE PART HIT HIM ON A EYE.
THE EE WAS WORKING ON THE MAINTENANCE OF A CONVEYOR BELT, HE DIDN'T STOP THE MACHINE TO CLEAN IT, THEN THE MACHINE HURT A FINGER OF THIS EE.
2001 · 2 incidents
WHILE WORKING ON THE INSTALLATION OF THE WEIGHT BALANCE HE STUCK A NAIL UNDER HIS FOOT THAT WENTIN THROUGH HIS SHOE. HE HAS TO STAY OUT OF WORK FOR UNKNOWN DAYS.
UNCOVERING VALVE PINCHED FINGER ON RIGHT HAND.