Employee was cutting rubber with a utility knife for installation on a pulley. Utility knife slipped and cut his thigh. *Note* Employee states that he was cutting away from body.
Waterman Plant: 25 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
Waterman Plant tiene $2K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 0 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Waterman Plant.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 15
- Años en registro
- 1990–2011
- Último incidente
- Jun 2011
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Waterman Plant tiene $2K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 0 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2009-03-04, hace 17 años
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz103 en exceso
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz191 en exceso
- Respirable dust, <.1mg1
Ver los análisis individuales (30)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-08-20 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 10.33 | 10 | 1.03 | Drill Operator, Rotary |
| 2003-05-19 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 72.23 | 10 | 7.22 | Drill Operator, Rotary |
| 2002-12-18 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 26.4 | 10 | 2.64 | Drill Operator, Rotary |
| 2001-10-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 2.07 | 2.07 | 1.00 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2009-03-04 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.31 | 1.68 | 0.18 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2009-03-04 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.37 | 1.68 | 0.22 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2007-05-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.69 | 1.93 | 0.36 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2007-02-22 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.49 | 1.09 | 0.45 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2007-02-22 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.42 | 1.05 | 0.40 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2007-02-22 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.3 | 0.99 | 0.30 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2007-02-22 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.49 | 1 | 0.49 | Stone Polisher/Cutter |
| 2005-11-02 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.44 | 1.62 | 0.27 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2005-11-02 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.15 | 1.71 | 0.09 | Utility Man |
| 2005-11-02 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 1.74 | 2.01 | 0.87 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2005-11-02 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.35 | 1.83 | 0.19 | Utility Man |
| 2005-11-02 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Drill Operator, Rotary Air | ||
| 2004-04-07 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.39 | 1.74 | 0.22 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2004-04-07 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.85 | 1.66 | 0.51 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2004-04-07 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.21 | 1.65 | 0.13 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2004-04-07 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 1.02 | 1.86 | 0.55 | Drill Operator, Rotary |
| 2003-05-19 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 4.23 | 10 | 0.42 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2003-05-19 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 0.41 | 10 | 0.04 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2003-05-19 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 2.22 | 10 | 0.22 | Mechanic |
| 2003-05-19 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 0.31 | 10 | 0.03 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2002-12-18 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 0.48 | 10 | 0.05 | Truck Driver |
| 2002-12-18 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 1.31 | 10 | 0.13 | Truck Driver |
| 2002-12-18 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 4.25 | 10 | 0.43 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2001-10-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.71 | 2.58 | 0.28 | Drill Operator, Rotary |
| 2001-10-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.19 | 1.72 | 0.11 | Truck Driver |
| 2001-10-11 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.34 | 1.69 | 0.20 | Truck Driver |
Waterman Plant registró 7.24 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2011.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 * | 7.24 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2009 * | 5.46 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2008 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2007 * | 9.65 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2006 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2005 * | 3.11 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2004 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Frazier Quarry Inc 1950 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2012 | 14 |
| 2011 | 13 |
| 2010 | 14 |
| 2009 | 18 |
| 2008 | 21 |
| 2007 | 19 |
| 2006 | 22 |
| 2005 | 29 |
| 2004 | 18 |
| 2003 | 17 |
| 2002 | 18 |
| 2001 | 16 |
| 2000 | 18 |
Waterman Plant se ubica en Rockingham County, Virginia, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 0.4% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | 6,481 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 7,447 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 6,912 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 7,270 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 6,801 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 8,311 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 5,230 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 6,725 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 43 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Q3 | 7,686 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 7,908 | 2 | 0 | 252.9 |
| 2010 Q1 | 7,087 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 7,574 | 1 | 0 | 132.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 9,574 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 9,602 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 9,879 | 1 | 0 | 101.2 |
| 2008 Q4 | 12,086 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 13,863 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 12,185 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 9,297 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 8,296 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 11,275 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 13,314 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 8,547 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 9,932 | 1 | 0 | 100.7 |
| 2006 Q3 | 12,888 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 12,507 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 15,653 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 15,622 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 17,491 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 16,986 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 14,289 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 12,820 | 1 | 0 | 78.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 12,696 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 11,612 | 1 | 0 | 86.1 |
| 2004 Q1 | 10,534 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 10,007 | 2 | 1 | 199.9 |
| 2003 Q3 | 10,377 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 10,310 | 7 | 0 | 679.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 9,788 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 10,566 | 4 | 1 | 378.6 |
| 2002 Q3 | 11,292 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 10,913 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 9,345 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 9,315 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 8,924 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 9,951 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 10,813 | 2 | 1 | 185.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 11,537 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 11,683 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 10,642 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 9,326 | 3 | 1 | 321.7 |
Incidentes reportables
15 en archivo2011 · 1 incidente
2009 · 1 incidente
Employee reports that has he was moving dimension stone rocks in a production area, two rocks pinched his right middle finger. The result was a fracture in his finger tip.
2007 · 2 incidentes
Employee mentions that he was placing processed stone on to pallets and felt a quivering in the center of his lower back before it gave out on 6/12/07. The employee thought he was simply tired and sore. After rest and over a week of time his back was still sore with pain extending down his right leg. Incident reported on 6/21/07 to a Foreman.
Employee was standing outside of his assigned CAT 771D Off - Road Haul Truck and mentioned that a gust of wind blew some fugitive dust around which entered his right eye. He reported the incident to a Foreman on Monday, 6/4/2007. He was treated by a physician and a corneal abrasion of the right eye was diagnosis. Employee was given antibiotics.
2005 · 1 incidente
EE was reaching from the exit belt side of the rock splitter machine underneath of the veneer gauge to remove a stone and mentions that his right pinkie finger was smashed between a rock being processed by the machine and the veneer gauge. *NOTE* He was wearing his leather gloves at the time of the incident.
1999 · 5 incidentes
EE WAS IN PROCESS OF REMOVING DRILL STEEL FROM BOREHOLE WHEN HIS LEFT HAND BECAME CAUGHT IN FEED CHAIN/FEED SPROCKET ASSEMBLY. HE CUT OFF THE TIP OF MIDDLE FINGER ON LEFT HAND. EE WAS GIVEN FI RST AID TO STOP BLEEDING AND TRANSPORTE TO E.R. BY OUR ONSITE EMT.
EE WAS OPERATING AN AIR TRACK DRILL & WAS IN PROCESS OF CHANGING A DRILL STEEL WHEN THE CHAIN BROKE OPERATING THE UP/DOWN MOVE OF HAMMER & CAUSED THE HAMMER TO FREE FALL THIS PINNING EE'S LEFT HAND BETWEENT HE HAMMER & DRILL STEEL
EE WAS ENROUTE FROM 1/4" DUST PILE W/LOAD TO SHOPSITE IN PIT. AS HE ATTEMPTED TO TURN LEFT IN THE SE CORNER OF QUARRY, HE ROLLED THE OFF ROAD HAUL TRUCK ONTO HIS RIGHT SIDE
EMPLOYEE WAS IN THE PROCESS OF MOVING A HYDRAULIC DRILL ON TO A STRIP SHOT. THE LEFT TRACK CAME UPON A ROCK AND TILTED MACHINE TO THE RIGHT. HE TRIED TO BACK UP, BUT THE MACHINE CONTINUED TO THE RIGHT AND OVERTURNED AWAY FROM THE OPERATOR.WHEN HE REALIZED IT WAS GOING OVER HE JUMPED FROM THE MACHINE. HE HAD A BRUISE ON HIS RIGHT FOREARM AND RIGHT HIP.
EE WAS DRILLING SHOT HOLES AND DURING THAT PROCESS HE TWISTED HIS RIGHT KNEE. THIS WAS APPROX 2 MONTHS PRIOR HE SAID IT WAS NO BIG DEAL & CONTTO WORK. KNEE THEN BECAME INFLAMED UNDER THE KNE ECAP & WOULD SWELL UP. ON 23/25/99 HE DECIDED HEHAD BETTER GET MED ATTENTION
1998 · 1 incidente
EE WAS IN PROCESS OF RETRIEVING A BIT & STEEL THAT HAD BEEN BROKEN OFF IN BOREHOLE. HE HAD HOLD OF THE STEEL & COUPLING USED TO RETRIEVE THE BROKEN STEEL & AS HE APPLIED DOWNWARD PRESSURE WITH THE DRILL HAMMER, THE STEELS SHIFTED PINCHING HIS FINGER BETWEEN THE STEEL & THE DRILL MAST. IT SEVERED HIS MIDDLE FINGER/LEFT HAND BELOW THE BASE OF HIS FINGERNAIL.
1997 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYE EWAS USING A SHORT HANDLE SHOVEL BECAUSE OF ACCESS BEING LIMITED. THIS RESULTED IN HIM HAVING TO BEN DOVER. WHEN HE TURNED TO THROW A SHOVEL FULL OF DUST, HE STRAINED HIS BACK AND LO ST HIS FOOTING. THIS RESULTED IN LOWER BACK PAIN. HE WAS ABLE TO CONTINUE WORKING WITH THE HELP OF A BACK BELT.
1992 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS ATTEMPTING TO FREE DUST BUILDUP FROM A CONVEYOR TAKE-UP PULLEY WITH A SHOVEL WHEN THE SHOVEL GOT CAUGHT IN THE PULLEY AND STRUCK THE EMPLOYEE'S LEFT HAND.
1990 · 2 incidentes
HE WAS BARRING TIRES APART TO UNLOAD OFF TRAILER WHEN BAR SLIPPED CASUING TIRE TO SLIP SMASHING FINGER.
I NAME DRILLER WAS SET-UP & DRILLING A 27FT BOREHOLE THROUGH 5-6FT OF LOOSE MATERIAL AT TOP WHICH REQUIRED MUDDING OF BOREHOLE SMALL BENCH WHERE WAS SET-UP WAS ACCESSED BY A STEEP RAMP OF ABOU T 20-25% GRADE FOR ABOUT A 12FT DROP HE HAD WALKED UP THE RAMP TO FILL A BUCKET WITH MUD THAT WAS DUMPED AT THE TOP OF RAMP & SLIPPED WHILE WALKING BACK DOWN THE RAMP HE COMPLAINED OF BACK PA