Employee was barring out the cone. Material gave way suddenly and employee hit arm against the cone. Received x-ray after continued pain and was diagnosed with a fracture. Reportable as of 3/30.
1010 Queen Creek #1: 102 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
1010 Queen Creek #1 tiene $23K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 16 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en 1010 Queen Creek #1.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 20
- Años en registro
- 2006–2023
- Último incidente
- Mar 2023
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.1010 Queen Creek #1 tiene $23K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $0 pendientes en 16 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 20 · 67%
- Quedaron como emitidas 5 · 17%
- Anuladas o retiradas 5 · 17%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEST 2018-0191 | Settlement | Miller | 2018 | $5K → $952 |
| WEST 2022-0195 | Withdrawal | Simonton | 2022 | $1K → $133 |
| WEST 2022-0284 | Default | 2022 | $1K → $1K | |
| WEST 2016-0608 | Settlement | Miller | 2016 | $686 → $417 |
| WEST20020340M | Settlement | Manning | 2002 | $500 → $400 |
| WEST 2015-0722 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2016 | $492 → $492 |
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2021-09-29, hace 4 años
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz31 en exceso
- Respirable dust, <.1mg10
- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz1
Ver los análisis individuales (14)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-04-19 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.37 | 0.37 | 1.00 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2021-09-29 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2021-09-29 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2021-09-29 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Washer Operator | ||
| 2018-09-11 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.19 | 10 | 0.02 | Washer Operator |
| 2016-11-08 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2016-11-08 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.24 | 1.16 | 0.21 | Washer Operator |
| 2013-11-19 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2013-11-19 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2012-04-19 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Mechanic | ||
| 2012-04-19 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Washer Operator | ||
| 2007-10-30 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2007-10-30 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Mechanic | ||
| 2007-10-30 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.14 | 0.66 | 0.21 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
1010 Queen Creek #1 registró 3.31 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2023.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 * | 3.31 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 2.79 | 2.79 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 8.24 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 2.48 | 2.48 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 12.26 | 12.26 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 5.89 | 5.89 | 0.000 |
| 2017 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2016 * | 8.66 | 8.66 | 0.000 |
- Southwest Rock Products LLC 1999 a 2014
- CalMat Co 2014 a 2014
- Southwest Rock Products 2014 a 2022
- Arcosa Aggregates West, LLC. 2022 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 27 |
| 2023 | 32 |
| 2022 | 34 |
| 2021 | 35 |
| 2020 | 38 |
| 2019 | 37 |
| 2018 | 33 |
| 2017 | 32 |
| 2016 | 33 |
| 2015 | 29 |
| 2014 | 32 |
| 2013 | 41 |
| 2012 | 29 |
| 2011 | 12 |
| 2010 | 15 |
| 2009 | 19 |
| 2008 | 21 |
| 2007 | 30 |
| 2006 | 22 |
| 2005 | 19 |
| 2004 | 17 |
| 2003 | 16 |
| 2002 | 16 |
| 2001 | 10 |
| 2000 | 6 |
1010 Queen Creek #1 se ubica en Pinal County, Arizona, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 0.8% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q1 | 13,802 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 13,465 | 2 | 0 | 148.5 |
| 2023 Q3 | 15,250 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 16,109 | 7 | 3 | 434.5 |
| 2023 Q1 | 15,661 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 15,869 | 3 | 0 | 189.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 20,176 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 20,038 | 2 | 1 | 99.8 |
Mostrar 88 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Q1 | 15,705 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 18,375 | 2 | 1 | 108.8 |
| 2021 Q3 | 14,808 | 1 | 1 | 67.5 |
| 2021 Q2 | 19,489 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 20,123 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 19,120 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 21,010 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 20,421 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 19,998 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 18,813 | 2 | 1 | 106.3 |
| 2019 Q3 | 20,016 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 21,369 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 21,340 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 16,848 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 17,888 | 3 | 0 | 167.7 |
| 2018 Q2 | 18,690 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 14,503 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 15,353 | 4 | 1 | 260.5 |
| 2017 Q3 | 15,288 | 1 | 0 | 65.4 |
| 2017 Q2 | 16,737 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 16,806 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 17,994 | 4 | 0 | 222.3 |
| 2016 Q3 | 17,811 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 18,212 | 9 | 3 | 494.2 |
| 2016 Q1 | 15,263 | 7 | 2 | 458.6 |
| 2015 Q4 | 18,899 | 7 | 1 | 370.4 |
| 2015 Q3 | 15,119 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 11,436 | 2 | 1 | 174.9 |
| 2015 Q1 | 11,293 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 10,589 | 1 | 1 | 94.4 |
| 2014 Q3 | 14,314 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 13,625 | 2 | 0 | 146.8 |
| 2014 Q1 | 15,101 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 13,140 | 2 | 0 | 152.2 |
| 2013 Q3 | 17,605 | 3 | 2 | 170.4 |
| 2013 Q2 | 21,327 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 13,538 | 1 | 1 | 73.9 |
| 2012 Q4 | 14,055 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 14,209 | 2 | 0 | 140.8 |
| 2012 Q2 | 12,654 | 6 | 2 | 474.2 |
| 2012 Q1 | 9,471 | 5 | 0 | 527.9 |
| 2011 Q4 | 9,840 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 9,505 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 3,872 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 3,094 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 9,836 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 7,793 | 1 | 0 | 128.3 |
| 2010 Q2 | 8,016 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 5,835 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 7,038 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 8,426 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 9,198 | 2 | 0 | 217.4 |
| 2009 Q1 | 12,150 | 1 | 0 | 82.3 |
| 2008 Q4 | 11,094 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 13,906 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 13,811 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 8,256 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 12,115 | 5 | 0 | 412.7 |
| 2007 Q3 | 11,849 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 14,470 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 14,956 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 16,161 | 1 | 0 | 61.9 |
| 2006 Q3 | 14,856 | 1 | 0 | 67.3 |
| 2006 Q2 | 14,702 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 14,451 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 13,005 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 12,134 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 11,236 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 11,687 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 12,229 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 11,846 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 15,595 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 9,102 | 5 | 2 | 549.3 |
| 2003 Q4 | 8,581 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 9,241 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 10,426 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 8,661 | 1 | 0 | 115.5 |
| 2002 Q4 | 9,461 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 7,492 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 5,982 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 8,432 | 2 | 1 | 237.2 |
| 2001 Q4 | 8,258 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 7,427 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 6,274 | 3 | 3 | 478.2 |
| 2001 Q1 | 8,081 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 6,065 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 4,381 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 3,315 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
20 en archivo2023 · 1 incidente
2022 · 1 incidente
EE was using the power washer to clean the concrete area where the water truck fills up. It is believed that EE was spraying off EE's work boots (an unsafe act) when the hot pressurized water entered the top of EE's boots and hurt EE's ankle.
2021 · 3 incidentes
Employee worked all day, but, around 3:00pm, complained of not feeling well due to the heat. Employee went home and began throwing up, then went to the ER for the heat related illness. Lost time as of 7/8/2021.
The injured employee was preparing to mount the cab of a flatbed truck. When EE placed EE's foot and tried to hoist self up, EE's leg twisted, which caused EE to fall. EE sustained a knee injury and was diagnosed with a sprain. Lost time as of 5/18/2021.
Injured employee was assisting with changing screens with another employee at the wash plant. In the process, the employee caught EE's finger on the sharp edge of the screen. EE's finger was lacerated and required 7 stitches. No lost time.
2020 · 1 incidente
The miner was dismounting loader in the lube bay when the miner stepped on a fuel hose. This caused miner's knee to buckle and miner to fall to the ground. The miner sustained a knee sprain.
2019 · 5 incidentes
The miner was driving a haul truck. When the miner got out of the truck, they tweaked their back. Lost time accident as of 5-30-19.
The employee was shoveling mud from under a conveyor belt. The employee twisted to toss a shovel-full of mud off of the shovel when the employee's back tightened up on employee. Back strain. Became a lost time accident as of 5/7/2019.
The employee was shoveling dirt from under a conveyor belt. As EE twisted to throw a shovel-full over EE's shoulder, EE felt a pop in the shoulder. Shoulder strain. Became a lost time accident on 5/3/2019.
The miner was tapping out a sheared bolt on a motor housing and using PB Blaster to tap it out. When that didn't work, the miner began to torch the metal to loosen it. The residual PB Blaster flashed at the miner and EE received 1st degree burns to EE's face and neck.
The employee entered the cab of the excavator, sat in the seat, and was closing the door when employee left a finger in the door jamb too long and closed the door on thumb. Lost time as of 1/28/2019.
2018 · 2 incidentes
The employee was dumping a wheelbarrow full of sand when the wheelbarrow tipped too far forward and caused the employee to strain their midsection in the process. The employee worked until 7/30/2018, when the injury became a lost time accident.
The employee was performing a workplace exam at the wash plant. When the employee stepped up and walked on a concrete platform for a piece of equipment, employee's foot slid out and employee almost did the splits. Did not become a lost time accident until 4/12/2018.
2016 · 3 incidentes
The miner was operating a crushing spread. The miner went to the top deck of the cone crusher to check if the cone was operating normally. The miner didn't follow proper procedure in this case. The miner looked into the cone when there was only a few rocks in it and when EE did, a rock bounced out and hit EE in the nose. The miner was seen at urgent care for a nose laceration.
Employee was walking in the wash plant tunnel. Per the employee, wasn't watching where was going and tripped on a small pile of dirt. Employee has a back injury. Lost time accident as of 8/28/2016.
Employee was changing a fuse in a bucket inside of the Wash Plant trailer (MCC). The employee shut down the bucket, opened the bucket, reactivated the bucket, removed and replaced one fuse and upon removing the second fuse, an arc occurred. The employee received minor burns to hands as a result.
2014 · 1 incidente
The employee was using a two-handed sledgehammer to move material in a feeder by striking the sides of the feeder. As the employee swung the sledgehammer over his head, he felt a "pop" in his left shoulder and released the sledgehammer, which then struck the same shoulder (left). The employee has scheduled an MRI to determine the extent of the damage (an x-ray revealed no damage).
2012 · 2 incidentes
The employee was adjusting a spring on a screen. While trying to get it into position the spring shifted cutting off the tip of his thumb between the spring and the cup. He was taken by us to hosiptal where they looked it over and wrapped it and said it will heal on its own, no stitches required.
The employee was walking down the wash plant screen stairs when he slipped and went to catch himself and hurt his hand. Employee was sent to Fast Med, was released back to work on 8/1/2012 he experienced sharp pain and numbness and sent him back to Fast Med.
2006 · 1 incidente
EE was using D8T Cat. Dozer w/Semi-U dozer blade w/approx 3050 total hrs on machine. He failed to stop machine & reverse unit to climb back up slope he'd just dozed the material from. His failure to control machine resulted in pushing through safety barrier & causing machine to become upset from its normal operating position. Received cut to left hand.