Injured was helping remove feeder wobble bars. He got his ring finger on his left hand caught in a pinch point. The pinch point crushed his distal phalange. It had to be amputated.
Capitol Crushed Stone: 92 citaciones de la MSHA Metal/Non-Metal
Capitol Crushed Stone tiene $20K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $59 pendientes en 2 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Capitol Crushed Stone.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 29
- Años en registro
- 1985–2009
- Último incidente
- May 2009
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Capitol Crushed Stone tiene $20K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $59 pendientes en 2 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 5 · 100%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT 2008-442M | Settlement | Zielinski | 2009 | $4K → $1K |
| CENT 2008-570M | Settlement | Weisberger | 2009 | $2K → $1K |
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Contaminantes en minas de metal y no metal (muestras personales)
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.
Última medición: 2004-08-04, hace 22 años
ⓘ
Muchas muestras son mediciones de detección de sustancias sin límite de exposición aplicable; se cuentan como muestras pero se excluyen de toda cifra de exceso. Los porcentajes de exceso usan solo muestras con límite establecido.- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz8
- Respirable dust, <.1mg1
Ver los análisis individuales (9)
| Fecha | Contaminante | Concentración | Límite | Conc / límite | Ocupación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-08-04 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.14 | 10 | 0.01 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2004-08-04 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 1 | 10 | 0.10 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2004-08-04 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.71 | 10 | 0.07 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2004-08-04 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.13 | 10 | 0.01 | Truck Driver |
| 2003-02-27 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.15 | 10 | 0.02 | Oiler, Greaser |
| 2003-02-27 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.17 | 10 | 0.02 | Mechanic |
| 2003-02-27 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2003-02-27 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.13 | 10 | 0.01 | Complete Load-Haul-Dump |
| 2003-02-27 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.14 | 10 | 0.01 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
Capitol Crushed Stone registró 4.39 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2009.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 * | 4.39 | 4.39 | 0.000 |
| 2008 * | 2.57 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2007 * | 8.58 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2006 | 3.53 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2005 | 5.24 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2004 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2003 * | 2.11 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2002 * | 7.80 | 2.60 | 0.000 |
- Capitol Aggregates Ltd 1981 al presente
| Año | Empleados |
|---|---|
| 2010 | 10 |
| 2009 | 34 |
| 2008 | 33 |
| 2007 | 38 |
| 2006 | 40 |
| 2005 | 40 |
| 2004 | 35 |
| 2003 | 30 |
| 2002 | 29 |
| 2001 | 29 |
| 2000 | 29 |
Capitol Crushed Stone se ubica en Williamson County, Texas, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 0.3% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Q4 | 3,502 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 3,370 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 272 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 176 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 9,749 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 13,056 | 2 | 0 | 153.2 |
| 2009 Q2 | 11,899 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 10,884 | 1 | 0 | 91.9 |
Mostrar 36 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Q4 | 12,120 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 15,873 | 2 | 0 | 126.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 23,713 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 26,064 | 10 | 5 | 383.7 |
| 2007 Q4 | 27,108 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 22,807 | 4 | 0 | 175.4 |
| 2007 Q2 | 21,656 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 21,617 | 6 | 0 | 277.6 |
| 2006 Q4 | 21,234 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 33,515 | 1 | 0 | 29.8 |
| 2006 Q2 | 29,500 | 9 | 2 | 305.1 |
| 2006 Q1 | 29,152 | 12 | 2 | 411.6 |
| 2005 Q4 | 28,594 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 28,434 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 27,951 | 8 | 0 | 286.2 |
| 2005 Q1 | 29,474 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 28,947 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 29,231 | 7 | 3 | 239.5 |
| 2004 Q2 | 28,203 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 30,174 | 2 | 2 | 66.3 |
| 2003 Q4 | 28,082 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 23,591 | 2 | 0 | 84.8 |
| 2003 Q2 | 23,384 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 19,802 | 7 | 0 | 353.5 |
| 2002 Q4 | 17,750 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 19,191 | 6 | 2 | 312.6 |
| 2002 Q2 | 20,324 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 19,645 | 2 | 0 | 101.8 |
| 2001 Q4 | 18,248 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 20,684 | 5 | 1 | 241.7 |
| 2001 Q2 | 22,410 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 20,946 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 19,948 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 24,177 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 23,251 | 4 | 2 | 172.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 24,306 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
29 en archivo2009 · 1 incidente
2008 · 1 incidente
IP was using a air powered cutoff tool to trim a bolt. IP was wearing safety glasses. Debris passed between the safety glasses and the IP's face and entered the IP's eye. IP reported the injury the following day and was taken to clinic for treatment. IP was put on light duty for 3 days.
2007 · 4 incidentes
The employee was working on the secondary plant discharge line removing a bolted cover on a check valve. He was positioning a wrench on a nut when co-worker activated a 3/4" drive impact wrench on the bolt head. This made the wrench spin with the nut and EE's finger was caught in a pinch point between the wrench and the pipe flange.
The employee was cleaning material out of a conveyor chute when he caught his finger between his cleaning bar and the frame of the chute.
Employee was descending the ladder from his R60 Haul Truck. As he reached the ground he felt a pain in his back.
Employee was cleaning under a conveyor belt and felt pain in his lower back.
2006 · 2 incidentes
Employee was greasing a dry screen when a rock bounced off the screen and hit him in the neck.
Employees were replacing an idler on frame. As they rotated it in place, the idler bracket pinched the employee's finger against the frame.
2005 · 3 incidentes
Employee was operating a loader bucket. The loader bucket dropped to the gound by itself and it jerked the entire piece of equipment.
Employee was cutting a conveyor belt (piece). The utility knife slipped and cut the employee on his right leg.
Employee does not know exactly when injury occured. It is an on-going process. The diagnosis is tennis elbow. The employee at first gave it some time for the pain to go away. However, it has not been determined if it is work related but is under company doctor's care.
2004 · 1 incidente
Lost control of haul unit vehicle while driving to the pit.
2003 · 1 incidente
THE EE WAS WALKING DOWN THE STAIRS AND HE SLIPPED AND FELL. THE STAIRS WERE VERY NARROW WHICH CAUSED HIS FALL. HE STRAINED HIS RIGHT KNEE.
2002 · 3 incidentes
EE WAS USING A DIE GRINDER WHEN THE WHEEL BROKE APART CAUSING A FOREHEAD LACERATION.
EE WAS RELEASING THE LOAD BINDER ON A USED OIL TANK WHEN THE BINDER SUDDENLY RELEASED AND STRUCK HIM ON THE RIGHT FOREARM.
EE WAS DESCENDING THE LADDER OF HIS LOADER WHEN HIS RIGHT FOOT STEPPED ON AN AIR HOSE WHICH CAUSED HIS FOOT TO ROLL. HE FELL ONTO HIS BACK.
2001 · 2 incidentes
REPLACING TRACKS ON 235C EXCAVATOR. EMPLOYEE CUT FINGER BETWEEN TRACKS AND PIN.
CAN FELL INSIDE AIR CONDITIONER VENT AND HE REACHED IN TOO FAR TO RETRIEVE IT FINGER TOUCHED BLOWER FAN.
2000 · 1 incidente
FOLDING UP CHUTE ON STEMMING TRUCK. LAST TWO FINGERS ON RIGHT HAND GOT CAUGHT IN PINCH POINT.
1999 · 1 incidente
FABRICATING A DUMP HOPPER, HE WAS HOLDING A METAL PLATE TO THE BACK OF THE HOPPER. THE PLATE SLIPPED DOWN ON TOP OF LEFT FOOT.
1993 · 1 incidente
WHILE HELPING TO REMOVE 1 1/4 SCREEN PANEL HE PLACED HIS RIGHT HAND ON THE SCREEN TO PULL IT OUT HIS RING FINGER WENT THRU THE SCREEN AND WAS PINCHED BETWEEN THE SCREEN AND THE EDGE.
1992 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS USING A HIGH PRESSURE GREASE GUN ON HAUL TRUCK.GREASE GUN HOSE RUPTURED UNDER PRESSURE AND INJECTED GREASE INTO FINGERS.
1991 · 1 incidente
EMPL & FOREMAN WERE STARTING TO REPAIR SUMP PUMP. PUMP WAS RUNNING BUT WAS NOT PUMPING WATER IN SUMP. POWER TO PUMP WAS TRNED OF. WATER THAT WAS IN PUMP HOUSING & DISCHARGE LINE FLUSHED BACK I NTO SUCTION LINE & BLEW ONTO EMPLS THIGHS & KNEES. WATER WAS HOT DUE TO FRICTION FROM PUMPING.
1990 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE ASCENDED THE UTILITY TRUCK TO TURN OFF THE OXYGEN AND ACETYLENE VALVES, AFTER TURNING THEM OFF THE JUMPED TO THE GROUND INSTEAD OF STEPPING DOWN TO THE GROUND AND HE LANDED ON SIDE OF LEFT FOOT AND TURNED HIS ANKLE.
1988 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS SETTING UP A WELDING MACHINE, HE TRIPPED OVER THE WELDING LEADS AND STARTED TO FALL, HE LANDED ON HIS FEET, THEN FELL BACK LANDING ON HIS POSTERIOR.
1987 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS WE5DING HEAVY EQUIPMENT APPLICATION REQUIRED HIGH HEAT AFTER RUNNING BEAD THE METEAL BEGINS TO COOL WHEN EMPLOYEE REMOVED HIS HOOD A PIECE OF SLAG POPPED NTO HIS EYE
1985 · 3 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS ST5NDING ON THE FRONT BUMPER OF CONCRETE TRUCK WORKING ON HOOD HE WAS ATTEMPTING TO PULL THE HOOD HINGE PIN OUT IT WAS DIFFICULT TO PULL OUT WITH ONE HAND SO HE USED BOTH HANDS TO PULL SUDDEN5Y THE PIN TURNED LOOSE AND HE FELL BACK HE COULD HAVE JUMPED DOWN BUT HIS PANT LEG CAUGHT ON THE BUMPER AND HE FELL TO THE FLOOR BREAKING HIS FALL WITH HIS LEFT HAND
EMPLOYEE WAS HOLDING ON TO CATWALK TALKING TO OPERATOR. HE JUMPED DOWN & HIS WEDDING BAND CAUGHT & HUNG ON THE CATWALK.
EMPLOYEE WAS SHOVELING UNDER A CONVEYOR WHEN A LARGE ROCK FELL FROM FEEDER STRIKING A GUARD BRACKET, AND THEN HITTING THE EMPLOYEE ON THE LOWER BACK.