EMPLOYEE'S WERE CUTTING THE TOP OUT OF A 55 GAL.DRUM. AN EXPLOSION TOOK PLACE. THE DRUM WAS BEING CUT INSIDE OF A LOADER BUCKET.
No 2 Surface: 1 muerte registrada Coal
No 2 Surface tiene $76K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $12K pendientes en 4 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en No 2 Surface.
- Muertes
- 1
- Incidentes totales
- 72
- Años en registro
- 1983–2014
- Último incidente
- Mar 2014
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.No 2 Surface tiene $76K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $12K pendientes en 4 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 15 · 88%
- Anuladas o retiradas 2 · 12%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA 2010-595 | Settlement | Koutras | 2011 | $6K → $3K |
| VA 2011-29 | Settlement | Tureck | 2011 | $6K → $2K |
| VA 2010-384 | Settlement | Koutras | 2011 | $5K → $2K |
| VA 2012-257 | Settlement | Rae | 2013 | $2K → $2K |
El muestreo de MSHA en No 2 Surface muestra que 100% de 238 muestras de polvo respirable de carbón cumplieron el estandar de 1.5 mg/m3.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Polvo respirable de carbón
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.
Última medición: 2019-02-13, hace 7 años
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
El valor de concentración excesiva (ECV) es el umbral de aplicación por muestra de la propia MSHA, que incorpora la incertidumbre de medición; una muestra por encima de su ECV puede motivar una citación. El conteo cubre solo las muestras a las que MSHA asignó un ECV.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR85
- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR57
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER46
Sílice (cuarzo)
Última medición: 2018-07-06, hace 8 años- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR11
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR10
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE1
Ruido
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.
Última medición: 2018-02-21, hace 8 años
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR34
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER29
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE21
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.| Año | dentro de 1.5 mg/m3 | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 100% | 4 |
| 2018 | 100% | 23 |
| 2017 | 100% | 10 |
| 2016 | 100% | 8 |
| 2014 | 100% | 11 |
| 2013 | 100% | 5 |
| 2012 | 100% | 10 |
| 2011 | 100% | 15 |
| 2010 | 100% | 9 |
| 2009 | 100% | 11 |
| 2008 | 100% | 8 |
| 2007 | 100% | 22 |
| 2006 | 100% | 12 |
| 2005 | 100% | 25 |
| 2004 | 100% | 24 |
| 2003 | 100% | 5 |
| 2002 | 100% | 10 |
| 2001 | 100% | 11 |
| 2000 | 100% | 15 |
| Año | sílice prom. (%) | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 24.7 | 3 |
| 2017 | 9.1 | 1 |
| 2008 | 18.7 | 1 |
| 2007 | 27.5 | 3 |
| 2005 | 29.2 | 1 |
| 2004 | 26.5 | 5 |
| 2002 | 9.9 | 1 |
| 2001 | 21.6 | 4 |
| 2000 | 26.7 | 3 |
| Año | sobre el LPE | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 0% | 11 |
| 2017 | 0% | 3 |
| 2016 | 0% | 4 |
| 2014 | 0% | 10 |
| 2013 | 20% | 5 |
| 2012 | 0% | 10 |
| 2011 | 0% | 13 |
| 2010 | 0% | 5 |
| 2009 | 0% | 5 |
| 2007 | 10% | 10 |
| 2005 | 0% | 5 |
| 2004 | 0% | 10 |
| 2002 | 0% | 5 |
| 2001 | 20% | 5 |
| 2000 | 20% | 10 |
No 2 Surface registró 11.13 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2013.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 * | 11.13 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2012 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2011 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2009 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2008 | 2.45 | 1.23 | 0.000 |
| 2007 | 3.77 | 1.26 | 0.000 |
| 2006 | 2.89 | 2.89 | 0.000 |
- Twin Star Mining, Inc. 1974 a 2017
- CM Mining, LLC 2017 al presente
ⓘ
La producción de carbón se reporta trimestralmente y va con retraso respecto al periodo actual; los trimestres más recientes pueden estar incompletos.| Año | Empleados | Carbón producido (toneladas) |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 5 | |
| 2016 | 7 | |
| 2015 | 8 | 2,485 |
| 2014 | 10 | 10,446 |
| 2013 | 16 | 55,547 |
| 2012 | 60 | 278,217 |
| 2011 | 48 | 242,583 |
| 2010 | 25 | 195,105 |
| 2009 | 27 | 205,775 |
| 2008 | 59 | 384,191 |
| 2007 | 57 | 421,509 |
| 2006 | 53 | 416,951 |
| 2005 | 55 | 404,309 |
| 2004 | 54 | 390,999 |
| 2003 | 55 | 406,282 |
| 2002 | 62 | 575,307 |
| 2001 | 61 | 617,010 |
| 2000 | 54 | 606,120 |
No 2 Surface se ubica en Buchanan County, Virginia, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 11.2% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Q3 | 2,330 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 2,590 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 2,770 | 1 | 0 | 361.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 2,430 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 2,923 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 4,085 | 1 | 0 | 244.8 |
| 2016 Q1 | 4,302 | 3 | 1 | 697.4 |
| 2015 Q4 | 3,490 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mostrar 63 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Q3 | 4,617 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 4,443 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 4,308 | 4 | 1 | 928.5 |
| 2014 Q4 | 3,532 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 4,687 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 5,177 | 7 | 3 | 1352.1 |
| 2014 Q1 | 6,301 | 2 | 0 | 317.4 |
| 2013 Q4 | 6,647 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 9,122 | 2 | 2 | 219.3 |
| 2013 Q2 | 9,736 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 10,436 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 9,470 | 16 | 8 | 1689.5 |
| 2012 Q3 | 39,279 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 51,515 | 13 | 3 | 252.4 |
| 2012 Q1 | 47,451 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 37,043 | 7 | 2 | 189.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 38,536 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 37,976 | 10 | 6 | 263.3 |
| 2011 Q1 | 29,562 | 8 | 0 | 270.6 |
| 2010 Q4 | 17,873 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 18,664 | 10 | 4 | 535.8 |
| 2010 Q2 | 19,142 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 17,183 | 11 | 7 | 640.2 |
| 2009 Q4 | 5,981 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 6,139 | 8 | 0 | 1303.1 |
| 2009 Q2 | 6,081 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 39,377 | 11 | 1 | 279.4 |
| 2008 Q4 | 40,767 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 40,237 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 40,309 | 9 | 3 | 223.3 |
| 2008 Q1 | 41,791 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 38,765 | 5 | 1 | 129.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 39,572 | 7 | 1 | 176.9 |
| 2007 Q2 | 38,807 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 41,876 | 13 | 3 | 310.4 |
| 2006 Q4 | 33,820 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 36,050 | 7 | 4 | 194.2 |
| 2006 Q2 | 33,382 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 35,390 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 30,637 | 6 | 2 | 195.8 |
| 2005 Q3 | 37,465 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 36,232 | 6 | 1 | 165.6 |
| 2005 Q1 | 43,368 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 37,078 | 4 | 0 | 107.9 |
| 2004 Q3 | 29,935 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 40,345 | 4 | 3 | 99.1 |
| 2004 Q1 | 38,896 | 5 | 1 | 128.5 |
| 2003 Q4 | 39,886 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 32,438 | 3 | 1 | 92.5 |
| 2003 Q2 | 27,782 | 2 | 0 | 72.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 30,071 | 5 | 0 | 166.3 |
| 2002 Q4 | 36,126 | 2 | 0 | 55.4 |
| 2002 Q3 | 37,047 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 47,689 | 2 | 0 | 41.9 |
| 2002 Q1 | 43,343 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 44,529 | 2 | 0 | 44.9 |
| 2001 Q3 | 35,058 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 40,727 | 2 | 1 | 49.1 |
| 2001 Q1 | 37,210 | 1 | 1 | 26.9 |
| 2000 Q4 | 33,761 | 1 | 0 | 29.6 |
| 2000 Q3 | 36,543 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 32,093 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 37,660 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Muertes en esta mina
1 registradasIncidentes reportables
71 en archivo (excluyendo las muertes anteriores)2014 · 1 incidente
Employee was installing roller on D11 dozer, the roller slipped and caught employee's finger.
2013 · 2 incidentes
Employee was diagnosed with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss in both ears on September 12, 2013. Company was not notified of this until February 6, 2014.
Claim of occupational noise exposure. Testing shows a degree of hearing loss.
2012 · 3 incidentes
Employee was terminated on November 17, 2012 and filed a hearing loss claim. He was diagnosed on 2/26/14 with work related noise exposure. Company Safety Department was not notified until April 10, 2014 of diagnosis.
EE was operating a 785 rock truck when he became disorientated in the fog. He then drove out of the road, across a drill bench, through a berm and over a highwall landing in a shot. The truck then caught on fire and we were unable to extinguish the fire within 30 minutes. EE exited the truck without injury.
Stepped on rock covered with mud and slipped.
2008 · 2 incidentes
EE was in the process of checking anitfreeze in a 992G Loader. He began to remove the radiator cap and hot anitfreeze came out, striking EE on the chest, stomach and left hand, resulting in a burn to his left hand and stomach.
777 Cat truck was loaded in pit, ground was soft and when truck started to pull out, front of truck raised up then came down hard and jarred operator, hurting neck and back.
2007 · 4 incidentes
Employee had installed a bearing and it was crooked. Was trying to remove it, and while hitting it, he missed the bearing. He was in the process of trying to get his hand out of the way, when his finger struck a sharp object and cut his finger.
Employee was granted 10% award by the Occupational Pneumonconiosis Board.
EE was repairing a rear spring on a F250 pick up truck when the spring fell & struck his left index finger causing a laceration. He rec'd 8 stitches.
Employee was cutting out a blade liner on a D-11R dozer. The liner broke loose pushing him to the ground. His foot was under the blade and his foot was fouled when he began to move causing a break to his lower left leg (blade was on the ground; the ground was uneven where the work was being done).
2006 · 2 incidentes
Employee was pushing in a shot. When he started to back up a rock came from the spoil and he backed up on it. When he started to tram off, the dozer slipped off causing a jolting action resulting in lower back pain. He continued to work until 10/21/06 at which time he bagan to miss work.
EE was starting to climb down the ladder of the 785B rock truck when he slipped and fell to the ground.
2005 · 1 incidente
Employee was pushing in shot rock. Dozer D-11R he was operating kicked rock from under track causing machine to drop suddenly & resulting in back injury.
2004 · 1 incidente
Truck driver backed under end loader with bucket raised and rock fell from bucket and hit in empty bed of truck.
2003 · 5 incidentes
EE'S WERE CUTTING TOP OUT OF A 55 GALLON DRUM & AN EXPLOSION TOOK PLACE. THE DRUM WAS BEING CUT INSIDE LOADER BUCKET.
JOB MECHANIC WAS CUTTING BARREL WITH CUTTING TORCH & IT EXPLODED.
EE'S WERE CUTTING TOP OUT OF A 55 GALLON DRUM. AN EXPLOSION TOOK PLACE. THE DRUM WAS BEING CUT INSIDE OF A LOADER BUCKET.
EE WAS GOING UP A GRADE TO DRILL IN A FORD SERVICE TRUCK. THE MOTOR QUIT LETTING TRUCK ROLL BACK AGAINST BERM AND LAID OVER.
EE WAS WAITING ON GETTING LOADED BY A LOADER OPERATOR. THE LOADER OPERATOR WAS GOING TOWARDS THETRUCK WITH A BIG ROCK WHEN LOADER BUCKET DUMPED ON IT'S OWN AND THE ROCK HIT THE EDGE OF THE TRU CK CAUSING A JOLT.
2002 · 5 incidentes
EE WAS CLIMBING UP THE DRILL LADDER AND FELL BACK.
EE INDICATES WHILE GETTING OFF LOADER HIS FOOT \SLIPPED CAUSING HIS LEG TO BEND BEHIND HIM. EE CONTINUED TO WORK. ONCE SWELLING STARTED HE CONTACTED HIS DR. AND SCHED. SURGERY. EE STARTED MIS SING TIME ON 11/22/02.
EE NOTIFIED THIS OFFICE THAT HE WAS SEEKING MEDICAL TREATMENT DUE TO HIS EXPERIENCE ON 10/30/02.HE EXPERIENCED ABDOMINAL PAIN THAT ROTATED TO HIS BACK. EE STARTED MISSING TIME ON 11/25/02, HE WAS TO RTW ON 12/3/02. EE DID NOT RETURN TO WORK& HIS CLAIM IS STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE IF WORK RELATED. EE WAS DIAGNOSED WITH A MILD BULGING DISC & DEG. DISC DISEASE.
CYLINDER ROLLED OVER STRIKING EMPLOYEE ON FOOT.
EE WAS WORKING ON COMPANY TRUCK WHEN HE SLIPPED WHILE HE WAS DISMOUNTING FROM THE TRUCK. HE FELLONTO THE CONCRETE FLOOR.
2001 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS RIDING IN A PICK UP TRUCK WHEN THE TRUCK RAN OVER A BUMP IN THE ROAD THROWING EE INTO TOP OF TRUCK CAUSING HIM TO STRIKE HIS HEAD.
2000 · 7 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS INSTALLING A BATTERY TERMINAL AND IT EXPLODED.
EE TRAMMED DRILL TO BENCH & STARTED DRILLING AFER SEVERAL HRS OF DRILLING EE COMPLAINED OF BACK PAIN Y
EE WAS GETTING IN GREASE TRUCK & PULLED SHOULDERRIGHT SIDE
OPERATOR WAS OUTSIDE AND WIND BLEW DUST INTO HIS EYE.
BACKED ONTO ROCK IN DOZER. HARD JAR TO RIGHT SIDE.
PRE-EMPLOYEE OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS EMPLOYER NOTIFIED OF COMPENSABILITY ON 9/22/00.
PROGRESSIVE SHORTNESS OF BREATH, ASSOCIATED WITH A DRY NONPRODUCTIVE COUGH.
1999 · 7 incidentes
OVERUSE OF RIGHT HAND, WRIST, ELBOW, AND SHOULDER.
REPEATED USE OF HANDS AND WRISTS - LIFTING AND OVERUSE OF HAND AND WRISTS - BOTH HANDS AND WRISTS AND LEFT THUMB.
HE WAS IN THE WATER TRUCK (DRIVING) HIT A HOLE IN THE ROAD AND HURT HIS BACK.
WHILE TRANPORTING TRANSIT BETWEEN SURVEY POINTS LOCATIONS, SLIPPED ON LOOSE STONES ON SLOPE AND TWISTED BACK.
FUEL TRUCK OPERATOR REACHED FOR FUEL HOSE ON TRUCK AND PULLED MUSCLE IN UPPER PORTION OF HIS BACK.
THE EMPLOYEE HIT HIS FINGER WITH SHOP HAMMER WHILE INSTALLING COILS.
WHILE USING RIPPER DOZIER TO PULL SLATE A SHAKE OR JAR WAS CREATED. OPERATOR DID NOT HURT UNTIL SHIFT WAS OVER.
1998 · 7 incidentes
CARPAL TUNNEL ON LEFT HAND/WRIST.
DOZIER HE WAS DRIVING SLIPPED OF ROCK, THE SEAT BELT BROKE FROM IMPACT.
PERSON WAS PULLING ROCK WITH A 992 WHEN TEETH STOPPED ON SLAB OF ROCK AND CREATED JERKING MOTION.
OPERATOR WAS MOVING ROCK LARGE AND DOZIER SLIPPED FROM HOLD ON ROCK AND CRESTED A JARRING EFFECT TO LEFT SHOULDER.
SNOW & ICE. TWISTED KNEE WHEN HE FELL ON ICE & SNOW.
HE PLACED HIS RIGHT HAND ON CABLE FOR BIT WRENCH WHILE BIT WAS BEING CHANGED. WHEN SLACK WAS TAKEN OUT OF CABLE, THE HAND WAS CAUGHT THUS INJURING HIS RIGHT RING FINGER & LITTLE FINGER.
SLIPPED ON DOZER PUSH BEAM AND HIT LEFT SIDE OF FACE ON DOZIER WOULDN'T GO TO DR TIL 3 PM.
1997 · 5 incidentes
SLIPPED FROM DOZER AND USED HANDRAIL TO BREAK FALL. PULLED SHOULDER.- NO CUTS OR BRUISES- SORE ONLY. DIDN'T GO TO DOCTOR UNTIL 1-5-98.
GPF-THE EMPLOYEE WAS WORKING AS A MECHANIC WHEN HE FILED FOR OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS.HIS PREVIOUS WORK EXPERIENCE IS WITH HOME INSULATION.THIS HAS BEEN TURNED OVER TO AN ATTORNEY. EMPLOYEE IS UNEMPLOYED AT THIS TIME.
GPF-EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN OFF WORK RESULTING FROM A PREVIOUS INJURY. HE FILED FOR OCCUPATIONAL PNEUMOCONIOSIS ON 08-18-97.HE HAS WORKED AS A BLASTER HELPER,BLASTER AND TRUCK DRIVER.
WHILE CLIMBING LADDER OF 785 B CAT EE SLIPPED ON THE 2ND STEP & FELL ABOUT 8' TO THE GROUND WHERE HE HIT ON HIS BACK & LEFT ARM.
EE WAS STANDING AT THE REAR OF THE BUILK TRUCK ON THE RIGHT SIDE. HIS LEFT HAND WAS NEAR A AUGER CHAIN. HE WAS SHUTTING THE AUGER DOWN WITH HIS RIGHT HAND WHEN TEH AUGER CAUGHT HSI GLOVE AND HIS LEFT HAND. THE CHAIN TORE AND DISLOCATED HIS THUMB.
1996 · 2 incidentes
REAR END BROKE ON COAL TRUCK AND ALLOWED IT TO RUN AWAY AND TURN OVER. ROAD GRADE OF 11%, AVERAGE BERMS OF 3'+ AND ADEQUATE BASING. DRIVER DID EXCELLENT JOB OF PUTTING TRUCK IN APPROPRIATE BER RM AND DITCH.
PERSON WAS CLIMBING INTO GREASE TRK. BY USE OF HANDRAIL AND PULLED LEFT SHOULDER.
1994 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE FELT RIGHT SIDE OF TRUCK DUMP GIVE, THEN TRUCK ROLED OVER [BED WAS DOWN & LOAD WAS OFF] TRUCKJ WAS STILL RUNNING IN REVERSE WHEN OTHER EMPLOYEES GOT THERE. TRUCK DID ROLL OVER ONE TIM E & LANDED ON IT'S WHEELS.
1988 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS PUSHING WITH DOZER & A PIECE OF SLATE FLEW INTO EMPLOYEES LEFT EYE & INBEDDED IN LEFT EYE TOOK MORE THAN FIRST AID TO REMOVE SLATE FROM EYE
EMPLOYEE WAS HELPING ON ROCK CRUSHER AND FELL OFF HURTING HIS ARM AND SHOULDER.
1987 · 4 incidentes
EMP WAS DRIVING3TRUCK WHEN BRAKES FAILED AND EMP JUMPED FROM THE TRUCK AND HIT HIS HEAD ON RAILROAD TRACK
EMPLOYEE WAS DR3VING TRUCK AND THE BRAKES FAILED AND TRUCK RAN INTO A CLIFF AND TRUCK TURNED OVER AND EMPLOYEE JUMPED OUT OF TRUCK.
EMPLOYEE WAS RU3NING A LOADER HEWAS THROWN TO THE SIDE AND HE HIT HIS FACE AND JAW AGAINST SIDE OF LOADER-CHIPPING HIS TOOTH.
EMPLOYEE WAS GE7TING OUT OF HIS TRUCK AND FELL AGAINST THE TRUCK HURTING HIS LEFT KNEE.EMPLOYEE RETURNED TO WORK ON THE FOLLOWING MONDAY AND DID NOT MISS ANY WORK AT THAT TIME-TREATMENT WAS ON LY FIRST AID.HO4EVER EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN OFF WITH THIS INJURY SINCE JULY 13,1987.THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN REPORTED IN JULY,HOWEVER THE YEAR OF 1987 WAS VERY STRESSFUL AND I OVERLOOKED REPORTTING H
1986 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAB DR3VING TRUCK HE STARTED TO GET OFF OF HIS TRUCK AND HIS FOOT SLIPPED ON STEP CAUSING HIM TO FALL TO THE GROUND. EMPLOYEE WAS OFF FROM 10-1-84 TIL 3-18-85 AT WHICH TIME HE RETURNE D AND WORK UP T3L 10-23-86. HE HAS BEEN RECEIVING MEDICAL ATTENTION SINCE HIS ACCIDENT ON 10-1-84. THERE IS NO NEW INJURY JUST A CONTINUANCE OF HIS BACK PROBLEM. AS STATE
EMPLOYEE WAS CL9ANING GASKETS IN MACHINERY AND CUT HIS LEFT INDEX FINGER.EMPLOYEE WENT TO THE DOCTOR AND RETURN TO WORK THE NEXT WORK SHIFT.GOT HURT ON A FRIDAY AND RETURN TO WORK ON MONDAY.
1985 · 1 incidente
EE WAS RUINNING ROADER AT THE END OF T HE SHIFT HE STEPPED OUT OF LOADER ON TO STEPS & SLIPPED & FELL TO GROUND.
1984 · 5 incidentes
EMPLOYEE WAS WORKING ON DRILL, WHEN A PIN FLEW OUT HITTING EMPLOYEE ON LEFT KNEE.
EMPLOYEE WAS DRIVING TRUCK HE STARTED TO GET OFF OF HIS TRUCK WHEN HIS FOOT SLIPPED ON STEP CAUSING HIM TO FALL TO THE GROUND.
EMPLOYEE STATES THAT HE HURT HIS BACK WHILE DRIVING HIS TRUCK. PER A COPY ATTACHED, PLEASE NOTE THAT OUR WORKMEN\S COMPENSATION CARRIER HAS DENIED COVEREGE OR PAYMENT OF THIS CLAIM.
EMPLOYEE LEFT HIS TRUCK TO GET SUPPLIES, THERE WAS SNOW & ICE ON THE GROUND. HE SLIPPED AND FELL ON THE GROUND HITTING ON HIS BACK.
RUNNING DOZER AND HURT BACK.
1983 · 1 incidente
EMPLOYEE WAS DRIVING THE TRUCK AND THE BRAKES FAILED TO WORK AND THE DRIVER JUMPED FROM THE TRUCK HITTING THE GROUND.