While repairing a splice on the #2 belt, the belt clamp unexpectedly came loose and struck the employee in the left forearm, resulting in a laceration.
Laurel Fork Mine: 1,199 citaciones de la MSHA Coal
Laurel Fork Mine tiene $1.3M en multas propuestas de MSHA y $162K pendientes en 46 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Laurel Fork Mine.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 42
- Años en registro
- 2005–2026
- Último incidente
- Jun 2026
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Laurel Fork Mine tiene $1.3M en multas propuestas de MSHA y $162K pendientes en 46 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.ⓘ
Las proporciones se calculan sobre las citaciones que llevan la codificación de gravedad y negligencia de la MSHA; una pequeña parte de los registros no está codificada.ⓘ
Impugnar una citación ante la Comisión Federal de Revisión de Seguridad y Salud Minera es un derecho legal. Estas cifras presentan los resultados públicos de ese proceso, según el archivo de Violaciones Impugnadas de MSHA.- Conciliadas 176 · 82%
- Quedaron como emitidas 15 · 7%
- Anuladas o retiradas 2 · 1%
- Aún abiertas 22 · 10%
ⓘ
Una citación Significativa y Sustancial cuenta como sobreviviente cuando la conciliación o la decisión del juez mantuvo la designación, o cuando la impugnación fue desestimada o quedó en rebeldía y la citación quedó como emitida. Las citaciones anuladas o retiradas, y las conciliaciones que quitaron la designación, cuentan en contra.ⓘ
Una reducción o desestimación ante la Comisión es un resultado legítimo de impugnar una multa propuesta. Las cifras son el monto propuesto y el monto confirmado en la decisión del expediente.| Expediente | Decisión | Juez | Año | Propuesta / confirmada |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEVA 2010-249 | Settlement | Lewis | 2011 | $197K → $98K |
| WEVA 2025-0311 | Settlement | Paez | 2026 | $139K → $47K |
| WEVA 2009-1927 | Settlement | Lewis | 2011 | $70K → $35K |
| WEVA 2009-1522 | Settlement | Lewis | 2011 | $46K → $23K |
| WEVA 2025-0480 | Settlement | 2026 | $40K → $40K | |
| WEVA 2023-0380 | Settlement | Sullivan | 2023 | $33K → $10K |
El muestreo de MSHA en Laurel Fork Mine muestra que 98% de 1,433 muestras de polvo respirable de carbón cumplieron el estandar de 1.5 mg/m3.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.Polvo respirable de carbón
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.
Última medición: 2026-08-19
ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
El valor de concentración excesiva (ECV) es el umbral de aplicación por muestra de la propia MSHA, que incorpora la incertidumbre de medición; una muestra por encima de su ECV puede motivar una citación. El conteo cubre solo las muestras a las que MSHA asignó un ECV.- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR532
- ROOF BOLTER (TWIN HEAD) (RETURN SIDE)337
- SHUTTLE CAR OPERATOR (STANDARD SIDE)305
Sílice (cuarzo)
Última medición: 2026-06-10- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR34
- ROOF BOLTER (TWIN HEAD) (RETURN SIDE)28
- SHUTTLE CAR OPERATOR (STANDARD SIDE)23
Ruido
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.
Última medición: 2026-06-09
ⓘ
La proporción cuenta las muestras de ruido cuya dosis medida superó el límite permisible de exposición de 90 dBA. Describe el lugar de trabajo muestreado, no lo que llegó al oído del minero: los programas de conservación de la audición y la protección auditiva usada durante el turno se registran por separado y no se reflejan aquí.- SHUTTLE CAR OPERATOR (STANDARD SIDE)15
- CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR14
- ROOF BOLTER (TWIN HEAD) (RETURN SIDE)11
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medición de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposición individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbón y sílice corresponden a instalaciones de carbón. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.| Año | dentro de 1.5 mg/m3 | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 100% | 113 |
| 2025 | 99% | 321 |
| 2024 | 100% | 327 |
| 2023 | 100% | 438 |
| 2022 | 95% | 88 |
| 2012 | 87% | 15 |
| 2009 | 80% | 10 |
| 2008 | 95% | 55 |
| 2007 | 100% | 41 |
| 2006 | 72% | 25 |
| Año | sílice prom. (%) | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6.6 | 7 |
| 2025 | 3.5 | 21 |
| 2024 | 4.9 | 19 |
| 2023 | 3.1 | 29 |
| 2022 | 2.6 | 17 |
| 2008 | 12.1 | 3 |
| 2007 | 4.7 | 4 |
| 2006 | 18.1 | 2 |
| Año | sobre el LPE | muestras |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 20% | 5 |
| 2025 | 0% | 9 |
| 2024 | 9% | 11 |
| 2023 | 15% | 20 |
| 2022 | 44% | 9 |
| 2008 | 0% | 6 |
| 2007 | 0% | 3 |
Laurel Fork Mine registró 9.87 casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo en 2025.
ⓘ
Esta tasa son los casos de lesión reportables por cada 100 trabajadores a tiempo completo por año, calculada como 200,000 por los casos dividido entre las horas-empleado reportadas por el operador a la MSHA. Los casos son lesiones que la MSHA clasificó en grado 01 a 07; se excluyen los eventos de solo accidente que no lesionaron a nadie, y también las lesiones de contratistas, cuyas horas no corresponden a una sola mina. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inicia el reporte trimestral de empleo, y se omiten por debajo de 20,000 horas en un año.| Año | tasa de casos totales | días perdidos | mortales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9.87 | 7.90 | 0.000 |
| 2024 | 5.60 | 2.80 | 0.000 |
| 2023 | 4.24 | 2.83 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 10.20 | 10.20 | 0.000 |
| 2008 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2007 * | 7.40 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Consolidation Coal Company 2005 a 2013
- Shadow Valley Mining, LLC 2005 a 2006
- Harvest-Time Coal Inc 2007 a 2009
- Wolfpen Mining, LLC 2012 a 2012
- Blue Diamond Coal Co. of Virginia 2012 a 2013
- CONSOL Amonate Mining Company LLC 2013 a 2016
- Buchanan Minerals, LLC 2016 a 2021
- Ramaco Resources, LLC 2021 al presente
ⓘ
La producción de carbón se reporta trimestralmente y va con retraso respecto al periodo actual; los trimestres más recientes pueden estar incompletos.| Año | Empleados | Carbón producido (toneladas) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 26 | 28,762 |
| 2025 | 35 | 132,712 |
| 2024 | 52 | 171,019 |
| 2023 | 55 | 173,335 |
| 2022 | 39 | 79,090 |
| 2021 | 2 | |
| 2020 | 2 | |
| 2019 | 6 | |
| 2018 | 4 | |
| 2017 | 1 | |
| 2016 | 1 | |
| 2015 | 0 | |
| 2014 | 0 | |
| 2013 | 0 | |
| 2012 | 10 | 2,306 |
| 2011 | 1 | |
| 2010 | 1 | |
| 2009 | 3 | |
| 2008 | 15 | 98,263 |
| 2007 | 12 | 74,713 |
| 2006 | 26 | 20,835 |
| 2005 | 0 |
Laurel Fork Mine se ubica en McDowell County, West Virginia, donde la categoría minera del Censo representa el 13.0% del empleo del condado.
ⓘ
Las cifras del condado provienen de la Encuesta sobre la Comunidad Estadounidense de la Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., estimaciones quinquenales agrupadas, por lo que la edición de 2023 abarca de 2019 a 2023. La categoría del Censo es 'minería, explotación de canteras y extracción de petróleo y gas', que es más amplia que la jurisdicción de la MSHA e incluye a trabajadores de petróleo y gas que ninguna mina emplea. Estas cifras describen el condado circundante, no esta mina, y no son un factor en ningún incidente específico.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 27,526 | 88 | 15 | 3197.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6,046 | 6 | 0 | 992.4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2,739 | 1 | 0 | 365.1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 24,097 | 70 | 16 | 2904.9 |
| 2025 Q2 | 37,859 | 78 | 15 | 2060.3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 36,602 | 99 | 21 | 2704.8 |
| 2024 Q4 | 34,421 | 63 | 16 | 1830.3 |
| 2024 Q3 | 36,314 | 31 | 8 | 853.7 |
Mostrar 69 trimestres anteriores Ocultar trimestres anteriores
| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 38,767 | 44 | 10 | 1135.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 33,327 | 65 | 10 | 1950.4 |
| 2023 Q4 | 28,337 | 52 | 11 | 1835.1 |
| 2023 Q3 | 33,786 | 60 | 10 | 1775.9 |
| 2023 Q2 | 39,223 | 63 | 11 | 1606.2 |
| 2023 Q1 | 40,047 | 44 | 8 | 1098.7 |
| 2022 Q4 | 33,017 | 24 | 6 | 726.9 |
| 2022 Q3 | 30,580 | 23 | 4 | 752.1 |
| 2022 Q2 | 26,290 | 18 | 4 | 684.7 |
| 2022 Q1 | 8,128 | 13 | 0 | 1599.4 |
| 2021 Q4 | 216 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 1,152 | 2 | 1 | 1736.1 |
| 2021 Q2 | 1,024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 1,008 | 1 | 0 | 992.1 |
| 2020 Q4 | 992 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 1,024 | 1 | 0 | 976.6 |
| 2020 Q2 | 1,024 | 1 | 0 | 976.6 |
| 2020 Q1 | 1,328 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 2,800 | 3 | 1 | 1071.4 |
| 2019 Q3 | 2,864 | 9 | 2 | 3142.5 |
| 2019 Q2 | 2,872 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 1,984 | 2 | 0 | 1008.1 |
| 2018 Q3 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 2,048 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 2,048 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 488 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 504 | 1 | 0 | 1984.1 |
| 2017 Q2 | 512 | 5 | 0 | 9765.6 |
| 2017 Q1 | 392 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 240 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 512 | 1 | 0 | 1953.1 |
| 2016 Q2 | 512 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2015 Q1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2014 Q4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2014 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2014 Q2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2014 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2013 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2013 Q3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2013 Q2 | 0 | 7 | 2 | |
| 2012 Q1 | 1,577 | 12 | 1 | 7609.4 |
| 2011 Q4 | 630 | 5 | 1 | 7936.5 |
| 2011 Q3 | 623 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 623 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 664 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 946 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 1,052 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 935 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 1,127 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 925 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 594 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 585 | 1 | 0 | 1709.4 |
| 2009 Q1 | 378 | 17 | 12 | 44973.5 |
| 2008 Q4 | 12,213 | 25 | 13 | 2047.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 12,247 | 10 | 9 | 816.5 |
| 2008 Q2 | 8,706 | 6 | 2 | 689.2 |
| 2008 Q1 | 4,829 | 6 | 1 | 1242.5 |
| 2007 Q4 | 4,309 | 10 | 6 | 2320.7 |
| 2007 Q3 | 8,857 | 42 | 22 | 4742.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 8,478 | 7 | 4 | 825.7 |
| 2007 Q1 | 5,374 | 4 | 2 | 744.3 |
| 2006 Q3 | 4,099 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 13,712 | 8 | 4 | 583.4 |
| 2006 Q1 | 9,651 | 1 | 0 | 103.6 |
| 2005 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Incidentes reportables
42 en archivo2026 · 4 incidentes
Employee was working in the No. 5 Right Entry when EE tripped over a lump of coal and fell, causing EE's right hand to flex during the fall. The employee continued working following the incident until EE was removed from duty by a physician on 6/10/26 for a fracture.
A non-injury roof fall occurred in the #5 entry on the 2nd East Mains at spad #258. The fall was approximately 80 feet long, 20 feet wide and up to 50 inches thick.
The employee was lifting a rub rail into position on a continuous mining machine when EE experienced pain in EE's groin area. The employee continued working following the incident and remained at work until being removed from duty by a physician on 6/1/2026.
2025 · 5 incidentes
On 8/2/25 employee picked up a small air compressor and felt a pain in groin/stomach area. Employee continued to work and sought medical treatment on 8/8/25 and diagnosed with a potential hernia. EE continues to work and has fulfilled all their duties as a dispatcher. The employee is scheduled to see a specialist for complete diagnosis and applicable treatment.
On 7/19/25 the injured employee twisted EE's knee while rising to EE's feet from a kneeled position but finished EE's shift. Employee missed work on 7/21/25 to be examined by a physician and returned to work on 7/22/25 with no restrictions and continued to work until 7/25/25, when EE again missed work to be evaluated by a physician. The employee received a full release for 7/28/25.
Employee was in the #4 entry when a coal rib gave loose striking them on the right ankle. Employee finished the shift and sought medical attention on 6/12/25 for a fracture ankle.
The employee's left foot was positioned near the edge of the scoop bucket as it was being lowered to the ground, resulting in the bucket making contact with their foot.
While working to repair dust vacuum hose on the roof bolting machine the drill boom was inadvertently raised pinching the injured employee's fingers between the top of the drill pot and the mine roof resulting in lacerations requiring stitches to two fingers.
2024 · 7 incidentes
Employee was struck by a coal rib when working on the number 8 drive.
Making a belt splice and got hit with a hammer on the pinky.
Employee was in the #2 entry when a piece of loose coal rib came loose and struck EE in the upper back. Injury was not the result of a training or compliance issue.
Employee was struck by A piece of rock came that from the CM ripper head hitting the employee above the ear.
A non-injury unplanned roof fall occurred above anchorage point in the #3 entry during retreat mining.
Employee was swinging the drill station over to change a piece of drill steel out and mashed the web of EE's hand between the canopy and the drill steel hanging down out of the hole.
Employee was in the process of repairing a damaged plastic water line and got a finger caught between the water line and a belt chain resulting in a laceration.
2023 · 3 incidentes
Employee was using a slate bar to remove a rock lodged in the #7 drive rock box. As EE was prying on the bar, it slipped striking the employee on the arm resulting in a laceration. Belts were not running at time of incident.
On 9-16-2023, the employee slipped in the battery barn and during the process of catching self employee pulled a shoulder. Employee sought medical attention but was released to work until 3-21-2024. On this date the employee received new restrictions from employee's doctor which could not be accommodated therefore resulting in a lost time accident.
Employee's finger inadvertently came in contact with an energized lead as EE was trouble shooting the panel of a shuttle car.
2022 · 10 incidentes
Employee was dusting section when the duster fell out of the scoop bucket and made contact with employee's foot causing injury.
The employee was using a chain ratchet set when the chain broke striking the employee in the lower left leg.
A non-injury roof fall occurred in the left return air course at break #49. The fall approximately measured 60'long by 20' wide and 5'high.
A non-injury roof fall occurred in the primary intake #3 entry at break #48. The fall approximately measured 30' long by 20' wide and 5' high.
The employee was hanging line curtain in the number two entry, and as employee was lifting the curtain felt a strain in groin and back. The initial incident happened on 9/11/22 and the employee sought treatment on 9/19/22 and was taken off work by employee's physician on 9/26/22.
The employee was getting off a mack-12 mantrip when they slipped striking knee on the metal seat bracket resulting in a laceration.
Employee was putting a scoop on charge and the battery bell fell striking employee on the finger.
An Non-Injury roof fall accident occurred in the roadway #3 entry at break #22. The fall is approximately 40' long by 20' wide and 10' high.
A Non-Injury unplanned methane ignition occurred in the Mains section of the number 8 right cross-cut.
Employee was scooping the cross-cut from the number 6 to 7 entry when a piece of coal rib gave loose striking EE in the back.
2019 · 2 incidentes
Unplanned roof fall at Break 33 in the #4 entry. The fall was dangered off and cribbed at all approaches. The life line was rerouted around the the fall in a different entry.
Rock Fall was discovered during weekly airway examination at Spad # 293 intersection in the Left Return.
2016 · 1 incidente
An unintentional roof fall occurred outby the section. The roof fall fell at cross-cut #50 in the intake #4 entry and extended to the intake #3 entry (3 to 4 cross-cut). The length of the fall was 75' by 18' wide and approximately 4' to 5' thick. A clean up plan will be submitted and the fall cleaned up.
2015 · 1 incidente
Employee was trying to pull drill steel out of roof and beat it with a sledge hammer to release it. Felt pain in back.
2009 · 2 incidentes
The shuttle car operator was loading behind miner in #5 left break when methane ignition occurred. The igniton came across the miner and back to the shuttle car striking the shuttle car operator on the left side of his face.
Miner operator was taking 2nd cut out of #5 left entry break when a methane ignition occurred. The ignition came back across the miner burning the operator.
2007 · 1 incidente
S/c operator making left turn in intersection. Oper side deck catching corner of rib. Lump of coal 3"x9" come into oper. deck. Oper tried to move with left foot while s/car still tramming, causing a laceration to inside of ankle.
2006 · 4 incidentes
While operating roof bolt machine, injured raised canopy against mine roof (uneven top) with too much pressure applied, causing part of canopy to break loose, fall, striking victim, causing injuries.
Employee was operating a drill with jack leg attachment, jack leg failed to release, employee was attempting to release jack leg when employee slipped, employees (right) foot was between two (2) rocks, when employee fell and injured ankle.
The pinner needed hydraulic oil; two co-workers went and got two 5 gallon buckets of oil from outside and carried it down slope through door to reach pinner. Once injured reached the pinner, he set the two buckets down. When he rose back up he felt pain in his lower back. Was taken to hospital at 11:00 a.m.
EMPLOYEE WAS USING SCOOP TO PULL CONVEYOR CHAIN WHEN THE STEEL CABLE BROKE, STRIKING HIM ON THE FACE AND RIGHT EYE, CAUSING BRUISING.
2005 · 2 incidentes
Employee was pushing an I-Beam off of a Mucker when little finger on right hand got caught between the beam and the roof. Employee went to doctor received stitches and returned to work with no restrictions the next day.
ee was installing I-Beams across intersection of slope when he strained right shoulder after attempting to lift beam over his shoulder